Investing in Precious Metals 101 Ad

Preventive Dental Care

Login or register to post comments Last Post 3611 reads   15 posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 15 total)
  • Tue, Feb 28, 2012 - 10:35pm

    #1
    1215

    1215

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 27 2008

    Posts: 4

    count placeholder

    Preventive Dental Care

 

I am truly baffled by those against fluoridation and wonder exactly how they intend to deal with a return of a rapid increase in decay if it ceases. Those fortunate enough to have genetic resistance or immaculate home care may scoff, but when tshtf and diets worsen with increased stress and lack of adequate preventive care, are you going to find a dentist when you need one or would you be better off using all tools available to prevent the disease?  I’ve seen threads based on wild, paranoid delusions and fear mongering, but critical analysis (requires reading and logical thinking) suggests to me that fluoridated water has been among the top three health improvement public benefits of the last century.

 "Along with vaccination, control of infectious diseases, and motor vehicle safety, adding fluoride to US drinking water is considered one of the greatest public health achievements of the 20th century. Fluoride was first added to water in 1945, a measure that was followed by a dramatic 50%-70% decline in the incidence of decayed, missing, or filled teeth . . ."

See Medscape article, Fluoride Supplementation: The Ongoing Debate, by Diane L. Markowitz, DMD, PhD

  • Tue, Feb 28, 2012 - 11:44pm

    #2
    eexpo

    eexpo

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 30 2011

    Posts: 44

    count placeholder

    water fluoridation

I believe the case for water fluoridation is pretty solid. My concern is if the city water is not being monitored due to ‘collapse ‘ just who is going to add the proper dose of fluoride to the polluted system ?

  • Wed, Feb 29, 2012 - 01:09am

    #3
    ao

    ao

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 04 2009

    Posts: 882

    count placeholder

    protect your precious bodily fluids

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluoride_toxicity

Here’s the real authoritative source:

Why next, the dental profession will be telling us mercury is good for us.

 

  • Wed, Feb 29, 2012 - 03:49am

    #4
    MarkM

    MarkM

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jul 22 2008

    Posts: 345

    count placeholder

    Maybe…

Maybe we should consider re-examining our dietary choices. Nah, I’d rather poison the water supply.

Add it to the list of poisons we are subjected to daily and ponder why we have all the health issues we do.

  • Wed, Feb 29, 2012 - 04:16am

    #5

    Damnthematrix

    Status Diamond Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 09 2008

    Posts: 1132

    count placeholder

    Fluoridation not necessary

Why put fluoride in the water when toothpaste is full of it?  Drinking fluoride doesn’t do a thing for your teeth when as a society hardly anyone drinks water anyway, all too occupied drinking soda pops and fruit juice which ALL rot your teeth…… and bottled water isn’t fluoridated either.

If you want to look after your teeth…:

a) stop drinking sugary drinks, especially Coca/Pepsi Cola which are full of acids that destroy enamel and sugar that assist bacterial growth
b) clean teeth regularly with fluoride toothpaste after every meal
c) floss regularly
d) quit all sweets…. but I draw the line at chocolate

Just common sense really…..  I refuse to drink and even shower in chlorinated water… let alone fluoridated.

Mike
 

  • Wed, Feb 29, 2012 - 04:41am

    #6
    1215

    1215

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 27 2008

    Posts: 4

    count placeholder

    dietary choices

Mark,

I agree with you 100% that we as a society should improve our dietary choices for many reasons, including reducing decay.

But seriously, are you kidding?

People as a whole, and most of us individually (including myself) are lazy and will usually take the easy way. If you can you truthfully answer yes to these questions, then I would guess you are in the top 2% of Americans:

–have you flossed in the last 24 hours? at least 3x in the last 5 days?

-exercised for 30 minutes in the last 24 hours? at least 3x in the last week?

-kept your carbohydrate intake  under 100 grams/day for any of the last several days?

-not had any carbonated beverage intake or nicotine use in the last month?

Another point that few decline to consider since it involves serious thought:

have you taken an aspirin or tylenol recently? Did you consider it a poison? Did you realize that they are lethal at high doses? Does that make them a poison?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspirin_poisoning

the same is true for coumadin, generic warfarin, which was developed as a rat poison and is now a life saving drug: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warfarin

have you had a sip of water today? careful, too much can be lethal:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_intoxication    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1770067/

The list goes on and on and on–almost everything we ingest can be lethal in high doses, but most are proven beneficial in low doses.

So I challenge you you to tell me how you differentiate one item as a poison and another not, except as it fits your comfort zone. Give me a logical, reasoned discussion refuting aspirin, warfarin and water as being any different than fluoride, with documentation, and we might have the start of an intellectual debate.

I stand by my assertion that low doses of fluoride are a beneficial preventive component to dental health–I am not discounting that the amount in water may be lowered since it is present in toothpaste and other sources, and I have no argument if people decide to avoid it for their own personal resons, but it is intellectually dishonest to call it  a poison and advocate for it being banned since the benefits will pay off in the future.

 

  • Wed, Feb 29, 2012 - 05:03am

    #7
    1215

    1215

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 27 2008

    Posts: 4

    count placeholder

    water

Mark and DTM,

As I re-read both your posts, perhaps we are not as far apart as I first thought.

With an ideal situation and personal responsibility, perhaps flouride would not be a benefit to some of us individually, but as the article suggested, the reduction in decay proves its benefits to society as a whole. The reduction in decay came DESPITE the typical American diet and since fluoride was added to municipal water supplies.

My argument is one of frustration seeing fluoride demonized by the same people that are drinking soda daily and taking aspirin for their headaches.  You CANNOT selectively call one substance a poison without realzing that nearly EVERYTHING we ingest is a poison at high concentrations.

It is the selectivity and narrow mindedness of weak, unsupported claims that creates confusion and doubt among the less educated.

I attribute having 28 teeth at my age a direct result of fluoridation. While I currently eat healthy and follow prescribed dental hygiene, I did not when younger and I doubt many of us did. My father lost his teeth before age 40 and my mother over half of hers. My kids have no cavities.

Thanks to the science that provided the knowledge.

  • Wed, Feb 29, 2012 - 05:08am

    #8
    1215

    1215

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 27 2008

    Posts: 4

    count placeholder

    ever take something for a headache?

http://www.lef.org/protocols/appendix/otc_toxicity_01.htm

  • Wed, Feb 29, 2012 - 12:00pm

    #9
    ao

    ao

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 04 2009

    Posts: 882

    count placeholder

    fluoride stupefaction, establishment propaganda, and Nazis

1215 wrote:

Mark,

I agree with you 100% that we as a society should improve our dietary choices for many reasons, including reducing decay.

But seriously, are you kidding?

People as a whole, and most of us individually (including myself) are lazy and will usually take the easy way. If you can you truthfully answer yes to these questions, then I would guess you are in the top 2% of Americans:

–have you flossed in the last 24 hours? at least 3x in the last 5 days?

-exercised for 30 minutes in the last 24 hours? at least 3x in the last week?

-kept your carbohydrate intake  under 100 grams/day for any of the last several days?

-not had any carbonated beverage intake or nicotine use in the last month?

Another point that few decline to consider since it involves serious thought:

have you taken an aspirin or tylenol recently? Did you consider it a poison? Did you realize that they are lethal at high doses? Does that make them a poison?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspirin_poisoning

the same is true for coumadin, generic warfarin, which was developed as a rat poison and is now a life saving drug: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warfarin

have you had a sip of water today? careful, too much can be lethal:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_intoxication    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1770067/

The list goes on and on and on–almost everything we ingest can be lethal in high doses, but most are proven beneficial in low doses.

So I challenge you you to tell me how you differentiate one item as a poison and another not, except as it fits your comfort zone. Give me a logical, reasoned discussion refuting aspirin, warfarin and water as being any different than fluoride, with documentation, and we might have the start of an intellectual debate.

I stand by my assertion that low doses of fluoride are a beneficial preventive component to dental health–I am not discounting that the amount in water may be lowered since it is present in toothpaste and other sources, and I have no argument if people decide to avoid it for their own personal resons, but it is intellectually dishonest to call it  a poison and advocate for it being banned since the benefits will pay off in the future.

“Warning: This Daily Habit is Damaging Your Bones, Brain, Kidneys, and Thyroid”

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/07/01/paul-connett-interview.aspx

“We now have 23 studies from four different countries; Mexico, Iran, India and China, which indicate that moderate exposure to fluoride is lowering IQ in children,” Connett says.

“The lowest level at which they estimate this is happening is 1.9 parts per million of fluoride.

If you’ve got an effect at 1.9 parts per million with a few hundred children in the study, then there is not enough margin of safety to protect every child that’s being exposed to fluoride.”

 

Fluoride and the Nazi connection.

http://truth11.com/2009/12/01/nazi-connections-to-flouride-in-americas-drinking-water/

 

I’ll pass … from someone whose children have been raised on well water to adulthood and have zero dental caries.   While I appreciate the benefits of modern dentistry, mercury based amalgam and excessive fluoridation are not two of their shining examples of good sense.

  • Wed, Feb 29, 2012 - 02:14pm

    #10
    mtforge

    mtforge

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 02 2009

    Posts: 2

    count placeholder

    currently nonfluoride water

So my household and others who have their own well with no fluoride water have an excess of cavities and our teeth are falling out? It would seem an easy enough study to confirm the benefits or dangers of fluoride by comparing city and non city water.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 15 total)

Login or Register to post comments