Cuck Baldwin's primer on a very real New World Order

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
DrKrbyLuv's picture
DrKrbyLuv
Status: Diamond Member (Offline)
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Posts: 1995
Cuck Baldwin's primer on a very real New World Order

Excerpts from Chuck Baldwin - It is hard to believe, but a
majority of Americans seem oblivious to the fact that there is
a very real, very legitimate New World Order (NWO)
unfolding. In the face of overwhelming evidence, most
Americans not only seem totally unaware of this reality,
they seem unwilling to even remotely entertain the
notion.

On one hand, it is understandable
that so many Americans would be ignorant of the emerging
New World Order. After all, the mainstream media refuses
to report, or even acknowledge, the NWO. Even
"conservative"
commentators and talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh,
Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, or Joe Scarborough refuse
to discuss it. And when listeners call these respective
programs, these
"conservative"
hosts usually resort to insulting the
caller as being some kind of
"conspiracy
kook."
One host even railed that if anyone questions
the government line on 9/11, we should
"lock them up and
throw away the key."
So much for freedom of speech!

This is an area--perhaps the
central area--where liberals and conservatives agree:
they both show no patience or tolerance for anyone who
believes that global government (in any form) is
evolving. One has to wonder how otherwise intelligent
and thoughtful people can be so brain dead when it comes
to this issue. It makes one wonder who is really pulling
their strings, doesn't it?

The list of notable personalities
who have openly referenced or called for some kind of
global government or New World Order is extremely
lengthy. Are all these people
"kooks" or
"conspiracy nuts"?
Why would world leaders--including presidents,
secretaries of state, and high government officials;
including the media, financial, and political
elite--constantly refer to something that doesn't exist?
Why would they write about, talk about, or openly
promote a New World Order, if there is no such thing?

Bush, Sr. said,
"We have before
us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future
generations a new world order . . .. When we are
successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at
this new world order, an order in which a credible
United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill
the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders."

What was President G.H.W. Bush
talking about, if there is no such thing as an emerging
New World Order? Was he talking out of his mind? Was he
hallucinating?

Former President George
W. Bush penned his signature to the Declaration of
Quebec back on April 22, 2001, in which he gave a
"commitment to
hemispheric integration and national and collective
responsibility for improving the economic well-being and
security of our people."

By
"our people,"
Bush meant the people of the Western Hemisphere, not the
people of the United States. Phyllis Schlafly rightly
reminded us that G.W. Bush
"pledged that the
United States will 'build a hemispheric family on the
basis of a more just and democratic international
order.'"

Remember, too, that it was G.W.
Bush who, back in 2005, committed the United States to
the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), which is
nothing more than a precursor to the North American
Community or Union, as outlined in CFR member Robert
Pastor's manual,
Toward a North American Community
.

If there is no such thing as an
emerging New World Order, what was G.W. Bush talking
about when he referred to
"a hemispheric family" and an
"international order"?

The public statements of notable
world leaders regarding an emerging New World Order are
copious. Consider the statements of former CBS newsman,
Walter Cronkite.

In his book,
A Reporter's Life,
Walter Cronkite

said
, "A
system of world order--preferably a system of world
government--is mandatory. The proud nations someday will
see the light and, for the common good and their own
survival, yield up their precious sovereignty . . ."

Cronkite told BBC newsman Tim Sebastian,
"I think we are
realizing that we are going to have to have an
international rule of law."
He added,
"We need not only
an executive to make international law, but we need the
military forces to enforce that law."
Cronkite also
said, "American
people are going to begin to realize that perhaps they
are going to have to yield some sovereignty to an
international body to enforce world law."

If there is no emerging New World
Order, what is Walter Cronkite talking about? Can there
be any doubt that Cronkite is talking about global
government? Absolutely not!

Now, when Bush, Sr. talks about
fulfilling "the
promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders,"
he was
talking about the same thing former UN Secretary-General
Boutros Boutros-Ghali was talking about when he said,
"The time for
absolute and exclusive sovereignty . . . has passed."

The United Nations has been on the
forefront of promoting the New World Order agenda since
its very inception. In 1995, the UN released a manual
entitled, "Our
Global Neighborhood."
It states,
"Population,
consumption, technology, development, and the
environment are linked in complex relationships that
bear closely on human welfare in the global
neighborhood. Their effective and equitable management
calls for a systematic, long-term, global approach
guided by the principle of sustainable development,
which has been the central lesson from the mounting
ecological dangers of recent times. Its universal
application is a priority among the tasks of global
governance."

If there is no emerging New World
Order, what is
"global governance"
all about?

"Who are the
movers and shakers promoting global government?"
you
ask. Obviously, it is the international bankers who are
the heavyweights behind the push for global government.
Remember, one cannot create a
"global economy" without a global government to manage, oversee, and
control it.

In a

letter
written to Colonel E. Mandell House,
President Franklin D. Roosevelt said,
"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know,
that a financial element in the large centers has owned
the government of the U.S. since the days of

Andrew Jackson
."

"Old Hickory"
did his best to rid the United States from the death
grip that the international bankers were beginning to
exert on this country. He may have been the last
President to actually oppose the bankers. In discussing
the Bank Renewal bill with a delegation of bankers in
1832, Jackson said,
"Gentlemen, I
have had men watching you for a long time, and I am
convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to
speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you
won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you
lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I
take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I
shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true,
gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on,
you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be
my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to
rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you
out."

Unfortunately, the international
bankers proved themselves to be too formidable for
President Jackson. And in 1913, with the collaboration
of President Woodrow Wilson, the bankers were given
charge over America's financial system by the creation
of the Federal Reserve.

Ever since the CFR and Trilateral
Commission were created, they have filled the key
leadership positions of government, big media, and of
course, the Federal Reserve.

In his book,
"With
No Apologies,
"
former Republican Presidential
nominee
Barry Goldwater
wrote,
"The Trilateral
Commission is intended to be the vehicle for
multinational consolidation of the commercial and
banking interests by seizing control of the political
government of the United States. The Trilateral
Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to
seize control and consolidate the four centers of
power-- political, monetary, intellectual and
ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends
is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the
political governments of the nation-states involved. As
managers and creators of the system, they will rule the
future."
Was Goldwater a prophet or what?

And again, the goals of the global
elite have been publicly stated. Back in 1991, the
founder of the CFR, David Rockefeller praised the major
media for their complicity in helping to facilitate the
globalist agenda by saying,
"We are grateful
to the Washington
Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine
and other
great publications whose directors have attended our
meetings and respected their promises of discretion for
almost forty years. . . . It would have been impossible
for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been
subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.
But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to
march towards a world government. The supranational
sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers
is surely preferable to the national auto-determination
practiced in past centuries."

How could Rockefeller be any
plainer? He acknowledged the willful assistance of the
major media in helping to keep the elitists' agenda of
global government from the American people. To this day,
the major media has not deviated from that
collaboration. And this includes the aforementioned
"conservative"
talking heads. They know if they want to keep their
jobs, they dare not reveal the New World Order. The NWO,
more than anything else, is the
"Third Rail" to the national media.

Is it any wonder that President
Barack Obama has stacked his government with numerous
members of the CFR? Among these are Robert Gates, Janet
Napolitano, Eric Shinseki, Timothy Geithner, and Tom
Daschle. Other CFR members include CFR President Richard
Haass, CFR Director Richard Holbrooke, and founding
member of the Trilateral Commission and CFR member Paul
Volcker. Obama even asked a CFR member, Rick Warren, to
deliver the inaugural prayer.

Still not convinced? Just a few
days ago, when asked by a reporter what he thought the
most important thing was that Barack Obama could
accomplish, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger
said, "I think
his task will be develop an overall strategy for America
in this period when, really, a New World Order can be
created. It's a great opportunity; it isn't just a
crisis."

This is the same Henry Kissinger,
you will recall, who said back in 1991,
"Today, America
would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to
restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is
especially true if they were told that there were [sic]
an outside threat from beyond, whether real or
promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is
then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver
them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is
the unknown. When presented with this scenario,
individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the
guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the
World Government."

Do you now see why it does not
matter to a tinker's dam whether it is a Republican or
Democrat who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue? For
the most part, both major parties in Washington, D.C.,
have been under the dominating influence of the
international bankers who control the Federal Reserve,
the CFR, and the Trilateral Commission. And this is also
why it does not matter whether one calls himself
conservative or liberal. For the most part, both
conservatives and liberals in Washington, D.C., are
facilitating the emerging New World Order. It is time we
wake up to this reality.

Presidents Bush, Sr., Bill Clinton,
and Bush, Jr. have thoroughly set the table for the
implementation of the NWO, as surely as the sun rises in
the east. All Obama has to do is put the food on the
table--and you can count on this: Barack Obama will
serve up a New World Order feast like you cannot
believe!

That a New World Order is emerging
is not in question. The only question is,

"What will freedom-loving Americans do about it?"
Of course, the
first thing they have to do is admit that an emerging
New World Order exists! Until conservatives, Christians,
pastors, constitutionalists, and others who care about a
sovereign, independent United States acknowledge the
reality of an emerging New World Order, they will be
incapable of opposing it. And right now, that is exactly
what they are not doing.

joe2baba's picture
joe2baba
Status: Martenson Brigade Member (Offline)
Joined: Jun 17 2008
Posts: 807
Re: Cuck Baldwin's primer on a very real New World Order

what freedom loving americans will do about it is .......................watch nfl fooball and sex in the city.

because you are a conspiracy theorist and none of this really exists.

personally i wont believe it till i see evidence of it like un troops or chinese troops or canadian troops policing our streets. and the repeal of the constitution.

then and ony then will i do anything about it.............................i will turn off my tv.

 

harm123's picture
harm123
Status: Member (Offline)
Joined: Mar 12 2009
Posts: 6
Re: Cuck Baldwin's primer on a very real New World Order

"And when listeners call these respective programs, these "conservative" hosts usually resort to insulting the caller as being some kind of "conspiracy kook." "

 "because you are a conspiracy theorist and none of this really exists."

...hhhmmm. 

 

 

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to post comments