Forum Replies Created
It's 2016 now and still no "collapse" yet. Or maybe just as Rome wasn't built in a day it probably didn't collapse in a day either. Catherine Austin Fitts subscribes to the "slow burn" theory as the US Empire devours itself from within and we sort of see that now as the interest burden on US public debt is about to exceed the cost of the US to maintain it's military empire across the globe. There are many indicators that the "collapse" has started it's just that the masses haven't yet woken up to it yet.
Thank you for a very comprehensive summary of events and the dynamics evolving around this tragic event. Great to have links to sources of so much material in one place.
After watching the 5-part series on Counter Intelligence, revelations by Michael Ruppert and Operation Gladio , the uncanny recurrence in history of false flag black ops as a pretext for war, obfuscation of the Bush administration over the 9/11 investigation, including the lies we were told about WMD in Iraq, and Daddy Bush's "Babies in incubators" lies, I'm giving the Rebels and Putin the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise. Unfortunately they are fighting a losing battle against a slick western media propaganda machine and have already been convicted in the court of (western) world opinion.
new angle of attack. Should we not be checking buildings worldwide?
We should. A disaster in the airline industry and all similar model aircraft would be grounded until the cause of the crash was investigated, determined and prevention measures put in place. So what has changed in the IBC as a result of the collapse of WTC7 & WTC1&2? The final WTC7 NIST report does give recommendations (Chapter 5) but my guess is those recommendations haven't really been translated into building codes worldwide.
I see that your post was some time ago and you have received no responses.
I too have wondered why crisis commentators (included CM) have recommended to pay off one's debts as quickly as one can. I can understand this advice to free yourself from the paper system and to protect your physical assets, importantly your home.
However if one has enough funds now to easily pay off say, mortgage debt, at any time, why would one rush to do this especially if that loan is going to become a lot cheaper with inflation? Why not use those funds to purchase PM's and wait for the collapse/inflation to unfold then pay off the debt and buy a few more properties to boot?
I'm still new here and finding my way around but answers to quite simple questions such as this seem rather elusive.
Has anyone listened to Dr. Judy Wood (ph.d.) on her Direct Energy Weapon? Her argument is that a D.E.W. was used on 9/11 to take down the Towers? The interview is pretty good and does raise other questions.
She also wrote a Book: Where did the Towers Go?
I'm familiar with her work and the observations she has made about 9/11. I am also aware of the animosity that has built up between the various "truther" camps notably those that support controlled demolition theory and those that support the DEW theory.
I am still of an open mind until a real investigation with subpoena power is conducted. Until then however my belief is that whoever was behind the destruction of WTC towers 1, 2, & 7, to ensure the "New Pearl Harbor" produced the intended widespread public shock in order to pursue their geopolitical machinations, they would want to make absolutely sure that those towers came down and it didn't "fizzle out", a rather embarrassing scenario! A hole or two in a building made by a plane wouldn't cut it as a pretext to go to war, or pass the Patriot Act. The sad fact is that the death of many innocents is what they needed.
As such, and knowing from a structural engineering standpoint the towers were designed to support 2-3 times the loads they might be subjected to, the energy required to destroy these structures would have to be enormous. And to ensure the job destroying them was done successfully one would want to be extra prudent and add in a lot more energy than the minimum necessary to avoid any possibility of "mission failure".
This brings me to conclude that without some sort of top secret "Manhattan Project", DEWs have not yet reached such an advanced stage to ensure, without doubt, complete 'dustification' of these enormous towers. High tech nanothermites however are a more tried and tested method that would give the confidence required without a doubt. There is always the possibly that both methods could have been used on 9/11 to avoid any possibility of mission failure.