Forum Replies Created
Bill in La Mesa said:
“So much of this study simply didn’t pass the sniff test, yet JAMA, CNN & the New York Times had a field day.”
In another post I mentioned how we are really behind enemy lines. This is a perfect example of what I was talking about.
We ought to no longer expect anything better from the “anti” side. And we need to live accordingly.
I am disappointed in most Docs. They have given me wrong advice and misdiagnosed conditions.
Most I know, even as friends, tend to be arrogant, lazy, self protective, narrow in thinking, and un- couragous. Mostly just paint-by-numbers white coats.
Sorry about that. But that is my experience. And in my immediate family there are three MD’s. My opinion holds for them as well.
Yep, B Hog, you nailed it. When they have to resort to drumming up non-news about the emerging “scariants” you know they are grasping at straws.
A quick look at the overall case and death curves tells the seasonal story. Game over.
For this season.
Now next season will be…next season! Flu? May be back. C19 could revisit. Scariant B.1.1.22 or whatever? Could happen. But like all viral situations in all of recorded medical history it too will come and will go.
So either fortify your personal/health terrain (as PP members here know how to do), or put your chin down, close your eyes, and run harder on your treadmill of fear and peril.
As to question #1 and #2 in the above post, recognize the truth of the political root and try to live outside the political system. Don’t let it effect you. It is pervasively around us, but know you are “behind enemy lines” so to speak. And then live accordingly.
As to “the REAL issue” questions at the end of the above post, I have already been under family, social, and commercial engagement pressure to cave in. My response has been to modify some family relationships, forego some commerce, and step aside from some organizations for a while, maybe a long while.
And example is the local ham radio club I belong to. They only allow “vaccinated” people to attend meetings. It is interesting they did not make the participation metric “immunity”. Instead they stipulate “vaccinated”. And by that they are missing issue on so many levels and revealing some very wrong thinking.
But myself and many others are immune for many reasons. None of which matter to that larger group. They have abandoned critical thinking and just go with vaccination non-sense.
Many of my family have taken the Moderna and Pfizer shots. Frankly, I am horrified that if the ADE/Pathogenic priming issue is even a fraction of what Cahill and Boosche suggest there might be some real tragedies in my family.
As far as government coercion, that has so far been pushed back with the law, since here in USA the vax is clearly, and technically, and under the EUA “experimental” and cannot be forced directly or by reduction of rights and public benefits or participation. But the authorities try. Vigilance is required. There are a number of legal activist organizations helping on this front.
Stay informed. And be supportive.
Tomorrow things may change. Turning to courts is only good when the “juridocracy” still respects the law. But that is also changing.
There may be a time when you might choose to not leave your homestead for quite a long time.
Well, I am not living in fear. Just patient prudence.
Just not in a rush to be a live animal test subject.
As viral curves go, soon getting the jab will make as much sense as buying tickets to last years Nut Cracker IMO.
I have similar thoughts. OK–Date is Sept 1, 2021.
That being said, I am not discounting some merit in the suggestion that the mRNA vac’s do not pose some sort of issue regarding ADE, innate system damage and similar issues not observed (admitted) in the initial trials.
And also noting 100 million jabs into the effort it seems preposterous to suggest that there are no terrible adverse reactions connected with the vaccines. NO product ever created can brag such a track record from a pool that large. I mean, not even Hank Aaron batted 1000 (oops, that was dark).
But seriously, I am suspicious of the manufacturers that continuously and completely dismiss any connection. After 100 million? On a new and partially tested product? Their thorough going shirk of all serious adverse reaction costs them creds in my mind.
So the way I see it, Vanden Boosche, Merritt, Tenpenny, Cahill etc might be onto something. Maybe not as doomsday as they suggest. So we will wait and see. That is what animal trials are all about. Right?
“They might have more intelligent Doctors” ???
Except that many trying to treat with IVM and the like are threatened with jail time.
Follow the Science, right?
Seasonal winter viral curve swinging up in the Southern Hemisphere might be the main driver on the bus.
Watch out (smug) New Zealand and bootjack Australia. You have little population immunity since you suppressed the spread with wrecking ball lockdowns. You might defer colliding with the virus, but you cannot hide from it forever.
You might have a tough go if it this winter which you are soon entering.
See the presentation of Dr Byram Bridle on this very topic.
Hmmmm. Thinking about this one. You might well be onto something. I have been looking into insulin issues via Ivor Cummins stuff. Read his book on the matter too. He is NOT a low salt proponent.
Will be interesting to see what else turns up.
That is a spot on accurate, measured, and sensible letter. I copied it for reference later. I hope you don’t mind if I steal some of your thoughts.