** Top Senate Democrat: bankers "own" the U.S. Congress **

7 posts / 0 new
Last post
DrKrbyLuv's picture
DrKrbyLuv
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Posts: 1995
** Top Senate Democrat: bankers "own" the U.S. Congress **

Exerpts from Glenn Greenwald's article - Full Article

Sen. Dick Durbin, on a local Chicago radio station this week, blurted out an obvious truth about Congress that, despite being blindingly obvious, is rarely spoken:  "And the banks -- hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created -- are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place."  The blunt acknowledgment that the same banks that caused the financial crisis "own" the U.S. Congress -- according to one of that institution's most powerful members -- demonstrates just how extreme this institutional corruption is.

The ownership of the federal government by banks and other large corporations is effectuated in literally countless ways, none more effective than the endless and increasingly sleazy overlap between government and corporate officials.  Here is just one random item this week announcing a couple of standard personnel moves:

Former Barney Frank staffer now top Goldman Sachs lobbyist

Goldman Sachs' new top lobbyist was recently the top staffer to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., on the House Financial Services Committee chaired by Frank.  Michael Paese, a registered lobbyist for the Securities Industries and Financial Markets Association since he left Frank's committee in September, will join Goldman as director of government affairs, a role held last year by former Tom Daschle intimate, Mark Patterson, now the chief of staff at the Treasury Department. This is not Paese's first swing through the Wall Street-Congress revolving door: he previously worked at JP Morgan and Mercantile Bankshares, and in between served as senior minority counsel at the Financial Services Committee.

So:  Paese went from Chairman Frank's office to be the top lobbyist at Goldman, and shortly before that, Goldman dispatched Paese's predecessor, close Tom Daschle associate Mark Patterson, to be Chief of Staff to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, himself a protege of former Goldman CEO Robert Rubin and a virtually wholly owned subsidiary of the banking industry.  That's all part of what Desmond Lachman -- American Enterprise Institute fellow, former chief emerging market strategist at Salomon Smith Barney and top IMF official (no socialist he) -- recently described as "Goldman Sachs's seeming lock on high-level U.S. Treasury jobs."

A Huffington Post article which reported on Durbin's comments also notes Sen. Evan Bayh's previously-reported central role on behalf of the bankers in blocking legislation, hated by the banking industry, to allow bankruptcy judges to alter the terms of mortgages so that families can stay in their homes.  Bayh is up for re-election in 2010, and here -- according to the indispensable Open Secrets site -- is Bayh's top donor:

Goldman is also the top donor to Bayh over the course of his Congressional career, during which Bayh has received more than $4 million from the finance, insurance and real estate sectors:

In a totally unrelated coincidence -- after the Government, as Matt Taibbi put it, enacted "a bailout program that has now figured three ways to funnel money to Goldman, Sachs"-- this is what happened earlier this month:

Goldman reports $1.8 billion profit

Goldman Sachs reported a much stronger-than-expected first-quarter profit Monday, bouncing back from its worst quarter as a public company. . . .

Nobody even tries to hide this any longer.  The only way they could make it more blatant is if they hung a huge Goldman Sachs logo on the Capitol dome and then branded it onto the foreheads of leading members of Congress and executive branch officials.

Of course, ownership of the government is not confined to Goldman or even to bankers generally; legislation in virtually every area is written by the lobbyists dispatched by the corporations that demand it, and its passage then ensured by "representatives" whose pockets are stuffed with money from those same corporations.  Just as one example, as Jane Hamsher reported about Bayh:

Bayh's little "lobbyist problem" is considered by many to be what tanked his Vice Presidential aspirations. His wife Susan earns about $837,000 a year serving on seven corporate boards, among them Wellpoint, a health insurance company for which Bayh helped secure a $24.7 million dollar grant. She's on the board of ETrade, even as Bayh is on the Senate Finance Committee. 

Taibbi, in a separate piece, so aptly calls the "peasant mentality":

After all, the reason the winger crowd can’t find a way to be coherently angry right now is because this country has no healthy avenues for genuine populist outrage. It never has. The setup always goes the other way: when the excesses of business interests and their political proteges in Washington leave the regular guy broke and screwed, the response is always for the lower and middle classes to split down the middle and find reasons to get pissed off not at their greedy bosses but at each other. That’s why even people like [Glenn] Beck’s audience, who I’d wager are mostly lower-income people, can’t imagine themselves protesting against the Wall Street barons who in actuality are the ones who f***** them over. . . .

Actual rich people can’t ever be the target. It’s a classic peasant mentality: going into fits of groveling and bowing whenever the master’s carriage rides by.  You know you’re a peasant when you worship the very people who are right now, this minute, conning you and taking your s***.  A good peasant is loyal, simpleminded, and full of misdirected anger.  And that’s what we’ve got now, a lot of misdirected anger searching around for a non-target to mis-punish

One might think it would be a big news story for the second most-powerful member of the U.S. Senate to baldly state that the Congress is "owned" by the bankers who spawned the financial crisis and continue to dictate the government's actions.  But it won't be.  The leading members of the media work for the very corporations that benefit most from this process.  Establishment journalists are integral and well-rewarded members of the same system and thus cannot and will not see it as inherently corrupt (instead, as Newsweek's Evan Thomas said, their role, as "members of the ruling class," is to "prop up the existing order," "protect traditional institutions" and "safeguard the status quo").  

That Congress is fully owned and controlled by a tiny sliver of narrow, oligarchical, deeply corrupted interests is simultaneously so obvious yet so demonized (only Unserious Shrill Fringe radicals, such as the IMF's former chief economist, use that sort of language) that even Durbin's explicit admission will be largely ignored.  Even that extreme of a confession (Durbin elaborated on it with Ed Schultz last night) hardly causes a ripple.

strabes's picture
strabes
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 7 2009
Posts: 1032
Re: ** Top Senate Democrat: bankers "own" the U.S. ...

Excellent find Larry.  I'm weary of trying to explain this myself.  

This is also the obvious answer to Chris' recent post about how the govt is happy to handout trillions to big finance, but continues to screw small business.  In that post, he said he couldn't think of a good reason for why that was happening.  Well, he's a smart guy and knows exactly what's going on having read Creature from Jekyll, but I understand why he has to play nice with this site. So for anybody reading Chris' post that doesn't know the reason for why the government is doing this, Durbin just gave you the answer...Wall St owns our government. And the creation of the Fed which created a cartel of banks who own the regional Fed branches was a key step in the process that brought us to this situation today.

mcafeejs's picture
mcafeejs
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Sep 21 2008
Posts: 34
Re: ** Top Senate Democrat: bankers "own" the U.S. ...

Support HR 1207, an Audit of the Federal Reserve:
www.govtrack.us/congre...

Find your congress person:
www.house.gov/house/Me...

mcafeejs's picture
mcafeejs
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Sep 21 2008
Posts: 34
Re: ** Top Senate Democrat: bankers "own" the U.S. ...

Support HR 1207, an Audit of the Federal Reserve:
www.govtrack.us/congre...

Find your congress person:
www.house.gov/house/Me...

Ready's picture
Ready
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Dec 30 2008
Posts: 917
Re: ** Top Senate Democrat: bankers "own" the U.S. ...

Durbin at the same time vowed not another penny in bailouts or loans to financial institutions. Said he would personally see too it. I wish I had a link, but I heard it on the radio.

He is a powerful Democrat, but I don' think he has that much power...

Rog

DrKrbyLuv's picture
DrKrbyLuv
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Posts: 1995
Re: ** Top Senate Democrat: bankers "own" the U.S. ...

strabes -

Good to see your post - you've been a champion for the cause of freedom and your thoughts are always welcome.

strabes - So for anybody reading Chris' post that doesn't know the reason for why the government is doing this, Durbin just gave you the answer...Wall St owns our government. And the creation of the Fed which created a cartel of banks who own the regional Fed branches was a key step in the process that brought us to this situation today.

You hit a point that I have been baffled over.  Many have read books, articles and history of the Fed but yet they still refuse to put the pieces together - what we are witnessing are not random acts of incompetence, debauchery and criminal misconduct - this is an organized and international financial coup usurping our national sovereignty and constitutional rule of law.

Larry

LogansRun's picture
LogansRun
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 18 2009
Posts: 1444
Re: ** Top Senate Democrat: bankers "own" the U.S. ...

Maybe he should do something about it.  What a joke.  Everyone knows what's taking place but no one has the balls to move forward and risk the destruction of their political careers (or lives for that matter).  What's funny, is that they are able to move fairly stealthily on many issues to create a majority when the issue is in THEIR best interest.  But when it's in the best interest of THE PEOPLE?!?!?!.....they could give a rats arse. 

The gov't in power is a lost cause and needs to be disbanded and relieved of duty IMO.  After that, we take out the Bankers/NWO Elite......preferably peacefully.....IMO that's not realistic though.  

Cheers!   

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to post comments