UK Government trying to conceal that all-cause mortality is up 15%
What do you think will happen when boosters come? If it doesn’t protect from new mutations, there shouldn’t be any efficacy improvement whatsoever across the board.
It looks like this supply chain slowdown isn’t going to be getting better. Kids aren’t running this thing.
Thanks for the link. Well well, this is one big rabbit hole. I read through several linked article. I interpret is it as “official cognitive dissonance“. One remark in the Daily Mail made my day. The date shown below is “misleading” because
This includes the vaccinated being more likely to get tested because they are more ‘health conscious’.
How can people who take an experimental drug that has been tested for a few months, based on a synthetic virus, and with officialy stated long term unknown effects be classified as “health consious”. This is so extremely funny that I couldn’t stop laughing for a couple of minutes.
Yeah Dave, sounds like insured drivers are more safety conscious as uninsured drivers hence, the higher accident rate of the insured drivers….
According to a UK Telegraph article, since July there were:
24% more heart failure deaths than baseline
19% ischaemic heart disease
16% cerebrovascular disease (strokes)
18% other circulatory diseases
This is being blamed on “delayed treatments, fewer consultations, and a lack of immunity.”
“[D]elayed treatments, fewer consultations, and a lack of immunity” for heart attacks and strokes?
The increased frequency of cardio & neuro all-cause events matches with Germany’s “Sitrep” report, page 4:
[Note I originally pulled this image from last week’s report in German; I found the English version of the SitRep just today]
Eyeballing the chart below, it sure seems like ED presentations – maybe doubled? – for CV and neuro chief complaints. And I included a chart of “new vaccinations” at the bottom so you can see how they line up.
“It seems that spikes are bad for you.”
Show this to EVERYONE!!
One of the most frightening, and telling, charts I have seen.
In June, a contract was posted, offering £6M to get rid of dead bodies, in the event of an excess death situation, which they expect to happen over the next four years.
They knew there would be excess deaths, in spite of, or, because of, the high vax rate in the UK.
Temporary Body Storage Service
Westminster City Council
Publication reference: 2021/S 000-013120 Publication date: 10 June 2021
F02: Contract notice
There is one part about his article that I have questions about:
The purpose of the above mini course in basic immunology is to educate the reader to the point where they understand that vaccines cannot lose effectiveness. Vaccines are DIGITAL. They are not ANALOGUE. They offer a 2-3 week training course to the immune system which either works or does not work. After that they have nothing whatsoever to do. They carry out no further process which can lose efficiency. Either they show the immune system part of the virus and alert it to the danger it poses or they do not. We know that the covid19 vaccines work initially, from the initial case number results. So they succeed in training the immune system. At the point their job is done. They have nothing more to do. There is no immunological mechanism by which vaccines can lose their efficiency because they have finished the purpose of their existence within 2-3 weeks, the normal period of a viral infection. The concept that they lose efficiency after 2-3 weeks is just immunological nonsense.
Is that true? I think that other vaccines have a booster, or is that not a thing and my doctor likes stabbing me.