I see no video. Just introduction, then a title header, then a large blank space, then the links and finally comments. No video.

Not sure...works for me.   I can see it in several browsers.

So, which browser are you using?  Have you tried shutting your tabs down and reopening your browser?  Seems like it might be something like that.

 Its out of control.. its far gone..   War not just on words coming to your hometown soon.

I completely agree.

And you have to be clued into the precise use of inflammatory words.  Emotionally laden content designed to force you react in a certain way.

The main lever usually exerted is the 'belonging lever.'  Everyone wants to belong.  We hate to be abandoned and forgotten.

So here's the LA Times recently working diligently to marginalize those who might dare to question the state of California's official edicts.  As if somehow elected officials even at the state level had risen beyond the right or duties of their own citizens to question their actions.

Do you see what I see?  The LATimes has framed things like this;

"The only way to stop Covid is to enter a lockdown.  That's settled science.  Further, there are no effective treatments that could replace a lockdown,  Therefore anybody resisting a lockdown is a danger to society.  Oh, and some of them are conspiracy theorists."

Left out of that, of course, is that there's an alternative framing which says:

"Hey, there is an effective set of treatments.  Ivermectin alone would plunge the transmission rate by more than 90%.  Further we could be smart about the way in which we allow people to live their lives.  Maybe younger folks with a 99.96% rate of survival don't need to be locked down.  Maybe we should be giving Ivermectin and Vitamin D to our elderly and then being, you know, a bit more careful around them."

But, nope.

The LA Times is clearly on the propaganda bandwagon and is branding people as "resistors" and "conspiracy theorists" for doing things like reading clinical trial results.

You can practically hear tribunals assembling out in a nearby empty stadium...

This needs to be fought.  It's unacceptable.  This sort of dangerous language and framing by the like of the LA Times is exactly what precedes very bad periods of history.

How about we 'just say no' to that path, mmmmkay?

You mentioned in today's "War on Truth" video that there are places that explain the dosage and use of vetrinary ivermectin for humans. Where can we find this?

Thanks!

We've covered that here pretty well.

For educational purposes only, you understand.  For those that like puzzles and minor math challenges, here's a handy link:

Ivermectin / HCQ / Azith or Doxycycline Dosage

---------------

DISCLAIMER: THIS WEBSITE DOES NOT PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE
The information, including but not limited to, text, graphics, images, videos and other material contained on this website are for informational and educational purposes only. No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health care provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or treatment and before undertaking a new health care regimen, and never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website.

Assessments and claims need to be rooted in some sort of data and both need to be separated from assertions, which are usually just a claim without much if any backing.

Accordingly, I've taken the liberty of editing a warning on Ivermectin posted at Tractor Supply to eliminate an assertion that has no data behind it.

It is true that animal products have not been approved for human consumption.

I cannot find any evidence at all that they have been evaluated in any way for human consumption in their current formulations.  So it's not correct to assert that these products "are not safe."

I get why they would word it that way, but it's neither accurate nor correct.

Further, it's kind of tricky to evaluate any further because Durvet is extremely cagy on their specification sheet.

Only one ingredient listed.  That's not very helpful.  Based on my own experience with it, I'd be surprised if the vast bulk of the rest of the tube isn't some form of petroleum jelly.

But that's just a guess.

From Bigfoot:

In any case the way I read the SDS, the ivermectin is the most toxic of all the ingredients at 10 mg per kilogram of body weight.  So for a 180 pound person (or 81 KG) that works out to 800 mg of horse paste.

Not quite.  The paste is 1.87% by weight.

Further the LD50 (the dose at which half the rats died) was 10mg/kg.  So we'd like to be really very far away from that value safety wise.

Now I don't have access to the actual toxicity curves, so I can't reasonably do that.  Further each animal species can be (and usually are) quite different, so a reading for rats is really just a starting point for further inquiry.

But for the sake of education and clarity, if we said that 10mg/kg is an amount we'd really like to know so we can avoid it like the plague, the math works out like this:

0.0187 X 6.08 g/tube = 113.7 mg per tube of Durvet.

For an 81 kg person, then, the amount to avoid would be 81x10 mg = 810 mg.

That's 7.12 entire tubes of paste.  So let's be really safe and suggest that nobody even think about taking 1 entire tube.

Although this guy did and experienced some visual hallucinations (but entirely recovered in 48 hours):

I copied this as a screen shot because I'm pretty sure that post will be deleted soon, either by the original poster or by Reddit.

At any rate, an interesting anecdote.

The usual doses being discussed as prophylaxis are in the range of 12mg to 18 mg.  These are in the range of 1/10 to 1/6 of a single tube.

More scientifically, we have this study from 2002 that someone recently brought to my attention.  In purple highlight we see that even at doses 10x the recommended 200ug/kg IVM was well tolerated and didn't result in any significant issues of safety or tolerance.  Nothing at all was noted even at 10x the recommended dose.

(Source - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12362927/)

By the way "mydriasis" is dilation of the pupil so they were looking for some ocular effects as their primary indication of toxicity.  Fits with the "I ate the whole tube" guy's experience above.

Not highlighted by me, but very interesting is that if taken with food, 2.6x more IVM made it into the subject's bloodstream.  So, take with food.

Bottom Line: IVM looks very well tolerated even at doses 10x the recommended dose.  So doctors should feel very comfortable with this sort of extremely wide safety profile.

India seems to be having no problems finding, producing and using Ivermectin.  In fact the "go to" treatment for Covid is quadruple therapy.

Here's a place that sells it for (drum roll please...) a whopping $1.73 per package.

https://www.rxindia.com/medicines/medicines-by-therapeutic-class/covid-19/ziverdo-kit/

Heck it's even on sale.  Was $2.04, now it's only $1.73.  15% off!  🙂

Sweet holy hell...what is even wrong with the country I live in?  How is it that I am living in a place of such barbaric intent that my only options are to remain in lockdown while awaiting a hastily slapped-together vaccine that will do God only knows what over the long term?

From the website:

Quadruple Therapy with Ivermectin is effective in treating COVID-19
Referring to a pre-official release of a randomised controlled trial using Ivermectin in three doses in primary contacts of COVID-19, It is said that 93 % of primary contacts who received Ivermectin did not develop any symptoms and 58 % of primary contacts who did not receive Ivermectin did progress to have symptoms of the pandemic.

“Quadruple Therapy includes Ivermectin 12 mg one dose, Doxycycline 100 mg once a day for four days, Zinc 50 mg once a day for four days and Vitamin D3 once a week. Ivermectin, Doxycycline and Zinc are to be repeated every 14 days and Vitamin D3 every week with blood levels monitored. The synergistic effect of these medicine acts to prevent viral multiplication and also stop the virus from entering human cells.

Thomas Borody, an Australian gastroenterologist who is known for curing peptic ulcers with triple antibiotic therapy, has revealed that one block in South America that received Ivermectin combination prophylaxis did not contract coronavirus infection while others did,” he said.

^^THAT^^ my friends, is what it sounds like to live in a civilized country.

We are truly through the looking glass here in the 'developed' world.

We've had a rough day.  First YouTube and now Vimeo are saying that my Covid coverage violates their rules.

Of course, there's absolutely no specific guidance or indication of even generally what that might be.

So we're busy switching platforms and adjusting our tactics.

As a first step we're going to be uploading everything to two locations:

Everything has been backed up here (including all banned and missing videos):

https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:2

We're starting a second channel on Rumble (only a couple of videos loaded so far):

I've also got a Parler account (kind of a Twitter knock off...a little clumsy and leans a bit  right/partisan, but dedicated to free speech).

My handle over at Parler.com is @ChrisMartenson

Make note of those and, if you could, open up accounts there and subscribe to the channels?  That's the easiest way to keep everyone in the loop and to migrate away from the evil banality that YouTube has become.