Re: The Complete Idiot’s Guide to the New World Order
Sam, the destruction seen in hundreds of videos and still photos shows explosive demolition with dust and debris violently ejected both to the sides and upward. This is not a gravity based collapse. A gravity collapse with failure at point on impact would have resulted in the upper portion of the tower settling on the lower and then falling off as an intact body. It could never have destroyed the lower portion – a physical impossibility. Concrete does not turn to dust from a gravity based impact. It is believed that final preparations were made over the summer when elevators, power cables, and fire systems were being repaired. A multitude of eyewitness described powerful explosions before and during the collapse including many police and firefighters. This page describes a reasonable hypothesis for how the destruction was accomplished:
While your question "how could the charges have been set?" is a reasonable one, when you consider that the official story is a physical impossiblity and that the pictures and video and eywitness accounts describe something completely different, your question does not constitute refutation of physical laws and evidence.