Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 56 total)
  • Author
    Posts
    • Mon, Nov 02, 2020 - 04:01pm

      #18
      2retired

      2retired

      Status Bronze Member (Offline)

      Joined: Jul 20 2020

      Posts: 174

      count placeholder1

      Hydroxychloroquine Controversy

    As part (in my former life) of my usual series of pre-op questions. (ever been in Hospital, any medical problems?), I once had a lady reply that she had had an episode of kidney stones, BUT there was some extra ‘something’ in the reply, which made me ask what kind of stones? the embarrassment increased and, after a long pause, she said hesitantly, Vit C stones. I asked somewhat incredulously, how much were you taking? the embarrassed answer was 12 grams a day! So, more Vit C, is not always better. Following the proper dosage is usually best.

    • Tue, Oct 20, 2020 - 08:25pm

      #3
      2retired

      2retired

      Status Bronze Member (Offline)

      Joined: Jul 20 2020

      Posts: 174

      count placeholder4

      POWERFUL: Coronavirus White Coats Summit 2 (Oct 16-17)

    There is a lot of cross talk with respect to masks, and a current of absolutism about beliefs. A lot of people are partly right and partly wrong; I ‘believe’ masks are a benefit, as much as for the behaviour that goes with them. To be 95%  effective (N95 masks) in preventing any transmission; they have to be properly fitted and sized (rarely done outside an infectious disease unit) and are quite uncomfortable to wear for any period of time. Wearing a mask without (strict) good practice and routine is marginally benefial, and may only function to keep ones hands away from your face. Wearing it the way most politicians are seen, eg. not fitted around nose, nose showing, loose around neck, taking it on and off; it is for show only. Cloth masks commonly seen are comfortable to wear and pretty ineffective (goes with the comfort). If you keep some distance, outside, or with good ventilation, any ill fitting (or cloth) mask is probably just virtue signaling. If properly worn, they may reduce your inoculum if you meet a spreader, so I am for wearing one around strangers and crowds (as I am considered high risk). Having had a career in the OR, and ultimate responsibility for any breaches in aseptic technique, I feel there is more to be gained with education about mask wearing than enforcement of mask adornment.

    • Sat, Oct 17, 2020 - 12:13pm

      #9
      2retired

      2retired

      Status Bronze Member (Offline)

      Joined: Jul 20 2020

      Posts: 174

      count placeholder1

      mercury and the mad hatter

    The video on acute mercury poisoning is interesting, but neglected to note that the mercury vapour is highly toxic and needs to be handled under a fume hood (not mentioned) so 2 drops on a glove (if latex there is no protective value, or nitrile effective if no holes and good quality gloves (not the bulk pack)). so my guess , with the omissions mentioned, it was acute, on chronic exposure, toxicity. The validity of the presentation is limited.

    • Thu, Oct 15, 2020 - 05:04pm

      #5
      2retired

      2retired

      Status Bronze Member (Offline)

      Joined: Jul 20 2020

      Posts: 174

      count placeholder3

      Reply To: Scientific consensus on COVID-19

    If it is science, it is not consensus; if it is consensus, it is not science

    • Wed, Oct 14, 2020 - 01:07pm

      #8
      2retired

      2retired

      Status Bronze Member (Offline)

      Joined: Jul 20 2020

      Posts: 174

      count placeholder1

      You’d think it was Treblinka.

    A video from early in the year suggesting that delaying reaching herd immunity just results in more deaths and sickness by prolonging the transmission in the population, as well as collateral damage; now censored by YouTube. How accurate he was.

    • Sun, Oct 11, 2020 - 09:42am

      #5
      2retired

      2retired

      Status Bronze Member (Offline)

      Joined: Jul 20 2020

      Posts: 174

      count placeholder0

      This just in

    Polio was a really big issue in the early and mid 50’s, now it isn’t; that’s a big change, whooping cough, smallpox and more, have faded from our memories. There are are lots of more plausible explanations for the change in autism incidence, including using the diagnosis as a label. Many a FLK (funny looking kid) of my youth would now have a label. To paraphrase Malcom Gladwell: we all love beauty, and beautiful presentations, and beautiful prose, and seamless  eloquent presentations…….but it doesn’t make any of it true.

    • Sun, Oct 11, 2020 - 08:41am

      #3
      2retired

      2retired

      Status Bronze Member (Offline)

      Joined: Jul 20 2020

      Posts: 174

      count placeholder0

      This just in

    The tragedy is the vaccines that benefited children in the 1950’s and 60’s, and being lumped together with (and their marginal benefits) flu vaccine now being pushed (for profit). This report is a little too all encompassing, and includes some iffy hyperbole on Autism, which for me debases it.

    • Sun, Oct 04, 2020 - 05:49pm

      #2
      2retired

      2retired

      Status Bronze Member (Offline)

      Joined: Jul 20 2020

      Posts: 174

      count placeholder0

      Nuremberg hold the Mayo

    It is a huge story if true. It does put the puzzle into better shape; with the increased vulnerability of a populations that had high levels of flu vaccination

    • Wed, Sep 30, 2020 - 01:12pm

      #2
      2retired

      2retired

      Status Bronze Member (Offline)

      Joined: Jul 20 2020

      Posts: 174

      count placeholder4

      To Surgery or NOT To Surgery.. that is the question

    For the 40 years I practiced surgery (statistically a high volume practice and statistically lower than expected complication rate) Hcq would not have entered into a decision balance. People however routinely did not tell the whole truth about their medications, behaviour, or weaknesses, (often amusing on occasion, when being asked again, in an oddball way).

    • Fri, Sep 18, 2020 - 03:03pm

      #29
      2retired

      2retired

      Status Bronze Member (Offline)

      Joined: Jul 20 2020

      Posts: 174

      count placeholder0

      Climate science denier appointed to top position at NOAA

    Not to forget, the chief cheerleader of global warming Micheal Mann, was called a fraud, sued for libel, lost, and had to pay costs(https://principia-scientific.org/breaking-key-un-climate-fraudster-makes-concessions-tim-ball-lawsuit/). There are several hundred years of oil and gas in Alberta, and more in the arctic (at a slightly higher price). which should allow time for innovation, which is driven by price. Even if European prices for gas come to the US in the very near future, it may create conservation and better energy habits for a long time before anything runs out.

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 56 total)