Vaccine issues and sources
I want to give a big thanks to JimH first who tracked down some really excellent materials. These two items are credited to him. I just want to put them together in one place so you can see what’s happenning.
This video too explaining VAERS data (note the exponential curve at about the 2 month mark)
With anecdotes throughout the comments sections about inflamation, and the number of cases pointing to cardiac events I think its becoming clearer that the vaccine is causing the immune response to ramp up and stay there for some time.
This is the CDC data vault:
It should give a good baseline on various aspects of public health and tell us if any inflamation related deaths or events are spiking after the vaccine rollout started.
This will tell us how long the vaccine actually takes to cause damage and whether there is excess mortality in any of these areas.
For those arming themselves with information to justify why they were willing to lose their job instead of getting the jab, brush off your statistics books and dive in. We may not see anything yet, but two months from now it could be a different world.
First I like to give a big thumb up to Jim and to you too for finding and compiling all the material.
The matter Dr. J. Rose picked up with the exponential curve is indeed intriguing. So, I would suggest if the VAERS data are accessible for the public we could here follow through with the graph Dr. J. Rose started – since the database is getting updated every week as I understand.
It is accessible. Openvaers.com has compiled the data for covid but here is the raw data: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
I just had a nice little fight with some buddies who are feeling the pressure to get the vaccine. I’m trying to arm them with as much useful data as possible so they can make informed decisions. To me the matter is simple: only the unvaccinated get to change their minds.
I’m hoping to find something that prevents others from getting it, or at least find out it’s not that bad. But we don’t know what we don’t know yet.
Dr. Tess Lawrie of the BIRD group on UK vaccine adverse drug reactions –
Clinically relevant categories:
A. Bleeding, Clotting and Ischaemic ADRs
B. Immune System ADRs
C. ‘Pain’ ADRs
D. Neurological ADRs
E. ADRs involving loss of Sight, Hearing, Speech or Smell
F. Pregnancy ADRs
I quite honestly am at a loss as to why the information in VAERS is being ignored by so many. With the staggering numbers it shows, and the theory that those numbers underrepresent the true number of adverse effects, why isn’t this front page news? We had a big public to-do a few weeks ago about a handful of serious blood clot incidents from the JNJ jab, so the media still is not quite 100% in the tank. But those numbers pale to the data in VAERS! What am I missing? Are there credible factions saying that VAERS data is incorrect? Or is the media just blatantly and willfully ignoring it?
I just found this long comments thread that includes endless “anecdotal” accounts of vaccine injury. I am thinking that a more realistic accounting of vaccine injury can be had by looking at the number of people who have taken the first dose but say “no way” to the second.
Also, here again is the so-called, “open VAERS” summary dashboard that updates weekly. This is definitely in the category of “A picture worth 1000 words”. Best regards to all fellow truth seekers, JimH
Once again, solid gold! This shows people who aren’t being entered into VAERS like systems and having clearly correlated symptoms the doctors refuse to acknowledge. This feels like the start of the COVID outbreak again. “Inosmia?! You’re delusional!”
I’m seeing reports in there of severe abnormal symptoms out to 5 weeks so far. Instances of sudden death out to 8 days and other unexplainable phenomena. This at least give us a relative window to look at for events after vaccination.
Good discussion here, by self-described inventor of nRNA vaccines. Major problems with the emergency authorization process.
Also, what Dontknownothin said is priceless:
To me the matter is simple: only the unvaccinated get to change their minds.
This is the link for the june 18 ACIP meeting.
I haven’t registered yet but will shortly. It may be a bunch of bureaucratic gladhanding but if they talk at all about the sudden increase in adverse events and hint at concern then there is progress.
Del Bigtree tends to testify at and then report about ACIP meetings at the next Highwire broadcaset. More than any other government deliberation you may ever watch, the ACIP discussions will dissuade you of any respect you ever had for the regulatory process. Between long periods of utter tedium it is possible there will be hints at concerns, but the subsequent votes are invariably unanimous in approving drugs or drug ingredients the committee had no scientific basis for approving. A lot of that because so many of them have severe conflicts of interest.