The Global Hoax is Rapidly Unraveling!

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   7 posts
  • Tue, Aug 10, 2021 - 01:30pm

    #1
    westcoastjan

    westcoastjan

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 04 2012

    Posts: 1459

    count placeholder4

    The Global Hoax is Rapidly Unraveling!

https://www.***uralnews.com/2021-08-08-hhs-documents-admit-the-cdc-has-never-isolated-any-covid-19-virus-global-hoax.html   [change ***to nat]

…Last year when covid skeptics were saying “there’s no such thing as a covid virus,” I strongly disagreed. As a published food scientist, laboratory owner and inventor of two published patents based on mass spectrometry analysis, I was aware that SARS-CoV-2 had been genomically sequenced. Surely, I mistakenly thought, it had been isolated, purified and determined to be the cause of covid-19 sickness.

A year later, it turns out the skeptics were right. And the warnings of people like Dr. Thomas Cowan, Sally Fallon, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Jon Rappoport, David Icke and others were right on the mark. (I have since apologized to them all in a public podcast.) …

… To show you what this looks like, consider the following graphic. It shows some mass spec results across a spectrum of masses. The horizontal axis here is m/z (mass over charge), which is simplified to just “mass” for general discussion. It’s the mass of the molecules or particles being detected.

Notice the red and orange lines across the bottom of each chart. That’s largely “background” noise across all the masses. Then notice the very tall orange peak which rises above the background. This is the mass of the molecule they’re looking for. It might be a pesticide, or a contaminant, or a nutrient, etc.

Importantly, if I were to turn up the amplification of the detector, the “background noise” at the bottom of the screen would vertically expand to fill the screen. The entire screen would be a “hit” on every mass, because the amplification is turned way up. That’s the equivalent to what PCR instruments are doing when they run 30+ cycles. They are amplifying noise, and then pretending they got a “hit” on covid.

But because they’ve amplified it so many times, they’ve obliterated any ability to say with certainty what they have, or even how much they have. Because the LOD (Limit of Detection) is scientifically invalid if it can’t pick a peak out of the background noise.

Typically in method validation, your LOD needs to be at least three times higher than background noise, which means a “peak” must be three times higher than the background. Anything less than that is considered bogus background noise. And when you’re doing quantitative work, you typically need a signal that’s at least 10 times higher than background.

Yet PCR instruments are taking background noise and amplifying it until they get a “positive” hit. This “positive” is then absurdly called a “covid case,” even though it means literally nothing from a legitimate science point of view.

The entire process being used today via PCR is complete junk science that wouldn’t pass even the most basic science lab audit. That’s why most of these PCR outfits aren’t ISO accredited, by the way. They couldn’t pass a single audit. (My lab is ISO accredited with an annual audit, including blind quantitation accuracy tests via mass spec instruments to make sure we are hitting our accuracy targets.) …

https://***ndnewtube.com/watch/covid-19-hoax-is-greatest-theatrical-event-in-history_U3yVqM1SWvZVlfV.html

Change *** to bra

Dr. Judy Mikovitz confirms it all in a recent interview
Dr. Judy Mikovitz, author of Ending Plague (PlagueTheBook.com), confirmed all this in a recent interview with me. Not only did she confirm that there is no isolated covid-19 virus that has been harvested and purified from a sick person and proven to cause disease in another person; she also confirmed that Dr. Fauci specifically chose a weaponized lab sample that was infected with a cocktail of coronaviruses to use as a basis for gain-of-function research via the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

See also the additional interviews found within the main article.

Mike Adams of Natural News has a huge audience. This will help in a powerful way!

  • Tue, Aug 10, 2021 - 02:21pm

    #2
    @

    @

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 45

    count placeholder2

    The Global Hoax is Rapidly Unraveling!

Mike Adams is a grifter going all the way back to the Y2K Newswire scam he ran. If you go to his about page you will notice he has no credentials. To each their own but i come to PP to get away from this kind of stuff.

“AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Mike Adams has personally authored over 2,000 articles, including investigative articles, satire and op-ed. His writings have been collectively read by over 100 million people over the past decade.

His articles demonstrate a diverse range of knowledge on many subjects, including psychology, anthropology, cosmology, U.S. history, philosophy, economics, money and finance, nutrition, politics, civil rights, plant biology, intellectual property law, chemistry, physics, quantum phenomena, agriculture, linguistics, microbiology, neurolinguistics and more.

Mike Adams has conducted over 1,000 interviews and is known for being able to delve into details on almost any conversational topic.”

  • Tue, Aug 10, 2021 - 04:19pm

    #3
    westcoastjan

    westcoastjan

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 04 2012

    Posts: 1459

    count placeholder2

    Reply To: The Global Hoax is Rapidly Unraveling!

I do not know enough about him to rebut what you are saying.  In the same vein, I do not know anything about you or your credentials. You are merely voicing an opinion of a guy that has done well and who has a big following. Perhaps you merely want to discredit him – there is a lot of that going around these days….

The thing you are overlooking one critically important point: he has planted a HUGE seed of doubt, strongly reinforcing the idea that we have been lied to repeatedly and that we are being played, in a way that your average person can understand. His article and video have the potential to make a whole lot more silent good people (per Julius Ruechel) stand up and speak out.

This is the same as with the Patrick King thing in his legal wranglings in Alberta. He did not in fact win, and what he did was twisted around by the media, but boy, his  line of thinking and exposing the govt of AB. sure got a lot of exposure!!!!  And that is exactly what we need right now!

In this war, more is definitely better!

  • Tue, Aug 10, 2021 - 04:58pm

    #4
    Dontknownothin

    Dontknownothin

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 14 2020

    Posts: 678

    count placeholder3

    The Global Hoax is Rapidly Unraveling!

Sam Adams too was a grifter and his era’s equivalent of an ambulance chaser. But he served his purpose to incite rebellion.

Thomas Paine was a debtor and a luckless buisiness owner. But he served his purpose in appealing to the rebellious nature of the colonists who cited his works as justification for breaking ties with the English government.

George Washington was a disaster as a military commander in both the French-Indian War and the Revolution. But he was diplomatic and lent nobility to the cause. He served his purpose.

It really doesn’t matter how many a degree’s or credentials a person stacks up, anyone can offer a piece of truth that rings in the psyche of those seeking it. Wheyher Mike Adams is a swindler or just a curious investigator he serves the purpose of furthering the debate amongst his audience. But as to the value of credentials, “Science progresses one death at a time”. Even the most credentialed scientist builds their knowledge on false assumptions and stubbornly clings to them until death. Give someone accolades and the their pride is wrapped up in the successful acceptance of their theories, no matter how flawed they are.

Jan is right, he has a purpose in this fight if only to lead his audience to those with bigger pieces of truth.

  • Tue, Aug 10, 2021 - 06:40pm

    #5
    Nate

    Nate

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: May 05 2009

    Posts: 607

    count placeholder3

    GCMS

I’ve looked at lots and lots of chromatograms and find the two spectra posted useless.  Before data is evaluated, spectra are matched against a library and we gain an understanding what we are looking at.   Peaks with given retention times tell us nothing (did they even bother with an internal standard?).

GCMS is he wrong tool for this type of evaluation.

  • Tue, Aug 10, 2021 - 08:33pm

    #6
    Aria

    Aria

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 03 2020

    Posts: 92

    count placeholder0

    The Global Hoax is Rapidly Unraveling!

I am not familiar with all those names mentioned but Mike Adams does not have a good reputation as far as being a legit news source (yes I realize that is subjective.)  David Icke is even worse. He is infamous because of his belief that many public figures are part of some reptilian race. That guy is out there.

  • Wed, Aug 11, 2021 - 01:00pm

    #7
    @

    @

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 45

    count placeholder0

    Reply To: The Global Hoax is Rapidly Unraveling!

honestly not trying to convince anyone just offering some facts. anyone pretending to own a certified lab should be discredited. However if someone could give a link to adress of said lab i will change my mind.

from a previous reply

Mike Adams has been scamming people since the y2k bug. Here is a list of questions he used to sell his “information products” on a website that has since been removed.

Edit:  As  far as eyeballs this type off stuff should staay over on infowars to obtain you objective of waking people up.

http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=00375z

 

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

Login or Register to post comments