Video: Are You Getting the Vaccine?
Are You Getting the Vaccine? 16:13, well produced, full of all the stuff I already knew about, and some of the things I didn’t. It really hangs together well. It threads the needle between going “full nutjob conspiracy” and being too anodyne. “Something is going on”, but it chooses not to go further. Included: PCR tests/casedemic, dying “near” COVID (vs “from” COVID), No Treatments For You, COVID survival rates, side effects, secret vax ingredients, corporate immunity, insufficient testing, efficacy (perhaps they’re too critical on that one), and censorship. And probably other things I forgot. Includes video clips from Fauci, and Mullis.
h/t Ilargi at https://www.theautomaticearth.com/
No idea who made the video. I think it nails the middle ground, sticking to what we actually know (and talks also about what we don’t know), without going Full Alex Jones.
Something I’ve been thinking: its getting tough for Onion, & Babylon Bee, because yesterday’s absurd, snarky humor is today’s every day reality. Satire is now life. Jen Psaki tells us that the WH will not mandate vaccination for the staff (or the Federal workforce), but pretty clearly they do want them mandated for the Plebes. “Mandates for thee, but not for mee.” What’s more, this is communicated without even an acknowledgement of the gross underlying hypocrisy. And our “press” doesn’t even blink.
What an amazing video. My only beef is the statement towards the beginning that “tens of thousands” of people are experiencing adverse effects. That is off by a magnitude. It’s hundreds of thousands. Currently almost half a million, with about a third of a million being serious events. At least that is something people can confirm for themselves by going to VAERS.
VAERS is not a precise instrument of measure. It may include information that is incomplete, inaccurate or coincidental. Multiple people could file a report on the same case. Malicious pranksters could make false reports.
I’ve been meaning to do this for a while but kept forgetting….
I’m at work. I just called our lab and asked what is the CT of our PCR test?
She wasn’t sure so she got out the “book” and it said essentially that a test can be terminated if no positive after 40 cycles…I just started laughing.
Why do you want to know says the young lady? I just kept laughing.
*now to be fair she didn’t know what the actually CT was set at – just that the test could be terminated after 40 cycles. In order to know what the CT is currently set at they would have to wake up the “analyzers” and ask them
An objective look at risk/benefit analysis, personal choice, and the failing desperation of Government coercion.
MIT Study: Vaccine Hesitancy Is ‘Highly Informed, Scientifically Literate,’ and ‘Sophisticated’
I agree that VAERS data is messy. Reports are filed by laypeople who believe that they have had a vaccine related adverse event. Some are probably anxiety episodes. Some unrelated to the vaccine itself.
VAERS is intended to function as an early warning system giving clues as to a problem.
My own opinion is that when VAERS reports are 100 times higher that previous that this is a clue that something is going on even though VAERS is not able to quantify it.
Nope unfortunately I have PEG and polysorbate allergies. It is a crying shame…
It’s not like all the reports are posted, and at least half are prepared by healthcare professionals. A report for at least the more serious events is reviewed and then a decision is made whether it will be posted, whether it will be returned for more information, or whether it will just be rejected. Late winter, Mass General Brigham determined from a reliable basis (their own healthcare employees) that only 1-2% of anaphylaxis events had been reported even though the reporting is mandatory.
As SP said, VAERS is supposed to serve as a signal for further investigation but TPTB are ignoring it.
I read that report once but I cannot find it now. I need it to help a relative get an exemption from mandatory vaccination required by a university.
Do you have a link to that study?