RFK Jr. interview on assassinations, vaccines, autism, and COVID19
This is an excellent, very informative interview of RFK Jr. by Ron Paul entitled, “Do not trust the medical or the national security establishment …”.
Just a few takeaways from the interview:
The CIA was responsible for the assassinations of both JFK and RFK.
The pharmaceutical cartel controls public health organizations.
There is abundant scientific evidence of the link between vaccines and autism that is actively suppressed.
COVID19 is no more dangerous than the flu (such as the 1968-1969 bird flu where we had no lockdowns and large gatherings such as Woodstock).
Deaths from the lockdowns exceeds COVID19 deaths.
And the Sun rises from the East and sets in the West.
Problem is, some people have heard for so long that the Sun rises from the West and sets in the East, that no matter how much actual evidence you throw at them, they’re still strongly inclined to ignore it and continue to pretend that they have genuine reasons to believe that vaccines haven’t become bioweapons…
This includes many people on this site!
Two quick points:
1) I think Robert F. Kennedy jr. is doing excellent work in exposing the pharmaceutical interests in the vaccine-industry and he gives away tons of good information. Everybody who hasn’t checked out Kennedy jr. yet, should definitely do so! Another MUST SEE source other than Kennedy jr. in my humble opinion is: https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/
2) As someone who has a degree in psychology and having worked in the field, I would only like to offer one correction into what Kennedy jr. says with regards to vaccination and autism.
There is a fundamental difference between autistic behavior and autism. Autism is genetic, so you have it from birth onward. On the other hand, bad vaccines can be the cause of AUTISTIC BEHAVIOR in a person. For example, if you get extremely sick, you will also be likely to exhibit autistic behavior. You will be focussed much more on yourself and you will withdraw into oneself. As I said, this is perfectly possible with bad vaccinations.
The difference between autism and autistic behavior is extremely difficult to see (especially for non-professionals), but there is a fundamental difference nonetheless. One way to see the difference is: if you have a treatment, and it works, then it was autistic behavior, not autism.
So please, while there certainly is without a doubt a lot of legitimate critism on vaccines (there are good ones, and bad ones, and everything should be examined critically especillay the links with the pharmaceutical industry), please do not put the emphasis too much on vaccines and autism. If you want to do that, then you can better put the emphasis on the relation between vaccines and AUTISTIC BEHAVIOR.
You stated: “One way to see the difference is: if you have a treatment, and it works, then it was autistic behavior, not autism.”
Let’s say we have a child who is born without autism. Then that child is administered a vaccine and the contaminants in that vaccine (mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, etc.) cause central nervous damage which produces autistic behavior. What treatments are available to change this autistic behavior back to normal?
Thank you for your help.
AO – The GAPS diet has been used to successfully reverse autistic symptoms/behavior in that situation.
Many families have had success with this protocol. I have followed this diet myself, but for a different purpose.
I didn’t want to comment on the autism thing too much. But since we are there, I am gonna throw something out there on how autism actually is caused by vaccines. Most of the studies done to “prove” vaccines don’t cause autism are based at looking at one and only one vaccine. Most notably the MMR. though a few others have been singly studied as well. Let me set the record straight here. Its not a single vaccine. Its how many. they all wreak havoc with the immune system. How much monkeying with the immune system do you have to do before it goes defunct. But there are other challenges, like cellular toxicity as well. We now know that about 45-55% of the general population has the MTHFR polymorphism. This gene controls the cellular methylation cycle. Which is a form a cellular housekeeping. The problem with having this polymorphism is it makes you more susceptible to medications and toxins in medications in general. AND vaccines are among the worst for this group. The fact is these people have no actual genetic defect. The problem occurs because they are unable to convert “folic acid” into folate. We all heard about folic acid added to all our foods. Its a drug. We are mass medicated. Folic acid is 100% synthetic and does not occur in nature anywhere. So without folic acid added foods these people are entirely healthy.. However, these people are caused great harm by this mass medication. Everyone in this group has a tolerance to how much folic acid they can consume before their methylation shuts down, called methylation block. If this occurs.. the vaccines and other toxins are disastrous.
So, for 1/2 the population vaccines are mostly ok, except for challenging the immune system some, which can lead to allergies, auto-immune disorders and other things. But the other 1/2 of the population, will suffer some level of autism ( note why its a spectrum ) Also, this is influenced by how many vaccines you take.. Some people will be ok with 3-5 , most will suffer some problems if more.. but kids now get 35 vaccinations by 60 mos. of age. Its more than enough for people with the polymorphism to be affected.
So for the numbers,. You can mostly tell whether someone is in methylation block by looking at their B12 levels and their folic acid levels. You can no longer convert the folic acid into the needed nutrient folate and you can no longer use folate as the folic acid is blocking it. Its sort of like how you die from carbon monoxide.. It binds up all the receptors from the needed nutrient .. and does not free it. In moderate-to-severe, you will have elevated folic acid levels and low B12 levels. When you have severe-extreme methylation block, you have both elevated folic acid levels and B12 levels.
As for the science to prove the relation with this and autism. When looking at folic acid levels of moms during pregnancy and the chance of having an autistic child, there is a direct significant correlation. In fact moms with elevated folic acid have a 17 fold increase in their child having autism, and moms with both elevated folic acid and elevated b12, have a 34 fold increase in having a child with autism. Though this looked at the mom, its clearly demonstrates the severeness of the hereditary gene and its affect on autism. There is a clear and distinct correlation. The relation of vaccines is consequential. But either way, it demonstrates actions by our medical establishment and FDA is negligent and harmful.
updated: The EU banned floride in water, folic acid in food. while the US still allows these mass medication toxins.
As a final note to the OP, “Covid is no more dangerous than the flu” Over all not much. But to who it is dangerous is the difference. It is as dangerous if not more dangerous to those with advanced age and comorbidity. It actually less dangerous to young healthy people , especially very young children, which the flu is rather dangerous.
Different causes can cause a person to display autistic behavior (without it being actual autism) such as trauma, poisoning, gross neglect, wrong nutrition or contaminants in a vaccination. The treatment depends on the specific case. In the case of wrong nutrition, you could cure autistic behavior with a relevant diet. In the case of gross neglect in a child, you could cure autistic behavior with giving care. If it is treatable, it is autistic behavior and not autism (which you have from birth onward). However, that doesn’t mean that everything regarding autistic behavior can be treated.
I don’t have hands on experience with patients who have had a vaccine who then subsequently display autistic behavior so unfortunately I am not familiar with treatments to change this autistic behavior back to normal in this case. Unfortunately I don’t think that neurological damage due to – for example – mercury can be reversed.
I wish I could be of more help. At least I hope I have given you a little bit of insight in a theoretical framework you could use.
So if I understand you correctly, the autistic behavior created by toxic chemicals in a vaccine such as mercury causing central nervous system damage (which is the classification of problem that RFK Jr. has confronted in his career) has no cure that you are aware of?
Also, do you happen to know when the distinction was made diagnostically between autism which is genetic and present at birth and autistic behavior which is created by conditions and/or circumstances in the child’s environment (be that environment chemical, psychological, social, or whatever)? I’m assuming that distinction is in the ICD-10 but was it in previous ICD classifications as well? It’s a distinction that I was not aware of previously and I wonder if it just a ploy to provide technical wiggle room for pharmaceutical companies to claim that their vaccines do not cause autism (but do, in fact, cause autistic behavior).
I absolutely agree with what nordicjack says about cumulative toxic load being a factor in inducing autistic behavior but again wonder if that is also a ploy whereby the pharmaceutical companies can deny responsibility for their individual vaccines causing autistic behavior while the cumulative load of multiple vaccines is indeed problematic at a certain threshold level. Just thinking here hypothetically about how legal departments work in these corporations to find an out.
Yes, there’s no cure that I’m aware of although I’m no expert on the effects of contaminants in vaccines.
I’m much more familiar with the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) than the ICD. The DSM-III in 1980 was the DSM in which it was for the first time mentioned that it was a Pervasive Developmental Disorder (with onset in the first 30 months), in contrast to the DSM-II which came out in 1968 in which autism was defined in the context of schizophrenia. So decoupling autism from schizophrenia in 1980 in the DSM-III is a very good thing in my opinion because they don’t have anything in common with each other. But I can imagine that if you are schizophrenic, you don’t feel so well and you will draw into oneself and you can display autistic behavior. Again, that’s not the same as autism.
From there on the definition of autism evolved further through the DSM-III-R in 1987, the DSM-IV in 1994, the DSM-IV-R in 2000 and up to the DSM-V in 2013.
But the thing to keep in mind is that it is a classification manual. That means that it’s strong suit is lumping statistical similar disorders together and describing it’s symptoms. On the other hand, it’s not so great in describing the origin of a disorder. It’s not great in understanding a disorder. You have to use the DSM for the insurance companies so you can point to some ‘objective’ criteria in order for them to pay the bill for clients who are insured. But if you want to know what is going on, if you want to understand certain disorders, it’s my professional opinion you better read a lot of other literature – at least from the people who know what they are talking about – as well.
In the case of autism, you can start for example by looking at how the two “fathers” of autism describe it: Leo Kanner and Hans Asperger. In my mind, it’s absolutely clear that you have it from birth.
I agree with you that we have to be critical of pharmaceutical companies and vaccines. But they are irrelevant for genuine autism. The DSM is great for describing symptoms of autism and symptoms of other disorders, but not so great when you want to understand what causes these disorders and symptoms. Sometimes things that look the same, but are not the same are lumped in together. So if I want to understand autism, I don’t look at the DSM much.
That being said, nordicjack raises a good point: if a mother is vaccinated with bad contaminants and ingests cumulative toxic loads during pregnancy, the child could have a disability from birth onwards. But is it genuine autism? I don’t think so. There is a big difference between being disabled and being autistic. Just look at the highly intelligent people with autism. I bet there are a lot of undiagnosed people with high intelligent autism among engineers, mathematicians and computer programmers for example.
I appreciate the detailed and informative answer.