Militaristic Police Tactics and The Coming Unraveling

5 posts / 0 new
Last post
Morpheus's picture
Morpheus
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Dec 27 2008
Posts: 1200
Militaristic Police Tactics and The Coming Unraveling

Excellent op-ed by Karl Denninger. First, I think it human nature to paint with a broad brush. Not all law enforcement are thugs. Many are dedicated, hard working brave men and women who pride themselves on serving their community. 

Their families live in town too. And so do their friends and other loved ones. 

But many ARE thugs. 

Let's face it. Too many. Way too many stories of military tactics and brutish methods used by police. 

Karl makes a very cogent point. After the SHTF, those cities/towns with ogre police forces will not receive the support of the community. Those that are respectful of the citizenry will. 

So, if your bug-out plan includes relocation to relatives (as mine does), you might want to check to see what type of cop resides in the area. Are they ogres, high school bullies who think this is downtown Saigon? Or are they peace officers? 

From The Market Ticker. http://market-ticker.denninger.net/

One City Where Citizens Will Not Assist

We all hear about "police brutality" and other similar incidents.

Then there are incidents that aren't so clear.

Or are they?

DETROIT - Seven-year-old Aiyana Jones was asleep on the living room sofa in her family's apartment when Detroit police searching for a homicide suspect burst in and an officer's gun went off, fatally striking the girl in the neck, family members say.

Her father, 25-year-old Charles Jones, told The Detroit News he had just gone to bed early Sunday after covering his daughter with her favorite Disney princess blanket when he heard a flash grenade followed by a gunshot. When he rushed into the living room, he said, police forced him to lie on the ground, with his face in his daughter's blood.

This isn't a case where the cops barged into the wrong house: The suspect they were looking for, who was wanted for murder, was in the house and was arrested - on a lawful warrant drawn for the property they entered.

"This is any parent's worst nightmare. It also is any police officer's worst nightmare," Godbee said.

Really?

Then perhaps you might consider your tactics in serving such warrants.

Let's remember that while a suspected murderer that was being sought, the key word here issuspected.  Until tried and a judgment is entered of "guilty", he's a suspect, not a convicted murderer.

Needless to say someone suspected of murdering another is presumed dangerous.  But from reports it was obvious there were children in the house (there were toys in the front yard), the raid happened at 12:30 in the morning, and a "stun grenade" or "flash-bang" device (basically a big firecracker) was tossed in a window first.

One word comes to mind: Why?

What sort of insane definition of "police work" leads a department to do this?  Isn't this pretty much like David Koresh?

Remember, at Waco, rather than waiting for Koresh to leave the compound and arresting him in town or in his car (which would have almost certainly been a peaceful arrest), they instead stormed the compound at Waco and many people, including innocent children who had no connection to the crimes alleged, died.

In this case instead of performing police work (that is, staking out the property and arresting the suspect when he attempted to leave - as he eventually almost certainly would - without incident) the cops decided to use their "flashy SWAT tools" and storm the house, despite apparent obvious and clear knowledge, just as at Waco, that there were known-innocent persons inside.

The militarization of "police response" at times and during events when it is unnecessary and excessive is a dangerous step, and not only for the obvious reason that there is now a dead girl who did nothing wrong.

No, the more serious problem comes if and when order degenerates generally in society.

Logical and reasonable police forces and officers, of which there are many, will find themselves allied with the citizens of the area against the gang-bangers and common thugs who would otherwise seek to play "Zombieland" in our nation's cities and towns.

But in places where the gendarme has chosen to play "Big Balls" instead of acting with logic and reason they will find that the citizens will defend only themselves and not the institutions and officers of law and order. 

And let's be clear, simply on the numbers: There are more bad guys than there are cops; only the general trappings of polite society keep them from deciding to go on human hunting expeditions with seriously-destabilizing results for the public at large.

If you doubt this then read some news, such as the LA task force that has had apparent gang-bangers try to blow up their offices by diverting a gas line!  To say that the trappings of "polite society" are getting stretched a bit thin these days is not an overblown conclusion.

"No-knock" warrants are almost always abusive.  If you know the person you want is inside, there's no reason to go in with guns blazing or in a military-style raid - unless you intend to kill.  Does it matter if you catch the person you're after right this instant or the next morning when they step out for a pack of smokes - or some food? 

There is no difference if your primary intent is to arrest and displaying your flashy hardware and tactics as a device to intimidate the population is not part of your agenda.

Are there instances where a raid as occurred in this case is justified?  I can come up with a few.  An active hostage situation where the assailant has demonstrated the will to kill hostages is one.

But a duplex where the sought person is believed (by, as it is alleged, observation of a vehicle registered to him) to be inside along with persons known to be uninvolved and innocent, such as the girl who is now dead, is not one of those circumstances until and unless said suspect barricades himself and threatens in some form to injure or kill the family, which obviously was not the case here.

The test should not be "can we get this guy if we storm the place" - it should be if we don't storm the place is someone likely to be injured or worse as a consequence of doing police work and arresting the suspect when he emerges, since by definition the use of these tactics has a high probability of injuring or killing someone innocent of any wrongdoing.

If I engage in conduct that has a high probability of killing an innocent person, I do so on purpose, and an innocent person dies, I face a near-certainty of being charged with some form of manslaughter - as I should.

Justice in this case cannot simply extend to the officer whose weapon went off via a negligent discharge or some sort of "I'm sorry." (As an aside there is no such thing as an "accidental discharge"; an unintended discharge of a firearm happens due to negligence, not accident.)  Rather, it must extend to the preference of manslaughter charges against everyone involved in the planning and execution of this raid, without exception, up to and including those in the department who authorized this "show of force."

Trust and partnership between law enforcement and law-abiding citizens has, in many cases, become something that law enforcement no longer values.

Sadly, by the time law enforcement in these areas recognize the foolishness of their militaristic approach to serving warrants and enforcing the law it will be too late for them to change their mind and rebuild the trust that they will need.

If you live in such an area and cannot change your law enforcement agency's approach to the community via peaceful means you must leave now for a village, town or area where law enforcement recognizes the essential marriage between public policy and law enforcement.  Such areas, if and when the gang bangers decide to try to serve "Zombieland" upon your area, will find both you and law enforcement standing shoulder-to-shoulder in your effort to resist - and you will be successful in doing so.

Cities like Detroit, on the other hand, will most likely literally burn to the ground.

Your choice to stay or go may, in the not-so-distant future, turn into the difference between life and death.

Choose wisely.

Subprime JD's picture
Subprime JD
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 17 2009
Posts: 562
Re: Militaristic Police Tactics and The Coming Unraveling

Based on Maslow's chart, when the economy goes to hell, the citizenry will care less for "peak experiences"  and "self actualization" and more for safety needs. Security will trump liberty. It is inevitable. We here are truly the outliers. Unless the facts change I will not change my outlook.

Morpheus's picture
Morpheus
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Dec 27 2008
Posts: 1200
Re: Militaristic Police Tactics and The Coming Unraveling

BMT. 

An excellent point but let me add this. 

What happens to the dynamic if the citizenry consider the police to be a central threat to their security? 

land2341's picture
land2341
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 20 2009
Posts: 402
Re: Militaristic Police Tactics and The Coming Unraveling

I think that is the point of what BMT is saying.  Maybe I am reading it wrong,  but the essential conflict will be security over liberty.  The question over our entire country right now is which do people find more important AND how do they think they will achieve that.   Many will be willing to submit to a police state in order to get security.  They will be in the majority in areas where the police and the citizens get along.  The citisnes will see the police as a protective force and will relinquish many rights to keep them as a wall between themselves and the anarchy they see.  Others will have stronger more violent battles between the citizens and police because the citizens see the police state as the problem.

I suspect it may be along these lines that the country divides permanently.   And a good deal of the outcoem rests with the culture withint the individual police departments.

I'll post a link to video of California students getting beaten during a protest.  You decide for yourselves which side these students will be on over the next few years.

land2341's picture
land2341
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 20 2009
Posts: 402
Re: Militaristic Police Tactics and The Coming Unraveling

 

Watch the video and decide.  There is a great deal of supposition and opinion in the writing.  You need to see it to decide.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/08/student-activists-beaten_n_4894...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to post comments