Yinon, PNAC and the Zionist / US / NATO Project to Destroy Syria
From Arnon Milchan's first production film. Released 1978.
From "The Lone Gunman", March 2001 Pilot (Fox Television).
Please send me ([email protected]) your complete posts on 911. Can you put in the photos that were left off of the first entry?
I'm thinking of starting a 911 Meet-Up Group in my tri-state area. People MUST see all your reviews and learn about that book you mention.
Thanks, Ken Pollinger
PS Forbidden Knowledge has quite a list of 911 videos. I'd love to see them ranked in terms of importance. Maybe one day a Washington March 911!!!!
The Saker posts about the role of the Zionist/Neocon faction in world politics.
Why should we even try to look at this indelicate topic?
The best information available is that the militant Zionist faction is actively destroying the Middle East to establish regional Israeli economic and military superiority. This is done largely by using the US military. The millions of displaced and killed Arab neighbors is why the subject must be tackled, despite risking offense to our Jewish friends.
My current understanding (always subject to updating) is that there is a RED/BLUE group hidden within the Jewish culture and nation that seeks power for its own sake. It is not religious, is not a nation, nor is it an ethnicity. It is purely a power coalition in the tradition of Machiavelli and Leo Strauss. However, the Jewish tribal mythology has provided a particularly good home base for efforts to reshape the world.
Lets give them a name: the cabal. The cabal uses the pattern of deception to advance its aims and convince populations to synergize their efforts towards the cabal's goals.
The general Jewish population is targeted by this myth-making as much as the non-Jewish. Perhaps even more so. Particularly effective are two interrelated myths:
1. the superiority of the Jewish Tribe (chosen people). A close corollary is the imperative to maintain separateness, and resist assimilation. The myth is ready made in scripture. We just emphasize a return to our scriptural heritage and there it it.
2. perpetual victimization (everyone hates us and we are always under threat). Siege mentality.
—intense ethnic cohesion. Circling the wagons, we must stick together. Any criticism of one is criticism of all. The Hasbara armies and the citizen editors of Wikipedia. Opinion makers at the NYT always aimed at "what is good for Israel."
—any violence we commit is justified as "we must defend ourselves."
—deserving of special protection.
Most of my liberal Jewish family and friends are aware of the superiority teachings in their historical scriptures, but they do not give them much weight. (The Talmud has a plethora of rules concerning the superiority of Jews over non-Jews.) My modern GREEN friends have grown past the BLUE ethnocentric way of thinking. In the same way, my Christian family and friends are aware of St Paul's description of the proper (subservient) role of women, prohibitions against divorce and homosexuality, but have moved on to other ways of thinking. Yes, those rules are there in our historical past, but we don't attend to them much. Same with the creation story of Genesis.
I also believe that the cabal is active in nurturing the perpetual victimization story. Several examples of Jewish on Jewish violence are known that serve to nurture this story. Alison Weir documents Zionist agents who were, at that time, pushing for the formation of the State of Israel, would bomb synagogues in Europe to create the climate of fear and persecution necessitating a safe haven for Jewish people. Recent bomb threats against American synagogues (that my facebook friends were blaming on intolerance due to Trump's election) were traced to an Israel citizen. Contributions to Jewish charities and PACs are known to increase with anti-Jewish violence. The wagons circle every tighter with each threat. This can be used by a cabal.
Both victimhood and superiority are useful for galvanizing a united block of coherent activists. My liberal Jewish friends and family will need to look at the way these myths operate and question if they are being used for purposes that are not truly in keeping with their values.
For as many are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
The statement has a specific meaning that is most important and should not be lost; but there is also a generic meaning: that you are spiritually an heir to that spirit in which you operate. So if you are led to murder, you are the offspring of the first murderer. If you are led to charity, you are the offspring of charity.
This is the philosophical sense in which there is nothing new under the sun, that we don’t create ourselves, but rather modify what already is.
But it’s stated succinctly in Romans 8:14. Paul, of course, was not only a student of the great rabbinical sages (being trained by Gemaliel) but also being a Roman citizen was a student of the Greek and Roman philosophers and culture.
Jesus, too, being a student of the Pharisees and trained under them during part of his life, also referred to this philosophical concept when he said to the Pharisees “fill up your father’s cup”. so we can be pretty sure that this was the understanding of the day.
I'm always looking for clues as to who exactly these people are. The Forward prints this open letter from a long list of Rabbis urging Trump to "act decisively" in Syria due to the chemical attack "war crimes" and "atrocity." (ht The Saker)
It is complete with pictures of injured children.
I would appreciate the input of anyone with better insight in to Israeli politics–how mainstream is this viewpoint? Is this a right wing faction?
It is very tough to sell wholesale murder of huge numbers of people to the liberal democracy of the west. (The core dilemma of bombing for "humanitarian reasons.") Basically, you have to establish that the people you want to murder-in-scale are monsters and criminals and "deserve to die." Then, we can all feel good and right about killing them.
They could not care less how high the pile of skulls grows.
Standing atop the pile at the end is all that matters to them.
I have heard from a number of writers that Jared Kushner has ascended in the Trump circle of advisors. As the advisor to the Commander In Chief of the largest military on Earth, I would like to know if he is RED/BLUE Meme, likely to advance the goals of militant Zionism?
What kind of human being is Jared Kushner? In Spiral Dynamics terms, all religions can be “done” from every meme. In which meme does Kushner’s thinking center: the RED/BLUE of ethnocentric Zionism, ORANGE of personal achievement, GREEN of compassion and world-centrism, or YELLOW of the integrative individual?
The likelihood that this influential, but unelected young man, will work for war or peace depends on the flavor of Judaism he embraces. Will he bomb for the Kingdom of God like RED/BLUE Menachem Begin, or teach peace from the heart-of-compassion like GREEN/YELLOW Anna Baltzer, or advocate an integral vision of "Sacred Economics" of TURQUOIS Charles Eisenstein? Each of the above examples are Jewish, but the Memes they operate from are profoundly different.
The Forward, a daily Jewish newspaper, has had several articles on Jared Kushner and his wife Ivanka, who converted to Judaism just before their wedding.
From what I can gather, the Kushners are Ultra-Orthodox associated with one of the Hassidic sects. Jared regularly attended and was closely associated with the Chabad movement at Harvard and he and his family were major financial donors to Chabad. The Forward more recently reports that the first daughter and son-in-law have purchased a home Washington’s Kalorama neighborhood and will join the small Chabad synagogue located there. Ivanka and Jared Kuchner visited the grave site of Rebbe Schneerson, Chabad’s leader, to pray for Trump victory the weeks before the election.
For the rest of this post, I will look at the Chabad movement leader, Rebbe Schneerson and the Hassidic movement drawing mostly from the book “Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel” written by a Jewish organic chemistry professor, Israel Shahak.
The Chabad movement was lead by a charismatic and popular teacher, Rebbe Manachem Schneerson. His teachings resonated with many well beyond the New York Hasidic community and influenced the global Jewish Community and politics in Israel. He was visited by Israeli prime ministers and government leaders. His grave site is considered a holy shrine and praying there is a way to invoke divine favor. His funeral was attended by 800,000 of the faithful who regard him as “The most influential rabbi in modern history.”
Rebbe Schneerson was a major thought leader of the National Religious Party (NPR) comprising about 11% of the Israeli voters. He also is a major thought leader in the ultra-orthodox Hassidic group called the Gush Emunim who comprise the militant "settler" movement.
Shahak estimates that two major orthodox Hassidic groups together comprise another 11% of the Israeli Jewish population. Thus, about 22% of the Israeli population (and Jared Kushner) hang on the teachings of this charismatic rabbi.
Schneerson supports the Likud political party of Netanyahu.
The NRP is now lead by the rabbi’s of the Gush Emunim movement making the two closely intertwined. (For simplicities sake, I will talk about the common attitudes of the NRP and Gush Emunim together.)
I have found that it is very difficult for the progressive Jewish community to fully appreciate the depth of the superiority belief of these orthodox groups. Infact, some have doubted their accuracy and have requested references. I will include quite a few quotes from Shahak.
The status of non-Jews in the Cabbala as compared to that in talmudic literature is a good beginning point for discussion. Most of the many Jewish authors that have written about the Cabbala in English, German and French have either avoided this subject or have hidden its essence under clouds of misleading generalizations. These authors, Gershon Scholem being one of the most significant, have employed the trick of using words such as “men,” “human beings” and “cosmic” in order to imply incorrectly that the Cabbala presents a path leading towards salvation for all human beings. The actual fact is that cabbalistic texts, as opposed to talmudic literature, emphasize salvation for only Jews. Many books dealing with the Cabbala that are written in Hebrew, other than those written by Scholem, present an honest description of salvation and other sensitive Jewish issues. Shahak, pp. 57-58.
The ideas of Rabbi Luria greatly influenced the theology of Rabbi Kook the elder and still underlie the ideologies of Gush Emunim and Hassidism. Yesaiah Tishbi, an authority on the Cabbala who wrote in Hebrew, explained in his scholarly work, The Theory of Evil and the (Satanic) Sphere in Lurianic Cabbala (1942, reprinted in 1982): “It is plain that those prospects and the scheme [of salvation] are intended only for Jews.” … “The Emanating Power, blessed be his name, wanted there to be some people on this low earth that would embody the four divine emanations. These people are the Jews, chosen to join together the four divine worlds here below.” Tishbi further cited Vital’s writings in emphasizing the Lurianic doctrine that non-Jews have satanic souls: “Souls of non-Jews come entirely from the female part of the satanic sphere. For this reason souls of non-Jews are called evil, not good, and are created without [divine] knowledge.” Shahak, p. 58.
In his illuminating Hebrew-language book, Rabbinate, Hassidism, Enlightenment: The History of Jewish Culture Between the End of the Sixteenth and the Beginning of the Nineteenth Century (1956), Ben-Zion Katz explained convincingly that the above doctrines became part of Hassidism. Accurate descriptions of Lurianic doctrines [including Jewish supremacism] and their wide influence upon religious Jews can be found in numerous other studies, written in Hebrew. In books and articles written in other languages, and thus read by most interested non-Israeli Jews and non-Jews, such descriptions and analyses are most often absent. The role of Satan, whose earthly embodiment according to the Cabbala is every non-Jew, has been minimized or not mentioned by authors who have not written about the Cabbala in Hebrew. Such authors, therefore, have not conveyed to readers accurate accounts of general NRP or its hard-core, Gush Emunim politics. Shahak, p. 58.
Me …. : I will include here a fairly long but disorganized discourse of Rebbe Schneerson on the subject of whether killing a Jewish embryo is different from killing a non-Jewish one. Though he rambles terribly, the values he espouses become clear in the discourse.
Quoting again from Shahak:
The ideas of Rabbi Schneerson that appear below are taken from a book of his recorded messages to followers in Israel, titled Gatherings of Conversations and published in the Holy Land in 1965. During the subsequent three decades of his life until his death, Rabbi Schneerson remained consistent; he did not change any of the opinions. What Rabbi Scheerson taught either was or immediately became official, Lubovitch, Hassidic belief.
Regarding the non-Jew the Lubovitcher Rebbe’s [Schneerson] views were clear even if a bit disorderly:
“In such a manner the Halacha, stipulated by the Talmud, showed that a non-Jew should be punished by death if he kills an embryo, even if the embryo is non-Jewish, while the Jew should not be, even if the embryo is Jewish. As we [the talmudic sages] learn from Exodus 22: 21, beginning with the words ‘and if any mischief will follow.’” This quoted verse is a part of a passage beginning in verse 21, describing what should be done “if men strive and hurt a woman with child,” thus damaging the embryo. Verse 22, whose beginning is quoted by the Lubovitcher Rebbe, says in full: “And if any mischief will follow, then you shall give soul for soul.” (Some English translations use the wording “life for life” instead of “soul for soul.”) The above stated difference in the punishment of a Jew and a non-Jew for the same crime is common in the Talmud and Halacha.
The Lubovitcher Rebbe continued:
The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: “Let us differentiate.” Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of “let us differentiate” between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world … The Old Rabbi [a pseudonym for one of the holy Lubovitch rabbis] explained that the
passage in Chapter 49 of Hatanya [the basic book of Chabad]: “And you have chosen us” [the Jews] means specifically that the Jewish body was chosen [by God], because a choice is thus made between outwardly similar things. The Jewish body “looks as if it were in substance similar to bodies of non-Jews,” but the meaning … is that the bodies only seem to be similar in material substance, outward look and superficial quality. The difference of the inner quality, however, is so great that the bodies should be considered as completely different species. This is the reason why the Talmud states that there is an halachic difference in attitude about the bodies of non-Jews [as opposed to the bodies of Jews]” “their bodies are in vain.” … An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness. As has been explained, an embryo is called a human being, because it has both body and soul. Thus, the difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish embryo can be understood. There is also a difference in bodies. The body of a Jewish embryo is on a higher level than is the body of a non-Jew. This is expressed in the phrase “let us differentiate” about the body of a non-Jew, which is a totally different kind. The same difference exists in regard to the soul: the soul of a Jewish embryo is different than the soul of a non-Jewish embryo. We therefore ask: Why should a non-Jew be punished if he kills even a non-Jewish embryo while a Jew should not be punished even if he kills a Jewish embryo? The answer can be understood by [considering] the general difference between Jews and non-Jews: A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews. “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” [Genesis 1: 1] means that [the heavens and the earth] were created for the sake of the Jews, who are called the “beginning.” This means everything, all developments, all discoveries, the creation, including the “heavens and the earth – are vanity compared to the Jews. The important things are the Jews, because they do not exist for any [other] aim; they themselves are [the divine] aim.”
… A non-Jew’s entire reality is only vanity. It is written, “And the strangers shall stand and feed your flocks” [Isaiah 61: 5]. The entire creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews. Shahak, p. 60.
The limited insight I have to Jared Kushner due to his association with Chabad is that he is probably RED/BLUE Meme and may seek to advance an ethnocentric, militaristic vision of “what is good for Israel.”
If this is correct, Kushner’s ascendance portends poorly for the prospects of international peace.
Thanks, sp, for putting that together. Very interesting and information that I would never dig up on my own.