Spike protein: natural infection versus vaccination
I have heard arguments made that the spike protein in the vaccines are dangerous, causing cell and tissue damage, microclotting, etc..
But is this risk of the spike protein not the same, or even worse, from natural infection?
If you are vaccinated, the assumption is you’ll allow the vaccine to do its thing, unless you were only doing it for the vax card in which case you might be looking for ways to limit the damage.
If you are infected, standard of care says you let it ravage your body, but some of us think you should do everything you can to beat it down.
So what are you really comparing? Letting the vax do its thing against the damage of an untreated infection? One issue with the vax is there is no control over how strong the response will be. Spike has been found in people weeks later but perhaps more typically is shut down long before that. If an infection, the active viral period is limited, like to a week or so, after that it’s your body’s inflammatory reaction.
Do I understand correctly that the vaccine may cause your body to produce more spike proteins / for a longer period of time than natural infection? Especially if you treat the infection with early treatment intervention?
The manufacturers never bothered to quantify what happens after a vaccination, something very important from a pharmacological standpoint. So I don’t know about quantities, but if you shut an infection down immediately, you would have the potential to produce spike for much longer if vaccinated, although that would depend on the individual’s response. And really, why wouldn’t you treat the infection?
Vaccine produces billions of spike in a matter of hours.
Natural infection may result in virus being neutralized before it even replicates in significant amount.
I witnessed this with my 7 year old last week. He tested positive, remained asymptomatic, and tested negative 4 days later. The reason is that virus colonized in the nose and stayed there before his immune system cleared it. This is how we get “asymptomatic cases.” These people never actually “have CoVID.”
Young, healthy people who supplement with quercetin, zinc, vitamin D, are more likely to clear virus before spike enters the blood stream esp if they are infected through small amount of inoculum. Therefore, vax is often way more damaging in that cohort.
Interesting insight, KCPS. Thank you.
This is the million-dollar question, but we won’t really know until there is more transparency regarding jab injury.
Some people in the high risk groups have been fatally overwhelmed by the infection – but my money is still on the jab causing more harm in the long run – especially in the young & healthy.