Prof Nikolai Petrovsky (Flinder Uni, SA, Australia) Most Explosive Interview Yet

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   6 posts
  • Sat, Nov 20, 2021 - 06:40am

    #1
    HPHovercraft

    HPHovercraft

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 31 2021

    Posts: 280

    count placeholder3

    Prof Nikolai Petrovsky (Flinder Uni, SA, Australia) Most Explosive Interview Yet

Professor Nikolai Petrovsky’s latest and most explosive interview yet is below, but first some background.

His remarkable credentials:

https://www.flinders.edu.au/people/nikolai.petrovsky

His last interview (see below) was more cautious, but even there he couldn’t really avoid the topic of corruption in Australia’s governmental and medical institutions. In this interview, he is much more blunt. And as he says, he now gets threats, from the establishment in Australia, daily.

The Petrovsky Affair

In any approximation of a normal world, he would be feted as the living incarnation of the government’s much trumpeted aspiration to be an ‘innovation nation’. Instead, he has been stood down by his university and threatened with arrest if he sets foot in his office. Why? For refusing to be immunised with one of the vaccines approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

Petrovsky says a government MP told him that doors would remain closed to him in Canberra unless he paid a lobbyist to open them. Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi on the other hand all have the deepest pockets to smooth their way.

There has already been some discussion of this interview towards the end of this thread (thankyou @MsSmith):

Daily Digest 11/19 — Austria Back in Lockdown; Africa’s COVID KPIs Outperform First World

We have already discussed Prof Petrovsky’s efforts and predicament earlier on this site here (where there is an earlier interview with Matt Wong (Discernable):

Interesting vaccine development in Aus… for Iran??

This interview will NOT have helped Prof Petrovsky’s attempts to get his vaccine approved with Australian government authorities (eg. The TGA). See the Matt Wong interview for his lack of assistance from and indeed resistance from Australian entities (TGA, CSL).

If you would like to assist him and COVAX-19, please see:

https://www.gofundme.com/f/bringing-covax19-back-to-australia

Other Medical Doctors and Academics in Australia

Up until this point it, has been difficult to find medical doctors in Australia who were able to speak out against the medical nihilism and tyranny that has gripped Australia. For just why, just listen or check the notes (this has been discussed before).

For this reason, they have mainly been academics:

Professor Robert Clancy (Newcastle Uni, NSW)(Order of Australia)

‘The worst 24 hours of my life’: Immunologist responds to Craig Kelly controversy

Professor Clancy, told 6PR’s Liam Bartlett he does not agree with all of Mr Kelly’s views, but said the use of on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin is highly effective.

“I have had the worst 24 hours of my life, I wanted to crawl under a rock,” he said.

I thought that Prof. Clancy had been completely frightened off, but it seems that he has not been completely silenced:

A Sad and Shameful Day for Australian Medicine

September 10, 2021, was a black day, the day a group of faceless bureaucrats known as the “Advisory Committee for Medicines Scheduling”, through its effector arm, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), compromised medical practise and the health of their fellow Australians. The TGA used its regulatory muscle to prevent doctors at the COVID-19 pandemic’s coalface from prescribing ivermectin (IVM), the one therapy available that is safe, cheap and which reduces mortality in the order of 60 per cent. This poorly conceived action threatens the high standards of medical practise we have achieved in Australia, and the credibility of the administrative structure within which medicine operates.

The immediate consequence of the TGA Notice means patients contracting COVID-19 are left to hear, “Sorry, no treatment for COVID-19 is legally available. Just go to hospital when you get very sick.”

Prof Petrovsky Interview with Dr Erin (Trial Site News)





Some timestamps and notes

Introduction

Nikolai introduces himself. Funded by the US NIH.

2.00

Currently developing a Protein unit vaccine for Covid-19.

3.00

The need for an adjuvent explained.

5.00

It is the first proten vaccine to be approved in the world (just pipped Novavax).

7.00

Trials in Iran

10.00

We had a higher Iranian benchmark to meet against the (tougher) delta variant.

11.00

The nature of delta relative to the earlier variants.

Our vaccine is still based on the original wuhan variant.

There is a second generation vaccine coming based on delta (which should do even better.)

Updating for subsequent variants should also be comparatively easy.

13.00

Age range – has becoming narrower.

15.00

Safety

Have not seen either mycarditis or thrombosis or over immune activation.

17.30

In Protein vaccines, the protein stays outside the cells and is rapidly degraded.

Protein made inside the cell is potentially done so for a long period of time.

In mRNA vaccines, spike protein has been found four months later. This makes sense.

They have been designed to be resistant to being broken down, unlike natural mRNA.

20.00

We know very little about these new technologies (mRNA).

23.00

Intra-musculuar, 2 doses, 3 weeks apart.

N. has taken the vaccine himself.

24.00

Australia: Call it a police state.

Subjects of protein vaccines (Novavax) are not being recognised in Australia.

26.00

N. cannot now work as a clinician as they are vax mandated in South Australia.

It has become a checklist thing which makes no logical sense.

27.00

Natural immunity is NOT recognised in Australia.

N. does not want to see his vaccine being mandated.

29.00

Natural immunity is stronger. 20 fold.

30.00

It is just a fact that the vaccinated are more likely to transmit disease than the naturally immune. This is not a debate.

Why wouldn’t you accommodate the science.

Maybe its the lobbyists

34.00

Only one shot would be required anyway. So, again two shots mandates are completely contrary to the science.

35.00

Pregnancy

Seems safe but we wouldn’t say that.

Is excluded from the trials.

36.00

Again children

37.00

Early treatment etc in Australia.

Illegal for doctors to merely compare vaccines

(The look on Dr Erin’s face is priceless at this point)

It is MANDATORY that a doctor loses their licence if they even mention or prescribe ivermectin in Australia.

This is no joke.

Not only have they removed all of the civil liberties of the
population (mandatory vax, but also gagging all doctors in Australia.
It is unheard of in history and it is real.

Australian constitution has no right to free speech.

It all boils down to politics.

40.00

The only defense is legal action against these governments.

Legal actions are proceeding everywhere in Australia, to try to get our rights back.

E: So are you going to get in trouble for doing this podcast. N: Absolutely!

41.00

They have made it illegal to do just about anything.

N: I get daily threats from the establishment but you are morally
compelled to stand up when you think things are really wrong and they
are really wrong in Australia right now.

We would probably have more rights if we were living in China or Russia than living in Australia.

How did we lose all our rights overnight.

44.30

Even the police are scared.

These powers are also being used against police forces.

The letter of the law is that they can arrest you for commenting on these matters.

E: So you can’t criticise the government at all. N: That is right.

E: That’s not a democracy. N: It has all been done under the cover of a pandemic.

48.00

Where to find out more.

Even planning to seek approval in the US, but it will take a while, as one has to apply to each regulator independently.

One depressing final note. He says (above) that legal actions are proceeding everywhere in Australia, to try to get our rights back. This is likely to be a dead end, since commonwealth countries (with the possible exception of Canada) overwhelming support the doctrine of ‘parliamentary supremacy’,  as discussed here:

Why No Constitutional Legal Remedy in Commonwealth Countries – AU Law & Rights

In such countries, the only (should I say, non-violent) solution is the ballot box.

HP

  • Sat, Dec 04, 2021 - 06:32am

    #2
    HPHovercraft

    HPHovercraft

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 31 2021

    Posts: 280

    count placeholder1

    Another interview with Professor Petrovsky (JP Drake)

This is a long (3+ hours) in person interview by JP Drake, a fellow South Australian.





 Trial Site News interview censored

Note that the comparatively recent trial site news interview of the above post already seems to have been censored for Youtube. So we can now say Professor Petrovsky, the only medical professional who has been actively speaking out in Australia, is now being actively censored. I would encourage you to make a copy of the interview and of course support the Professor in his efforts to get the truth out.

Both South Australia and Australia face state and federal elections, respectively, early next year

HP

  • Mon, Dec 06, 2021 - 05:51pm

    #3

    Jim H

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1751

    count placeholder3

    Promoting this thread back to the top of the forums list and mainpage

This thread is approximately where an unprecedented spamming effort started about 52 hours ago.. such that this thread was buried down to page 30 in the forums “more” view.  Out of sight.  Why?

I don’t know for sure that the spam was targeting this..  but I am happy to get it more visibility nevertheless.  Best regards, Jim

  • Mon, Dec 06, 2021 - 06:12pm

    #4

    Jim H

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1751

    count placeholder1

    Prof Nikolai Petrovsky (Flinder Uni, SA, Australia) Most Explosive Interview Yet

From the first link in the extensive post at the start of this thread…. oh this is juicy and interesting!!!!!

The results of Petrovsky’s trials in monkeys, ferrets and hamsters showed not only that his vaccine was safe but that vaccinated animals produced neutralising antibodies in the nose and throat, blocking transmission to animals which had not been immunised. Before injecting the vaccine into a single person, Petrovsky injected it into himself to demonstrate his confidence in the product. Compare that with the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla who began dosing people with its experimental vaccine on April 23, 2020. Bourla didn’t get his first shot of the Pfizer vaccine until 21 March 2021.

Anybody see any reason why TPTB would want this post buried?

  • Mon, Dec 06, 2021 - 10:26pm

    #6
    Sandflyone

    Sandflyone

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 03 2021

    Posts: 25

    count placeholder1

    Prof Nikolai Petrovsky (Flinder Uni, SA, Australia) Most Explosive Interview Yet

Great video, Just put my name down for the stage 3 at vaxine .net

Thanks everyone,

This thread is approximately where an unprecedented spamming effort started about 52 hours ago.. such that this thread was buried down to page 30 in the forums “more” view. Out of sight.

An excellent gentleman’s description of this nudge strategy:

https://www.peakprosperity.com/forum-topic/the-forums-hacked/#post-691231

Why?

Both an interesting observation and question.

Since all our other government bodies seem to have been corrupted, perhaps the site is being targetted by ASIO (Australian Security Intelligence Organisation) or the ASD (Australian Signals Directorate):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Security_Intelligence_Organisation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Signals_Directorate

The results of Petrovsky’s trials in monkeys, ferrets and hamsters showed not only that his vaccine was safe but that vaccinated animals produced neutralising antibodies in the nose and throat, blocking transmission to animals which had not been immunised. Before injecting the vaccine into a single person, Petrovsky injected it into himself to demonstrate his confidence in the product. Compare that with the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla who began dosing people with its experimental vaccine on April 23, 2020. Bourla didn’t get his first shot of the Pfizer vaccine until 21 March 2021.

Good catch. Yes. In an earlier interview (see the later post), it was noted that it was sterilizing in hamsters and the interviewer, (Matt Wong, who has interviewed Geert), immediately recognised the potential significance of this for Geert vanden Boosche’s concerns:

https://www.peakprosperity.com/forum-topic/interesting-vaccine-development-in-aus-for-iran/#post-677841

Note also that this is just his first generation vaccine, not his second which is still coming!

A recurrent theme of all the interviews is that Petrovsky has had absolutely no support from the Australian government, quite the opposite.

HP

 

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

Login or Register to post comments