Investing in Precious Metals 101 Ad

Re: The Hubris Of Empire

  • Sun, Oct 31, 2010 - 08:35am

    #119
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder

    Re: The Hubris Of Empire

[quote=Farmer Brown]

Who cares how long they’ve been around? Does that make them right about wiping Israel off the map? And, you cannot equivocate the rantings and ravings of a lunatic in a members-only jacket (if it was only the straight-jacket model I’d be thrilled) whose hold on power is at the barrel of a gun (well, and the ordainment of a lunatic mullah or two) with the the desires and wishes of the citizens of Iran.  If they were an established democratic regime, I would agree with letting them have the bomb but they are not.  Democracies do not go to war with each other.  Lunatics not only do so, but they depend on it in order t keep a “bigger monkey” on their subjects backs.  As for the US being the only country to have used nuclear weapons, what’s your point?  It was in self defense, or did you forget the Japanese attacked the US first?  Did you also forget that estimates for invading Japan surmounted 1,000,000 US troops and who knows who many Japanese?  Quite frankly, we probably did them a favor as much as we did ourselves one.

[/quote]

Patrick,

No offence, but the line that I’ve darkened above is a phrase that has been force fed into the minds of the people of the United States since it was misquoted and run with over four years ago now. It was formed by the usual multi-media culprits. Whenever I see this misquote, I do my best to educate how it came about. This video below is correct in every way : –

Hunt down this book by Noam Chomsky called What We Say Goes, and read the sections on Iran. From the original democracy that brought Mosaddegh to power in 1951, through to his subsequent fall by intervention of the CIA with a coup de etat, what is evolving politically today has its roots firmly established in the past. What happens next in Iran is a continuing series of blow-backs, as a cause and effect that was begun by the United Kingdom, and the United States.

I leave you with the words of the then Prime Minister, Mohammed Mosaddegh, on the 21st of June 1951, and ask whether there is more to compare the past with the present than that which is promoted to our nation’s today, who’s people today, and without thought and study of their own, have more belief in the facts that are filtered daily into their homes by the box in their living-rooms; as proof by the lack of viable and relevant reading material on their empty book-shelves.

[quote=Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddegh]

“Our long years of negotiations with foreign countries… have yielded no results this far. With the oil revenues we could meet our entire budget and combat poverty, disease, and backwardness among our people. Another important consideration is that by the elimination of the power of the British company, we would also eliminate corruption and intrigue, by means of which the internal affairs of our country have been influenced. Once this tutelage has ceased, Iran will have achieved its economic and political independence.
The Iranian state prefers to take over the production of petroleum itself. The company should do nothing else but return its property to the rightful owners. The nationalization law provide that 25% of the net profits on oil be set aside to meet all the legitimate claims of the company for compensation…
It has been asserted abroad that Iran intends to expel the foreign oil experts from the country and then shut down oil installations. Not only is this allegation absurd; it is utter invention…

[/quote]

~ VF ~