Walter Chesnut – Loads of covid/vax info
Check the tweet, then go to Walter’s twitter page and click the link in the bio. In the sections you will find plenty of info about Covid, spike and vaccines. Link works best on desktop.
I’m leaving this here for more scientifically minded people who can disseminate this information faster. Some of it is already known, some I’ve never heard before. Science discussing everything from immunity, reproduction, cancer, cardiovascular, genetics, systemic, metabolism, CNS. Have at it, you might find it insightful.
In patients who succumbed to SARS, SARS-CoV was detected in the heart of 35% of the subjects suggesting that SARS-CoV is capable of infecting the myocardium in susceptible individuals. We showed that patients who had SARS-CoV in their hearts died considerably earlier suggesting that myocardial SARS-CoV infection was associated with a more aggressive course of illness.
This is troubling for both Covid and especially vaccines. Think of the athletes dropping dead of late. Are they experiencing a more sped up form of heart failure than others?
How any sentient person who has (seemingly) survived the first two shots can read this and still go ahead and get boosted is beyond me…..
Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Steven R Gundry
Originally published 8 Nov 2021 Circulation. 2021;144:A10712
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score. The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients. This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35+/-20 above the norm to 82 +/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46+/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac. We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
Edit: Dr. John on twitter made a nice set of graphical representations of the data. One thing you will notice is that the +/- bars, which I assume to be +/- one standard deviation bars, don’t even cross over in the case of HGF… these are not insignificant changes, especially given that they represent data from over 500 patients!
(1/2) The #COVIDVaccination dramatically increases endothelial inflammatory markers & acute coronary syndrome risk as measured by the PULS cardiac test.
Study of 566 subjects. Conference abstract: https://t.co/Owszx8hFdk
I quickyl visualized the data given in the abstract: pic.twitter.com/IlC0XsKamF
— Dr John B. (@DrJohnB2) November 21, 2021
I think his work is fascinating and fast-moving and free-flowing. He is rapidly coming up with insights that I think hit a lot of nails on the head. We have meds and injections out there for years that have been causing similar issues on a smaller or less obvious scale. I’m not a scientist but from a perspective of having been asking some of these same questions for about 6 years I think he is on to some really exciting findings and understands it on a much more detailed level than I do.
Fascinating study. It would be interesting to see if there is a cumulative rise in these markers after a third injection.