Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Typical (well worded) virologist response, could have been given by the Dutch ‘Outbreak Management Team’.
It does not consider the economy and the ability to keep on handling the situation; riots are already breaking out everywhere. Most areas in the world are not islands, and don’t have a highly disciplined population and competent authorities.
As long as ivermectine is not widely used and people are becoming more and more vitamin D deficient through the lockdowns the pandemic will be with us, perhaps easing during summer time.
When did the mutations, suddenly, parallel in different locations occur?
Some animals got infected, but at different times, and probably not leading to more virulent outbreaks.
What changed?
Dr Been suspected it was induced by the mono/ polyclonal antibody therapies, in which patients with a weakened immune system can become breeding vessels for new mutations.
So instead ofendless lockdowns, the antibody therapies need to be banned immediately, the older population vaccinated, and early ivermectine therapy being made available. And of course massive vitamine D suppletion, with the recommended dose upped.
Watch porn all the time? Not the best way to spend time.
But what these puritans always come up with is that it is somehow related to lower fertility and population decrease. They said the same thing about homosexuals There are very few gays who never at least tried heterosex.
They obviously forget that for a replacement number of kids (2.3 kids per couple-or female) a woman has to have intercourse less than once a YEAR, and that there always will be plenty of volunteers to replace the hopeless porn addict.
-
Tue, Jan 19, 2021 - 12:32am (Reply to #4)
#5count placeholder0statistical likelyhood of infection?
It is still important math. I don’t want to boast or lie. An important task here is to inform. At the moment, I can say I probably, or likely had covid. These things become important when talking to medical professionals.
An unofficial way to describe probabilities (IPCC reports):
Virtually certain ………..99-100% probability
Very likely ……………..90-100% probability
Likely ………………….66-100% probability
About as likely as not ……33 to 66% probability
Unlikely ………………..0-33% probability
Very unlikely ……………0-10% probability
Exceptionally unlikely ……0-1% probabilityNot being a statistician, I still would like to know, for accuracy and truthfulness, which term to use.
-
Mon, Jan 18, 2021 - 11:15pm (Reply to #3)
#6count placeholder0I miss the youtubes!
@ NordicJack: Terminology can be confusing. I would personally never call big tech, big pharma, and MSM ‘progressive’ or ‘left’. Neither ‘conservative’, or ‘right wing’. (Both movements are mostly populated by misguided and ideology blinded herd animals anyway.)
It is a corporate hybrid of oligarchy and their minions, with a pseudo left veneer. Sometimes called: the radicalized centre in the horse shoe model, where the flanks on left and right have more in common than the middle.
-
Sun, Jan 17, 2021 - 07:41am (Reply to #3)
#4count placeholder0Norway warns of fatal side effects of Covid-19 vaccine after elderly deaths
About some anafylactic reactions: no need to worry. Just keep the people just vaccinated around the facility for half an hr. This is predictable and can be mitigated….
But this seems like a triggered auto immune response and seems to occur in clusters.
I was almost ready to get the shot.
However: They (Dutch gov.) is not issuing vaxxx proof (Vaxxxx-passports) I was quite willing to to get the shots, ready to take up the risks of adverse effects, in order to move on with my life!!! Even exposing myself to some risks…
it seems ignorant propaganda to me!
I came across this video: street vendors selling Artemisia in South Africa against covid:
The fact remains that the US has been deeply involved in GOF research.
Another fact remains that she has ties to Steve Bannon, who loves nothing more than instigating tensions with China.
It seems the link did not work:
-
-
AuthorPosts
Sun, Feb 07, 2021 - 03:36pm
#6BMJ: The E484K mutation and the risks it poses