Podcast

ssguy/Shutterstock

Former CIA Director: We're Not Doing Nearly Enough To Protect Against The EMP Threat

It's a BIG risk. And we're doing little about it.
Sunday, June 7, 2015, 10:33 AM

On Monday we covered the release of an open letter written to President Obama, issued by a committee of notable political, security and defense experts  -- which includes past and present members of Congress, ambassadors, CIA directors, and others -- on the country's concerning level of vulnerability to a natural or man-made Electro-Magnetic Pulse (EMP).

An EMP has very real potential for crippling much of our electrical grid instantaneously. Not only would that immediately throw the social order into chaos, but the timeline to repair and restart the grid in most estimated scenarios would take months to a year or more. Those curious on learning exactly how devastating an EMP can be can read our report on the topic from last summer.

This week, we've been fortunate enough to get several of the authors of that open letter to join us and explain in depth what they conclude needs to be done to protect against the EMP risk: former CIA Director and current Ambassador James Woolsey, Executive Director of the EMP Task Force Dr Peter Pry, and security industry entrepreneur Jen Bawden.

What's frightening in this story is not just the carnage an EMP could wreak, but the apparent rabid intransigence with which the electrical power lobby is fighting any responsibility for defending against one:

Chris Martenson:   Now, we’ve had a commission to assess the threat to the United States from an EMP attack, which delivered a report back in 2008. In fact, I found no less than two congressional commissions, a National Academy of Science report, other U.S. government sponsored studies, including your own. All have raised heightened concerns about this issue. All have found, all of them, that the EMP threat poses a significant and existential threat to the United States, and yet here we are still talking about this. Why is that?

Dr. Pry:   Well, the short answer to that is it’s called the North American Electric Reliability Corporation. They used to be a trade association or a lobby for the 3,000 electric utilities that exist in this country. And, their relationship with the federal government, with the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, is a 19th century-type relationship. There is no part of the U.S. government that has the legal powers to order them to protect the grid. This is unusual, because in the case of every other critical infrastructure, there’s an agency in the U.S. government that can require them to take actions for public safety. For example, the Food & Drug Administration can order certain medicines kept off shelves to protect the public safety. The Federal Aviation Administration can ground aircraft and require protective devices, put locks on aircraft doors, for example, to protect people from having the aircrafts hijacked by terrorists.The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission doesn’t have those legal powers or authorities.

And, the NERC, which owns half of K Street and has got very deep pockets, has been successful in lobbying against legislation like the Grid Act and the SHIELD Act, both bipartisan bills supported almost unanimously by Democrats and Republicans. They’ve been able to stall for years and keep these bills held up. One time when we got a bill passed: the Grid Act actually, in 2010, unanimously passed the House. Everybody supported it. But Washington is so broken, one senator put a hold on a bill—if they know which senator to buy, they can buy that one senator and the person can put a hold on the bill so it can’t come to the floor for a vote and they can do it anonymously. The senator doesn’t have to identify themselves. So, you never know who stopped the bill.

And, that’s been the problem in Washington. We’ve been trying to overcome resistance by the electric power lobby to try to protect the grid. 

They’ve basically been successful in stymying efforts at the federal level. Now, we’ve got another bill, Critical Infrastructure Protection Act, that we’re hoping will pass this year. Again, we’ve got a lot of support, but it’s already under attack by the utilities. And, they’re trying to change the language of the bill to basically gut the bill.

Ambassador Woolsey:  And, when NERC is studying a problem, it doesn’t exactly operate at breakneck speed. After the ’03 outage in Cleveland that started with a tree branch touching a power line and took out the electricity for several days of Eastern Canada and much of the northeastern United States, NERC was finally prevailed upon to do a study. And, they did one and focused entirely on how to cut tree branches so that they won’t interfere with electric power lines. And, that tree branch study took them three years and eight months. What’s interesting about that lapse of time is three years and eight months is exactly the amount of time the United States was engaged in World War II, from beginning to end. So, one wonders how many wars worth of time it would take NERC to deal with a more complicated problem such as say, squirrels.

Chris Martenson:  I understand that NERC is against this and they think this is overbearing regulation and they don’t want to be more highly regulated. I think possibly understandable concerns from any industry, but in this case, what kind of money are we talking about here? How much would it take to really begin to remedy this issue and how much time would it take? What is NERC fighting here?

Dr. Pry:  Sure. Interesting question, because there are different numbers, depending upon how much security you want to buy. One of my colleagues on the, who served on the EMP Commission, had a plan that would cost $200 million. That’s not billions, but millions with an ‘m’. Now, that would be a very minimalist plan, and it would just protect the extra high voltage transformers that service the major metropolitan areas. It would by no means—we would still be at a very high level of risk, but it would at least give us something like a fighting chance to save all those people in the big cities, in the hundred largest big cities from starving to death, if you just invested $200 million. 

At this point, as I recently testified to Congress, I think the U.S. FERC is so broken and untrustworthy that we probably need to scrap the regulatory system we’ve got now and go to something completely different. I think what you’ve got is a situation of what’s called regulatory capture. You’ve got a rotating door between FERC and NERC and these guys are basically in cahoots with the electric power industry .

Click the play button below to listen to Chris' interview with Dr. Peter Pry, Jen Bawden, and Ambassador James Woolsey (48m:35s)

Transcript: 

Chris Martenson: Welcome to this Peak Prosperity podcast. I am your host, Chris Martenson. And, for several years, we’ve been writing about electromagnetic pulse or EMP events and the threats they pose. As you know, we’ve interviewed NASA scientists, we’ve written reports, we’ve held podcasts describing these possible events and what might happen should one occur. Well, today, we’ve got three top level and highly experienced people to help us understand both the threat the United States faces from an EMP, and what still needs to be done to reduce that threat.

Well, I will let each person introduce themselves more fully. Today, we have with us, Dr. Peter Pry, Executive Director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security. Welcome, Dr. Pry.

Dr. Pry: Thank you.

Chris Martenson: And, we’ve got Ambassador James Woolsey, a national security and energy specialist and former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency from February ’93 to January of ’95. Welcome, Ambassador Woolsey.

Ambassador Woolsey: Thanks. Good to be with you.

Chris Martenson: And, we’ve got Jen Bawden, a serial social entrepreneur who is passionate about disruptive technologies with a decade of experience in homeland security technology solutions, and whom I’ve had the pleasure of knowing personally since 2009. Welcome, Jen.

Jen Bawden: Thank you, Chris.

Chris Martenson: Well, along with a host of other notable players, our three guests sit on a Homeland Security EMP task force, which has recently penned a letter to President Obama seeking more focus and specific actions on what many term an existential threat. So, Dr. Pry, starting with you, could you please provide us with a bit more of your background and experience?

Dr. Pry: Sure. I worked at the CIA on these issues, on nuclear weapons and strategy with a specialty in AMT, including under Jim, who I consider to be the best CIA director we ever had. Worked on these issues for the House Armed Services Committee, looking for solutions. I served on the Congressional EMP Commission, which was stood up by the Congress to try to come up with a plan to protect the country. And, we did come up with a plan. And, since then, I’ve been the Executive Director of the EMP Task Force, which is a congressional advisory board, where we’re trying to find ways to get this problem solved, and hopefully on an accelerated basis.

Chris Martenson: Well, also, Dr. Pry, to you, and with a nod towards those who may not be familiar with an EMP, or why it could be a threat, could you please tell, what are these things and what do we really need to know about them?

Dr. Pry: Well, an electromagnetic pulse can be caused by a nuclear weapon detonated at high altitude, for example, 200 kilometers over the center of the country. That would be so high that you wouldn’t even know that the nuclear weapon was going off. You wouldn’t hear it, you might not see it on a cloudy day, there’d be no blast or fallout effects. The one thing it would do is create an EMP, which is a super energetic radio wave that’s got so much energy in it that it would fry electronics across the whole continental United States, and cause the collapse of the power grid, burn out big transformers that are very hard to replace, very difficult to replace, and cause a protracted blackout across the whole country that could last years.

The Congressional EMP Commission in which I serve, estimated that given a year-long blackout, up to 90% of the American population could die from starvation, disease and societal collapse. This, by the way, is why Iran wants the bomb. They actually write about this scenario. So does North Korea. And, China and Russia also have contingency plans.

It actually gets worse. This can cause an EMP; Mother Nature can cause it. And, in fact, a great geomagnetic storm like the 1859 Carrington Event is inevitable. We were narrowly missed by such a storm just three years ago, and NASA estimates the likelihood is 12% per year that a nature-caused EMP will happen. That means our lifetimes and that of our children, we will almost certainly experience a natural EMP that could collapse electric grids, not just in the United States, but all over the world.

And, last, a lunatic or a criminal or a madman, through non-nuclear EMP devices or weapons—you can even build one using design information available on the Internet. Now, these don’t cause a nation-wide kind of an EMP field that would collapse electric grids across the whole country, but we’ve arrived at a place for the first time in history that someone armed with one of these small, manned portable radio frequency weapons could topple the technological pillars of civilization for a major metropolitan area. And, you don’t even have to build them. There are actually devices that are not intended to be used as EMP weapons, but could be. You could actually buy them, and you don’t even need a license. And, in effect, the people who are selling them don’t know that they’re selling a weapon of mass destruction.

Chris Martenson: Well, fascinating. I did not know about that angle at all. So, that’s certainly something to look towards. And, what I’m interested in is finding out, of course, what we can do about this.

Mr. Woolsey, Ambassador Woolsey, excuse me—also starting with a bit more about your background and experience, start there, and then tell us what sorts of things might happen. I would like to know more about what might happen if we lost a significant portion of the grid in our country, if that might last years, as I just heard, but what would happen if it even lasted a month? So, again, starting with a little more about yourself, and then onto that question, please.

Ambassador Woolsey: Well, I practiced law for 22 years here in Washington, focusing on litigation, especially arbitration dealing with technical conflicts and issues. And, then I was in the U.S. government for 12 on four different occasions, and actually, five. And, participated four times in negotiations with the Soviets and once with the Warsaw Pact as a whole, on weapons systems, mainly strategic, but the last time, in ’91, I was the Ambassador and Chief Negotiator for the conventional forces in a Europe treaty that would still be in effect if we hadn’t have walked out on it. I have been consulting for about the last 12 years, working on especially energy and national security issues as they relate to one another.

And, I am especially concerned about electromagnetic pulse and both the natural variety, which could be devastating enough, but especially from Iran and North Korea. It’s very troubling that both China and Russia have nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles capable of getting them into space, into orbit. But, it’s even more troubling that North Korea already has such. And Iran could, within a year or two or three. Any country that has a ballistic missile that can get something into orbit—and 45 countries or so have Scuds, for example, they would work just fine—and has a nuclear weapon, even a very primitive one, can detonate it in orbit over a target and, as Peter said, the target may never know. And, the only thing it knows is that all its electronics all of sudden get fried at the same moment.

We have 18 critical infrastructures in the U.S—food, water, medicine, telecommunication, etc. And, as Peter said, and the reason the forecast of fatalities in the event of an EMP attack is so huge is because all 17 of the other infrastructures depend on electricity to operate. So, if the lights go out, it’s not just the lights, it’s the fuel pumps, it’s the water purification, it’s food transportation, it’s pretty much everything that makes us a 20th century society. And, very few of us have enough hand water pumps to get through and live in the 19th century. This is a really terrible prospect and one that the North Koreans and the Iranians, as well as the Russians and Chinese are fully aware of the opportunity for use or threatened use of something like this.

Chris Martenson: Now, Ambassador Woolsey, in researching this, I found a number of critics who said that, “Well, you know, we have limited experience with really knowing what an EMP might or might not do, of the nuclear sort bouncing off the ionosphere.” Do we really have the data to know what kind of a threat we’re dealing with here?

Ambassador Woolsey: Thank God we don’t have the experience, because if we did, it would’ve fried our electronics. There were several tests in the early 1960s, just before the atmospheric test ban took effect, in which the U.S. and the Soviets detonated nuclear weapons at high altitudes. And, both were extremely surprised at the ability for some of the early non-vacuum tube electronics, how they would be fried at distances—thousands of miles. And, the problem is that the electronics of that age are about a thousand times less capable than the electronics—I’m sorry, a billion times less capable than the electronics that we have today. But, today’s electronics are not only a billion times more capable, they’re a billion times more vulnerable.

So, we happily will not, I hope, see a nuclear weapon detonated on orbit, so that these people who are skeptical can see through dimmed eyes, since all the lights will have gone out, what the result would be of an electromagnetic detonation at substantial altitude. But, of all the foolish concerns, not to believe the distinguished physicists and scientists that work with Peter and others in the National Academy of Sciences’ study of EMP and in the EMP Commission’s work and the congressional commissions’ work—not to believe all of those and say, “Well, we don’t have any direct experience with EMP bursts at very high altitude,” means you don’t have experience with the destruction of the infrastructure of major parts of the earth. Thank God.

Chris Martenson: Well, on the plus side, I’ve heard that regret goes well with candlelight. So, perhaps they will be able to…

Ambassador Woolsey: Right.

Dr. Pry: Could I add to Ambassador Woolsey’s comment?

Chris Martenson: Peter, please do.

Dr. Pry: Yes, we actually do have excellent empirical evidence. And, that is, or I should say, the Russians have it. Our test was conducted over the Pacific Ocean, and we have information, of course, from Hawaii. But, after the Russians learned about EMP, when they knew it, initially, they were surprised by it when they did their tests over Novaya Zemlya in the Arctic Ocean. But, then they deliberately conducted EMP attack, the Evil Empire, rightly called, conducted EMP tests, high altitude EMP tests over their own country, over Kazakhstan, an area the size of Western Europe, and deliberately destroyed and then reconstructed their own critical infrastructures. So, they’ve actually got the best data in the world on what you can do. And, they released some of that data from one of their least effective tests, and the consequences were catastrophic against the electric grids in Kazakhstan, which was a highly industrialized country at the time.

The _____ [00:12:40] need to detonate a nuclear weapon. We have EMP simulators and we have 50 years of data from the EMP simulators as well that gives us very high confidence in what would happen. And, finally, the EMP Commission in which I serve, it wasn’t a paper commission. We actually were the last body that did extensive analysis and went back and we put modern electronics into EMP simulators and fried them to verify what Jim Woolsey was just saying about how our modern electronics are millions of times more vulnerable than the vacuum tube-type technologies that existed in the ‘60s.

So, this isn’t a speculation. This is based on solid science, and it’s a much more certain threat than global warming or even cyber-attacks. We have more of an empirical basis for this threat than we do for those others.

Chris Martenson: Well, you say 12% a year and if that was a Wall Street option I could buy, I’d take that. That’s a very clear and obvious threat. Jen Bawden, so great to have you on. Hey, please tell us a bit more about your background and experience.

Jen Bawden: Well, I’ve been a serial social entrepreneur. I helped build with the Department of Energy and Homeland Security an anti-terrorism technology company. It was funded by the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, DNDO, and we were developing and deploying innovative technologies to protect America’s infrastructure from radiological and nuclear attack. So, we were trying to make sure that no nuclear weapons were being smuggled through the ports and borders in the cargo containers. So, that’s how I came to learn about this threat, and of course, I was very shocked and concerned a number of years ago when I recognized that nobody was really doing anything to help the cause. So, I joined the EMP warriors, Jim and Peter, to try to do whatever I could to make a difference.

Chris Martenson: Well, thank you for that. And, I did read the letter that I alluded to before. And, so this is a letter to Obama. The EMP threat is described as potentially catastrophic and even as an existential threat. Well, those are big, loaded words. Were those just a device to catch a busy president’s attention:

Jen Bawden: No, I think we could’ve used words that were a lot bigger than that, Chris. I think it is, it’s a category killer if you’d like to call it that. It took hundreds of years to build American and it would take one minute to destroy it. So, I truly believe that we’re custodians of this great country and our first priority must be to protect it. And, right now, there is no protection for our grid. And, as Jim and Peter have explained, this could happen at any time and almost has happened. There’s been a number of, I would say near misses and attacks, which I’m sure that we’ll talk about further in this program. But, when you look at the big black swans that we’re trying to protect ourselves against, and to know that we have no protection against protecting our grid, which is really, I would say, the worst thing that could happen to us, it’s just—it’s unbelievable to me.

Chris Martenson: Well, here’s where I’m surprised, too, because I can’t think of anything more essential than electricity. You take that out, hospitals go down, food systems go down, we can’t refine fuels, like everything stops. And, so I look at that and I am shocked by the lack of hardness that exists in our grid at this particular stage. You know what really caught my attention, was it 2010, maybe 2011, I can’t remember, but the San Jose transformer shootings were…

Jen Bawden: Exactly.

Chris Martenson: …were really quite eye-opening and we studied those quite a bit at my site and analyzed those. And, they looked like the works of professionals. I don’t know who they were or what sort of demands were made. I assume some were made, but they were kept completely out of the public sphere. But, those just showed that you could take out a pretty major substation with pretty minimal effort, with using literally 18th century technology, if you consider a rifle born in that century. And, still to this day, I don’t see anything has particularly happened in the transformers and substations I drive past. To me, is it unfair for me to look at that and say that same level of concern that I don’t see being applied to substations currently, that that’s just indicative of how this whole issue is being treated right now?

Jen Bawden: Absolutely. I’d like to mention that—think about not just the substations, but think about the nuclear stations, that’s when it really gets heavy-duty scary. Think about the fact that if the grid went down, now many of those nuclear stations would be able to shut off. When you also look at the fact that the former chairman of the U.S. agency responsible for grid security and the U.S. Navy Seals warned that Metcalf is probably a dry run for future large-scale attacks on the national grid. So, we’ve got—and, I think another interesting thing to mention is that we had the north, well, we had in July 2013, a North Korean freighter was discovered in the Gulf of Mexico and coming through the Panama Canal. And, they decided to check it for illegal drugs and they found two nuclear capable SA-2 missiles mounted, missile mounts for a launcher hidden in the hold, so under a bunch of bags of sugar. Peter can tell you more about that, but that, to me, was also very scary.

Ambassador Woolsey: One thing to pay attention to when you’re looking at terrorist activities is anniversaries. Benghazi was on 9/11. There are _____ [00:18:33] this year. There are a number of circumstances in which there seems to be a substantial amount of attention paid, particularly by Al-Qaeda-like organizations, to anniversaries. And, one that is interesting is Metcalf occurred on the anniversary of the American Revolution. It was one day off because of a holiday in Boston and a marathon at the same time and so forth. But, 18th of April, 1775, was Lexington and Concord, the beginning of the American Revolution. And, I think that one wants to, when you’re trying to decide whether something was just a random bunch of thugs, which is what all the law enforcement people except the woman sheriff of the county where Metcalf is, thought that this was just a bunch of thugs and they didn’t need to pay any attention to it. Look for anniversaries. If there’s an important patriotic anniversary for the United States in there, it’s probably somebody’s plotting it.

Chris Martenson: Now, we’ve had a commission to assess the threat to the United States from an EMP attack, which delivered a report back in 2008. In fact, I found no less than two congressional commissions, a National Academy of Science report, other U.S. government sponsored studies, including your own, have raised heightened concerns about this issue. All have found, all of them, that the EMP threat poses a significant and existential threat to the United States, and yet here we are still talking about this. Starting with you, Dr. Pry, why is that?

Dr. Pry: Why are we just talking about it and why hasn’t the problem been fixed?

Chris Martenson: Yes.

Dr. Pry: Okay. Well, the short answer to that is it’s called the North American Electric Reliability Corporation. They are basically the representative—they used to be a trade association or a lobby for the 3,000 electric utilities that exist in this country. And, their relationship with the federal government, basically, the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, is a 19th century-type relationship. There is no part of the U.S. government that has the legal powers to order them to protect the grid. This is unusual, because in the case of every other critical infrastructure, there’s an agency in the U.S. government that can require them to take actions for public safety. For example, the Food & Drug Administration can order certain medicines kept off shelves to protect the public safety. The Federal Aviation Administration can ground aircraft and require protective devices, put locks on aircraft doors, for example, to protect people from having the aircrafts hijacked by terrorists.

The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission doesn’t have those legal powers or authorities. And, the NERC, which owns half of K Street and has got very deep pockets, has been successful in lobbying against legislation like the Grid Act and the SHIELD Act, both bipartisan bills supported almost unanimously by Democrats and Republicans. They’ve been able to stall for years and keep these bills held up. One time when we got a bill passed, the Grid Act actually, in 2010, unanimously passed the House, everybody supported it. But, Washington is so broken, one senator put a hold on a bill—if they know which senator to buy, they can buy that one senator and the person can put a hold on the bill so it can’t come to the floor for a vote and they can do it anonymously. They don’t even have to identify—the senator doesn’t have to identify themselves. So, you would never know who stopped the bill.

And, that’s been the problem in Washington. We’ve been trying to overcome resistance by the electric power lobby to try to protect the grid. They’ve basically been successful in stymying efforts at the federal level.

Now, we’ve got another bill, The Critical Infrastructure Protection Act, that we’re hoping will pass this year. Again, we’ve got a lot of support, but it’s already under attack by the utilities. And, they’re trying to change the language of the bill to basically gut the bill.

Ambassador Woolsey: And, when NERC is studying a problem, it doesn’t exactly operate at breakneck speed. After the ’03 outage in Cleveland that started with a tree branch touching a power line and took out the electricity for several days of Eastern Canada and much of the northeastern United States, NERC was finally prevailed upon to do a study. They did one and focused entirely on how to cut tree branches so that they won’t interfere with electric power lines. That tree branch study took them three years and eight months. What’s interesting about that lapse of time is three years and eight months is exactly the amount of time the United States was engaged in World War II, from beginning to end. So, one wonders how many wars worth of time it would take NERC to deal with a more complicated problem such as say, squirrels.

Chris Martenson: Well, if anybody ever asks me what do Hitler and tree branches have in common, I now know. They both take about the same amount of time to understand and theoretically defeat. This is concerning. This is really concerning to me, because I’ve done a little other research and I don’t have hard numbers on this. So, help spell this out for me. I understand that NERC is against this and they think this is overbearing regulation and they don’t want to be more highly regulated. I think possibly understandable concerns from any industry, but in this case, what kind of money are we talking about here? How much would it take to really begin to remedy this issue and how much time would it take? What is NERC fighting here?

Ambassador Woolsey: Peter, you know that.

Dr. Pry: Sure. Interesting question, because there are different numbers, depending upon how much security you want to buy. One of my colleagues who served on the EMP Commission had a plan that would cost $200 million. That’s not billions, but millions with an ‘m’, okay. Now, that would be a very minimalist plan, and it would just protect the extra high voltage transformers that service the major metropolitan areas. It would by no means—we would still be at a very high level of risk, but it would at least give us something like a fighting chance to save all those people in the big cities, in the hundred largest big cities from starving to death, if you just invested $200 million. The EMP Commission…

Chris Martenson: With an ‘m’, million, Peter, we’re talking million with an ‘m.’

Dr. Pry: With a million, yeah.

Ambassador Woolsey: Yeah, that’s one dollar for every adult American. That’s one dollar for every adult American.

Chris Martenson: I got a buck.

Dr. Pry: The EMP Commission plan costs about $2 billion, with a ‘b.’ That’s what we give away every year in foreign aid to Pakistan. And, it’s a robust plan. It would’ve protected every transformer in the United States, all the control systems, all the SCADA systems that are necessary. It would greatly reduce the risk and give us high confidence that we would be able to restore the grid in timely fashion to avoid mass starvation of the population. It would basically reduce it from an existential catastrophe to a manageable disaster.

Now, there are more expensive plans than that. You could spend 10, 20, 30 billion, and I would be in favor of that. I would be in favor of spending that much, because it would even further reduce the risk. I don’t think you can over-invest when you’re protecting the country against an existential threat. But, if you wanted to, with the EMP Commission plan, that was the official body to try to solve this problem, it’s just $2 billion. You know, a very modest amount of money indeed, especially against the threat.

Chris Martenson: Well, those are, I mean, I just read in the paper today that the U.S. has spent 2.8 billion bombing ISIS since the beginning of April. We can argue about what kind of a threat that is, but in my book, ISIS is so far down my personal list compared to my grid that it doesn’t even begin to compare. So, sounds like priorities. What it sounds like to me is that we have a serious mismatch between a for-profit power industry and a national security issue. Who’s in charge of this? Does anybody have commanding authority? Peter, you mentioned that FERC does not have that particular capability, but is anybody seriously in charge of this at this point from the national security side?

Dr. Pry: The U.S. FERC is supposed to be the tip of the spear. I mean, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, they partner with NERC, and they’re supposed to be the ones responsible for it. But, I think what you’ve got is a situation of what’s called regulatory capture. You’ve got a rotating door between FERC and NERC and these guys are basically in cahoots with the electric power industry and are very—as an example, they did do some positive things. FERC forced the NERC to adopt or to propose what’s called a GMD standard, a standard for protecting the grid against natural EMP, from the sun. And, NERC didn’t want to do that. At one point, they were arguing that there isn’t even any threat from the sun in terms of the natural EMP. And, that was completely destroyed, their credibility was destroyed on that point in a technical conference that has held before the FERC. And, they were ordered to come up with a standard.

Now, FERC can’t tell them under the law, it can’t tell them what the standard has to be. That has to come out of NERC, and they set the standard so low that it’s worthless. And, that’s the dilemma. And, the object of the SHIELD Act and the Grid Act was to try to empower the U.S. FERC so it would have more regulatory authority to tell these guys, “No, this is the level to which you’re going to protect the grid. And, you are going to install blocking devices and Faraday cages and surge arresters and things like that.” Just the same way that the Federal Aviation Administration can force an airline industry to ground a plane that isn’t safe to fly, because hundreds of lives are at stake when people fly in an airplane. Well, millions, hundreds of millions of lives are at stake about preservation of the electric grid. So, there should be at least as much authority over the grid in the FERC that the FAA has over the airline industry.

But, at this point, I recently testified to Congress, I think even U.S. FERC is so broken and untrustworthy that we probably need to scrap the regulatory system we’ve got now and go to something completely different. Maybe, give it to…

Ambassador Woolsey: Yeah, it’s…

Dr. Pry: …the Department of Homeland Security, or—sorry, Jim, go on.

Ambassador Woolsey: It’s essentially worthless and part of the psychological dimension of this is that people have a propensity to identify with ostriches in the face of really horrible threats. And, but the problem with NERC, especially, is that it’s sort of a proselytizing ostrich. It wants everybody to fall in line and not protect themselves, because otherwise it would require NERC to pay some attention to what people outside its own four walls are saying. And, they just don’t want to do that.

Chris Martenson: Understood, and that’s not an atypical thing. I’ve seen that in other industries. So, Jen, you spearheaded the effort to write a letter to President Obama. Tell us why you did that and what you hope might come from that.

Jen Bawden: Well…

Ambassador Woolsey: Well…

Jen Bawden: Oh, sorry.

Ambassador Woolsey: Yeah, Jen, go ahead. I was about to say I did not, but you were talking to Jen, not Jim. Please.

[Laughter]

Jen Bawden: That’s funny.

Chris Martenson: We’re going with J-E-N, Jen. Sorry, go ahead, Jen.

Jen Bawden: Exactly. We’ve already got the two mixed up, Jim. Well, I was, frankly, very shocked and concerned that nobody was doing anything to protect our grid. And, I was trying to think of anything that I could do here in New York. Washington, Peter and Jim live in Washington and are trying to deal with the government and push things along from that side. And, I was thinking more as an entrepreneur what kind of tactics could we take and I thought that if we wrote a letter to the president and we got an awful lot of top scientists and government experts to sign it, that maybe sent it to Obama, that maybe we would at least get to his desk. But, I also thought that we could get it out into the press. So, what’s quite, I say shocking to me, is that 15 years ago I wrote a best-selling book, and the best-selling book, it was a guide for young women, and it was called Get a Life, Then Get a Man. And, in I would say, I did 100 national shows, and so I said to myself, “No problem. This is such an important issue, everybody’s going to want to put Jim on national television to talk about it. And, it’ll be no problem for us to get the word out.”

Well, I can tell you that the whole world wanted to somehow learn about how to get a life and then meet the right guy, but nobody seems to care, except for you, Chris, and this very small group of others about publishing the information on an EMP and what it can do to destroy America and civilization. Because, if America is gone, what do you think happens to the rest of the world? I mean, the stock markets will be shut down the next day. So, it’s really just shocking to me that it’s being, I say, so hard to get the world interested or especially American newspapers and radio shows interested in this situation. So, we really thank you, Chris, for helping to bring this to your readership.

Ambassador Woolsey: Chris, I think Jen is exactly right and there’s, I think, one thing I would add, which is that there’s really been a very aggressive campaign by the utilities to keep from being given any, even the most minimal requirements. And, it seems as if we were trying to nationalize the electric business or something. And, that’s the way they’ve reacted and that’s the way they deal with the issue. They are just not willing to sit down and figure out what you need to do to fix this very serious problem. And, you can’t really pass legislation that will put somebody in charge effectively as long as the industry itself is fighting tooth and nail against being asked to deal with the problem in any way. And, it’s really quite remarkable why people should want to run the risk.

I think people are thinking of this sort of like nuclear war and therefore, it can be deterred. If the Chinese or the Russians launched a nuclear weapon at us the traditional way, we would know where it came from and we’d be able to retaliate and that, during the Cold War, that deterrence has worked. But, the problem with electromagnet pulse is you may not know anything except all the electricity stops. As Peter said, you may not know that anything has been detonated, because the altitude would be so high, there won’t be any blast, there won’t be any sound. And, it might have come at you, instead of coming over the northern pole, which is where all of our warning gear is set up and radars, they might launch it around the south pole, so-called fractional orbital bombardment system, which the Soviets developed in the last, during the Cold War. And, we don’t have hardly any surveillance trained on something that would come around from the south.

But, since you’re talking about something in orbit, not just a launch, and detonating in orbit, it can be a very primitive nuclear weapon. It doesn’t have to re-enter the atmosphere, it doesn’t have to be accurate, you’re not shooting at a specific target. It, in a lot of ways, is much easier to do than what we have all spent years thinking about, at least from time to time, which is deterring a traditional Soviet or Chinese nuclear attack. This is much harder to deter.

Chris Martenson: Understood. And, as a kid, I shot bottle rockets off. They’re unguided. It sounds like you need the same level of technology. You just need to get something up in the air. That’s a much simpler task in some ways. So, Dr. Pry, I’m almost afraid to ask this question: How does the United States fare in its EMP protection efforts? Are we just as bad as everybody else, or has Europe already addressed this? Where do you think Russia stands and China as well?

Dr. Pry: Well, Russia and China are the only countries in the world that have hardened their civilian critical infrastructures, including their electric grid to survive an EMP. Taiwan and South Korea are in the process of doing that, because they know the Chinese plan EMP attacks against Taiwan, and of course, South Korea is right opposite North Korea. Countries at high northern latitudes like Sweden, Finland and Norway are much better off than we are, because they have protected their grids against geomagnetic storms. However, not against the super geomagnetic storm like a Carrington Event, even they would be affected by that. But, most of the world, aside from Russia and China is pretty vulnerable.

We’ve got— the U.S. military, the Department of Defense has hardened selective parts of our critical military infrastructures that, in fact, NORAD is putting more commands, they’re moving back basically into Cheyenne Mountain, and spending $700 million to further harden Cheyenne Mountain against the EMP threat from North Korea. So, the military part is being done responsibly. But, what we’re concerned about, if the Iranians or the North Koreans attack us, it’s not our military systems that they’re mainly interested in going after. It’s going after our people and our civilian critical infrastructures. If you just think about that, spending $700 million just to increase the hardness of Cheyenne Mountain, that’s almost half of what we would need to spend to protect the whole country.

I mentioned before that we give away two billion dollars in aid to Pakistan for some reason every year. Pakistan isn’t even a friend of the United States, and they are a nuclear weapon state. I don’t know why we give them two billion dollars. But, if we suspended that foreign aid to Pakistan for just one year and spent it on the security of the American people, it would be a giant step toward solving this problem.

And, one last thing about the threat in terms of its proximity. Most Americans don’t know it, but you had mentioned earlier in this broadcast about the attack on the Metcalf transformer substation in April of 2013 by parties unknown. Had that attack succeeded, it would have—and, we don’t, it would’ve collapsed, it could’ve collapsed the western grid. This country has three parts of the grid system, the western grid, the eastern grid and Texas. Well, on that same day, on the very day that that happened, that’s the day that North Korea orbited that satellite, the KSM-3, over a position where it could’ve collapsed the eastern grid. And, we don’t know who did the western grid attack. It’s possible that that was, that they were experimenting with some kind of combined arms operation that involves both nuclear EMP as well as physical sabotage on April 16th. And, the KSM-3 is still up there, it still passes over the United States with regularity. And, nobody knows what's inside that satellite. Is it just a peaceful satellite, or do they have a nuclear weapon in there already that is passing over us as a force in being that could be used to blackmail us or to actually make an EMP attack on the United States.

Chris Martenson: Wow. Fascinating, terrifying. I somehow suspected that other countries would’ve already undertaken the hardening, because the cost is minimal and the potential benefit is extraordinary, it’s huge. So, for the individual—yeah, go ahead.

Jen Bawden: I was just going to say that an EMP could also happen very simply if they wanted to send it off a boat from the East Coast, just above, high into the altitude, you could take down the entire East Coast pretty quickly.

Chris Martenson: And, that seems like probably the easiest way to go about doing it, too. Lots of ships travelling.

Jen Bawden: I mean, you can’t check every single boat. So, there’s a lot of ways that they can get in to cause a lot of damage.

Dr. Pry: Yeah, Jen had mentioned earlier, the North Korean freighter that passed through the Gulf of Mexico, and that we found the SA-2s onboard in the Panama Canal. There’s an example, a real world example of what they were probably practicing to do it off of a boat, off the Gulf of Mexico, where we have no early warning capabilities. And, all you really have to do to destroy the United States, by the way, is to collapse the eastern grid. A nuclear weapon detonated anywhere over the eastern grid would do that, because 75% of our electricity is generated by the eastern grid. Most of our nuclear reactors and population are located under the eastern grid and we can’t survive—even if the western grid and the Texas grid remained intact, it would be catastrophic and we wouldn’t be able to survive as a nation without the eastern grid.

Chris Martenson: Understood. And, so here’s a question, maybe for Peter, maybe for Ambassador Woolsey. So, let’s imagine you’re an individual listener or maybe a corporation out there who doesn’t want to wait for D.C. and the power industry to align their actions. Is there anything we could do to help insulate ourselves, besides getting a hand pump for our water, anything to insulate ourselves and our families? What really could we—how could somebody respond who’s not responding at the national level?

Dr. Pry: Could I jump in here?

Chris Martenson: Sure. Please do.

Dr. Pry: Well, actually, we’re trying to—my task force a couple of years ago decided to go to the states, because we weren’t making as much progress as we wanted at the federal level. One of the EMP Commission recommendations is that the states harden their grids individually. It’s called islanding. It doesn’t change the way the grid would normally operate. If you put these protective devices, the Faraday cages, the blocking devices, the surge arresters, if you put them in place to protect the most important parts of the grid within your state, it will basically enable you to keep the lights on in your state, even though the rest of all the other states around you might go down, might go dark. And, we’ve actually started making progress. It took, after trying for years in Washington to get a bill passed, it took only six months to get a bill passed through the Maine State Legislature, a couple of months through the Virginia State Legislature, Arizona passed a bill. So, three states actually passed bills to protect their grids and people from EMP. And, we’re hoping this is a trend that will continue.

We’ve had some disappointment and setbacks this year, though, because NERC figured out what we were doing, and now they’re fighting us at the state level. And, valiant efforts were made to pass bills in Texas and in Colorado that, unfortunately, were defeated because of lobbying by the NERC. We’ve also had other successes, though, in Florida, where they look like they’re moving in the right direction, and most recently, in Louisiana. So, at a state level, people, in addition to agitating and telling their senators and congressmen to support things like the Critical Infrastructure Protection Act in Washington, you could actually ask your state governor, your state representatives and say, “Hey, let’s get our state protected.”

And, as far as individual families are concerned, basically, the same kinds of preparedness that you would engage in to safeguard your family from a protracted blackout in a hurricane. Have food, have water, have a plan to keep your family safe and how to use a—get an electrical generator and have enough fuel there to keep the thing running.

Ambassador Woolsey: The other aspect of this, I think, is that we’ve been far too gentlemanly with the utilities and their representatives. I’m reminded of Admiral Nelson’s notion. He said, used to say, “Never mind the maneuvers, just go right at them.” I think we have to point out that NERC is toying with permitting the destruction of the United States. And, we need to hang that around the necks of the utilities and let people know what they are doing in order to try to thwart efforts to protect the country with these very modest expenditures. They are really worth a Nelson-like approach.

Jen Bawden: I agree with Jim and I’ll just mention that part of the problem is the American citizens don’t even know what an EMP is. When you go out there, one out of every 25 people you speak to even has ever even heard of it before, and it’s usually from a comic book. So, unless we get the word out and unless we can get more people like you to help us let the world know about this devastating threat, it makes it a lot harder. Because, it has to come from the people.

Chris Martenson: Understood.

Jen Bawden: The change has to come from the people.

Chris Martenson: And, I’m completely baffled. This is just another thing that makes me question what’s going in this country. Because, it’s common sense and it’s just classic risk mitigation, and by the way, the numbers—I know two billion sounds like a lot, but not to me anymore. It sounds like chump change. It’s what the Federal Reserve printed up in about, oh, about six hours when they were at the peak of their money printing to make sure the banks were healthy. So, a healthy grid, to me, is more important, actually, than too-big-to-fail banks, but that’s me. And, so what I’m wondering at this point is, well, what then, what can citizens, maybe corporations do to help you break the inertia in D.C., move things along in the right direction? How do people get involved?

Jen Bawden: Well, I’d start by saying that Peter Pry is really ground central. He’s really one of the most amazing men I’ve ever met. So, maybe there’s a way to let people know about his website, let them go, if they want to help out, it’s a non-for-profit. That would certainly be a great help, because Peter’s been doing it just on a very, very limited budget, fighting, it’s David against Goliath. So, anybody that wants to help, that would probably be one of the first places to start. And, I would also say that if you could speak to your congressman, write letters, if anybody that you know of influence can help, let them know, get them involved with Peter and the EMP Task Force and national and homeland security. Peter, Jim, what other ideas do you have?

Ambassador Woolsey: No, I think that’s right. Peter’s really done a superb job of pulling the facts together on this and we can all do what we do best on different things. But, I think we’ve got to make it absolutely clear what the utilities are doing, and they are trifling with the destruction of our civilization.

Chris Martenson: Understood. And, Dr. Pry, what is that website?

Dr. Pry: EMPTaskForce.org. Also, our task force has put out some books for basic education about this. One of them is called Electric Armageddon and another is called Apocalypse Unknown. And, those are available through CreateSpace.com, or Amazon.com.

Chris Martenson: Fantastic. And, we will also provide links at the bottom of this podcast so people can just click and get there. This is a fascinating topic to me and I’m just intrigued by it on a lot of levels, and I know that someday, it’s just a question of "when," not "if," it’s a "when" thing for a coronal mass ejection, a sun event, that’s coming. We know one’s coming at some point, and if we go into that unhardened and find our country destroyed, that’s just such a "shame on us" moment. It just seems so baffling to me that we’re even having this conversation. But, it’s been my pleasure to have it with you, Dr. Pry, Ambassador Woolsey, Jen Bawden. I want to thank you all, all three of you and your colleagues for doing what you can and trying to bring this issue up. God speed, good luck and keep going.

Ambassador Woolsey: Thanks a lot, good to be with you.

Dr. Pry: Thank you so much.

Jen Bawden: Thanks, Chris.

Endorsed Financial Adviser Endorsed Financial Adviser

Looking for a financial adviser who sees the world through a similar lens as we do? Free consultation available.

Learn More »
Read Our New Book "Prosper!"Read Our New Book

Prosper! is a "how to" guide for living well no matter what the future brings.

Learn More »

 

Related content

32 Comments

Mark Cochrane's picture
Mark Cochrane
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: May 24 2011
Posts: 1216
Beyond belief

Just $200 million to protect the major cities, only $2 billion to provide  basic protection for the whole country and we can't be bothered? The 'last remaining super power', the 'world's richest country' and we can't harden our electric grid but both China and Russia have already done so? What is left of the US econo-government system is so  shortsighted it can't see its own navel. I grow more ashamed of my county's foolishness day by day.

DLWELD's picture
DLWELD
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 7 2015
Posts: 4
EMP Electro Magnetic Pulse

Here’s an interesting scenario and dramatization of a large power outage’s effects,

makes the statistics personal, but mostly cheap thrills, and a sudden happy ending and no addressing of the difficult questions - like what if the power didn't come back - one thing is a power failure due to cyber attack - ie the  power fails, but most electrical devices are OK - just no power - fixable in fact - but with an EMP the electronics get fried - so even with backup power, things  just don't work. So no TV, no internet, no cell phones, no fuel pumps or GPS etc.and the blown transformers are custom items to build, so it'd take years to get the grid working again. Also all the cooling pools for all the spent atomic reactor fuel that need constant power would be a "nice" complication

So, unexpected and serious effects – from stuck express elevators - no doors to pry open, to fried electronics in all air traffic, to farming – no irrigation pumps, to no cars, no ATMs, to no food distribution, to widespread meltdowns – as the old GE Mk1 atomic reactor blows up without constant cooling, to all the spent fuel storage facilities burning up. Check the location of these things in the US - scary!

Talk about unsymmetrical warfare – one EMP from N Korea and bye bye USA – a glaring, glaring vulnerability.

JDavis's picture
JDavis
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: May 17 2009
Posts: 19
One Second After

Check out the Book "One Second After"

It's an fictional account of year in the life of a small-town that experiences EMP pulse that knocks out the power grid.

Pandabonium's picture
Pandabonium
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 30 2008
Posts: 87
EMP Task Force website

Correction to the website address given in the podcast.  Visit: http://www.emptaskforcenhs.com/

Thanks for another important and informative interview, Chris!

ezlxq1949's picture
ezlxq1949
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 29 2009
Posts: 175
Something similar in Oz

An analogous situation exists in Australia, not regarding EMP but transport fuel stocks. If either system breaks in either of our countries and havoc will ensue.

In The Land of the Long Weekend a succession of federal governments on both sides of the political fence (or to be more accurate, both wings of the Central Party) has refused to attend to our national transport fuel reserves. As it stand now all we need is for two tankers to arrive in a row with contaminated cargoes (surprisingly easy to contaminate a cargo) and rationing would ensue. We are letting our domestic refining capacity run down to nil. We can't re-refine a contaminated shipment. It has to go back to Singapore or wherever.

Here I see the same wilful blindness, the same complacency, the same belief that The Market will sort everything out, the same pious hope that we don't have to think or plan or spend money on something that doesn't immediately enrich a corporation, the same foolishness at high levels of power and in the corporate sector.

I have not heard of anything being done here to mitigate against an EMP. Almost too scared to investigate...

I too am baffled at what is happening — or not happening. Sometimes I wonder if our western civilisation has a death wish. Or has gone totally mad. Or both.

Mark Cochrane's picture
Mark Cochrane
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: May 24 2011
Posts: 1216
About those reactors

If anyone wants to see the areas of risk if the grid goes down and all of the US reactors have Fukushima meltdowns, there is a nice interactive map here. Rather sobering.

davefairtex's picture
davefairtex
Status: Diamond Member (Online)
Joined: Sep 3 2008
Posts: 5071
a death wish

ezl-

I too am baffled at what is happening — or not happening. Sometimes I wonder if our western civilisation has a death wish. Or has gone totally mad. Or both.

Given how paranoid the US is, and how much we spend on frisking little old ladies in wheelchairs, one wonders why $200 million is too much for our defense establishment to spend?

Your question got me to thinking: is it possible that we are being left vulnerable for a reason?  Does Mr. Global want the US to continue having this particular weak spot?

Next question: why?  It certainly would deal with the whole "unfunded liabilities" issue, now wouldn't it?  And the population issue too.  And quickly.

And there would be lots of newly-vacated land too.  Although ecological damage from the uncooled-reactor meltdowns would probably make a good amount of the land less-than-desirable for centuries to come.

As I said, your comment just got me to thinking.  Normally I'd ascribe it all to incompetence, but this level of stupidity for this long, alongside the number of smart former insiders who are complaining about it, really does seem to be over the top.

ian.k's picture
ian.k
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Sep 23 2008
Posts: 40
Hidden costs of US aggression

Perhaps it should be recognized that the current regime in charge of the USA has such an aggressive foreign policy towards countries like Russia, China and Iran that they bear some responsibility for the heightened threat of an EMP event. US politicians like to present themselves as goodness personified while Russians and Iranians are an evil threat. Surely if this were the case they would already have carried out such an attack. I would note that the US is the only country in the world to have actually  used atomic weapons in warfare.I can imagine this conversation occurring in Russia or China with their experts citing America as the source of an EMP threat

Saying  that protection of the grid is a "no brainer." 

God must be having a little laugh at the corporate lobbying system of politics in the USA.  

sampenny's picture
sampenny
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Sep 27 2014
Posts: 1
Staring into headlights

This is another very enlightening interview that illustrates how so many of the people in today's society simply stare into the headlights of an oncoming disaster, just as a deer or rabbit will do at night on an open road, and they will not move out of danger. It is sad, and it is frightening. Sad, because they very possibly will be subjected in time to a disaster; frightening because their inaction threatens my life and well-being. 

The Carrington event was a direct hit of a solar-generated EMP, and it destroyed some portion of the very primitive electronics of the time: the telegraph that connected batteries through a coding key to an electrical line stretching across the country-side. The electrostatic disturbances lasted more than a day, and the most obvious effects were the aurora borealis shining around the world. A few years ago the earth missed an equivalent event by just a couple of days of orbit, only now our entire society depends on electronics that fries when subjected to the kind of EM fields that will enter our grids when such as event does occur.

12% chance in the next decade is a huge risk. And yet enough of those in power are happy to just stare into the headlights and block proaction in protecting one of the key components of today's civilization.

Back in the early 70s I had some association with the oil patch. I watched as several stupid decisions were made, and the word back then was, "just let the bastards freeze in the dark." Today I am simply frightened because inaction of TPTB threatens my life and well-being.

Thanks, Chris, for shining a light on this problem. Keep it up.

thc0655's picture
thc0655
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 27 2010
Posts: 1517
Agreed: inaction on this is too suspicious

is it possible that we are being left vulnerable for a reason?

We the people are known for some monumental stupidity, but this 

does seem to be over the top.

Combine this with the fact that the military is preparing even more than before, and insiders/authority figures are warning us about EMP's (and the ones currently in power aren't doing anything about it) is setting them up to save the military so they can continue world domination after the EMP and be able to say "We tried to warn you, but you wouldn't listen."  I suppose we already know who will be blamed and the very clear retaliation we are going to take (to further our world domination).

Chilling.

Time2help's picture
Time2help
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 9 2011
Posts: 2768
Makes you wonder...

...if the ubiquitous surveillance apparatus has been EMP hardened. Wouldn't make much sense to put all that up and then EMP it all away. So if the grid goes down but the cameras stay up, well, there's your sign...

agitating prop's picture
agitating prop
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: May 28 2009
Posts: 854
Govt subsidized emergency repairs

I suppose this could simply be utilities milking a cash cow until things go sideways (like tree trunks landing on power lines). In the event of a dire emergency, the govt would move in and order costly fixes or new grids, whatever it takes. I imagine it would play out much like demand turned command economies, during major wars.  In exchange for immediate compliance from utilities, government foots the bill, or subsidizes cost.  Taxpayer is on the hook.  

Sweet deal if you can get it. 

ezlxq1949's picture
ezlxq1949
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 29 2009
Posts: 175
Wilful blindness or ... ?

davefairtex:

is it possible that we are being left vulnerable for a reason?

This comment set me thinking. I don't want to start erecting conspiracy theories — that way lies madness — but I can't avoid concluding that something like this is indeed going on.

A bit of recent Australian history. In the 1970s the Whitlam (federal) government started a policy to "buy back the farm", a scheme to curtail foreign ownership of mining assets. They pursued an ill-advised funding scheme and later it led to what some see as our only coup d'état, with the government being sacked by the Governor-General. It helped the coup that the US government of the day was very unhappy with Australian policies towards Vietnam.

At the time Australia was one of the few countries in the world woth the potential for autarky, to be (almost) completely self-sufficient. The only resources we lacked then were natural rubber and heavy crude, both of which lacks could have been dealt with. Today our ability to provide our own transport and other fuels is (deliberately?) curtailed. Our indigenous motor vehicle manufacturing industry has been destroyed. Our economy is being reduced to that of a fossil fuel and bulk resource dispensary.

So I reckon that it's simply not on for any country to move or stay outside of the World System. Something big is being erected (TTP - TISA - TTIP ?) and all countries are to be compulsory participants. BRICS are being very naughty and irritating by so far staying outside the System.

Am I mad?

Satanic Reptilian NWO EUSSR Mind Control Paid Troll's picture
Satanic Reptili...
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 1 2015
Posts: 331
Meh, not scary enough, this

Meh, not scary enough, this is much better -

http://www.robertschoch.com/plasma.html

"Plasma hitting the surface of Earth could heat and fuse rock, incinerate flammable materials, melt ice caps, vaporize shallow bodies of water creating an extended deluge of rain, and send the climate into a warming spell. The release of pressure that follows the melting of thousands-of-meters-thick ice sheets can induce earthquakes and even cause hot rock under pressure to melt and erupt to the surface as volcanoes. The world was in chaos, and this is the event recorded by petroglyphs and the rongorongo texts.

The plasma event of 9700 B.C. eradicated advanced civilizations and high cultures of the time, and the radiation emanating from the plasma may have affected mental and psychical abilities. This could be the basis for the nearly universal myth of a Golden Age, a time when beings on Earth had mental abilities far surpassing those of later times. The 9700 B.C. event may be the original basis for the Atlantis legends; the timeframe fits well with Plato's account."

You'd need some strong sunblock for that, eh ?

sand_puppy's picture
sand_puppy
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 13 2011
Posts: 1763
A thoughtful discussion on The Plan To Rule The World

The New World Order - A Faustian Bargain

by Jeff Thomas via Doug Casey's International Man blog

The argument over the existence of an Elite, who plan to control the entire world under a New World Order ... has been around for a long time. ...[E]events created by world leaders of all stripes in recent years give rise to an increasing belief in the likelihood of the existence of such an effort.

There are two great dangers in attempting to describe this perceived secret endeavour, and they are at opposite ends of the spectrum:

a) being so naive as to assume that no collusion exists amongst various groups of leaders to further their respective ends, and

b) over-simplifying such alliances to suggest that there is an Elite Master Plan that all members implicitly agree upon and follow in every respect.

He believes that there IS coordination towards a global empire:

There can be no doubt that a New World Order is being sought by some—this ... is an open secret. As stated by David Rockefeller in his memoirs:

Some even believe we are a part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty and I am proud of it.

But those who hunger for power are many and, in the final act, each wants to ultimately be THE BIG KAHUNA.  Like in the TV game show, Survivor, alliances for mutual advantage are formed and hold for a while, then the contestants turn on their former allies in deception and conquest.  Cooperation fails as each reaches for the prize of being the single winner.

Thomas' Summary:

First, that there most assuredly are extremely domineering forces (regardless of how closely associated they might be), which, in the near future, will do immense damage to the cause of freedom in the world, particularly in those countries where they are most dominant, or will become most dominant. Second, the situation does appear to be reaching a head.

The two greatest uncertainties will be how much damage will be done before the dust has settled, and how protracted the period of destruction and struggle for dominance might be.

And here we are, living through this time.

Bankers Slave's picture
Bankers Slave
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Jul 26 2012
Posts: 520
From the mouths

of the psycho puppets themselves!

 

 

Bankers Slave's picture
Bankers Slave
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Jul 26 2012
Posts: 520
America...change it or leave it!

agitating prop's picture
agitating prop
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: May 28 2009
Posts: 854
sand_puppy wrote: The New
sand_puppy wrote:

The New World Order - A Faustian Bargain

by Jeff Thomas via Doug Casey's International Man blog

The argument over the existence of an Elite, who plan to control the entire world under a New World Order ... has been around for a long time. ...[E]events created by world leaders of all stripes in recent years give rise to an increasing belief in the likelihood of the existence of such an effort.

There are two great dangers in attempting to describe this perceived secret endeavour, and they are at opposite ends of the spectrum:

a) being so naive as to assume that no collusion exists amongst various groups of leaders to further their respective ends, and

b) over-simplifying such alliances to suggest that there is an Elite Master Plan that all members implicitly agree upon and follow in every respect.

He believes that there IS coordination towards a global empire:

There can be no doubt that a New World Order is being sought by some—this ... is an open secret. As stated by David Rockefeller in his memoirs:

Some even believe we are a part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty and I am proud of it.

But those who hunger for power are many and, in the final act, each wants to ultimately be THE BIG KAHUNA.  Like in the TV game show, Survivor, alliances for mutual advantage are formed and hold for a while, then the contestants turn on their former allies in deception and conquest.  Cooperation fails as each reaches for the prize of being the single winner.

Thomas' Summary:

First, that there most assuredly are extremely domineering forces (regardless of how closely associated they might be), which, in the near future, will do immense damage to the cause of freedom in the world, particularly in those countries where they are most dominant, or will become most dominant. Second, the situation does appear to be reaching a head.

The two greatest uncertainties will be how much damage will be done before the dust has settled, and how protracted the period of destruction and struggle for dominance might be.

And here we are, living through this time.

Sand Puppy,

 

it appears to me to be an obvious policy rather than a conspiracy. Even if people discount the 911 coup d'état, it's still evident that the Anglo American axis has always been angling for total world domination. It appears to me that geo strategically, oil flows have been crucial to maintaining a stranglehold on compliant nations.  How long that can be maintained, is a question. Much rides on what happens in the Ukraine.

 

It should also be obvious that those who control the most information, have disproportionate political control and can use the political drives of organized systems (Anglo American axis) to further their own ends.  The covert letter agencies, funded by govt but unaccountable to elected reps, working together, are likely the ultimate controllers and working for corporate oligarchs.  

You can imagine that before Glasnost, the covert agencies on BOTH sides were working together both before and after, through Yeltsin. It's only since Putin cracked down on subversion of his own people  by Russian oligarchs, that there is so much animosity between Russia and Western elites and Western puppet media.  

The electrical grid problem appears to me to be an easy way to get govt to fund a new grid after a catastrophe of epic proportion, through deficit spending. I don't see it as a way to usher in a police state.  That is already in place and the population is by and large fairly complacent. Angry, fed up but no danger to the system.  The most efficient way to accomplish their goals of greater profits, is just to sit back and do nothing, for the time being. 

 

Satanic Reptilian NWO EUSSR Mind Control Paid Troll's picture
Satanic Reptili...
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 1 2015
Posts: 331
I thought the point of this

I thought the point of this website was that there won't be any electricity going down the grid in the future, and that if there was it would mean planetary destruction anyway ? Woolsey must be optimistic about the US energy and consumer future. Or he's got investments lined up.

CleanEnergyFan's picture
CleanEnergyFan
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Jan 29 2012
Posts: 103
Outstanding Interview..Reinforcing the need to take action!

The irony for NERC and its Utility constituents is that if the public ever truly comes to understand all this it should hasten the move towards more competitive Distributed Generation & Microgrids as people recognize that resilience means we can't afford to have all our eggs in the Utility/Centralized grid basket.  As a minimum NERC should be forced to remove the word "Reliability" from their name.  For anyone wondering who the Senator was who impeded the EMP provisions of the GRID act, it was Alaska R. Sen Lisa Murkowski (and Chairman Jeff Bingaman D-N.M.) so it was bipartisan.  Also even the Edison Electric Institute EMP Rebuttal does not dispute that a high level nuclear EMP device would be catastrophic to the US but avoids responsibility by saying this is the purview of the military/defense industry and not their problem.  Thanks for shining the light on this Chris (and incredible how MIA our media is on this), I will make sure my Congressman is fully aware of this but not sure what he could do about it either since the political system itself is so broken (maybe focusing on our own State of TX might be more productive). This is truly a wakeup call for finally moving ahead with buying that backup generator and hopefully getting some type of solar as well.

 

Satanic Reptilian NWO EUSSR Mind Control Paid Troll's picture
Satanic Reptili...
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 1 2015
Posts: 331
....so it's not going to be

....so it's not going to be an issue in the post peak future because there will be nothing travelling through the grid anyway, and the internet and electronics industry will have collapsed too.  In a "world made by hand" (as they say) what do solar flares matter ?

Mark_BC's picture
Mark_BC
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 30 2010
Posts: 429
CleanEnergyFan wrote: This is
CleanEnergyFan wrote:

This is truly a wakeup call for finally moving ahead with buying that backup generator and hopefully getting some type of solar as well.

You'll want to protect those too. I'm not sure if solar panels will get fried but the electronics managing them will. Look into making a Faraday Cage, they are easy. Basically you need a metal container with no gaps greater than 1 mm. That will stop the waves from going through. An easy one is a metal garbage can with steel wool stuffed in the lid crack, or the lid taped on with conductive tape. Line the inside with insulating material to keep your electronics out of electrical contact with the metal.

pinecarr's picture
pinecarr
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Apr 13 2008
Posts: 2237
Mark, thanks for sharing the interactive fallout map link

Seeing the proximity of potential nuclear fallout from nearby reactors is sobering.  And seeing the number of nuclear reactors, and how condensed they are in nearby regions, is downright disturbing.  I wonder how much more the fallout could travel depending on weather...
 

Mark Cochrane's picture
Mark Cochrane
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: May 24 2011
Posts: 1216
Surprised me too

Hello Pinecarr,

Yeah, I had no idea the coverage of those reactors was so thick. The end results would be a lot less catastrophic than those 50 mile circles everywhere since that is the 'potential' contamination area, not the actual one. I thought it was interesting that in the US we actually use a 10 mile zone but we told Americans near Fukushima to use a 50 mile radius... If you zoom in you will see the actual estimated plumes for differing levels of radiation dosage if the meltdown had occurred on the same days as Fukushima. They used the actual weather on those days for each location. You can see quite a wide variation in the patterning if you look at different reactors to get a feel for what the range of outcomes might look like. Actual results would be different depending on the weather at the time when things went bad. So, if you are in the 50 mile zone then it is a bit of Russian roulette if they do blow. Good chance you will do ok, but a definite chance of a bad outcome.

Mark

DLWELD's picture
DLWELD
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 7 2015
Posts: 4
You'd sort of think the NERC

You'd sort of think the NERC would be in favour of hardening the grid - their profits will certainly drop when we all go offline and they have no way to deliver their product.

DLWELD's picture
DLWELD
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 7 2015
Posts: 4
A big win at FUKUSHIMA

Good to see a realization of how the atomic reactors add to the existential risk of the grid failing. If Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) lose their cooling pumps for any period of time - the reactors blow up - baked in the design - and that's what happened at Fukushima. Back when these GE reactors were being designed several GE engineers resigned in protest over the implementation - an interesting story.

So, to add to the topic: one bullet dodged at Fukushima was that TEPCO managed (barely) to keep the "spent" fuel pools cooled - they had to compromise big time by spraying in unfiltered sea water using fire hoses. If they hadn't, the pools would have boiled dry, continued to heat, and finally melted down and caught fire. Now THAT would have been major contamination. And if the wind had been from the North East - result: the end of Tokyo and I assume Japan as a useful country. Oh well, a miss is as good as a mile.

So, due to the inability of the US Gov't to agree on where to ship and store all the US reactors' hundreds of tons of highly radioactive spent fuel - the fuel is currently all stored in or near the reactors themselves, outside of any containment vessel - and you can see on the map just where the reactors, and their planet killing waste, are located -

 

A couple of interesting links:

http://fukushimaupdate.com/

http://www.dcbureau.org/20110314781/natural-resources-news-service/fissi...

mikemadison's picture
mikemadison
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 17 2015
Posts: 1
Scary but Disappointing Interview

The lack of EMP protection planning is more than suspicious. I'm like others on this thread who believe there is always a reason behind the reason given by .gov. But, to have what came across as a brigade of neocons as the experts in this area was a little surprising to me as a fan of Peak Prosperity. The constant references to "terrorism" made me think that either this was a panel of propagandists or fools. Is it really possible for the former CIA official to NOT know how entangled the US is in almost EVERY terrorist event. As I see it - if we are not spending a couple of billion$ to protect us from such a catastrophic event, there is a reason the elites want us to remain vulnerable.

So while I can really appreciate Chris' further attempts to bring this important issue to light, the panel of neo-con warmonger, finger-pointers was very disappointing.

cmartenson's picture
cmartenson
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 7 2007
Posts: 5570
Re: Scary But Disappointing Interview
mikemadison wrote:

The lack of EMP protection planning is more than suspicious. I'm like others on this thread who believe there is always a reason behind the reason given by .gov. But, to have what came across as a brigade of neocons as the experts in this area was a little surprising to me as a fan of Peak Prosperity. The constant references to "terrorism" made me think that either this was a panel of propagandists or fools.

Mike,  I'm in complete agreement with you and understand the feeling of disappointment.

My role and approach to these sorts of interviews is to try and unearth something of interest and then understand the mindset of the people involved.  Confrontation can also reveal interesting things, but it will cause defensive reactions in the guests shutting out some things.

With a deferential approach I believe I 'get more' even if that's an uncomfortable peek inside the minds of neocons.

My interview style is explained by the wisdom in this quote.

'It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.'

~Upton Sinclair

My job then is not to confront these people to try and change their minds, because that will never be possible as long as there is a monetary or political conflict of interest, which we all know has to be the case here.

Looked at another way, I truly believe these people are genuinely concerned about this threat and that they know better than anybody that the only way to gain the political traction they desire is to spout the centrist "terrorist" garbage that is all the rage in DC these days.  I also would be surprised if they were not angling to be compensated for these efforts in some way, either directly via product/consulting sales, or indirectly via enhanced political connections and prestige.

If they had to do all this a few hundred years ago they'd be spouting the threat we all face from heretics or whatever the bogeyman of the times was.  "Nothing new under the sun" and all that, eh?

However, once we get our chance to react to and chew on the interviews I count on the fact that we get to bring our own data and conclusions to the table, such as your correct observation that virtually every 'terrorist' threat the US faces is actually an outgrowth of prior US actions and inveiglements.  Further, they are not 'terrorists' but just military actions...at least that's what we used to call it when people picked up arms and shot at each other.

mentalarson's picture
mentalarson
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Jan 6 2016
Posts: 7
Hawaii EMP Risk Assessment

We will be moving to Maui this summer. I'm curious about the EMP threat is for the Hawaiian islands.
- Easy target for adversaries.
+ Heavy military presence and protection on Oahu.
+ Each island generates its own power so there is no "gird" like on the mainland.
+ There's near constant sun for personal solar power.
- However most people would not have any power self-sufficiency so even if we were covered, the zombies would not be.
+ Climate supports food production year-round so we could pull a Cuba and start growing food everywhere.
+ 140K people on Maui compared to 9.8M on Oahu.
- It seems like if an enemy wants to inflict the most harm on the United States, they wouldn't waste their toys on a few small lumps of land in the middle of the ocean...but I guess that's a big gamble...and of course all bets are off in the event of a natural disaster.

If just about everywhere on the mainland, especially urban areas, would be screwed, how do you feel Maui's population's survivability would compare?

cmartenson's picture
cmartenson
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 7 2007
Posts: 5570
The critical question...
mentalarson wrote:

We will be moving to Maui this summer. I'm curious about the EMP threat is for the Hawaiian islands.
- Easy target for adversaries.
+ Heavy military presence and protection on Oahu.
+ Each island generates its own power so there is no "gird" like on the mainland.
+ There's near constant sun for personal solar power.
- However most people would not have any power self-sufficiency so even if we were covered, the zombies would not be.
+ Climate supports food production year-round so we could pull a Cuba and start growing food everywhere.
+ 140K people on Maui compared to 9.8M on Oahu.
- It seems like if an enemy wants to inflict the most harm on the United States, they wouldn't waste their toys on a few small lumps of land in the middle of the ocean...but I guess that's a big gamble...and of course all bets are off in the event of a natural disaster.

If just about everywhere on the mainland, especially urban areas, would be screwed, how do you feel Maui's population's survivability would compare?

Good observations and questions.

To those I would add:

 

  • What is the native carrying capacity of the island on which you plan to live?  
  • Now, how does that compare to the 140k currently live on Maui?
  • What's your confidence that the re-supply ships will be servicing Maui during an event which might include the targeting of the Hawaiian islands for EMP attack?

If it turns out that Maui cannot support 140k then it really won't matter if people have working solar systems or not.  Famine will set in, and that will only be alleviated by the return of the resupply ships or a rebalancing of population and resources.

That's as politely as I can put it.

I do know of a few individuals on the Big Island that are actively planting Breadfruit all over the place in the wild specifically to blunt the impact of which you write.  

I've met plenty of Hawaiians who are quite aware of the issues and risks involved.  There's something about living on an island that grounds people in the reality of life more so than mainlanders.  Kudos to that.

But...that doesn't change the basic math.

Were I to commit to living on an Island, I would commit to creating edible forests and maximizing plant-based abundance with a passion bordering on zeal.  Plus it would be fun and the other people invovled worth knowing.  That's my theory.  :)

mentalarson's picture
mentalarson
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Jan 6 2016
Posts: 7
Thank you for your response

Thank you for your response and thought provoking questions.

I believe, as with most states, the large population center will consume all relief efforts if and when they arrive. Oahu has 980K population so everything would probably go there and the other islands would be on their own. After all, everyone coordinating the relief lives on Oahu. In the case of a natural or man-made EMP event, the ramifications are global so I wouldn't expect help any time soon.

I'm guessing Maui currently could only sustainably support 10% of it's population, and my current plan would be to figure out how to be in that 10% through food forestry and other high density production methods...though that requires space and space requires more money than we have currently.
We have friends there with whom we plan to co-op some sort of survival strategy.

A massive rebalancing would occur and the cold reality of my goal would be to make it into that 10% by whatever means was necessary. I plan to try to suck other people into permaculture and prepping in an attempt to expand the survivability of those around me.

I guess the next question is...could there still be better than most places in the CONTUS?

i.e. I was born and raised North of Seattle where there is much vegetation, some hunting, plenty of water etc. but if you don't start your tomatoes in a greenhouse in May, they may not ripen in the summer...and you can forget about solar panels and just invest in more fire wood.

We have been full-time RVing since May, 2014 and we've crossed the Southwest half of the US a few times...not retired...Website developer.

Every place seems to have it's survivability pros and cons. EVERY place we go we ask:
1. Could we survive here?
-- There are some big chunks of the country where that would be tough without technology.
2. Do we want to live here?
-- My wife really hates the cold. I think it's mostly a matter of cold, wet and short days in Western WA, but in general we would like to be further South and warmer in the winter than Idaho, but then you get cooked in the summer.
3. Could we love living here?
-- So far nothing has really turned our crank.

So, rather than strategically relocating for risk management, we seem to be leaning toward the idea of living where we really want to live, Hawaii, and take aggressive steps to reduce the risk factors.

It's a very challenging and exciting position to be in.

epgelinas's picture
epgelinas
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Jul 15 2014
Posts: 6
Thanks for sharing...

Just another reason why my move from Southern NH to rural Western TN will be a good one! Now we just gotta last until springtime to make the move. The lack of snow will be welcomed too, that's for sure.

Erik

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to post comments