rockefeller Foundation 2010 “fictional pandemic” predicts measures now

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   2 posts
  • Mon, Aug 03, 2020 - 06:06pm



    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 12 2020

    Posts: 299

    count placeholder0

    rockefeller Foundation 2010 “fictional pandemic” predicts measures now

Right now, foreigners cannot leave China to return home. Because of their racial hatred, Africans or dark skinned people have been evicted onto the street. Their embassies won’t help them and they have no income. Many trying to get out have had their reservations and permits canceled numerous times.

Look at the Rockefeller Foundation Plan where they praised China as the perfect model of totalitarianism.  Here’s an excerpt of a fictional scenario from 2010:

          In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain—originating from wild geese—was extremely virulent and deadly…

The pandemic blanketed the planet—though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. ….The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives….   Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight  of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.

(Continuing in the fictional scenarios)

At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit.  In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.

The New Food Reset per Rockefeller Foundation. Links transforming food and medical care into central control. “Helping supply chain be more effective.”                 

  • Wed, Aug 05, 2020 - 07:44am



    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Apr 12 2020

    Posts: 1112

    count placeholder0

    From Rockefeller to Gates Foundation (technocratic eugenicists)

And then you hear Gates himself saying they are the continuation of the Rockefeller Foundation’s agenda:

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Login or Register to post comments