PCR not diagnostic -proof from inventor of PCR and the electron micrograph

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   1 posts
  • Sun, Dec 13, 2020 - 05:28pm



    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 12 2020

    Posts: 199

    count placeholder0

    PCR not diagnostic -proof from inventor of PCR and the electron micrograph

PCR was never intended to be diagnostic.

Roberto A. Giraldo, MD and Etienne de Harven published an article indicting the use of PCR to diagnose AIDS/HIV years ago. In it they state the PCR is not a diagnostic tool, as did the PCR creator Kary Mullis.

Video of Kary Mullis saying, “It doesn’t tell you that you are sick.”


Here is a video of now deceased Mullis ripping Fauci as a complete farce.              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oza1j2_WqBk

The scientific paper disappeared from many online resources just before Event 201 in Oct. 2019. Kary Mullis died of pneumonia in his 70s Aug. 2019. Seems too coincidental.

In a sharp rebuttal of the Gallo claims, claims endorsed by Fauci and the NIAID as well as CDC, Roberto A. Giraldo, MD and Etienne de Harven, MD, the scientist who produced the first electron micrograph of a retrovirus, pointed out that both the ELISA and Western blot, and a genetic test, the PCR or ‘Viral Load’ test,” the two major tests used to determine if one has AIDS, are invalid. “None of these tests detect the HIV virus itself, nor do they detect HIV particles.” They add that there are “more than 70 different documented conditions that can cause the antibody tests to react positive without an HIV infection.” Among the false positive cases are influenza, the common cold, leprosy or the existence of pregnancy. The same tests are used today to determine SARS-CoV-2-positive.

They concluded,

“The fact that after 25 years of intense research HIV has been neither isolated nor purified in terms of classical virology indicates to us that the infectious view of AIDS as a contagious viral disease is based on an apparently non-existent microbe!”


Remember this from CDC? ” We don’t actually have the virus isolate.”

The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.





Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

Login or Register to post comments