“Secret” report shows rapidly diminishing vaccine efficacy

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   9 posts
  • Wed, Oct 27, 2021 - 11:51pm

    #1
    atom

    atom

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 19 2021

    Posts: 54

    count placeholder12

    “Secret” report shows rapidly diminishing vaccine efficacy

I was almost hoping that this could be dismissed as fake-news. It has all the wrong elements to it, starting with the headline,  “AI-powered DoD data analysis program named “Project Salus” SHATTERS official vaccine narrative, shows A.D.E. accelerating in the fully vaccinated with each passing week”, then the “Page Not Found” error from their primary source, and then citing Natural News as a source.

https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/10/breaking-ai-powered-dod-data-analysis.html

I approached it with scepticism, kind of hoping that it could be easily dismissed as fake-news. I’m not sure about the ADE part, but at the very least it indicates rapidly diminishing efficacy.

Here is the original PowerPoint file (seems to the same report that Natural News has in PDF format) – https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.humetrix.com/ppt/Salus_Humetrix_VE_study_2021_09_28a.ppsx

This effectively validates that the report was compiled/presented by Humetrix, which was available on their website between (at least) 22 Sep and 1 Oct – https://web.archive.org/web/20211001200020/https://www.humetrix.com/powerpoint-vaccine.html

Was available through 7 Oct – https://web.archive.org/web/20211007175610/https://www.humetrix.com/powerpoint-vaccine.html

And removed from their website on 8 Oct – https://web.archive.org/web/20211008181724/https://www.humetrix.com/powerpoint-vaccine.html

Curiously, the only mention of Humetrix on Wikipedia is a small mention in here – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Button#Growth_of_Blue_Button

The lack of a Wikipedia page would seem that Humetrix is not interested in publicity.

fwiw, metadata in the Natural News PDF shows “Creator” and “Author” as “Chris Burrow”.

Metadata in the original PPSX shows “Creator: Chris Burrow”, “Last Modified By: Art Friesz”.

Christopher R. Burrow, M.D. – CMO, EVP Data Analytics – https://www.humetrix.com/about.html

Art Friesz – Senior Software Architect – https://www.humetrix.com/about.html

Other metadata in the PPSX:

Create Date: 2021:09:05 22:46:40Z
Modify Date: 2021:10:01 22:39:13Z

Page one of the report says “Weekly update of September 28, 2021”, which implies that there’s a lot more weekly updates from them, somewhere.

Who are they making the report for? I wonder if their other reports may be subject to FOIA Requests…?

  • Thu, Oct 28, 2021 - 12:07pm

    #2
    Bob Johnson

    Bob Johnson

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 03 2021

    Posts: 29

    count placeholder1

    “Secret” report shows rapidly diminishing vaccine efficacy

Thanks for posting that, I downloaded a copy as I always do these days, before it disappears, and read through it.  It must be intended for a pretty “select” audience as the data looks fairly honest and straightforward, far different from the story presented in the mass media.

Honestly, the page that really struck me was the last, the multiplier factors of co-morbidities.  Seeing that being Native American was riskier than being morbidly obese or having liver failure was a surprise, as was having asthma and living in an apartment reduced your risks significantly.  I understand asthmatics take steroids, I suspect that’s the correlation, but “multi family housing”? That’s a mystery to me.

  • Thu, Oct 28, 2021 - 04:05pm

    #3
    Epistemology Proponent

    Epistemology Proponent

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 17 2021

    Posts: 6

    count placeholder0

    “Secret” report shows rapidly diminishing vaccine efficacy

I’ve had a running debate going with someone on Twitter on all sorts of topics. Their explanation on this one was reasonable if you’d like to read it: https://twitter.com/EpistemologyPro/status/1445087519234736132

  • Thu, Oct 28, 2021 - 04:20pm

    #4
    Mike from Jersey

    Mike from Jersey

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jan 22 2018

    Posts: 1413

    count placeholder3

    Reply To: “Secret” report shows rapidly diminishing vaccine efficacy

The charts on that Twitter feed are too small for me to read. But if it is about infection rates per 100,000 vaccinated/unvaccinated, then the counterargument is without merit.

The counter argument states that since there are more vaccinated people than unvaccinated people than one might expect that there would be more infections in the vaccinated per 100,000 since a greater proportion of that 100,000 have been vaccinated than have not vaccinated.

But that is a misreading of the charts.

The charts that I have seen on this issue compare infections of the vaccinated per 100,000 vaccinees against infections of unvaccinated per 100,000 unvaccinated. Thus, the fact that there are more vaccinated is irrelevant to reading the charts. The charts show the absolute probability of being infected regardless of how many are vaccinated or unvaccinated. The charts that I have seen show a higher probability of infection in the vaccinated for every age group except for young people.

Finally, if these were truly “vaccines” at all, one would expect virtually zero infections in vaccinees regardless of how many were vaccinated.

The fact that people are making arguments such as your Twitter-antagonist advances only shows that the pro-vaccine narrative is very weak.

  • Sat, Oct 30, 2021 - 06:52am

    #5
    Jill Shaver

    Jill Shaver

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jul 15 2021

    Posts: 2

    count placeholder0

    “Secret” report shows rapidly diminishing vaccine efficacy

I  have  questions on on a release that CDC has said that vaccine Provides more protection than natural immunity. Could anybody weigh in on this?

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s1029-Vaccination-Offers-Higher-Protection.html

  • Sun, Oct 31, 2021 - 01:08am   (Reply to #5)

    #6
    atom

    atom

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 19 2021

    Posts: 54

    count placeholder4

    “Secret” report shows rapidly diminishing vaccine efficacy

I have questions on on a release that CDC has said that vaccine Provides more protection than natural immunity. Could anybody weigh in on this?

Simple; they’re cherry-picking from smaller studies (with more room for error) while ignoring larger studies (with less room for error), they’re cherry-picking shorter duration studies (during which there may be some efficacy of these inoculations) while ignoring longer term studies (after which any efficacy quickly fades), and relying on misinterpretations of the data.

As someone else noted, above: Finally, if these were truly “vaccines” at all, one would expect virtually zero infections in vaccinees regardless of how many were vaccinated.

 

  • Sun, Oct 31, 2021 - 03:28am

    #7

    gyrogearloose

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 08 2008

    Posts: 374

    count placeholder4

    vaccine efficacy 0%

I just read a Pfzier report looking at the fall in effectiveness.

Study over 3.4 million found at 5 months only 47% effective.

Interestingly those that died over the period of the study were excluded from the study…..

Down here in NZ the govt adds are hammering ‘95% effective at preventing you from ending up in hospital.

A few people I asked assume that it also reduces your risk of dying of covid.

I got asked “how can it be that it stops you getting hospitalized but not stop you from dying…

 

Cheers Hamish

  • Sun, Oct 31, 2021 - 07:18am

    #8
    You've been Nudged...!

    You've been Nudged...!

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 28 2021

    Posts: 538

    count placeholder2

    Reply To: “Secret” report shows rapidly diminishing vaccine efficacy

The bottom line is that we already have simple vitamins, minerals, aspirin & now a cheap antidepressant, which all significantly reduce hospitalisations without the risk of nasty side effects, ADE or the Hoskins Effect – so why then did most major Western governments opt for potentially lethal, experimental, waning mRNA biotech platforms that don’t even stop viral transmission?

  • Sun, Oct 31, 2021 - 07:52am

    #9
    richcabot

    richcabot

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Apr 05 2011

    Posts: 458

    count placeholder1

    There’s a newer version of the report

I have a pdf version Salus_Humetrix_VE_study_2021_10_05.pdf which has data updated on 10/5.  It doesn’t call itself a weekly update so it may be a final report on the project.  The graphs on slides 7 – 16 don’t have newer data.  I don’t remember where I downloaded it from or where I saw it referenced originally.  Given the dates listed above it must have been updated only a day before someone told them to take it down.

Statements in the 10/5 version that don’t appear in the 9/28 version include:

Hospitalization rate (21% vs 32%) and death (4% 12%) of breakthrough infections are lower than rates observed in Covid-19 cases in the pre-vaccination pandemic phase in 2020

The death rate on slide 6 increased from 2.1% in the earlier presentation to 4%.  I wonder what it is now.

In the last slide, where the 9/28 version said “Prior COVID-19 infection has a major protective effect against breakthrough hospitalization” the 10/5 version says “In fully vaccinated cases, prior COVID-19 infection provides a major additional protective effect against hospitalization in breakthrough infections”.  It seems like they figured out that the original statement was counter to the authorized narrative.

 

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

Login or Register to post comments