Public Roads & Bridges

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
Gregory K. Soderberg's picture
Gregory K. Soderberg
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Jan 8 2009
Posts: 32
Public Roads & Bridges

It is a good idea to “invest” in roads and bridges to help our
economy. To provide sustainable relief, the money must be created and
“spent” into circulation not created and “lent” into circulation.

Money created as loans and “lent” into circulation only creates the principal. The principal is uncreated when repaid.

Adding interest creates a debt greater than the money supply. More
borrowing is required to pay the interest causing the inevitable crisis
situation we now face.

Borrowing more to pay this debt has not worked, will not work and cannot work. It’s mathematically impossible.

Investments should show a growing benefit over time. America’s
“investments” have not shown the desired returns not because of
“spending” but because of”lending” and using an evidence of unpayable
interest bearing debt as our medium of exchange.

The proposed “spending” spree to build roads and bridges is not what
it is at all. It’s another “lending” spree whereby money is created and
“lent” before it is “spent.”

We can only get rid of debt by paying for it with something that is
not a debt, money that is created not as a loan but as a debt-free
payment for production that benefits everyone. Roads and bridges would
work.

Spend it. Don’t lend it.

Alex Szczech's picture
Alex Szczech
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Dec 31 2008
Posts: 105
Re: Public Roads & Bridges
Gregory K. Soderberg wrote:

Roads and bridges would
work.

Investing in a nationwide passenger rail system would be an even better. 

Gregory K. Soderberg's picture
Gregory K. Soderberg
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Jan 8 2009
Posts: 32
Re: Public Roads & Bridges

Alex,

Thank you.

Yes, nearly any type of production would work.

A debt-free medium-of-exchange actually represents some form of the people's production that benefits all of society equally. That's what silver and gold coins were under the principles of the 1792 Coinage Act---the peoples' production , raw bullion, 'monetized' free of charge to the producer (coined) who then 'spent' them into circulation for someone else's production. A medium-of-exchange with no debt. The supply increased with productivity gains. The people controlled their money supply. It did not have to be repaid nor extinguished. Additionally, all society benefitted equally because they could all use the debt-free Meedium-of-exchange. Not keeping it to production that benefits everyone equally moves us towards special interest.

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to post comments