Forum Replies Created
My expectation/hope is that this book will awaken many more people and things will fall apart for these folks quickly. Though, I am feeling very impatient and anxious about that not happening fast enough.
I am sending copies to higher ups at my work as they are currently deciding what to do about OSHA, in hopes it will “moves them” in a better direction.
This. My parents work for a major health care provider in town that is in an ecosystem of unionized medical workers. Even though her hospital does not have unionized workers, and does not support that model, you can be damn sure the employees there benefit from all other hospitals being unionized.
if the other hospitals increase wages or benefits, the non-unionized ones inevitably have to follow suit, otherwise risk losing their employees. They get the benefits of union wages/benefits without being in a union.
There aren’t many technologies that can exist for 30 years and still be considered new just because it doesn’t work (and hasn’t for 30 years) and that the media says it is new.
I came here to say what some others already have. Polio vaccine, like most came after either eradication through other means had started or herd immunity has started to be achieved. It is common for the industry to change the definition of something once a vaccine has been created so that the perceived effectiveness is higher.
In the case of polio, two things are widely attributed to its demise prior to the creation of a vaccine.
1. Chlorination of public swimming holes
2. Ceasing the use DDT. There is evidence that India still has a significant polio issue (which is whyBMGF went there to “print money” and kill people) because they still use DDT. Check out what the BMGF did there, trying to “eradicate” polio. It is disgusting.
- I Just replied to another post “raising it from the dead” and I will post it here since the minimal searching I have done has turned up a lot of ” I have read” or “my sisters husbands, aunts, 3rd removed relative said” responses.
Apparently jab shedding is a real thing and at least the FDA has known about it for quite some time.
Though, if this information has been found to not be accurate or if there is updating information, I would love for someone to post some articles or data instead of the continuance of what comes off as “campsite stories”.
I would like to add that I am really trying to figure this out because my mother, who has been a nurse/night charge nurse at a hospital in Portland for nearly 40 years and is retiring mid December was required to get a 3rd dose of Moderna, and she decided to do it 2 days before we are supposed to have her over for Thanksgiving.
after weeding through MSM and other “fact” checkers, it is widely accepted, by FDA, Pfizer and other people of merit that these shots do shed spike protein.
However, it is thought to be in such low amounts to not be of any concern. Still looking though, trying not to look so hard that i simply find affirmation as to whether or not that is actually the case.
bringing back an old post since I am researching “jab shedding” because my mother decided to get her 3rd moderna 2 days before thanksgiving…
This previous PP post indicates that shedding is possible, and the FDA has known about it for a while now.
I suppose I am surprised to see NZ caught up in all the hoopla at all considering how well they handled this pandemic at the beginning. I was under tue impression that this was a non-issue for them now. So to see them trying to force any type of vaccine mandate, again, is surprising to me. Perhaps I missed some crucial parts of the timeline though.
- Ivermectin – before, during and after
- Tulsi – Tea, powder, drops, etc. emerging evidence that Eugenol, a component of Tulsi binds to spike protein, essentially clogging it up and keeping it from binding to ACE2 receptors.
- Tumeric (curcumin) – some information coming about that also indicates this clogs up spike protein.
- Other herbs and spices! : there are several others like Tulsi and Tumeric that are likely to block the spike protein.
So, lots of Teas!
Not sure it is a trick, it has been known since any of the shots became available that those that have received a shot and those who haven’t are tested differently, in a way that the ones that haven’t will have a significantly higher likely hood of showing “an infection”.
The idea that anyone still accepts any of this type of data considering the CDC itself has asked for the use of the PCR test to be stopped as it is not capable of doing what these reports are telling people it does. Which is distinguish SARS infection over the flu or any other viral infection.
I do not see any sticky’s on these forums which is a first for me, though there should be a main COVID thread that maybe goes over some things everyone should know and should keep in mind when seeing any news or studies. One of those, until it changes, is the fact that those that have not taken a shot are being tested in a way to try and produce a higher infection rate. again, because of how ineffective the PCR tests are, that “higher infection rate” is infection of whatever may be present.
My copy should be arriving soon, mixed emotions about wanting to read it. Excited and already expecting to need some emotional/mental support once I am done.
I believe the idea of OAS can apply to natural immunity as well depending on the lens you are looking through.
It is somewhat explained in this video that (it is a video so of course) “You’ve been Nudged…!” shared @ 25:00 in.
Though, OAS is a bit different when it comes to vaccination because of different factors which can include method of infection (injection instead of nasal passage or other natural expected method), missing pieces of the full virus, and outdated strain of the virus would be some examples.