Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 113 total)
  • Author
    Posts
    • Thu, Aug 18, 2011 - 08:55pm

      #11
      Farmer Brown

      Farmer Brown

      Status Silver Member (Offline)

      Joined: Nov 23 2008

      Posts: 159

      count placeholder0

      T&T:  Great post – thanks

    T&T:  Great post – thanks for taking the time to write it. 

    Especially liked the very last sentence, even though this was far from the major point of discussion:

    [quote=timeandtide]. The whole carbon debate should really be about the energy equation rather than this endless red herring of anthropomorphic climate change.[/quote]

    • Wed, Aug 17, 2011 - 09:04pm

      #7
      Farmer Brown

      Farmer Brown

      Status Silver Member (Offline)

      Joined: Nov 23 2008

      Posts: 159

      count placeholder0

      JAG wrote:. I just wish he

    [quote=JAG]. I just wish he would clean up his website. I can’t make heads or tails out of it. Don’t make it so hard for me to give you my money Janszen.  [/quote]

     

    [quote=dgilmart]who can’t figure out Janzen’s website – i’ve been also fighting hard to give him money to get the subscription material! Quite a battle!

    [/quote]

    No kidding!  That website is a disaster.  Adam – is the good Doc willing to "rent you" out?  Maybe a good way to make some easy revenues for CM.  I bet you could clean that mess up in 1 night! 

     

    • Wed, Aug 17, 2011 - 08:58pm

      #6
      Farmer Brown

      Farmer Brown

      Status Silver Member (Offline)

      Joined: Nov 23 2008

      Posts: 159

      count placeholder0

      My oh my!  Quite a

    My oh my!  Quite a convincing article by Janszen. 

    I’ll be very interested in seeing Mish’s rebuttal. 

    I can already see one hole in Janszen’s argument, and that is that he completely pretends Japan does not exist.  I don’t think the name "Japan" even appears in the entire article and Japan is, well, THE case of deflation ocurring in a non-gold standard econom.  If he wants his argument to hold up, he really needs to address it.

    On the other hand, Mish has some ‘splainin’ to do. 

    Time to stock up on pop corn.

     

     

    • Wed, Aug 10, 2011 - 04:44pm

      #8
      Farmer Brown

      Farmer Brown

      Status Silver Member (Offline)

      Joined: Nov 23 2008

      Posts: 159

      count placeholder0

      Dogs_In_A_Pile wrote:eexpo

    [quote=Dogs_In_A_Pile]

    Truncated cone hollow points add a considerable error margin.[/quote]

    Yes they do!  Understatement of the year?

    What about this:  If you have to defend your dwelling or business from a mob, is it better to fire a few warning shots first, or to hell with warning shots and go ahead and aim?

    It seems killing someone could invite big time retribition, and against a mob, which later comes back armed, those are bad odds. 

    The fear of death may be a better way to stear a mob elsewhere, no? 

     

     

    • Wed, Aug 10, 2011 - 04:32pm

      #7
      Farmer Brown

      Farmer Brown

      Status Silver Member (Offline)

      Joined: Nov 23 2008

      Posts: 159

      count placeholder0

      Dogs_In_A_Pile wrote:eexpo

    [quote=Dogs_In_A_Pile]

    [quote=eexpo]Truncated cone hollow points add a considerable error margin.[/quote]

    Yes they do!  Understatement of the year?

    What about this:  If you have to defend your dwelling or business from a mob, is it better to fire a few warning shots first, or to hell with warning shots and go ahead and aim?

    It seems killing someone could invite big time retribition, and against a mob, which later comes back armed, those are bad odds. 

    The fear of death may be a better way to stear a mob elsewhere, no? 

     

     

    • Sat, Jul 23, 2011 - 12:25am

      #14
      Farmer Brown

      Farmer Brown

      Status Silver Member (Offline)

      Joined: Nov 23 2008

      Posts: 159

      count placeholder0

      Dogs_In_A_Pile wrote:As to

    [quote=Dogs_In_A_Pile]

    As to the program ending 10 years ago……my friend and Naval Academy classmate Willie McCool and the rest of his crew would probably agree with you.

    [/quote]

    Sorry about your friend, Dogs.  At least he died doing something he loved.  95% of people cannot say that. 

    JAG:  I don’t exactly hate the space program, I just hate the seemingly unqualified love for it that everyone seems to have, without any apparent regard to costs. Call me Grumpy.

    • Fri, Jul 22, 2011 - 08:52pm

      #10
      Farmer Brown

      Farmer Brown

      Status Silver Member (Offline)

      Joined: Nov 23 2008

      Posts: 159

      count placeholder0

      mobius wrote:Well, think

    [quote=mobius]

    Well, think back to the times when the program began and then picture a possible scene if NASA wasn’t involved.  I don’t think we woud be feeling very happy today having only cosmonauts looking down on us from the ISS, etc…[/quote]

    Based on what we now know about the USSR, it does not seem like they would have outlasted the US anyway.  Maybe they would have been gone even sooner.  If we had invested all those resources countering the USSR’s efforts here on Earth instead of on the Moon, who is to say what would have hapenned?

    [quote]Now, I believe that it is in human nature to have a "government" in society.  It has evolved out of the necessity to protect a group of people from outsiders and to exert a social control on the insiders.  It also tends to act in cycles and when too large without any balance of power, it will grow too large to fulfill its fundamental functions.  I think we are at this point right now.[/quote]

    We are in full agreement there!

    [quote]Actually, I’m quite sad because this "largess of government spending" was vital to trail-blasing work, which in turn stimulated the sciences (pure & applied) in education; that more than say the lonely inventor tinkering in his garage which would happend anyway.[/quote]

    There is plenty of research that shows that real trailblazing work and inventions occur during times of durress and scarcity, not times of excess.  As they say, necessity is the mother of invention.  I wouldn’t count on the government stimulating anything, except debt.  As for US public eductaion, it is among the worst in the developed world and is the worst in terms of $ spent per pupil (highest) compared with results achived (among the lowest).

    [quote]And on a last note {it’s all friendly} Farmer Brown, my life experience has convinced me not to over-estimate the masses ability to exercise free choice and make informed decisions. Enjoy the weekend.[/quote]

    Well, the public sure has elected some doosies, so I cannot argue with you there!  However, that does not take away anyone’s right over their own property.  If they want to waste it on stupid decisions, that’s up to them.  Likewise, they should not have the right to pass laws that tax me for arbitrary programs they think may be "beneficial". 

    Have a good weekend as well.

    • Fri, Jul 22, 2011 - 08:41pm

      #9
      Farmer Brown

      Farmer Brown

      Status Silver Member (Offline)

      Joined: Nov 23 2008

      Posts: 159

      count placeholder0

      nickbert wrote:Farmer

    [quote=nickbert]

    Farmer Brown-

    Are you talking about the Shuttle Program and manned spaceflight or the space program as a whole?  And are you really objecting to space science and travel, or just the fact there is government involvement in it?

    I won’t argue with you that government must fund the space program…. I personally find a space program to be a worthwhile endeavor (no big surprise there), but I wouldn’t force anyone to pay for it without their consent.  I also will go so far as agreeing that Shuttle Program is unsustainable and inefficient, but that is more a matter of problems in the design process (losing sight of the purpose and requirements) and especially the interference of politics.  But as the link ehood showed, you can’t say there wasn’t at least some benefit realized from the space program!  And not all benefits come in the form of a monetary profit, nor should they.  How much more shallow would the world be if everything we did was only profit-motivated?  We wouldn’t likely have astronomy, art, or cures for some diseases…. instead we’d only have things like marketing research, pornography, and erection pills .

    [/quote]

    I’m talking about the entire space program/NASA.  It’s a giant sink hole.  You cannot say what would have happened if we hadn’t funded it in the first place, because all the resources not consumed by the space program would have been used for other things, with different and quite possibly more or quite possibly less beneficial results.  It is impossible to say if the world would be better or worse because we cannot go back in time and run the experiment.  What can be said is that the choice of what to do with the resources would have been made by the individuals who rightfuly owned them, not government bureaucrats, be they astronauts or not. 

    I am baffled with America’s love affair with the space program.  It reminds me exactly of the pyramids.  I guess we don’t know if the pyramids were built by slaves or if a theocratic social structure evolved wherebye they were built out of "love".  Either way, a lot of people spent a lot of time and resources building something with few benefits.  Europe is also literred with awe-inspiring works from hundred or thousands of years ago, mostly palaces and cathedrals but also a few water works and bridges here and there.  For the most part, these were also built by slaves, though the king who ruled them is credited. 

    And no, I am not saying that anything not-profit-driven is bad, not at all!  There are inumerable non-profit driven endeavors that are fundamental to life (or at least a worthwhile life IMO), but none of the ones I can think of require taxes to pay for them, nor should they!  Most of them, in fact, don’t even cost any money!

    I just don’t understand why anyone is sad over the end of the space shuttle era.  There are easier, more efficient ways to get payloads into space and they’ve been around for quite some time.  The program should have ended at least 10 years ago. 

    • Fri, Jul 22, 2011 - 05:52pm

      #6
      Farmer Brown

      Farmer Brown

      Status Silver Member (Offline)

      Joined: Nov 23 2008

      Posts: 159

      count placeholder0

      ehood wrote:Benefits of the

    [quote=ehood]

    Benefits of the Space Program:

    How does NASA technology affect your life? The benefits of America’s space program can be found just about everywhere! This Web site provides a down-to-Earth look at what the space program has done for you, your neighbors, America and the world. Explore these pages and feel at home with NASA technology!

    http://techtran.msfc.nasa.gov/at_home.html

    I have lived on the space coast for a short time and heard the last double sonic boom and also saw the last shuttle launch. I’m almost 60-years old and have seen a few things in my life time. Never worked for NASA but have been to the visitor center. Once you stand next to one of the rockets that helped transports something like the shuttle into space you can never comprehend the magnatiude of such an effort.  To say the U.S. Space Program is a total waste is simple not true. I’m sure the people who dedicated their careers to the effort and lost their lives for it don’t consider it a waste nor the the entire labor force that helped make space travel happen[/quote]

    Are those benefits worth the cost?  I’m sure the people who dedicated their lives (in some cases literally) do not consider it a waste either.  But that is because they chose those careers.  The everyday taxpayer has little or no choice.  You can try to convince him the program is worth it, but in the end, there is no choice in the matter, so what’s the point?

    Like I said, it is an awe-inspiring incredible achievement; a testament to the capabilities of man; achieved through the extortion of money from law abiding citizens by brute force, who could have otherwise done something of their own choosing with that property.

    • Thu, Jul 21, 2011 - 08:52pm

      #2
      Farmer Brown

      Farmer Brown

      Status Silver Member (Offline)

      Joined: Nov 23 2008

      Posts: 159

      count placeholder0

      mobius wrote:Good evening

    [quote=mobius]

    Good evening folks,

    Atlantis landed today concluding the  30-some years of (more) sustainable space flight.[/quote]

    What, exactly, has been "sustainable" about it?  Energy and resource-wise, there is of course nothing sustainable about it. 

    In terms of finances, there is nothing sustainable about it either.  Has the space program every turned a profit?  In my opinion, the space program is mostly a giant waste of money.  I would be happy about the "end" if only it really were.  Instead, they’re going to blow billions of dollars going to Mars and who knows where else. 

    The space program is the modern-day equivalent of the pyramids:  incredible, amazing work, awe-inspiring work… all built on the backs of slaves, with the modern-day slave being the ordinary tax payer. 

     

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 113 total)