Risks from the “Vaccinated”?

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   38 posts
Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 38 total)
  • Wed, Apr 28, 2021 - 05:48am

    #12
    brushhog

    brushhog

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 06 2015

    Posts: 554

    count placeholder7

    Risks from the “Vaccinated”?

Scary stuff. Of course Bill Gates promised us a pandemic and we’ve got one. Recently, he promised us that the “next” pandemic will be much worse.

Yggdrasil,

That article about contagious vaccines is one of the scariest things that I have ever read.

They are serious about producing such things. I would have thought that this would come from some “fringe site” as some sort of wild speculation.

Instead, the article you posted is from a mainstream site.

The mere fact that they would even consider creating vaccines that can spread from one person to the next like a virus proves that the people in control are completely crazy.

  • Wed, Apr 28, 2021 - 06:07am

    #14
    Yggdrasil

    Yggdrasil

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jan 25 2014

    Posts: 443

    count placeholder2

    Risks from the “Vaccinated”?

Agreed, it would basically turn the ‘vaccinated’ into mobile spore production facilities. For whatever means the designers intended.

  • Wed, Apr 28, 2021 - 07:21am

    #15
    David Kendrick

    David Kendrick

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: May 13 2020

    Posts: 22

    count placeholder1

    Risks from the “Vaccinated”?

http://82.221.129.208/pfizervax.pdf

Pfizer is stating inhalation and contact will transmit from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated.

  • Wed, Apr 28, 2021 - 08:03am   (Reply to #15)

    #16

    Jim H

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1403

    count placeholder3

    A little more help please David?

You linked a 146 page document with no further guidance.  Where does it say vaccines can be transmitted from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated?  Thank you, Jim H

  • Wed, Apr 28, 2021 - 10:53am   (Reply to #15)

    #17
    debu

    debu

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 16 2009

    Posts: 92

    count placeholder1

    Risks from the “Vaccinated”?

See p. 67 of the Pfizer document

mentioned above.  Does look a little scary to this layman…

  • Wed, Apr 28, 2021 - 12:00pm   (Reply to #15)

    #18

    Jim H

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1403

    count placeholder2

    Oh my….

Everytime you think the story can’t get any worse….

So Pfizer is talking about the possibility of “environmental exposure” to vaccinated individuals.  Seems to me that there are two high level possibilities here;  Either the concern is shed spike protein RNA, or shed fully intact lipid nanoparticles with their mRNA payload, or both.  I would be much more afraid of fully intact nanoparticles as they likely would get into my cells and start the machinery going.  Otherwise we know that spike protein itself is not benign.

 

  • Wed, Apr 28, 2021 - 12:11pm

    #19

    Jim H

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1403

    count placeholder2

    Adam Gaertner is discussing the same topic today…

  • Wed, Apr 28, 2021 - 12:30pm   (Reply to #15)

    #20
    coh

    coh

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 121

    count placeholder3

    Risks from the “Vaccinated”?

Pfizer is stating inhalation and contact will transmit from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated.

It’s unclearly written, but I interpret that as meaning inhalation of the vaccine itself, i.e. if it were spilled or a vial broken and possible aerosolized during the vaccination process.

They talk about inhalation or skin contact of the “study intervention” and as someone else pointed out (possibly on the twitter thread), the study intervention refers to either the 2 vaccines or the saline that is given to trial participants.

  • Wed, Apr 28, 2021 - 01:07pm   (Reply to #15)

    #21

    Jim H

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1403

    count placeholder1

    I don’t think it’s that Coh….

This is clear;

A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

They are not talking about the male participant spraying vaccine towards their pregnant mate, especially in the special case of one who has discontinued the study and then later “exposes a female partner”.  There is something else going on here…

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 38 total)

Login or Register to post comments