Forum Replies Created
I am very, very, happy to see the appointment of any person, who knows enough to not blame man-made CO2 emissions for causing “Climate Change/Warming.”
First, the Earth’s climate is NOT driven by CO2 at all.
Second, Man’s ENTIRE contribution to atmospheric CO2 is only about 18 ppmv, of the total 411, or so, ppmv present.
Third, The ENTIRE contribution of the U.S. to the atmosphere is only about 4 ppmv.
Fourth, You can totally eliminate 100% of U.S. created CO2, and this would have ZERO effect on the Earth’s climate. Zero.
Fifth, In fact, the natural fluctuation of atmospheric CO2 per year is about 6 ppmv. This means we experience a six ppmv swing in CO2 levels every year, 2 ppmv MORE CO2 than all the CO2 created by mankind from the U.S..
Sixth, We could remove the ENTIRE amount of man-made CO2 (18 ppmv ) from the current average CO2 levels and reduce the total volume to just 393 ppmv. So, imagine we exterminate ALL of mankind and remove ALL human created CO2 from the atmosphere and achieve a CO2 level of 393 ppmv. Do you think this would cause a dramatic cooling of the climate? Do you think reducing the CO2 from 412 to 393, would make a difference in our climate?
No. It would not…not in the least. How do we know this? Because we lived on the Earth while the average CO2 levels WERE 393 AND LESS!! The climate paid NO attention at all.
Seventh, The Earth’s climate is cooler now…right now…than I was just 4,000 years ago, and MUCH cooler than it was just 6,000 years ago…when this current inter-glacial period reached the hottest climatic temperatures it shall ever witness. Fact, is we have been cooling down for over 6,000 years….
Eighth, …and I’ll stop…, The energy absorbed by CO2 is exactly the same frequency as is absorbed by WATER VAPOR…of which there is so much…it simply overwhelms the ability of the CO2 to even get a chance at doing so. Plus, CO2 RADIATES ITS ABSORBED ENERGY IN ALL DIRECTIONS, NOT JUST BACK AT ITS SOURCE. If you are warm at night, it is because of water vapor..not CO2..for example.
I agree with the Doctor, whose Tweet you posted, who rightfully thinks the Lancet report is entirely fictional and an intentional effort to confuse and misinform. It is part of the ubiquitous propaganda being officially pumped into the media for the express purpose of enhancing the worldwide effects of SARS-COV-19.
My experience and training told me this pathogen was a product of deliberate design from the moment I first studied its genome. I knew months ago this pathogen would duplicate characteristics of HIV, and no vaccine could ever be developed for it, as it is just not possible. I knew this pathogen would rapidly mutate, and have the ability to quickly scramble a segment of its RNA signature, giving the impression of an explosion of different strains. But, the rapid mutations of this pathogen are NOT, caused by natural environmental effects, this ability is deliberately part of its design. It is specifically meant to make normal efforts to develop vaccines meaningless.
What good is a biological agent, if a simple vaccine can be quickly developed to defeat it by an enemy? If the “enemy” is the human population of this planet, it would be best if a pathogen could perform its mission without hindrance.
I think the mission is population control, which has been the mission for many years now. Why else would there be so much calculated propaganda and efforts to promote meaningless vaccines, instead of effective treatments?
After watching the video, I am amazed at how ignorant and confused the French TV commentators are.
I agree the virus has been modified, not only with HIV sequences, but other pathogens, too. Naturally, the HIV splices jump out at the Doctor, out of familiarity, but this is to be expected.
The moment I reviewed the RNA genome of this virus, I knew it was modified, and could NEVER be a naturally occurring virus. I then traced the virus from Wuhan to North American labs.
But, the error in the nature of the virus is made from it origins in bats, when ALL the genetic evidence demonstrates against this idea. Rather, SARS-COV-2 best matches another animal, much more precisely.
I used to think the virus was accidentally released…but, not any more.