Re: The Complete Idiot’s Guide to the New World Order
Fellas, have you heard of the mafia? Insiders don’t spill the beans…does that mean it doesn’t exist? There’s no smoking gun that ever pointed to the top guys in the past…does it exist? RICO codifies conspiracy…why would we need laws if conspiracies don’t exist? Yet a certain Bush look proves to you that he knew about 9/11? If he knew about it, there must be a lot of people on his team that knew. Why do you believe they can keep a secret, but others can’t?
I used to think 9/11 conspiracists were idiots that just wanted to bring down Bush. I thought they were psychologically deranged individuals. Then the stuff I saw being done by Bush and Obama on this economic collapse was such an obvious raping of the people with the media playing us as total fools (because they’re also fools willing to listen to official govt versions of the story instead of doing hard investigation) that I had to consider that my old worldview was wrong. I have since learned about the conspiracy behind the Fed Reserve and other reserve banks. Massive massive conspiracy and look at how many years/decades the conspiracy has been kept quiet…a few people knew, but the masses still don’t know. And this led me to checking out 9/11 too. Have you ever taken the time to at least consider the evidence? There’s an MIT engineer that gives a scientifically-based presentation similar to the crash course. I don’t 100% accept the conspiracy option yet, but I don’t 100% believe the simple media version either. The evidence leans more than 50/50 toward something else. But no investigation is allowed. Evidence was destroyed. People on the other side are immediately written off as nutjobs…ad hominem attack is an effective way of distracting people from the real issue.
Mike, you list the impact, the explosions, the fuel burning as proof that the version of 9/11 we saw on TV is all that occurred. Hmm. Not the type of analysis the CM site is known for. I could list many more than 3 things in a sentence that suggest a conspiracy. But to quickly consider the things you list: 1) other buildings have been impacted by aircraft without falling, and building 7 wasn’t impacted at all…fell just like the towers, 2) the explosions people reported on the ground floors and mid-level floors are actually indications of planned demolition not evidence supporting the popular version, 3) airplane fuel burns at low temperature that engineers say is too low to melt steel.
Not trying to start a fight. Just hoping CM members make decisions based on solid evidence.
I usually find your posts quite interesting and informative. Certainly no one of any intelligence denies that conspiracies do exist in the world – always have, always will. The plot to kill Caesar was a conspiracy; the many plots to kill Hitler were conspiracies.
And this led me to checking out 9/11 too. Have you ever taken the time
to at least consider the evidence? There’s an MIT engineer that gives
a scientifically-based presentation similar to the crash course.
However, re 911 explosions, please explain how you can get around my simple reply to CB in post # 21. Enquiring minds want to know!