• Blog
    thumbnail stating peak webinar series insider edition episode 3 Webinar 003

    Wondering What To Do About Social Unrest?

    Find out in webinar 003 here...
    by Whitney

    Friday, July 23, 2021, 8:12 PM

Available Now

Our latest exclusive webinar (003) is now available to subscribers here.

In this webinar, Chris explains what’s really going on with the recent waves of social unrest and how we can best prepare ourselves materially, socially, and emotionally for what’s to come.

Join Us!

A major benefit to our Peak Prosperity subscribers is having access directly to Chris and his special guests through regularly scheduled live webinars.

If you are interested in trying out our premium service, we have a special one-month introductory offering for you of just $7 here, which would allow you to access the webinar and all other Insider content.

Hope to see you there!

Related content
» More

32 Comments

  • Sat, Jul 24, 2021 - 1:02am

    #1
    girlflower

    girlflower

    Status: Member

    Joined: Nov 09 2008

    Posts: 26

    9

    girlflower said:

    21 July 2021 - UK governmental recommendation: no vaccination for under-18s.

    _________________

    IMPORTANT BREAKING NEWS:

    The UK Government Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation have made a decision based on current data to NOT recommend vaccinating healthy under-18s, with exceptions. Clear benefits superseding the potential risks of vaccination do not exist in this age group. You can read the full report here.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccination-of-children-and-young-people-aged-12-to-17-years-jcvi-statement/jvci-statement-on-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-and-young-people-aged-12-to-17-years-15-july-2021

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jul 24, 2021 - 1:15pm

    #2
    davefairtex

    davefairtex

    Status: Member

    Joined: Sep 03 2008

    Posts: 2729

    3

    food prices

    Food prices.  Moving higher.  Last time this happened: 2012.  "Oils" are leading.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jul 24, 2021 - 4:25pm

    #3

    000

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Dec 10 2013

    Posts: 309

    3

    Know your rights

    9th Circuit: Passengers in a car don’t have to identify themselves

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jul 24, 2021 - 5:00pm

    telebob

    telebob

    Status: Member

    Joined: Mar 10 2012

    Posts: 1

    1

    telebob said:

    Inhibition of action

    A major role of the brain is to organize behaviors, ie, action. There is inhibition of action when behaviors become impossible, and this is deleterious to health. This happens when an instinctive behavior (such as fight or flight) is impossible, when acting is useless, when a danger cannot be predicted, or when no previous response pattern exists to direct action. In these situations, a brain system, the système inhibiteur de l'action, or behavioral inhibition system (BIS), is activated and stimulates the neuroendocrine responses that were described by Walter Cannon in the 1920s and Hans Selye in the 1930s and 1940s.

    Inhibition of action is illustrated in animal experiments that we carried out in Laborit's laboratory during the early 1970s. Rats were placed in an activity-avoidance conditioning apparatus with two compartments. Rats received 10 cycles of 21 plantar electric shocks daily for 1 week, each shock session being preceded by a light and sound warning stimulus. In these conditions, if the animal could carry out an active avoidance (when the other compartment was open), or if the rat was placed with another rat and could fight with it, no arterial hypertension was observed. If the rat could not escape or fight, hypertension developed that remained chronic for 1 month.5 Follow-up of these rats showed that they remained hypertensive 3 months later (Kunz, unpublished). In another experiment, all rats received shocks from which they could not escape. Half of them were subjected to convulsions (induced electrically) after each shock session and did not develop hypertension. This lack of hypertension was interpreted as being due to the impossibility- of conditioned learning because of the convulsions.6 The BIS (median septal area, hippocampus, lateral amygdala and ventromedial hypothalamus) could be at the origin of peripheral vasomotor disorders, while the central activating systems, or behavioral activating systems (BAS — medial forebrain bundle and paraventricular system) would prevent these effects.

    A film was made based on Laborit's theories: Mon Oncle d'Amérique (My American Uncle) by the French film maker Alain Resnais (1980). The film contains explanations by Laborit (Box I) ,7 as well as scenes of the rat experiments described above. The main theme of the movie was that achieving the right equilibrium between action and inhibition of action is paramount to mental and physical health. Fleeing is the solution to escape inhibition of action, when other behaviors are not possible.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jul 24, 2021 - 5:13pm

    #5
    luzmagiraldo

    luzmagiraldo

    Status: Member

    Joined: Jun 12 2021

    Posts: 1

    3

    "Novel" Coronavirus patented 18 years ago?

    I came across this article about the origins of the coronavirus seems to have been patented 18 or 19 years ago.

    Here is the link to the article and video. https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/07/24/patents-prove-sars-cov-2-is-a-manufactured-virus.aspx?ui=95fc761b8a6c270e016bf1bcd5cfb32def073e185b2245d1610d6502e1113c26&sd=20130629&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20210724_HL2&mid=DM944496&rid=1216669394

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jul 24, 2021 - 6:45pm

    Andy in the Sun

    Andy in the Sun

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: May 28 2021

    Posts: 108

    3

    Food prices 2011/2012

    @Dave

    Good chart. I remember well 2011/12. My fiancee at that time had a restaurant in Dubai. It was a horror... the prices for rice and other stuff in the market rose by 5-10% every week. The catering customers refused to pay more... Then rice was not available at all...

    And then there was a rumor - a Chinese shipment of rice is coming. We secured us 300 bags or so (I don't exactly remember) and then we pushed all the furniture in our flat together - freeing up any space we can - so that we can stock the 300 bags - because nobody knew at that moment when sufficient supply will return again.

    It was a crazy time for which I don't have any ambition to experience again.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jul 24, 2021 - 9:51pm

    #7

    sand_puppy

    Status: Member

    Joined: Apr 13 2011

    Posts: 1932

    22

    David Martin Interview on Patents on the

    Appreciate the link luzmagiraldo,   This is the interview of David Martin, the patent expert from Charlottesville, VA, where he reports that some 100+ patents exist on every aspect of the SARS-CoV-2  Spike protein including the polybasic (furin) cleavage site and the Receptor Binding Domain.

    I watched the interview and furiously took notes and was frustrated that my 7 + pages of notes still missed quite a bit.  This article posted by Mercola has a transcript with links!!!   Yay!!

     

     
    Patents Prove SARS-CoV-2 Is a Manufactured Virus
    Intro

    In a January 2021 lecture, Jonathan Latham, Ph.D., introduced the term "the pandemic virus industrial complex," to describe the academic, military and commercial complexes that are driving the pandemic agenda and obscuring facts that indicate SARS-CoV-2 is a manmade virus.

    In the video above, David E. Martin, Ph.D., introduces ... evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is indeed a manmade bioweapon, and has been in the works for decades. Much of this research was funded by none other than the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci.

    Pandemic virus industrial complex indeed! You do not want to miss this .... interview, conducted by Reiner Fuellmich,1 founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee2,3 (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss or ACU4). A transcript5 is available if you prefer to read it.

    Summary

    STORY AT-A-GLANCE

    • Hundreds of patents show SARS-CoV-2 is a manmade virus that has been tinkered with for decades. Much of the research was funded by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci, and may have been an outgrowth of attempts to develop an HIV vaccine.  [Fauci was trying to use the CoV as a delivery mechanism for an HIV vaccine.]
    • In 1999, Fauci funded research at University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to create “an infectious replication-defective coronavirus” specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. This appears to be the virus that became known as SARS-CoV
    • U.S. Patent 7279327 shows we knew the ACE receptor, the ACE2 binding domain, the S-1 spike protein, and other elements of SARS-CoV-2 were engineered and could be synthetically modified using gene sequencing technologies
    • The CDC holds patents to a SARS coronavirus that is 89% to 99% identical to the sequence identified as SARS-CoV-2, as well as the PCR test to diagnose it
    • 120 patents detail supposed “unique” features of SARS-CoV-2: the polybasic cleavage site, the spike protein and the ACE2 binding [receptor binding domain target], proving it’s not a novel virus at all.  [Not from a pangolin????!!!!]

    A comprehensive list of 120 patents relating to SARS-CoV-2-associated features can be found here.6 The features patented are referenced in two key scientific papers, "A Novel Bat Coronavirus Reveals Natural Insertions at the S1/S2 2 Cleavage Site of the Spike Protein and a Possible Recombinant 3 Origin of HCoV-19," and "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2."  [The references in these 2 papers point out the aspects of SC2 that are unique and lead to the patents and funding of their developments.]

    On that list, we see numerous patents detailing manipulation of the polybasic cleavage site for SARS-CoV, the spike protein, as well as ACE2 binding, all three of which are supposed to be unique features of SARS-CoV-2. As explained by Martin:

    "We took the reported gene sequence, which was reportedly isolated as a novel virus, indicated as such by the ICTV, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses of the World Health Organization. We took the actual genetic sequences that were reportedly novel and reviewed those against the patent records that were available as of the spring of 2020.

    And what we found, as you'll see in this report, are over 120 patented pieces of evidence, to suggest that the declaration of a 'novel coronavirus' was actually entirely a fallacy.

    ---------

    When did Pfizer start working on a spike protein vaccine in animals?  1999.

    Spike Protein Vaccine for Coronavirus Patented 22 Years Ago

    Up until 1999, coronavirus patents were all in the veterinary sciences. The first coronavirus vaccine to use the S spike protein was patented by Pfizer in January 2000 (Patent No. 6372224). It was a spike protein virus vaccine for canine coronavirus. You can look up the actual patents for yourself on the United States Patent and Trademark Office's website,7 if you like.

    "Ralph Baric's work on … rabbit cardiomyopathy … and then canine coronavirus in Pfizer's work, to identify how to develop S spike protein vaccine target candidates, [give] rise to the obvious evidence that …

    … neither the coronavirus concept of a vaccine, nor the principle of the coronavirus itself, as a pathogen of interest with respect to the spike proteins behavior, is anything novel at all. As a matter of fact, it's 22 years old based on patent filings," Martin says.

    From HIV Vaccine Development to COVID-19

    According to Martin, Fauci and the NIAID "found the malleability of coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines," and in 1999, Fauci funded research at University of North Carolina Chapel Hill (where Baric has a lab) to create "an infectious replication-defective coronavirus" specifically targeted for human lung epithelium.

    The patent for that replication-defective coronavirus that attacks human lung cells was filed April 19, 2002 (Patent No. 7279327). "In other words, we made SARS," Martin says. Or perhaps more accurately, Fauci and UNC did. Several months after that patent filing, the SARS outbreak in Asia occurred.

    "That patent, issued as U.S. Patent 7279327 … clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing, the fact that we knew that the ACE receptor, the ACE2 binding domain, the S-1 spike protein, and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen, was not only engineered, but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies.

    Taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen, or an intermediate of the pathogen, and that technology was funded exclusively, in the early days, as a means by which we could harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine."

    Sequoia Pharmaceuticals

    April 28, 2003 — three days after the CDC filed its patent for the SARS coronavirus — Sequoia Pharmaceuticals filed a patent on an antiviral agent for the treatment and control of infectious coronavirus (Patent No. 7151163). So, the CDC files a patent on SARS coronavirus, and three days later there's a treatment?

    This strongly suggests there was a working relationship behind the scenes. Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, founded in 2002, develops antiviral therapeutics with a special focus on drug-resistant viruses.8 Its lead investors include the Wellcome Trust.

    But there's yet another problem with Sequoia's 2003 filing for an antiviral agent. It was actually issued and published before the CDC patent on SARS coronavirus had been granted, which didn't happen until 2007, and the CDC had paid to keep the application private.

    The next bombshell revelation occurred on June 5, 2008, when Ablynx, now a part of Sanofi, filed a series of patents detailing what we've been told are novel features of SARS-CoV-2, namely the polybasic cleavage site, the spike protein and the ACE2 receptor binding domain. The first of those patents, U.S. Patent No. 9193780, was issued November 24, 2015.

    Between 2016 and 2019, a series of patents were issued to Ablynx and Sanofi covering the RNA strands and the subcomponents of the gene strands.

    Between 2008 and 2017, a series of patents were also filed by a long list of players, including Crucell, Rubeus Therapeutics, Children's Medical Corporation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in München, Protein Science Corporation, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, University of Iowa, University of Hong Kong and the Chinese National Human Genome Center in Shanghai.

    This series of patents detail ever single attribute that is supposed to be unique to SARS-CoV-2, according to the paper, "A Novel Bat Coronavirus Reveals Natural Insertions at the S1/S2 2 Cleavage Site of the Spike Protein and a Possible Recombinant 3 Origin of HCoV-19."

    This paper has routinely been used to identify the so-called novel coronavirus that is SARS-CoV-2. Yet there are 73 patents, issued between 2008 and 2019, that describe the very elements that are said to be unique to SARS-CoV-2. Patents have been filed for SARS-CoV-2's polybasic cleavage site, the ACE2 receptor binding domain, and the spike protein.

    Intentional Weaponization of Spike Protein

    Martin says:

    "There wasn't a lab leak. This was an intentional bio-weaponization of spike proteins to inject into people, to get them addicted to a pan-coronavirus vaccine. This has nothing to do with a pathogen that was released, and every study that's ever been launched to try to verify a lab leak, is a red herring.

    [There are] 73 patents on everything clinically novel — 73, all issued before 2019. And I'm going to give you the biggest bombshell of all to prove that this was actually not a release of anything, because Patent No. 7279327, the patent on the recombinant nature of that 'lung-targeting' coronavirus, was transferred mysteriously from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to the National Institutes of Health in 2018.

    Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and the rest of the pandemic virus industrial complex.

    Incidentally, Fauci is on the board of directors of the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, as is Dr. Chris Elias, president of the Global Development Program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and George Fu Gao, Ph.D., director-general of the Chinese CDC and a Chinese communist party member.10

    It's a long interview, but it does not disappoint. I urge you to take the time to listen to it, as Martin really lays out the timeline of when and how this pandemic virus came to be. He's also published a 205-page paper11 detailing Fauci's involvement that you can download from archive.org.

    It now seems clearer than ever that everything we're experiencing was planned and executed with a profit motive in mind. Armed with this new knowledge, I urge you once again to reclaim your life, your freedom and independence, and resist this manufactured notion of a "new normal." A new normal will surely be established if we persist, but it will be the converse of what the pandemic virus industrial complex is hoping for.

    We will resurrect medicine and science from the induced coma these fields are currently in, and usher in a new era of medical freedom, personal liberty, responsible and transparent government, fiscal stability and health care that actually promotes health rather than slow death. It may take a while, but together, we can do it. To get there, keep sharing information such as that provided by Martin in this mind-blowing interview in any way you can. In the end, truth will prevail. Believe it.

    ----

    Dr Martin's list of the patents on SARS-CoV-2 is here.

    Mercola's summary of the arguments that the spike protein is damaging is here

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sat, Jul 24, 2021 - 10:56pm

    Primary Care_MD

    Primary Care_MD

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: May 14 2020

    Posts: 132

    14

    Primary Care_MD said:

    I’m no Sherlock Holmes, but one thing I can deduce is that when people get too close to the truth, they get a clear warning to back off.  In keeping with the theme of ‘the dog that didn’t bark,’ it appears that ANY suggestion that the US govt, or Ralph Baric, or Fauci created / patented SARS-CoV-2, or the vaccine, prior to the disease being identified in Dec 2019, is strictly off limits.

    But this is EXACTLY why I believe David Martin’s evidence on patents is so important! He’s got the smoking gun! A confession, written, signed, and notarized, by attorneys(!), BEFORE the crime was committed. By the way, Covid IS the biggest crime in history, children are dying, and it IS a crime against humanity. Oh. Um, did I mention it’s part of a fascist coup? So, that means it’s also treason.

    As Dr. Martin explains, the patents prove beyond any reasonable doubt that Fauci /Baric created the virus, and decided (along with Peter Daszak / DARPA / NIH / Moderna) to monetize their patented biological weapon, by also patenting the vaccine. They were in a BIG hurry, because they patented the vaccine 2 months before the virus accidentally (wink wink) escaped from the WiV (wink), and 1 month before the simulation known as Event 201 (wink).

    …………

    Why the BIG hurry? Look up Mick Harrison or David Meiswinkle.

    As Dr. Martin said, unambiguously, to Dr. Fuellmich, this already IS a RICO case. It’s a criminal conspiracy. It’s killing young healthy people. Our own govt, media, and medical establishment are a part of it. What can we do? Speak out. Speak truth to power. Keep pressuring Chris to interview Dr. Martin, Whitney Webb, Dr. Yeadon, Dr. McCullough, and RFK, Jr. When TPTB say ‘you cant talk about x’, my instinct is to say, ‘why not? Why can’t I talk about x?’ What is the ‘man behind the curtain’ so afraid of, that he has to terrorize the innocent?

    Why are so many people afraid to take on Big Brother? As Whitney Webb has pointed out, DHS was created by Richard Armitage, who ran the Phoenix Program. And DHS is all about domestic surveillance, suppressing dissent.

     

    “It does not take a majority to prevail…but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.”

    — Samuel Adams; as referenced often, by the fearless Gerald Celente

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jul 25, 2021 - 2:15am

    #9
    Canuck21

    Canuck21

    Status: Gold Member

    Joined: Aug 10 2020

    Posts: 812

    6

    Another David Martin interview

    Here is another interview with David Martin, in which he predicts millions of deaths from the vaccines. Not exactly light listening.

    KunstlerCast 347 — Chatting with David E. Martin About Covid-19, Vaccinations, and Other Mass Casualty Events

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jul 25, 2021 - 8:08am

    grandefille

    grandefille

    Status: Member

    Joined: Oct 11 2010

    Posts: 61

    7

    fantastic interview!

    Kunstler did a great job in this interview: hit the most important points and didn't preach at his guest.  I was impressed at how Dr. Martin was able to calmly and clearly discuss this horrific situation.  Thanks for sharing!

    I was a little sceptical about the patent situation, and then I clicked on the link to find six pages of 20 or so patent citations on each page.  I didn't see a definition of the dates in the right-hand column, but having been a patent researcher in a previous life, I believe that the three dates for each are 1) date the application was filed, 2) the application was published, and 3) patent was granted.  Martin and his crew know their stuff!  This is a VERY long list of incrimination.

    Julie

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jul 25, 2021 - 3:34pm

    #11

    sand_puppy

    Status: Member

    Joined: Apr 13 2011

    Posts: 1932

    12

    David Martin Interview with JHK

    Greatly appreciate this interview between James Howard Kunstler and David Martin.

    Surprised to hear a couple of points of David Martin's (DM) viewpoint.

    • DM suspect a significant population die off as a result of this virus and the vaccine in the next years.
    • He is worried that the US military may find itself incapacitated by the vaccine.
    • He anticipates a dark-age / long-emergency in the near future where we are mre likely to be hunting squirrels than living in an advanced techno-utopia.
    • He anticipated a financial system crash.  The debts simply cannot be repaid in the same currency that they were issued.  (Federal reserve notes with 10 cents of real money backing up 1 dollar of loaned money.)  Within the decade, probably sooner.
    • He would not be too surprised to find the Fauci crowd and the Russian collusion crowd being brought to justice (doing perp-walks) as the public eventually demands some accountability.
    • But, he doubts that the invisible hand (behind the Fauci control level) will be uncovered and that they will live out a long life in their fluffy pillows dying comfortable, rich and undiscovered, never suspected of being the origin of the collapse.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jul 25, 2021 - 3:51pm

    #12
    westcoastjan

    westcoastjan

    Status: Platinum Member

    Joined: Jun 04 2012

    Posts: 1001

    6

    Police joining Italian rallies

    https://brandnewtube.com/watch/police-in-florence-italy-remove-helments-and-join-protesters-part-2_soGB53wsz1hXxa6.html

     

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jul 25, 2021 - 4:05pm

    Mike from Jersey

    Mike from Jersey

    Status: Platinum Member

    Joined: Jan 22 2018

    Posts: 1075

    6

    Replying to David Martin Interview with JHK (#11)

    That really was an interesting interview.

    One of the things that Martin mentioned was that Fauci had a plan to inoculate everyone at birth with a universal anti-cold/flu vaccine. Then they would get "booster shots" to deal with variants for the rest of their lives.

    As crazy as that sounds, I believe it is true. I previously read over all of the Fauci emails from the Buzz Feed dump. In there, was an article that had been sent to Fauci quoting him from an interview. He had talked about plans just like that.

    I am not a scientist but a retired attorney. But I know enough science to know that a plan like that is flat out crazy. He was treating a non-linear human physiologic/immune/eco system like it was an automobile on an extended warranty plan.

    It was totally nuts.

    The only conclusion I could come to was that Fauci (although he had a medical degree) was simply an out of touch desk jockey with grand dreams.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jul 25, 2021 - 4:24pm

    azjbpotter@gmail.com

    [email protected]

    Status: Member

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 10

    His video on the source of the virus was very good

    Published on 21 Jul 2021 / In News and Politics

    This is a multiple-warhead bombshell: Intelligence analyst David E. Martin has been checking the patent files concerning SARS-CoV2 and found out ... damn, listen to the guy yourself. If this turns out to be true there can be no more doubt about what the hell is going on.
    The German Corona Inquiry Committee has been formed in July 2020 and heard almost 150 scientists, experts, researchers, witnesses and victims in 60 five-hour sessions. (https://corona-ausschuss.de/en/)

    https://ugetube.com/watch/david-e-martin-testifies-at-the-german-corona-inquiry-committee-july-9th-2021_StPPIUWeina1DCI.html

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Sun, Jul 25, 2021 - 11:01pm

    JWhite

    JWhite

    Status: Silver Member

    Joined: Jul 12 2016

    Posts: 247

    9

    POLICE IN FLORENCE ITALY REMOVE HELMENTS AND JOIN PROTESTERS 07/25/2021 678

    Bravo!  I used to live in Firenze so this is great to see.  The crowd is calling out 'David', a reference to 'David and Goliath'.  Michaelangelo's statue of David is in Florence, so this may be one reason for the reference.....

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Jul 26, 2021 - 8:12am

    JWhite

    JWhite

    Status: Silver Member

    Joined: Jul 12 2016

    Posts: 247

    4

    Thanks sand-puppy

    Thanks sand-puppy for taking time to put together this summary of the information, and for your words of inspiration.

    One thing I've been curious about is why Fauci and Gates both reportedly received a Covid shot.  Presumably they would both know the dangers inherent in these 'vaccines'?

    For anyone who is interested, I've just come across this site, which has some interesting analysis and opinion pieces.  The article 'Proof that the pandemic was planned with a purpose' under 'Pandemic Facts', is an interesting read and connects some dots, including a connection drawn to the WEF's plans.  One doctor suggests that the aggressive Covid vaccine initiative is meant to prepare people for transhumanism.  Many of the people being shared here on PP are also linked to on this site so there is some interesting food for thought....

    https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Jul 26, 2021 - 10:17am

    #17
    Doug

    Doug

    Status: Platinum Member

    Joined: Oct 01 2008

    Posts: 1566

    1

    This David E Martin?

    New ‘Plandemic’ Video Peddles Misinformation, Conspiracies

    "David Martin and Patent Claims

    If Event 201 is the backbone of the conspiracy theory in “Plandemic,” then David Martin is the central character. He’s featured throughout the video, making claims primarily about patents.

    Martin runs a company called M-CAM, which analyzes patents and intellectual property to estimate the investment value of companies.

    M-CAM has five investment companies as clients, managing assets of $1.1 million, according to a recent statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    “Not big in investments, seems more like another guy using predictive modeling as a selling tool for many types of information,” Suzanne Lynch told FactCheck.org in an email, after looking through M-CAM’s SEC filings. Lynch has worked on Wall Street and is now a professor of economic crime at Utica College."

     

    You guys are hilarious.  $1.1 million under management?  I "manage" almost that much in my home, tiny portfolio and property.  In investment circles that's chump change.

    Read the rest of the article I linked to discover of his record of unfounded conspiracy theories.  This guy is a charlatan, sort of like Martin Armstrong.  Believe him at your peril.

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Jul 26, 2021 - 10:33am

    Kat43

    Kat43

    Status: Gold Member

    Joined: Feb 10 2020

    Posts: 639

    2

    Was Fauci really vaccinated?

    Perhaps you remember that we watched him get vaccinated and then tell the world two days later that he didn't have much in the way of symptoms, just soreness at the injection site.  For emphasis, he reached for that arm.  Except it was the wrong arm.  That started the rumor that perhaps he wasn't vaccinated at all or that it was only something like saline.

    I think there is another possibility.  If he actually believed in the vaccine he could have arranged to be vaccinated the spring of 2020 as it was starting to go into production.  If you recall, he was very cavalier about a mask last year, including at the baseball game, so he didn't appear to be very concerned about C19 even at his advanced age.  Certainly another possibility is that he is loaded up on prophylactics, as we suspect many public figures are.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Jul 26, 2021 - 10:53am

    Yggdrasil

    Yggdrasil

    Status: Gold Member

    Joined: Jan 25 2014

    Posts: 495

    6

    Back to the Playground...

    Doug,

    I don't think anyone here is interested in the playground. Most of us stopped playing there over a decade ago...

    All the best

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Jul 26, 2021 - 10:57am

    Ision

    Ision

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: Feb 07 2020

    Posts: 267

    13

    Ision said:

    Doug:

    M-CAM International, and Dr. David Martin, are not small time, like you try to say...at all.

    For Example:

    "CNBC Launches the CNBC IQ100 Index Powered by M-CAM International"

    "CNBC, First in Business Worldwide, today announced the launch of the CNBC IQ100 Index in partnership with M-CAM International. The CNBC IQ100 is a first of its kind rules-based index of 100 large-cap companies that derive material revenue growth by leveraging their own portfolios of protected, proprietary technology.

    "The index is powered by M-CAM International, a global firm that maintains an unprecedented archive of documents related to patents, trademarks and other intangible assets from 160 countries."

    ---https://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/25/cnbc-launches-the-cnbc-iq100-index-powered-by-m-cam-international.html

    I know you are just doing your job of trying to preserve as much of the COVID19 propaganda as possible.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Jul 26, 2021 - 1:34pm

    JWhite

    JWhite

    Status: Silver Member

    Joined: Jul 12 2016

    Posts: 247

    3

    Replying to Was Fauci really vaccinated? (#18)

    Yes I have these questions as well - and also about Bill Gates.  In the case of Fauci reaching for the opposite arm, many people are getting a first shot in one arm and the 2nd shot in the other arm.  Some people have a sore arm, or arms, for a very long time (I know a couple in this situation), so this could be an explanation for reaching for the other arm.  If he did get both shots I expect he would have done it in the recommended time frame of ~21 days.  Perhaps the news report pertained to a 2nd shot rather than the 1st?

    But if Fauci believes in the vaccine, my question is why does he believe in it and why would he want it for himself?  Same question for Bill Gates.  I don't know whether Klaus Schwab got the jab, but am trying to reconcile all this information.

    Many things that make you go 'Hmmmmm'....

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Jul 26, 2021 - 1:55pm

    #22
    goldrunner1

    goldrunner1

    Status: Silver Member

    Joined: Apr 20 2009

    Posts: 142

    6

    Trudeau's Fake Jab

    I am not a medical expert so I can't comment on this. Apparently this video was narrated by a nurse and she states that the vaccination of Trudeau & his wife are fake. Can anyone shed some light on this. I have always suspected there was a "celebrity version" of the vaccine which was most likely saline solution or possibly the use of retractable needles in some videos. Also someone mentioned that injecting through a tattoo was a no no.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/DbrB0X1OoGbd/

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Jul 26, 2021 - 2:33pm

    #23
    Friedrichs_teeth

    Friedrichs_teeth

    Status: Gold Member

    Joined: Feb 15 2019

    Posts: 534

    5

    Friedrichs_teeth said:

    Well he was a drama teacher.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Jul 26, 2021 - 3:59pm

    #24
    Doug

    Doug

    Status: Platinum Member

    Joined: Oct 01 2008

    Posts: 1566

    2

    Yggdrasil and ision

    I post here in the hope that there are some who are actually interested in information that differs from the pp thought bubble.  Critical thinking and all that.  I understand there aren't many who are interested in well sourced evidence, but there have been a few who seek balanced viewpoints.  And, I'm a hopeful person.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Tue, Jul 27, 2021 - 12:07am

    nanchesca

    nanchesca

    Status: Member

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 11

    2

    nanchesca said:

    I sent this video to my friend who is a nurse and has given many vaccinations, she says the nurse in the video is incorrect in her second and third point. Aspiration is not recommended for vaccines and second, they are trained to give the shot like a dart.

    But I'm as skeptical as anyone, it definitely didn't look right

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Tue, Jul 27, 2021 - 12:18am

    Yoxa

    Yoxa

    Status: Silver Member

    Joined: Dec 20 2011

    Posts: 356

    2

    That partnership did not last.

    "CNBC Launches the CNBC IQ100 Index Powered by M-CAM International"

    Ision, methinks you are too impressed by a years-old PR news release. CNBC does not seem to be using M-CAM's info these days.

    Between October 25, 2016 and September 30, 2018 the Innovation α® United States Index was published as the CNBC IQ 100 Index.

    Source: https://www.m-cam.com

    I agree with Doug that 1.1 million is a surprisingly small portfolio. Something doesn't add up.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Tue, Jul 27, 2021 - 2:20am

    davefairtex

    davefairtex

    Status: Member

    Joined: Sep 03 2008

    Posts: 2729

    10

    Doug: Hoping for Change

    You guys are hilarious. $1.1 million under management? I "manage" almost that much in my home, tiny portfolio and property. In investment circles that's chump change.

    Read the rest of the article I linked to discover of his record of unfounded conspiracy theories. This guy is a charlatan, sort of like Martin Armstrong. Believe him at your peril.

    I have noticed that Doug's main challenge is - always - to say: "hey!  This guy doesn't look good!"  That, and calling him names.  "Conspiracy theories!"  Left unaddressed are the merits of the argument itself.  Is the guy right?

    "But...but...the Fact Checkers - The Authority - says he's a very bad man!  A conspiracy guy!"  Right.  Clearly Martin is violating the current Overton Window, and Doug is calling him out on this violation.

    But - outside the Overton Window violation - is Martin correct?

    To me, and to most of us here, that's the only question that matters.  Not "reputation", not "face", not "looking good."  Just - is he right about this or not?

    Someday I believe that Doug will learn - he's not stupid, just ... stuck in a pattern - that correctness is the key to convincing people here at the site.  Take a claim that Martin makes.  "This patent was filed on thus-and-such a date, with these claims" - and show that either the patent wasn't filed on that date, or that the claims weren't as advertised.  That's how you win here.

    I am hopeful that, sooner rather than later, Doug will figure this out and change his approach.  Once he does, he'll have a lot more success.  And he'll actually turn into an asset, too.  Wouldn't that be nice?

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Aug 02, 2021 - 9:08am

    Doug

    Doug

    Status: Platinum Member

    Joined: Oct 01 2008

    Posts: 1566

    1

    Dave, I've debated with myself

    Whether to respond to your last post on this thread.  I, obviously, have decided to do so.

    Your thesis here is that I'm "stuck in a pattern" that renders me unable to understand patterns that David E Martin has sussed out of patents.  You are wrong, of course, but let me explain shortly how I came to that conclusion.

    First, much of what lies at the bottom of our frequent differences on this forum, is our abilities to critically think about those differences.  I should start by pointing out that critical thinking is basically a three legged stool, each leg of which is vital to determining whether an allegation or story line has credibility.  Those legs are simply content, context and source.  If you wish to get into an extended conversation about those criteria, we can.  But, your argument is that content is the only leg that matters.  How do you arrive at that conclusion?  That requires some sort of procedure that involves all of those criteria.  That is what critical thinking is all about.  Your mere claim that you are a critical thinker doesn't hold much water.

    If you haven't considered the source's credibility you have dismissed one third of the process necessary to evaluate the substance of an argument.  In this case you suggest that David E Martin is credible based on no evidence that he is.  As far as I can tell, his claim to fame is that he advises investors based on patents.  IOW, he accumulates data on patents that, no doubt, comes from publicly available data bases.  The fact that he can collect this data and make a living on it is all well and good.  But, there is little reason to believe that data leads to conclusions at which he arrives.  Patents only tell us who owns what rights to inventions or technological improvements, not the merit of those developments beyond being useful.

    Patent Requirements
    • The invention must be statutory (subject matter eligible)
    • The invention must be new.
    • The invention must be useful.
    • The invention must be non-obvious.

     

    There have been arguments (or rather unsupported claims) here that Dr. Fauci somehow profits from covid vaccines.  From what I have seen, Dr. Fauci does not have a patent interest in any covid vaccines.  That doesn't seem to matter here.  You and your running mates just accept that there is a connection somewhere.  That conclusion simply ignores two of the three legs of the stool.  It says nothing about the context or source of your information.  If you don't consider the credibility of the source you have failed miserably in the critical thinking process.

    Merely aggregating publicly available information is making Mr. Martin a living of some sort, but its hard to believe, based on a $1.1 million client base he is getting rich.  He is, however, probably making money on those who believe his history of pushing conspiracy theories.  To my way of thinking, that is a serious problem.  If you have gone no deeper in investigating his credibility, you have not done your job, unless your job is simply to drum up membership for PP.

     

     

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Aug 02, 2021 - 9:31am

    Susan7

    Susan7

    Status: Silver Member

    Joined: Feb 15 2020

    Posts: 201

    9

    Doug…….

    You want someone “credible”. In other words someone who aligns with your personal expectations of “rightness”. But wouldn’t it be more logical to simply examine the evidence presented in any given area, rather than dismiss a priori any such evidence based on your assessment of the presenter? When it comes to data, credibility inheres in the data itself, not the source. Otherwise scientific progress is needlessly hindered by human bias. You would profit greatly by letting go of some of your internal beliefs and assumptions and simply evaluating evidence on its own terms. I know I have.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Aug 02, 2021 - 10:25am

    #30
    Andy in the Sun

    Andy in the Sun

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: May 28 2021

    Posts: 108

    2

    Susan, you hit the nail.

    @ Susan,

    full points, you hit the nail.

    The media is more and more professionally using our emotions to steer us. 100-80 years ago they have been addressed them directly with the results we all know. Today they have been perfected and come much more subtle to us and lately... camouflaged as science.

    I am observing by many of my (few) friends, who all consider themself as intelligent, with a moral-logic reasoning that often ends more or less up in one of in the current mainstream perceptions. They consider themself as alternative thinkers - but all to often I only wonder why I find myself on the opposite side of their position.

    Over time I realized that with the advancement of science and technology we got too used to challenge and call into question everything around us including many of our principles. And once we are loosing our common sense principles of judgement and principles of checking our perceptions, we are subject to manipulation and accept to interpret anything that comes across in the coat of correctness as a principle - including the feeling of being on the (morally) right side.

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Aug 02, 2021 - 12:19pm

    #31
    Primary Care_MD

    Primary Care_MD

    Status: Bronze Member

    Joined: May 14 2020

    Posts: 132

    5

    NIAID had the vaccine BEFORE the pandemic started - otherwise who's gonna invest, right?

     

    "The confidentially agreement (read below) states that providers ‘Moderna’ alongside the ‘National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) agreed to tranfer ‘mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates’ developed and jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna to recipients ‘The Universisty of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’ on the 12th December 2019."
    Secret Docs Reveal Moderna Sent Coronavirus Vaccine To North Carolina University Weeks Before Pandemic
Found on page 105 of the agreement

    The material transfer agreement was signed the December 12th 2019 by Ralph Baric, PhD, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and then signed by Jacqueline Quay, Director of Licensing and Innovation Support at the University of North Carolina on December 16th 2019.

    The agreement was also signed by two representatives of the NIAID, one of whom was Amy F. Petrik PhD, a technology transfer specialist who signed the agreement on December 12th 2019 at 8:05 am.

    The other signatory was Barney Graham MD PhD, an investigator for the NIAID, however this signature was not dated.

    The final signatories on the agreement were Sunny Himansu, Moderna’s Investigator, and Shaun Ryan, Moderna’s Deputy General Councel. Both signautres were made on December 17th 2019.

    All of these signatures were made prior to any knowledge of the emergence of the novel coronavirus. It wasn’t until December 31st 2019 that the World Health Organisation (WHO) became aware of an alleged cluster of viral pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China.

    But even at this point they had not determined that an alleged new coronavirus was to blame, instead stating the pneumonia was of “unknown cause”.

    It was not until January 9th 2020 that the WHO reported Chinese authorities had determined the outbreak was due to a novel coronavirus which later became known as SARS-CoV-2 with the resultant disease dubbed COVID-19.

    https://greatgameindia.com/moderna-vaccine-north-carolina-university/

     

    Login or Register to post comments

  • Mon, Aug 02, 2021 - 3:15pm

    Doug

    Doug

    Status: Platinum Member

    Joined: Oct 01 2008

    Posts: 1566

    2

    Susan7

    "You want someone “credible”. In other words someone who aligns with your personal expectations of “rightness”."

    No, that is incorrect.  I look at their backgrounds, what peer reviewed publications they have written, their history of veracity and their political biases.  Then, I look at the consistency of their views with content and context of their writings, and that of others.

    "But wouldn’t it be more logical to simply examine the evidence presented in any given area, rather than dismiss a priori any such evidence based on your assessment of the presenter?  When it comes to data, credibility inheres in the data itself, not the source."

    I don't dismiss evidence.  That is content, one of the three stool legs.  I will, of course, evaluate the evidence, comparing it with other evidence and the opinions of peer reviewers.  I try to avoid thought bubbles.

    "You would profit greatly by letting go of some of your internal beliefs and assumptions and simply evaluating evidence on its own terms. I know I have."

    Have you?  Really?  What evidence did you use to compare the stuff that David E Martin puts out?  Did you look for other sources who specialize in data mining from public patent records?  Did you actually look at any patents to figure out how they were or were not consistent with Martin's opinions?  Did you evaluate any of his evidence for consistency with other evidence?  Remember, as far as I can tell, he has never published anything that was peer reviewed.  So, what standards do you use to evaluate his notions?

    If you haven't done any of that, then it is probably you who relies on "your internal beliefs and assumptions" and, of course, those anonymous sources who post on the internet.

    Login or Register to post comments