Trump Election Fraud Presser
10 years a Federal Prosecutor, and a brilliant lawyer. She is a patriot of the highest order. She almost can’t hold back tears around 1:06 as she describes the big picture of what we are up against. For those who don’t understand what the Globalist Deep State is, I am sorry, but you are naive, even if you are just an innocent whose idealism has been stolen. For those of us who do understand, this is our 1775… and 1776 may in fact be coming. Best to all, Jim H
As just described by Nicole Wallace, long time Republican and Bush staffer, “Rudy and Sidney Powell sounded like lunatics.” That’s what Trump et al have become.
“Wow, could you find a greater group of losers to push a conspiracy theory.”
Doug, you are an imbecile.
I am a reasonably simple minded man. Let’s see Trump received about 9 million more votes this time than 2016….at least votes that were allowed to be counted for him. The president worked his butt off in campaigning. Record crowds filled every venue….thousands turned away as the outdoor airports were at capacity …many were in the dark and the cold (I know I tried to attend one but was only there 90 minutes early so was too late). Single women were parking their cars near mine on dark side streets over a mine away. women with children, old couples, people of many nationalities all streaming toward an all ready closed venue just to take pictures that they tried to support the president.
Biden does not campaign and when he does can not draw a crowd.
The cities being accused of fraud have a well documented history of corruption. mail in ballots do create possible fraud – documented in many setting domestically and abroad. Vote counting stopped at 3a and when restarted huge numbers of votes showed up for Biden but not Trump.
A software system used in many locations that has been heavily criticized by democrats in the past.
Something just feels, looks a little off – so what is the harm in making sure the election was a s fair and free as all Americans should hope for?
I only want a fair election, I want those who have information to be able to safely report what they have seen, I want only legal ballots counts and let the most votes win.
Again I am a simple person, is that too much to ask?
We have a court system and process lets let it work for our future confidence.
Thanks for stating your position.
Let’s see if election administrators and judges continue to remain in agreement, or if they start to divide. My gut feeling is that division is coming – but let’s see.
If they start dividing up, it will be interesting to see whether your beliefs also start to divide. I’ll be observing with curiosity.
Geedard, you should know by now that Doug has never changed his mind at this site about any “official narrative.” The fact that some assertion is the official narrative is all the evidence he needs or will consider.
Hi thc0655, I’ll readily admit that track record to date strongly supports your viewpoint.
Let me take advantage of this opportunity to say many thanks for all your contributions and wisdom throughout the years, which I’ve found extremeley helpful. Also your wit, I’ve laughed out loud many a time 🙂 also when you comment with dry humour on darker topics. Bravo.
What would it take to convince me that there was fraud in the election?
If Trump started winning even a few of his significant court cases, that would start to convince me. But he’s losing them one after another. In some cases they are being withdrawn because his lawyers are worried about the legal sanction they’ll receive in court if they are found to be obviously lying. Trump’s argument literally doesn’t stand up in court. That dog won’t hunt.
If the full recount in Georgia, conducted under a Republican secretary of state, shifted things Trump’s way, that would be an important sign. But instead, it just reconfirmed the accuracy of the original vote totals that gave the state to Biden.
Another commenter noted how many people there were at Trump rallies. And how more people voted for Trump this time. Ok. But Biden still got over 6 million more votes than Trump and won the electoral college by decisive margin (306 to 232).
You like Trump. A lot. I get that. But he lost. By over 6 million votes. That’s the reality and he hasn’t put forth any arguments that seriously question that fact.
So he’s beginning the push to get Republican officials to simply override the clearly stated will of the people. Things like inviting Republican officials from Michigan to the White House. And suggesting that Republican controlled legislatures simply appoint a slate of Trump electors, even though he got fewer votes in those states. Trump is trying to open up a jagged, ugly rip in the fabric of our republic, but so far it’s holding strong.
What will he do next? Start a military action to up the chaos level generally? I wouldn’t put it past him. Pardon his friends, family and maybe even himself? Trump will do whatever he thinks he can get away with.
His rhetoric is poisoning our nation when he suggests his re-election is more important than the democratically expressed will of the majority of voters, who have chosen Biden. When Trump supporters start vaguely hinting at violence (re “1776”), please remember you are doing so in support of someone who doesn’t want to be a president, but a dictator.
“You like Trump. A lot. I get that. But he lost. By over 6 million votes. That’s the reality and he hasn’t put forth any arguments that seriously question that fact.”
I think Trump is an arrogant pr!ck. I don’t think he is the leader America needs at this point in time, but, here he is- he won in ’16. If you watched the vid Geedard posted, and I’m assuming to be factual, how can you claim Trump lost at all, let alone by 6 million votes? Like most of us here I presume, I’m just looking for some truth, fairness, and faith in our systems. But this election just plain stinks to high heaven. Perhaps someone up there can provide a bit of succor…..Aloha, Steve
I’m going to cross-post this video on vote-switching.
The first part is a bit technical, but the money shot comes at 33:14, where the interviewee talks about vote-switching, and provides evidence of the phenomenon shown in real time, on national TV.
This video clip from CNN shows 560 votes literally being moved from Matt Bevin’s total, to the guy who ended up “winning” the governor’s race in Kentucky, in real time. Bevin’s total drops by 560, and the other guy’s total rises by that exact same amount, 560. How could that happen in any real world scenario of vote-counting? Answer: it can’t.
I mean – how would I write that code? Ballots get counted. They either go to one guy, or the other. Totals only ever move higher. They never drop. And they definitely don’t switch.
The evidence is right there, on national TV, of vote-switching. And nobody notices.
So I started to wonder: why “switch” votes? It seems too easy to detect. I mean, we see it now. So instead, why not just add votes for your favorite guy?
Then I got the answer: if you just add votes, you will end up with “more votes than ballots received.” That’s an easy math check. You might end up with something like 5M people voting, and – somehow – the computer is telling you that 7M total votes were cast. That’s clearly cheating. Even normal people would figure that out. “Hey, the computer is adding votes for someone.”
So to successfully cheat, you must switch votes, so that the # of votes always equal # of ballots. Switching votes is a requirement for the whole scheme to work.
And vote-switching is exactly what we saw happening in realtime on that CNN tape. 560 votes, from Bevin, to the guy who ended up “winning”. When all the other Republicans down ballot won by +200k votes, Bevin lost by 5000 votes.
Vote switching. That’s one way they do it. And this was in 2018.