My apologies it was my first time posting in the discussion forum
Insider
-
Where's the line where inflation will become hyperinflation?
-
To fail to plan is to plan to fail
Comments
kelvinator: 17 hours 27 min ago
Michael_Rudmin: 1 day 8 hours ago
kelvinator: 23 hours 33 min ago
kelvinator: 1 day 5 hours ago
New Forum Topics
Adam Taggart: 3 days 22 hours ago
anninvancouver: 1 week 3 days ago
thc0655: 2 weeks 10 hours ago
greendoc: 2 weeks 3 days ago
Time2help: 2 weeks 3 days ago
nordurson: 4 weeks 9 hours ago
Adam Taggart: 4 weeks 1 day ago
Adam Taggart: 6 weeks 5 hours ago
jeantheau: 6 weeks 20 hours ago
Afridev: 6 weeks 1 day ago
Newest groups
-
Nordic brothers sharing thoughts and ideas on pre-crisis investment strategies and contingency planning.
-
Looking for likeminded people
-
Living a resilient life on both sides of the MO/KS state line
-
Looking for like minded folks near me. Anyone want to discuss the 3 E's?
-
Developing ham radio capability
When Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase Bank, appeared before the Senate Banking Committee on June 13, he was wearing cufflinks bearing the presidential seal. “Was Dimon trying to send any particular message by wearing the presidential cufflinks?” asked CNBC editor John Carney. “Was he . . . subtly hinting that he’s really the guy in charge?”
The groveling of the Senators was so obvious that Jon Stewart did a spoof news clip on it, featured in a Huffington Post piece titled “Jon Stewart Blasts Senate’s Coddling Of JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon,” and Matt Taibbi wrote an op-ed called “Senators Grovel, Embarrass Themselves at Dimon Hearing.” He said the whole thing was painful to watch.
“What is going on with this panel of senators?” asked Stewart. “They’re sucking up to Jamie Dimon like they’re on JPMorgan’s payroll.” The explanation in a news clip that followed was that JPMorgan Chase is the biggest campaign donor to many of the members of the Banking Committee.
That is one obvious answer, but financial analysts Jim Willie and Rob Kirby think it may be something far larger, deeper, and more ominous. They contend that the $3 billion-plus losses in London hedging transactions that were the subject of the hearing can be traced, not to European sovereign debt (as alleged), but to the record-low interest rates maintained on U.S. government bonds.
The national debt is growing at $1.5 trillion per year. Ultra-low interest rates MUST be maintained to prevent the debt from overwhelming the government budget. Near-zero rates also need to be maintained because even a moderate rise would cause multi-trillion dollar derivative losses for the banks, and would remove the banks’ chief income stream, the arbitrage afforded by borrowing at 0% and investing at higher rates.
The low rates are maintained by interest rate swaps, called by Willie a “derivative tool which controls the bond market in a devious artificial manner.” How they control it is complicated, and is explored in detail in the Willie piece here and Kirby piece here.
Kirby contends that the only organization large enough to act as counterparty to some of these trades is the U.S. Treasury itself. He suspects the Treasury’s Exchange Stabilization Fund, a covert entity without oversight and accountable to no one. Kirby also notes that if publicly-traded companies (including JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley) are deemed to be integral to U.S. national security (meaning protecting the integrity of the dollar), they can legally be excused from reporting their true financial condition. They are allowed to keep two sets of books.
Interest rate swaps are now over 80 percent of the massive derivatives market, and JPMorgan holds about $57.5 trillion of them. Without the protective JPMorgan swaps, interest rates on U.S. debt could follow those of Greece and climb to 30%. CEO Dimon could, then, indeed be “the guy in charge”: he could be controlling the lever propping up the whole U.S. financial system.
Hero or Felon?
continue
http://webofdebt.wordpress.com/2012/06/19/why-the-senate-wont-touch-jamie-dimon-jpm-derivatives-prop-up-u-s-debt/
Hi everyone I was wondering what your thoughts are on this article?