The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the Renaissance 2.0 series)

28 posts / 0 new
Last post
strabes's picture
strabes
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 7 2009
Posts: 1032
The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the Renaissance 2.0 series)

Just published the next lesson in the Renaissance 2.0 series from the Council on Spiritual, Psychological, and Economic Renewal. 

This one paints a strategic picture of what's going on in the world that's very different from the left vs. right perspective of the media and the "politicians are simply corrupt and make endless stupid decisions" perspective of some of the economic blogs many of us read.  Of course I think both of those perspectives are wrong, or at least incomplete, so I felt compelled to describe "The Emerging Global Empire" in lesson 5.

Part 1:

Part 2:

Then after this lesson, the series will start imagining a different, brighter future than the one illustrated in this lesson.

I still have to do the Intro to the series that makes the "why you should care" argument to watch the rest of the series, in which I'll send people to the CC for a primer on debt-based money and exponential growth because I think those things need to be understood before my series can be understood.  But I wanted to get the series out to people who already understand those things to get any feedback you may have.

 

M.E.'s picture
M.E.
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Jul 21 2009
Posts: 81
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

Strabes,

Your posts are among those I always read.  Thank you.  I appreciate the time people put into this website on a daily basis and wish I could convey it with VF's eloquence so everyone would what a difference it has made to me.

As far as the content:  chilling.  I have no comments about it because I am just getting a handle on the money concepts in the CC.  It does seem like the only ticket out is to educate about debt.

Regarding the video:  Is this the final cut?  If so, I suggest doing another voice over keeping in mind background noise (i think you received an email at around 6:45 in part 2  ;)  ) and doing small takes of the v/o so words don't get smooshed together.  I might also edit a little of the copy to take out any hint of apology for saying what you're saying or suggesting that people might want to turn it off and to take out some of the "I"s to make sure some of the info doesn't come across as opinion.  Where you mention your other work, I might add the website where people can find them.  Also, can you get in trouble for calling that guy an empty suit?  I hear people of that sort think of suing as a sporting event.

DrKrbyLuv's picture
DrKrbyLuv
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Posts: 1995
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

strabes,

You have tackled a huge topic in only two 10 minute videos and I'm sure you didn't want to get too caught up in the details of the NWO.  That said, I think some of the material you presented may be misleading.  I'm not sure how you approach the subject with so little time but I suspect you might be better off focusing on the "western banking cartel" that originated in the sovereign city of London.  There are some wild cards for sure once you leave the client states (E.G. U.K., U.S., Germany, France, Australia, etc.).

You mentioned the Trilateral Commission which was created to forge the three spheres of globalization - North America, Europe and Asian Pacific Groups.  Originally the Trilateral Commission members were from the banking, academic, political and media sectors.  More recently it has been dominated by the banking cartel with a focus on the political.

It is worth noting that apparently Japan was the nucleus of the Asian Pacific Group.  China is the wild card here as it only has had a few members under the category of "Participants from Other Areas - “Triennium Participants.”  China seems to be more nationalistic than any of the western banking cartel client states.  Their central bank is quite different in being independent from the Trilaterals, IMF and BIS.

It may be that we are headed for a bipolar world with China heading its own group of "independents" including Iran, Venezuela and much of Asia.  Russia is another wild card that may or may not be part of the Western group.  Like China, they are not direct Trilaterals and they have not been directly represented at the Bilderberg Group.

Another question is Israel.  They are not part of the Trilateral European Group but are well represented with a strong presence and are regulars at the Bilderberg Meetings.  Some have speculated that the upper echelon of the western banking cartel are Israeli Zionists operating out of the "Crown" (sovereign City of London).  And should the Freemasons get a shout out?

Like I mentioned earlier, it gets complicated when you look at the global implications.  Wish I had better suggestions and more specific information but the topic is more than can be addressed in this post.  My point is that the two newest videos may be misleading.

Larry

LogansRun's picture
LogansRun
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 18 2009
Posts: 1443
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

Damon,

Your work always amazes me!  While Larry's suggestions have merit ( and I do agree with them, but I understand the difficulties you're running into on this issue), I'm still impressed with the logic that you've been able to use in tackling the issues at hand!  Outstanding work!  

On this, what's the ultimate goal?  Where do you see this info being used?  It's being used on the blogs but outside of that....?  I've sent it onto as many people as possible, but where do you ultimately want to go from here?  I personally think your info can be understood by many persons, but the "American Idol" average american is going to get lost in this info....agree or not agree?  

Now as I said, I think you really have done an outstanding job of explaining/breaking down the subject.   How can we push it forward?  Any ideas?  Funds needed to do this?  I think this info needs to go very viral....how?

Cheers!

strabes's picture
strabes
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 7 2009
Posts: 1032
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

Mary, I appreciate those points.  Now I know the importance of an editor's perspective if I ever take this to a higher level.

Larry, I made a mistake saying it was the "work of the trilateral commission."  I'll leave it up to others like Alex to argue about which organizations may have planned everything...I think that's a distraction.  My goal in that slide was to just paint the picture of how the global bond market already integrates much of the globe and then mention the fact that there are strategic control freak personalities out there that really do view the world as a chessboard.

Logan, your note motivates me a bit when I'm just about to follow in Paul Craig Roberts footsteps and give up.  A friend who used to write for gold sites until he gave up last month asked "why the hell are you wasting your time?"  Good question.  Even if I had a million viewers, I don't think it would matter.  I was serious in my last article when I said I'm starting to accept the fact that we don't deserve self-government because I'm rather weary of trying to force people to do it when they obviously don't want to.  Anyway, hope this doesn't unmotivate you.  I'll likely be more cheery next week.

LogansRun's picture
LogansRun
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 18 2009
Posts: 1443
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

Strabes,

I understand what you're saying and can appreciate the thoughts but........you need to remember, the central planners have been at this game for a LONG time.  They have an extreme headstart on persons like yourself in convincing/educating/manipulating the masses.  The enlightenment won't happen overnight.  It can't!  IMO, this battle is going to be a process in which "they" will continue to gain and consolidate power for some time yet.  But "we" will be the water in the crack of the concrete of the damn.  Eventually, we'll wear the crack into a chasm, and the damn will break.  It may take a generation or two but the drip of water needs to be placed into the crack for it to work.  It took the central planners how many years to get to the level they're at now?  It'll take us that much time or longer, but I honestly think humans want freedom and it's in their DNA.  Human Nature will win out and the sheep mentality will be evaporated.  Maybe not in our lifetime but I refuse to leave my children and grandchildren with to a fascist future without some hope of breaking out!

Again, any way I can help please let me know.  

DrKrbyLuv's picture
DrKrbyLuv
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Posts: 1995
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

strabes,

I look forward to the next editions of your series as I think solutions are the most important part and I'm sure you will have some great stuff to add.  

Larry 

John99's picture
John99
Status: Gold Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 27 2009
Posts: 490
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

ditto

knucklewalker's picture
knucklewalker
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Oct 18 2009
Posts: 13
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

While much of the information provided in this series is reasonable the one huge gorilla that is missed is the fact of global declining energy supplies.

 

The NWO essentially cannot exist and indeed will fail utterly, not based on human actions but rather based upon the rapid slide down the Net Hubbert Energy Curve.  At EROEI ratios of around 26:1 (the best the alternative energy can deliver: windbased) all economic growth will cease.

Global fossil fuel reserves are now flatlined and it is becoming very very obvious that Peak Oil is HERE.....we will slide down the curve (less fossil fuel per year avaliable to global markets) within 1-5 years. 

The loss of the availability of Petro dollars will expose the utter fragility of the NWO........COLLAPSE is coming......a retreat of the human enterprise on all fronts.

 

 

ao's picture
ao
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 4 2009
Posts: 2220
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

strabes,

Thanks for your excellent work, as always.  Don't you even consider giving up.  You can be having a profound influence without ever personally being aware of the effects.  In fact, I know that you are.  Hang in there.  

LogansRun's picture
LogansRun
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 18 2009
Posts: 1443
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

Anyone and everyone, 

How do you see Peak Oil playing into this whole game?  I mean, wealth consolidation is obviously taking place and the "owners" are getting more powerful by the day, but economies cannot continue to grow without excess energy.  What's their endgame with the PO situation?  

ao's picture
ao
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 4 2009
Posts: 2220
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...
LogansRun wrote:

Anyone and everyone, 

How do you see Peak Oil playing into this whole game?  I mean, wealth consolidation is obviously taking place and the "owners" are getting more powerful by the day, but economies cannot continue to grow without excess energy.  What's their endgame with the PO situation?  

Peak oil will facilitate further economic and geopolitical instability, these instabilities set the stage for war, war leads to depopulation (through violent death as well as death from disease and famine), depopulation to 1/3rd of the present world population (a figure frequently stated by The Owners) will dramatically decrease demand on oil, and, as a consequence, there will be enough oil remaining for the game to continue a little longer until the cycle repeats itself again.

 

V's picture
V
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Dec 14 2009
Posts: 849
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

The ruling elites were in control in 1850. This was before the age of Oil. Oil is energy. The Empire of those in control used surplus human energy in the form of slaves to acquire wealth and power. We are heading in that direction right now. Most humans are currently wage slaves due to the monetary system devised by a small group of aristocrats. The wealth that is created by these slaves is being systematically harvested to the benefit of a very few. This system is ubiquitous and very subtle. The extremely wealthy have been able to use every tool available to establish complete control, including the work of Freud through his nephew Edward Bernays

No matter what we have for any form of energy the controllers at the top will own it. The biggest investors in alternative energy are Goldman Sachs and company. The board of directors of Bloom Energy is almost entirely CFR. Energy is in the forefront of many discussions here but the elites are quietly grabbing control of water. This is the real future threat.

Empires existed before oil they will exist after oil. Sociopaths have seized power before and they will continue to do so as long as there are humans.

Good work Damon. As Gandhi said " what you do may be insignificant but it is important that you do it" You/ we may not stop them but maybe we can poke them in the eye.

V

V's picture
V
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Dec 14 2009
Posts: 849
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

 

I just thought this might be a good place to post this. Jupiters Dance is an amazing musical video. It is a documentary about a musician in the ghetto of Kinshasa DRC. He is struggling to not only survive  but get his music out to the rest of the world. Along the way you get a view of what it is like to live on the bottom of society in a country which just might be the worlds most resource rich country.

This might be a glimpse of just what we might be getting ready to experience on a grand scale in the US. If you have not heard of or watched Link tv I highly recommend watching it. They have aired this documentary. It is a viewer sponsored tv station. It carries news from all over the world as well as all kinds of cultural productions.

In any event get this documentary and watch it there are many lessons contained within.

V

DrKrbyLuv's picture
DrKrbyLuv
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Posts: 1995
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

LogansRun wrote:

Anyone and everyone,

How do you see Peak Oil playing into this whole game? I mean, wealth consolidation is obviously taking place and the "owners" are getting more powerful by the day, but economies cannot continue to grow without excess energy. What's their endgame with the PO situation?

WW3 is coming and that will help the international banking cartel reduce the population of the planet.  Many of those remaining will have shortened lives and reproduction rates will drop as mankind's DNA is poisoned by nuclear material. 

Larry

goes211's picture
goes211
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 18 2008
Posts: 1114
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...
DrKrbyLuv wrote:

WW3 is coming and that will help the international banking cartel reduce the population of the planet.  Many of those remaining will have shortened lives and reproduction rates will drop as mankind's DNA is poisoned by nuclear material. 

Larry,

You must be a lot of fun at parties.  Wink

LogansRun's picture
LogansRun
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 18 2009
Posts: 1443
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

How do we all seeing it play out?  Is the US being taken to the woodshed or is it to be the "garden of eden" to repopulate the world?  Where do the elite plan on hunkering down during this crisis?  What's the timeframe that's obviously somewhere to be found (being as they alway show their cards in some way or another)?  Anything and everything would be appreciated to help me and mine do our best to survive?!?

 

DrKrbyLuv wrote:

LogansRun wrote:

Anyone and everyone,

How do you see Peak Oil playing into this whole game? I mean, wealth consolidation is obviously taking place and the "owners" are getting more powerful by the day, but economies cannot continue to grow without excess energy. What's their endgame with the PO situation?

WW3 is coming and that will help the international banking cartel reduce the population of the planet.  Many of those remaining will have shortened lives and reproduction rates will drop as mankind's DNA is poisoned by nuclear material. 

Larry

compinthegroove's picture
compinthegroove
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Nov 8 2009
Posts: 113
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

Regarding WWIII...

I don't see nuclear force in the cards because as we all know, nothing is more profitable for banks than war.  Tossing a few nukes would destroy all the profits to be had by fighting the war the old fashioned way.  The whole thing is about taking oil, so how are you going to do that in a radiation zone? The powers that be know that going nuclear would be akin to shooting yourself in the foot.

Larry brought up the notion of reducing the population of the planet.  The simplest way to do this is to suddenly restrict the supply of oil.  Oil dependency is found throughout each step in the food production and distribution chain.  When the oil price skyrockets, the economy crashes and the food distribution chain breaks down.  People starve in droves.  Mission accomplished.  No nukes needed. 

Any thoughts?

 

Romans12.2's picture
Romans12.2
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Jul 14 2009
Posts: 227
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

I think ?? Larry was jesting....when oil is gone -people will starve and that will acomplish the population reduction that some think the evil empire so deisres.....

I'm listening, I believe, I'm preparing, but WHEN? 

And are we the prepared going to be left with all the wealthy elites who will always have the means to out prepare and so, able to control us, no matter what we do now?

Romans12.2's picture
Romans12.2
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Jul 14 2009
Posts: 227
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

double post

compinthegroove's picture
compinthegroove
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Nov 8 2009
Posts: 113
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...
Romans12.2 wrote:

I think ?? Larry was jesting....when oil is gone -people will starve and that will acomplish the population reduction that some think the evil empire so deisres.....

I'm listening, I believe, I'm preparing, but WHEN? 

And are we the prepared going to be left with all the wealthy elites who will always have the means to out prepare and so, able to control us, no matter what we do now?

My guess is that if the Elites are going to pull the plug, they'll do it before the November elections.  The next election is going to be a politcal bloodbath, and the people in power have to know that. 

The Elites rule by deception.  If enough people see through the haze, then the Elites lose their power.  The most powerful thing that we the people can do is to spread the truth the best we can. 

I just read some history regarding the French Revolution.  The similarities between then and now are chilling.  I pray the outcome won't be the same.

V's picture
V
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Dec 14 2009
Posts: 849
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

I pray the outcome won't be the same as well. We are over 200 years later and nothing has changed.

V

sjmvideo's picture
sjmvideo
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 2 2010
Posts: 34
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...
V wrote:

I pray the outcome won't be the same as well. We are over 200 years later and nothing has changed.

V

That is an extreme statement to say nothing has changed. While there are lots of similarities to the past, when I hold that statement in mind, I become paralyzed and overwhelmed that I can make any difference. Even on the smallest scale.

It's also not true that nothing has changed. If you look at the evolution of consciousness, humans have gone through major shifts in awareness and relationship to the world multiple times. French philosopher Michel Foucault actually looked through historical documents and showed how things like the scientific world view has gone through significant shifts. In his book The Order of Things 

"...its central claim: that all periods of history have possessed certain underlying conditions of truth that constituted what was acceptable as, for example, scientific discourse. Foucault argues that these conditions of discourse have changed over time, from one period's episteme to another." - Wikipedia Entry The Order of Things

Spiral Dynamics also gives some perspective on how our world views can evolve as individuals and as a species. We have been evolving in awareness along with technology. As some have said, technology has appeared to evolve faster than our awareness. I hope/expect that as a whole there will be some significant awakenings is consciousness for humanity. There are plenty of religious and spiritual stories that point to now is the time. I'm sure no matter your beliefs about 2012 prophesies, if you know about them, the coincidence of 2012 and our economic, environmental, and energy issues is food for thought.

Point being the paradox, as much as I can find that nothing has changed in 200 years, I can also find that there has been enough evolution in consciousness that I have hope. There is a lot of uncertainty, and for many people the transition will be difficult. Many will not survive. But I believe the level of consciousness and thinking that has created and allowed this mess to continue is being overtaken by a more just and compassionate awareness. I don't see how the current "powers that be" can continue in their roles after a global collapse. Even if there isn't a major awakening of the masses. To put it extremely simplified; the will either wake up themselves, or they will perish in their bunkers fortified against the world.

-Steven

ericg's picture
ericg
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 23 2010
Posts: 101
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

I'm with sjmvideo and knuckledragger both on this issue. I think peak oil and the convergent timelines of future events be it economic crash, depletion of cheap oil, natural disasters, war,  and such, make 2012 a significant year.... The Mayans actually refered to it as "The Purification". There is a video out called Bracing for Tomorrow put out by the Horizon Project that suggests passing thru the Galactic equitorial plane will cause major disruptions in the geophysical properties of earth. It could be great earthquakes, tsunamis, pole shifts, and what have you. All that coupled with the social and economic conditions of the day.... Maybe there is something to this Mayan "Purification" thingy.

I don't know anything except that we are living in fascinating times. Preparing for the worst and hoping for the best.... I'm not really a doomsayer, just would like to get off this hamster wheel/slave trudge and actually live life :)   

ericg's picture
ericg
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 23 2010
Posts: 101
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

Awesome video V.... Thank you !

sammy's picture
sammy
Status: Bronze Member (Offline)
Joined: Feb 23 2010
Posts: 35
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

 Compinthegrove, I am not following you. Forgive me, I am fairly new at this. Are you saying the Elites will somehow pull the plug on oil to the rest of the world? What do you mean "pull the plug" and what have you seen to give the opinion that this is coming? Sammy

compinthegroove's picture
compinthegroove
Status: Silver Member (Offline)
Joined: Nov 8 2009
Posts: 113
Re: The Emerging Global Empire (next lesson in the ...

Sammy,

The US is heavily dependent on oil imports and we don't have any adequate backup systems in place.  A hyperinflationary scenario would drastically reduce the oil available to us.  Why would foreigners sell us oil if we paid them in worthless currency?

 

V's picture
V
Status: Platinum Member (Offline)
Joined: Dec 14 2009
Posts: 849
Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler

Some have missed my point in stating that nothing has changed. I am not talking about external superficialities. To say human consciousness has evolved is an opinion with no basis in fact. 

Human consciousness has not evolved. It is still subject to the same rational and irrational forces it has always been ruled by ie. greed, love, anger., lust, joy, hatred etc.. The elites use simple human psychology to control the sheeple , the vast majority of which is incapable of making informed decisions based on critical thinking. This is the fact. The sheeple overwhelmingly prefer being led. The Matrix is the ultimate comfort, the ultimate prozac. Whether it be a tribe, social club, political party what have you the masses go along to get along. The proof of this is the mass hypnotism of the American sheeple into voting for hope and change.

The elites will never surrender willingly and are much further ahead in planning than the " evolved human consciousness is capable of comprehending. There are a few on this site who are able to see the game for what it is but most are still feeding the system still committed to establishing a worldwide neo feudalist regime. I would refer any one wishing to know a little more visit the webstie of Michael Hudson.

Damon great work. I hope the following proves useful in furthering your work. It is the final chapter of a book a friend sent to me. It is by Anthony C Sutton

V

 

 

CHAPTER TWELVE

Conclusions


We have demonstrated with documentary evidence a number of critical associations between Wall Street international bankers and the rise of Hitler and Naziism in Germany.

First: that Wall Street financed the German cartels in the mid-1920s which in turn proceeded to bring Hitler to power.

Second: that the financing for Hitler and his S.S. street thugs came in part from affiliates or subsidiaries of U.S. firms, including Henry Ford in 1922, payments by I.G. Farben and General Electric in 1933, followed by the Standard Oil of New Jersey and I.T.T. subsidiary payments to Heinrich Himmler up to 1944.

Third: that U.S. multi-nationals under the control of Wall Street profited handsomely from Hitler's military construction program in the 1930s and at least until 1942.

Fourth: that these same international bankers used political influence in the U.S. to cover up their wartime collaboration and to do this infiltrated the U.S. Control Commission for Germany.

Our evidence for these four major assertions can be summarized as follows:

In Chapter One we presented evidence that the Dawes and Young Plans for German reparations were formulated by Wall Streeters, temporarily wearing the hats of statesmen, and these loans generated a rain of profits for these international bankers. Owen Young of General Electric, Hjalmar Schacht, A. Voegler, and others intimately connected with Hitler's accession to power had earlier been the negotiators for the U.S. and German sides, respectively. Three Wall Street houses — Dillon, Read; Harris, Forbes; and, National City Company — handled three-quarters of the reparations loans used to create the German cartel system, including the dominant I.G. Farben and Vereinigte Stahlwerke, which together produced 95 percent of the explosives for the Nazi side in World War II.

The central role of I.G. Farben in Hitler's coup d' état was reviewed in Chapter Two. The directors of American I.G. (Farben) were identified as prominent American businessmen: Walter Teagle, a dose Roosevelt associate and backer and an NRA administrator; banker Paul Warburg (his brother Max Warburg was on the board of I.G. Farben in Germany); and Edsel Ford. Farben contributed 400,000 RM directly to Schacht and Hess for use in the crucial 1933 elections and Farben was subsequently in the forefront of military development in Nazi Germany.

A donation of 60,000 RM was made to Hitler by German General Electric (A.E.G.), which had four directors and a 25-30 percent interest held by the U.S. General Electric parent company. This role was described in Chapter Three, and we found that Gerard Swope, an originator of Roosevelt's New Deal (its National Recovery Administration segment), together with Owen Young of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Clark Minor of International General Electric, were the dominant Wall Streeters in A.E.G. and the most significant single influence.

We also found no evidence to indict the German electrical firm Siemens, which was not under Wall Street control. In contrast, there is documentary evidence that both A.E.G. and Osram, the other units of the German electrical industry — both of which had U.S. participation and control — did finance Hitler. In fact, almost all directors of German General Electric were Hitler backers, either directly through A.E.G. or indirectly through other German firms, G.E. rounded out its Hitler support by technical cooperation with Krupp, aimed at restricting U.S. development of tungsten carbide, which worked to the detriment of the U.S. in World War II. We concluded that A.E.G. plants in Germany managed, by a yet unknown maneuver, to avoid bombing by the Allies.

An examination of the role of Standard Oil of New Jersey (which was and is controlled by the Rockefeller interests) was undertaken in Chapter Four. Standard Oil apparently did not finance Hitler's accession to power in 1933 (that part of the "myth of Sidney Warburg" is not proven). On the other hand, payments were made up to 1944 by Standard Oil of New Jersey, to develop synthetic gasoline for war purposes on behalf of the Nazis and, through its wholly owned subsidiary, to Heinrich Himmler's S.S. Circle of Friends for political purposes. Standard Oil's role was technical aid to Nazi development of synthetic rubber and gasoline through a U.S. research company under the management control of Standard Oil. The Ethyl Gasoline Company, jointly owned by Standard Oil of New Jersey and General Motors, was instrumental in supplying vital ethyl lead to Nazi Germany — over the written protests of the U.S. War Department — with the clear knowledge that the ethyl lead was for Nazi military purposes.

In Chapter Five we demonstrated that International Telephone and Telegraph Company, one of the more notorious multi-nationals, worked both sides of World War II through Baron Kurt von Schroder, of the Schroder banking group. I.T.T. also held a 28-percent interest in Focke-Wolfe aircraft, which manufactured excellent German fighter planes. We also found that Texaco (Texas Oil Company) was involved in Nazi endeavors through German attorney Westrick, but dropped its chairman of the board Rieber when these endeavors were publicized.

Henry Ford was an early (1922) Hitler backer and Edsel Ford continued the family tradition in 1942 by encouraging French Ford to profit from arming the German Wehrmacht, Subsequently, these Ford-produced vehicles were used against American soldiers as they landed in France in 1944. For his early recognition of, and timely assistance to, the Nazis, Henry Ford received a Nazi medal in 1938. The records of French Ford suggest Ford Motor received kid glove treatment from the Nazis after 1940.

The provable threads of Hitler financing are drawn together in Chapter Seven and answer with precise names and figures the question, who financed Adolf Hitler? This chapter indicts Wall Street and, incidentally, no one else of consequence in the United States except the Ford family. The Ford family is not normally associated with Wall Street but is certainly a part of the "power elite."

In earlier chapters we cited several Roosevelt associates, including Teagle of Standard Oil, the Warburg family, and Gerard Swope. In Chapter Eight the role of Putzi Hanfstaengl, another Roosevelt friend and a participant in the Reichstag fire, is traced. The composition of the Nazi inner circle during World War II, and the financial contributions of Standard Oil of New Jersey and I.T.T. subsidiaries, are traced in Chapter Nine. Documentary proof of these monetary contributions is presented. Kurt yon Schrader is identified as the key intermediary in this S.S. "slush fund."

Finally, in Chapter Ten we reviewed a book suppressed in 1934 and the "myth of 'Sidney Warburg.'" The suppressed book accused the Rockefellers, the Warburgs, and the major oil companies of financing Hitler. While the name "Sidney Warburg" was no doubt an invention, the extraordinary fact remains that the argument in the suppressed "Sidney Warburg" book is remarkably close to the evidence presented now. It also remains a puzzle why James Paul Warburg, fifteen years later, would want to attempt, in a rather transparently slipshod manner, to refute the contents of the "Warburg" book, a book he claims not to have seen. It is perhaps even more of a puzzle why Warburg would choose Nazi von Papen's Memoirs as the vehicle to present his refutation.

Finally, in Chapter Eleven we examined the roles of the Morgan and Chase Banks in World War II, specifically their collaboration with the Nazis in France while a major war was raging.

In other words, as in our two previous examinations of the links between New York international bankers and major historical events, we find a provable pattern of subsidy and political manipulation.


The Pervasive Influence of International Bankers

Looking at the broad array of facts presented in the three volumes of the Wall Street series, we find persistent recurrence of the same names: Owen Young, Gerard Swope, Hjalmar Schacht, Bernard Baruch, etc.; the same international banks: J.P. Morgan, Guaranty Trust, Chase Bank; and the same location in New York: usually 120 Broadway.

This group of international bankers backed the Bolshevik Revolution and subsequently profited from the establishment of a Soviet Russia. This group backed Roosevelt and profited from New Deal socialism. This group also backed Hitler and certainly profited from German armament in the 1930s. When Big Business should have been running its business operations at Ford Motor, Standard of New Jersey, and so on, we find it actively and deeply involved in political upheavals, war, and revolutions in three major countries.

The version of history presented here is that the financial elite knowingly and with premeditation assisted the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 in concert with German bankers. After profiting handsomely from the German hyper-inflationary distress of 1923, and planning to place the German reparations burden onto the backs of American investors, Wall Street found it had brought about the 1929 financial crisis.

Two men were then backed as leaders for major Western countries: Franklin D. Roosevelt in the United States and Adolf Hitler in Germany. The Roosevelt New Deal and Hitler's Four Year Plan had great similarities. The Roosevelt and Hitler plans were plans for fascist takeovers of their respective countries. While Roosevelt's NRA failed, due to then-operating constitutional constraints, Hitler's Plan succeeded.

Why did the Wall Street elite, the international bankers, want Roosevelt and Hitler in power? This is an aspect we have not explored. According to the "myth of 'Sidney Warburg,'" Wall Street wanted a policy of revenge; that is, it wanted war in Europe between France and Germany. We know even from Establishment history that both Hitler and Roosevelt acted out policies leading to war.

The link-ups between persons and events in this three-book series would require another book. But a single example will perhaps indicate the remarkable concentration of power within a relatively few organizations, and the use of this power.

On May 1st, 1918, when the Bolsheviks controlled only a small fraction of Russia (and were to come near to losing even that fraction in the summer of 1918), the American League to Aid and Cooperate with Russia was organized in Washington, D.C. to support the Bolsheviks. This was not a "Hands off Russia" type of committee formed by the Communist Party U.S.A. or its allies. It was a committee created by Wall Street with George P. Whalen of Vacuum Oil Company as Treasurer and Coffin and Oudin of General Electric, along with Thompson of the Federal Reserve System, Willard of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, and assorted socialists.

When we look at the rise of Hitler and Naziism we find Vacuum Oil and General Electric well represented. Ambassador Dodd in Germany was struck by the monetary and technical contribution by the Rockefeller-controlled Vacuum Oil Company in building up military gasoline facilities for the Nazis. The Ambassador tried to warn Roosevelt. Dodd believed, in his apparent naiveté of world affairs, that Roosevelt would intervene, but Roosevelt himself was backed by these same oil interests and Walter Teagle of Standard Oil of New Jersey and the NRA was on the board of Roosevelt's Warm Springs Foundation. So, in but one of many examples, we find the Rockefeller-controlled Vacuum Oil Company prominently assisting in the creation of Bolshevik Russia, the military build-up of Nazi Germany, and backing Roosevelt's New Deal.


Is the United States Ruled by a Dictatorial Elite?

Within the last decade or so, certainly since the 1960s, a steady flow of literature has presented a thesis that the United States is ruled by a self-perpetuating and unelected power elite. Even further, most of these books aver that this elite controls, or at the least heavily influences, all foreign and domestic policy decisions, and that no idea becomes respectable or is published in the United States without the tacit approval, or perhaps lack of disapproval, of this elitist circle.

Obviously the very flow of anti-establishment literature by itself testifies that the United States cannot be wholly under the thumb of any single group or elite. On the other hand, anti-establishment literature is not fully recognized or reasonably discussed in academic or media circles. More often than not it consists of a limited edition, privately produced, almost hand-to-hand circulated. There are some exceptions, true; but not enough to dispute the observation that anti-establishment critics do not easily enter normal information/distribution channels.

Whereas in the early and mid-1960s, any concept of rule by a conspiratorial elite, or indeed any kind of elite, was reason enough to dismiss the proponent out of hand as a "nut case," the atmosphere for such concepts has changed radically. The Watergate affair probably added the final touches to a long-developing environment of skepticism and doubt. We are almost at the point where anyone who accepts, for example, the Warren Commission report, or believes that that the decline and fall of Mr. Nixon did not have some conspiratorial aspects, is suspect. In brief, no one any longer really believes the Establishment information process. And there is a wide variety of alternative presentations of events now available for the curious.

Several hundred books, from the full range of the political and philosophical spectrum, add bits and pieces of evidence, more hypotheses, and more accusations. What was not too long ago a kooky idea, talked about at midnight behind closed doors, in hushed and almost conspiratorial whispers, is now openly debated — not, to be sure, in Establishment newspapers but certainly on non-network radio talk shows, the underground press, and even from time to time in books from respectable Establishment publishing houses.

So let us ask the question again: Is there an unelected power elite behind the U.S. Government?

A substantive and often-cited source of information is Carroll Quigley, Professor of International Relations at Georgetown University, who in 1966 had published a monumental modern history entitled Tragedy and Hope.1 Quigley's book is apart from others in this revisionist vein, by virtue of the fact that it was based on a two-year study of the internal documents of one of the power centers. Quigley traces the history of the power elite:

... the powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.

Quigley also demonstrates that the Council on Foreign Relations, the National Planning Association, and other groups are "semi-secret" policy-making bodies under the control of this power elite.

In the following tabular presentation we have listed five such revisionist books, including Quigley's. Their essential theses and compatibility with the three volumes of the "Wall Street" series are summarized. It is surprising that in the three major historical events noted, Carroll Quigley is not at all consistent with the "Wall Street" series evidence. Quigley goes a long way to provide evidence for the existence of the power elite, but does not penetrate the operations of the elite.

Possibly, the papers used by Quigley had been vetted, and did not include documentation on elitist manipulation of such events as the Bolshevik Revolution, Hitler's accession to power, and the election of Roosevelt in 1933. More likely, these political manipulations may not be recorded at all in the files of the power groups. They may have been unrecorded actions by a small ad hoc segment of the elite. It is noteworthy that the documents used by this author came from government sources, recording the day-to-day actions of Trotsky, Lenin, Roosevelt, Hitler, J.P. Morgan and the various firms and banks involved.

On the other hand, such authors as Jules Archer, Gary Allen, Helen P. Lasell, and William Domhoff, writing from widely different political standpoints2are consistent with the "Wall Street" evidence. These writers present a hypothesis of a power elite manipulating the U.S. Government. The "Wall Street" series demonstrates how this hypothesized "power elite" has manipulated specific historical events.

Obviously any such exercise of unconstrained and supra-legal power is unconstitutional, even though wrapped in the fabric of law-abiding actions. We can therefore legitimately raise the question of the existence of a subversive force operating to remove constitutionally guaranteed rights.


The New York Elite as a Subversive Force

Twentieth-century history, as recorded in Establishment textbooks and journals, is inaccurate. It is a history which is based solely upon those official documents which various Administrations have seen fit to release for public consumption.


Table: IS THE EVIDENCE IN THE "WALL STREET" SERIES CONSISTENT WITH RELATED REVISIONIST ARGUMENTS PRESENTED ELSEWHERE?


But an accurate history cannot be based on a selective release of documentary archives. Accuracy requires access to all documents. In practice, as previously classified documents in the U.S. State Department files, the British Foreign Office, and the German Foreign Ministry archives and other depositories are acquired, a new version of history has emerged; the prevailing Establishment version is seen to be, not only inaccurate, but designed to hide a pervasive fabric of deceit and immoral conduct.

The center of political power, as authorized by the U.S. Constitution, is with an elected Congress and an elected President, working within the framework and under the constraints of a Constitution, as interpreted by an unbiased Supreme Court. We have in the past assumed that political power is consequently carefully exercised by the Executive and legislative branch, after due deliberation and assessment of the wishes of the electorate. In fact, nothing could be further from this assumption. The electorate has long suspected, but now knows, that political promises are worth nothing. Lies are the order of the day for policy implementors. Wars are started (and stopped) with no shred of coherent explanation. Political words have never matched political deeds. Why not? Apparently because the center of political power has been elsewhere than with elected and presumably responsive representatives in Washington, and this power elite has its own objectives, which are inconsistent with those of the public at large.

In this three-volume series we have identified for three historical events the seat of political power in the United States — the power behind the scenes, the hidden influence on Washington — as that of the financial establishment in New York: the private international bankers, more specifically the financial houses of J.P. Morgan, the Rockefeller-controlled Chase Manhattan Bank, and in earlier days (before amalgamation of their Manhattan Bank with the former Chase Bank), the Warburgs.

The United States has, in spite of the Constitution and its supposed constraints, become a quasi-totalitarian state. While we do not (yet) have. the overt trappings of dictatorship, the concentration camps and the knock on the door at midnight, we most certainly do have threats and actions aimed at the survival of non-Establishment critics, use of the Internal Revenue Service to bring dissidents in line, and manipulation of the Constitution by a court system that is politically subservient to the Establishment.

It is in the pecuniary interests of the international bankers to centralize political power — and this centralization can best be achieved within a collectivist society, such as socialist Russia, national socialist Germany, or a Fabian socialist United States.

There can be no full understanding and appreciation of twentieth-century American politics and foreign policy without the realization that this financial elite effectively monopolizes Washington policy.

In case after case, newly released documentation implicates this elite and confirms this hypothesis. The revisionist versions of the entry of the United States into World Wars I and II, Korea, and Vietnam reveal the influence and objectives of this elite.

For most of the twentieth century the Federal Reserve System, particularly the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (which is outside the control of Congress, unaudited and uncontrolled, with the power to print money and create credit at will), has exercised a virtual monopoly over the direction of the American economy. In foreign affairs the Council on Foreign Relations, superficially an innocent forum for academics, businessmen, and politicians, contains within its shell, perhaps unknown to many of its members, a power center that unilaterally determines U.S. foreign policy. The major objective of this submerged — and obviously subversive — foreign. policy is the acquisition of markets and economic power (profits, if you will), for a small group of giant multi-nationals under the virtual control of a few banking investment houses and controlling families.

Through foundations controlled by this elite, research by compliant and spineless academics, "conservatives" as well as "liberals," has been directed into channels useful for the objectives of the elite essentially to maintain this subversive and unconstitutional power apparatus.

Through publishing houses controlled by this same financial elite unwelcome books have been squashed and useful books promoted; fortunately publishing has few barriers to entry and is almost atomistically competitive. Through control of a dozen or so major newspapers, run by editors who think alike, public information can be almost orchestrated at will. Yesterday, the space program; today, an energy crisis or a campaign for ecology; tomorrow, a war in the Middle East or some other manufactured "crisis."

The total result of this manipulation of society by the Establishment elite has been four major wars in sixty years, a crippling national debt, abandonment of the Constitution, suppression of freedom and opportunity, and creation of a vast credibility gulf between the man in the street and Washington, D.C. While the transparent device of two major parties trumpeting artificial differences, circus-like conventions, and the cliche of "bipartisan foreign policy" no longer carries credibility, and the financial elite itself recognizes that its policies lack public acceptance, it is obviously prepared to go it alone without even nominal public support.

In brief, we now have to consider and debate whether this New York-based elitist Establishment is a subversive force operating with deliberation and knowledge to suppress the Constitution and a free society. That will be the task ahead in the next decade.


The Slowly Emerging Revisionist Truth

The arena for this debate and the basis for our charges of subversion is the evidence provided by the revisionist historian. Slowly, over decades, book by book, almost line by line, the truth of recent history has emerged as documents are released, probed, analyzed, and set within a more valid historical framework.

Let us consider a few examples. American entry into World War II was supposedly precipitated, according to the Establishment version, by the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Revisionists have established that Franklin D. Roosevelt and General Marshall knew of the impending Japanese attack and did nothing to warn the Pearl Harbor military authorities. The Establishment wanted war with Japan. Subsequently, the Establishment made certain that Congressional investigation of Pearl Harbor would fit the Roosevelt whitewash. In the words of Percy Greaves, chief research expert for the Republican minority on the Joint Congressional Committee investigating Pearl Harbor:

The complete facts will never be known. Most of the so-called investigations have been attempts to suppress, mislead, or confuse those who seek the truth. From the beginning to the end, facts and files have been withheld so as to reveal only those items of information which benefit the administration under investigation. Those seeking the truth are told that other facts or documents cannot be revealed because they are intermingled in personal diaries, pertain to our relations with foreign countries, or are sworn to contain no information of value.

3

But this was not the first attempt to bring the United States into war, or the last. The Morgan interests, in concert with Winston Churchill, tried to bring the U.S. into World War I as early as 1915 and succeeded in doing so in 1917. Colin Thompson's Lusitania implicates President Woodrow Wilson in the sinking of the Lusitania — a horror device to generate a public backlash to draw the United States into war with Germany. Thompson demonstrates that Woodrow Wilson knew four darts beforehand that the Lusitania was carrying six-million rounds of ammunition plus explosives, and therefore, "passengers who proposed to sail on that vessel were sailing in violation of statute of this country."4

The British Board of Inquiry under Lord Mersey was instructed by the British Government "that it is considered politically expedient that Captain Turner, the master of the Lusitania, be most prominently blamed for the disaster."

In retrospect, given Colin Thompson's evidence, the blame is more fairly to be attributed to President Wilson, "Colonel" House, J.P. Morgan, and Winston Churchill; this conspiratorial elite should have been brought to trial for willful negligence, if not treason. It is to Lord Mersey's eternal credit that after performing his "duty" under instructions from His Majesty's government, and placing the blame on Captain Turner, he resigned, rejected his fee, and from that date on refused to handle British government commissions. To his friends Lord Mersey would only say about the Lusitania case that it was a "dirty business."

Then in 1933-4 came the attempt by the Morgan firm to install a fascist dictatorship in the United States. In the words of Jules Archer, it was planned to be a Fascist putsch to take over the government and "run it under a dictator on behalf of America's bankers and industrialists."5 Again, a single courageous individual emerged — General Smedley Darlington Butler, who blew the whistle on the Wall Street conspiracy. And once again Congress stands out, particularly Congressmen Dickstein and MacCormack, by its gutless refusal to do no more than conduct a token whitewash investigation.

Since World War II we have seen the Korean War and the Vietnamese War — meaningless, meandering no-win wars costly in dollars and lives, with no other major purpose but to generate multibillion-dollar armaments contracts. Certainly these wars were not fought to restrain communism, because for fifty years the Establishment has been nurturing and subsidizing the Soviet Union which supplied armaments to the other sides in both wars — Korea and Vietnam. So our revisionist history will show that the United States directly or indirectly armed both sides in at least Korea and Vietnam.

In the assassination of President Kennedy, to take a domestic example, it is difficult to find anyone who today accepts the findings of the Warren Commission — except perhaps the members of that Commission. Yet key evidence is still hidden from public eyes for 50 to 75 years. The Watergate affair demonstrated even to the man in the street that the White House can be a vicious nest of intrigue and deception.

Of all recent history the story of Operation Keelhaul6 is perhaps the most disgusting. Operation Keelhaul was the forced repatriation of millions of Russians at the orders of President (then General) Dwight D. Eisenhower, in direct violation of the Geneva Convention of 1929 and the long-standing American tradition of political refuge. Operation Keelhaul, which contravenes all our ideas of elementary decency and individual freedom, was undertaken at the direct orders of General Eisenhower and, we may now presume, was a part of a long-range program of nurturing collectivism, whether it be Soviet communism' Hitler's Naziism, or FDR's New Deal. Yet until recent publication of documentary evidence by Julius Epstein, anyone who dared to suggest Eisenhower would betray millions of innocent individuals for political purposes was viciously and mercilessly attacked.7

What this revisionist history really teaches us is that our willingness as individual citizens to surrender political power to an elite has cost the world approximately two-hundred-million persons killed from 1820 to 1975. Add to that untold misery the concentration camps, the political prisoners, the suppression and oppression of those who try to bring the truth to light.

When will it all stop? It will not stop until we act upon one simple axiom: that the power system continues only so long as individuals want it to continue, and it will continue only so long as individuals try to get something for nothing. The day when a majority of individuals declares or acts as if it wants nothing from government, declares it will look after its own welfare and interests, then on that day power elites are doomed. The attraction to "go along" with power elites is the attraction of something for nothing. That is the bait. The Establishment always offers something for nothing; but the something is taken from someone else, as taxes or plunder, and awarded elsewhere in exchange for political support.

Periodic crises and wars are used to whip up support for other plunder-reward cycles which in effect tighten the noose around our individual liberties. And of course we have hordes of academic sponges, amoral businessmen, and just plain hangers-on, to act as non-productive recipients for the plunder.

Stop the circle of plunder and immoral reward and elitist structures collapse. But not until a majority finds the moral courage and the internal fortitude to reject the something-for-nothing con game and replace it by voluntary associations, voluntary communes, or local rule and decentralized societies, will the killing and the plunder cease.

 

Footnotes:

1Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, op. cit.

2There are many others; the author selected more or less at random two conservatives (Allen and Lasell) and two liberals (Archer and Domhoff),

3Percy L. Greaves, Jr., "The Pearl Harbor Investigation," in Harry Elmer Harnes, Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, (Caldwell: Caxton Printers, 1953), p, 13-20.

4Colin Simpson, Lusitania, (London: Longman, 1972), p, 252.

5Jules Archer, The Plot to Seize the White House, (New York: Hawthorn Book, 1973), p. 202.

6See Julius Epstein, Operation Keelhaul, (Old Greenwich: Devin Adair, 1973).

7See for example Robert Welch, The Politician, (Belmont, Mass.: Belmont Publishing Co., 1963).

 

 


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to post comments