Investing in Precious Metals 101 ad

Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in on Chicago Climate Exchange

Login or register to post comments Last Post 13831 reads   20 posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 20 total)
  • Fri, Dec 18, 2009 - 07:01pm

    #1

    DrKrbyLuv

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 10 2008

    Posts: 354

    count placeholder

    Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in on Chicago Climate Exchange

It’s a Small World (After All)…

“Obama Years Ago Helped Fund Carbon Program He Is Now Pushing Through Congress” is a FOXNews story by Ed Barnes.  In short, “While on the board of a Chicago-based charity [the Joyce Foundation], Barack Obama helped fund a carbon trading exchange that will likely play a critical role in the cap-and-trade carbon reduction program he is now trying to push through Congress as president.”

The “privately-owned” Chicago Climate Exchange is heavily influenced by Obama cohorts Al Gore and Maurice Strong.  For years now Strong and Gore have been cashing in on that lucrative cottage industry known as man-made global warming.

Strong is on the board of directors of the Chicago Climate Exchange, Wikipedia-described as “the world’s first and North America’s only legally binding greenhouse gas emission registry reduction system for emission sources and offset projects in North America and Brazil.”

Gore, self-proclaimed Patron Saint of the Environment, buys his carbon off-sets from himself–the Generation Investment Management LLP, “an independent, private, owner-managed partnership established in 2004 with offices in London and Washington, D.C., of which he is both chairman and founding partner. The Generation Investment Management business has considerable influence over the major carbon credit trading firms that currently exist, including the Chicago Climate Exchange.

Strong, the silent partner, is a man whose name often draws a blank on the Washington cocktail circuit.  The Canadian born Strong is little known in the United States. That’s because he spends most of his time in China where he he has been working to make the communist country the world’s next superpower. The nondescript Strong, nonetheless is the big cheese in the underworld of climate change and is one of the main architects of the failing Kyoto Protocol.

It may be interesting to note that the Chicago Climate Exchange in spite of its hype, is a veritable rat’s nest of cronyism. The largest shareholder in the Exchange is Goldman Sachs.  Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley is its honorary chairman, The Joyce Foundation, which funded the Exchange also funded money for John Ayers’ Chicago School Initiatives.  John is the brother of William Ayers. 

Even as man-made global warming is being exposed as a money-generating hoax, Obama is working feverishly to push the controversial cap-and-trade carbon reduction scheme through Congress.- complete article link

We know Gore and Obama…but who is Maurice Strong?

Strong has emerged as one of the most powerful and enigmatic figures on the international scene. He wields considerable influence in the areas of business and politics. Twenty years ago, The New Yorker magazine described Maurice Strong as the man upon whom “the survival of civilization in something like its present form might depend.”

In addition, his credentials include membership in the UN funded Commission on Global Governance. This body’s 1995 report called “Our Global Neighborhood” contained a number of ominous proposals including the establishment of a global tax, UN control over “global commons,” expansion of the powers of the World Bank, expansion of the jurisdiction of the International Court, removal of U.S. veto power in the Security Council and creation of an Economic Security Council to oversee the world’s economy. Clearly, the implications of such proposals were intended to move us towards the creation of a world government infrastructure. Unfortunately, they also necessitate and precipitate the decline of U.S. sovereignty.

As of late, this billionaire Canadian businessman works simultaneously for the United Nations as Senior Advisor to the UN Secretary General and for the Rockefeller and Rothschild’s Trusts.  Strong has complained that “the United States is clearly the greatest risk to the world’s ecological health” and has forcefully advocated a new economic order based on the redistribution of the developed world’s industries and wealth to the Third World.  – complete article link

“Redistribution of the developed world’s industries and wealth to the third world?”  This guy is an employee and henchman for the Rothschild and Rockefeller crime syndicates.

“In 1978, a mystic informed Hanne and Maurice Strong that “the Baca would become the center for a new planetary order which would evolve from the economic collapse and environmental catastrophes that would sweep the globe in the years to come.”

“What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment?  Will they do it? Will the rich countries agree to reduce their impact on the environment?  Will they agree to save the earth?

“The group’s conclusions is ‘no.’ The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change.  So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilization collapse?  Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?  This group of world leaders form a secret society to bring about a one world collapse.”  – complete article link

If you haven’t figured it out yet…our economy and civilization are being intentionally destroyed.  Global warming is a man-made emergency, a hoax….out of the chaos will come nasty solutions that will help bring about the end of life as we know it.  Our opinions and preferences don’t matter; to these people we are the enemy.

Larry

P.S. – Please don’t tell me that they actually care about the climate at the Copenhagen Summit.  If they did, wouldn’t they also discuss Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) and the manipulation of climate for military use?  For more information see the article written by Michel Chossudovsky  – complete article link


  • Fri, Dec 18, 2009 - 07:24pm

    #2
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder

    Re: Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in …

I think it’s a mistake to conclude that elite forces don’t  believe in carbon based global warming, etc.. They probably do. They are also very self interested and plan to benefit from any solutions they design to address eco-calamity. The two tracks, implementing policy and benefiting from the policies are paralleling tracks that their beliefs ride on.

Maurice Strong is big in nuclear energy circles, isn’t he? It’s pretty odd, that a quiet, unattractive Canadian who has been channeling spiritual entities with his wife and preaching gloom and doom, isn’t sleeping under a bridge somewhere in Vancouver, instead of pulling international strings and acquiring billions. I want HIS job!

  • Fri, Dec 18, 2009 - 07:47pm

    #3
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder

    Re: Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in …

DrKrbyLuv nice post…..love that picture…so fitting LOL.

  • Sat, Dec 19, 2009 - 02:30am

    #4
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder

    Re: Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in …

Hi DrKrbyLuv,

I’ve read acres of peer reviewed pdf on the subject of global climate change and am in the human caused camp. It’s an opinion that will change if and when I find the evidence to prove me otherwise. Politicising the subject is an entirely different matter when you put the issues up against one of Stefan Molyneux latest You Tube broadcasts from Freedomain Radio however …

… this puts things in perspective for me, how about you? …Laughing

Taking the private jet to Copenhagen (Times Online – 29th Sept 09)

http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/celebrity/article6931572.ece

Copenhagen climate summit: 1,200 limos, 140 private planes and caviar wedges (Telegraph.co.uk – 5th Dec 09)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6736517/Copenhagen-climate-summit-1200-limos-140-private-planes-and-caviar-wedges.html

Best,

Paul

 

  • Sat, Dec 19, 2009 - 03:27am

    #5
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder

    Re: Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in …

Hi Larry

You once again have nailed it . I try to read every one of your posts. You are one of the few on this site that get it.

The name strong rang a bell. Wasn’t there a Benjamin Strong chairman of the Fed? I wonder if this one is from a branch of the same species of reptile.

Anyway I went to wiki and found this. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Strong

A new world order slime if there ever was one. 

Well are we surprised?

What conspiracy theory?

  • Sat, Dec 19, 2009 - 06:15am

    #6
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder

    Re: Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in …

[quote=Vanityfox451]

Hi DrKrbyLuv,

I’ve read acres of peer reviewed pdf on the subject of global climate change and am in the human caused camp. It’s an opinion that will change if and when I find the evidence to prove me otherwise. Politicising the subject is an entirely different matter when you put the issues up against one of Stefan Molyneux latest You Tube broadcasts from Freedomain Radio however …

… this puts things in perspective for me, how about you? …Laughing

Taking the private jet to Copenhagen (Times Online – 29th Sept 09)

http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/celebrity/article6931572.ece

Copenhagen climate summit: 1,200 limos, 140 private planes and caviar wedges (Telegraph.co.uk – 5th Dec 09)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6736517/Copenhagen-climate-summit-1200-limos-140-private-planes-and-caviar-wedges.html

Best,

Paul

[/quote]

Paul

Too funny! You gotta love Molynieux. Somehow his annoying accent and his smug demeanor only make him more effective. LOL. He’s beautiful!

On AGW, I’ve slowly shifted from skeptic/ undecided to reluctantly assuming an almost certain anthropogenic role (I’ve never questioned the pollution/destruction end of it  – even if climate change turns out to be much less catastrophic than our worst fears, does anyone doubt we are completely ravaging the planet?) But while I may have shifted slightly on the science, I haven’t budged an inch on the politics. In my view, the “deniers” have that part right. This is nothing but a shameless power grab. And it frightens me every bit as much as melting polar ice caps.

Best

Greg

PS: Real good to see you around.

You’re still coming up with some of the best sh*t!

 

  • Sat, Dec 19, 2009 - 06:00pm

    #7
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder

    Re: Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in …

[quote=DrKrbyLuv]

“In 1978, a mystic informed Hanne and Maurice Strong that “the Baca would become the center for a new planetary order which would evolve from the economic collapse and environmental catastrophes that would sweep the globe in the years to come.”

“What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment?  Will they do it? Will the rich countries agree to reduce their impact on the environment?  Will they agree to save the earth?

“The group’s conclusions is ‘no.’ The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change.  So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilization collapse?  Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?  This group of world leaders form a secret society to bring about a one world collapse.”  – complete article link

[/quote]

The above link continues with this bit of info:

“It’s February. They’re all at Davos. These aren’t terrorists – they’re world leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodity and stock markets. They’ve engineered, using their access to stock exchanges, and computers, and gold supplies, a panic. Then they prevent the markets from closing. They jam the gears. They have mercenaries who hold the rest of the world leaders at Davos as hostages. The market’s can’t close. The Rich countries..?”

Later it details how order would be restored post-collapse with a “civilian Earth Rescue Corps formed from former military personnel” (War is Peace) and “sufficient financial credit to employ everyone at peaceful work to supply human needs” (Freedom is Slavery.) Of course all this is possible because Ignorance is Strength has been standard operating procedure for awhile now.

So since it would be extremely irresponsible to have such power and just spout out such a scenario as a “novel he’d like to write,” (as Strong does in the article) would it be far-fetched to think we should keep a close eye on the next World Economic Forum, which does meet in Davos … from January 27 – 31? Methinks we really can’t last another whole year – too much uncertainty lying in the fact that you really can’t account for what human nature will do when a critical number are out of work and hungry.

When I read the whole article, in a creepy way, it helped me understand how these powers can move forward with these games … they really do believe they are saving the whole earth! Like generals moving counters on a world map, some counters are sacrificed to gain x, y, or z; but now the counters (acceptable losses) are entire nations and millions of people. 

I feel disgusted. I wish there was a more powerful way to express it cause it really doesn’t do the feeling justice.

  • Sat, Dec 19, 2009 - 07:53pm

    #8
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder

    Re: Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in …

Hello all,

As usual, Paul brings us a great video, Stefan Molyneux points out the hypocrisy of the celebrities who have comfortably rallied to the cause. We can also see quite a bit of hypocrisy on the part of policy makers. For example:

1)  Why are we continuously moving towards “globalization” and “outsourcing” when it is very energy intensive to ship products half way around the world.

One would suspect that an opposite policy would be pursued if there were a sincere concern with carbon emissions and energy usage. Surely local manufacturing and productive capabilities offer us a huge opportunity to reduce our energy needs and carbon footprint. According to an article that appeared in the Mail Online, 16 ships create as much pollution as all the cars in the world

Today award-winning science writer Fred Pearce – environmental consultant to New Scientist and author of Confessions Of An Eco Sinner – reveals that the super-ships that keep the West in everything from Christmas gifts to computers pump out killer chemicals linked to thousands of deaths because of the filthy fuel they use.

We’ve all noticed it. The filthy black smoke kicked out by funnels on cross-Channel ferries, cruise liners, container ships, oil tankers and even tugboats. It looks foul, and leaves a brown haze across ports and shipping lanes. But what hasn’t been clear until now is that it is also a major killer, probably causing thousands of deaths in Britain alone. As ships get bigger, the pollution is getting worse. The most staggering statistic of all is that just 16 of the world’s largest ships can produce as much lung-clogging sulphur pollution as all the world’s cars.

The recession has barely dented the trade. This Christmas, most of our presents will have come by super-ship from the Far East; ships such as the Emma Maersk and her seven sisters Evelyn, Eugen, Estelle, Ebba, Eleonora, Elly and Edith Maersk. Thanks to the IMO’s rules, the largest ships can each emit as much as 5,000 tons of sulphur in a year – the same as 50million typical cars, each emitting an average of 100 grams of sulphur a year. With an estimated 800million cars driving around the planet, that means 16 super-ships can emit as much sulphur as the world fleet of cars.

For decades, the IMO has rebuffed calls to clean up ship pollution. As a result, while it has long since been illegal to belch black, sulphur-laden smoke from power-station chimneys or lorry exhausts, shipping has kept its licence to polluteAmazingly, they pleaded poverty. Two-thirds of the world’s ships are registered in developing countries such as Panama. These are just flags of convenience, to evade tougher rules on safety and pay for sailors.  – complete article link

2) Excluded from the Copenhagen Agenda: Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) and Climate Change

The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) based in Gokona, Alaska, has been in existence since 1992. It is part of a new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the US Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Operated by the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating “controlled local modifications of the ionosphere” [upper layer of the atmosphere]:

HAARP has been presented to public opinion as a program of scientific and academic research. US military documents seem to suggest, however, that HAARP’s main objective is to “exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes.” (See Michel Chossudovsky, The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction: “Owning the Weather” for Military Use, Global Research, September 27, 2004

“Intervention in atmospheric and climatic matters ….will unfold on a scale difficult to imagine at present… [T]his will merge each nation’s affairs with those of every other, more thoroughly than the threat of a nuclear or any other war would have done.” (Quoted in Spencer Weart, Environmental Warfare: Climate Modification Schemes, Global Research, December 5, 2009)

Weather manipulation is the pre-emptive weapon par excellence. It can be directed against enemy countries or ‘friendly nations’ without their knowledge, used to destabilise economies, ecosystems and agriculture. It can also trigger havoc in financial and commodity markets. The disruption in agriculture creates a greater dependency on food aid and imported grain staples from the US and other Western countries.” (Michel Chossudovsky, Weather Warfare: Beware the US military’s experiments with climatic warfare, The Ecologist, December 2007)

“Weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary… In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.” (US Air Force, emphasis added. Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report, http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/ emphasis added)

The manipulation of climate for military use is potentially a greater threat to humanity than CO2 emissions. Why are environmental modification techniques (ENMOD) not being debated by the civil society and environmentalist organizations?  – complete article link

3)  How Did the Chinese Create Snow?

Not to be outdone by the west, China is tampering with the weather as reported in this article from Time Magazine

“Everybody complains about the weather,” the old saying goes, “But nobody does anything about it.” That is, until now. A Nov. 1 snowfall in Beijing — the city’s earliest since 1987 — is due, Chinese scientists say, to a campaign of “cloud-seeding” to encourage precipitation. If true, it’s the wettest success yet in a long-standing effort to bring moisture artificially to the parched northern regions of China. So how’d they do it?

The method of cloud-seeding used by the Chinese involves dosing the atmosphere with silver iodide, a chemical solution either dropped from planes or shot up from the ground. (Other methods use salt or dry ice.) The silver iodide particles supercharge cloud formation, as they act as excellent condensation nuclei. Once clouds form, they also start a positive feedback effect. As droplets freeze and are added to the cloud, they release their heat, creating an updraft which draws additional moisture from the ground into the atmosphere.

But if you choose to believe in cloud-seeding, the Chinese scientists may have even overdone it. The snowstorm lasted for 11 hours, disrupting flights in and out of Beijing and hampering shipping off the Chinese coast.  The Chinese may be becoming the world’s best at managing weather. In a 2008 experiment, scientists seeded clouds in advance of the Beijing Olympics, successfully ensuring clear skies for the opening ceremony.  complete article link

4)  Is the international banking cartel fighting a secret war on the planet?

Formerly a well-traveled Far East correspondent for Forbes magazine, Fulford, fluent in Japanese, is hosting What is This?, his weekly podcast from Tokyo, and alleges “Hazel” Takana, Japan’s finance minister, told him in 2007 “a group of American and European oligarchs” threatened to strike the country with manufactured earthquakes unless he ceded control of the Japanese banking system.

Fulford’s allegation is accompanied by a critical explanatory note in the webpage’s “more info” opition; it cites similarities in Japan’s 2007 ‘quakes with those more recently striking China: “Benjamin Fulford reports from Tokyo on a mysterious plasma weapon seen prior to the Niigata earthquake [… on 16] July, 2007 and red, white and blue lights seen prior to the recent earthquake in China.  Both quakes targeted nuclear facilities… coincidence?”  – complete article link

I don’t know if the above video is accurate.  But I do think there is enough evidence to say with some certainty that the feigned climate concerns are nothing more than another scam designed to steal the wealth of the middle class while greatly damaging our productive capability.  The criminals running the scam are arrogant enough to openly enrich themselves by the “solutions” that they offer.  In the old days, this would be seen as a giant conflict of interest but sadly today we just accept the corruption.

Larry

  • Sat, Dec 19, 2009 - 09:20pm

    #9
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder

    Re: Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in …

Hello V,

Thanks for kind words.  Yup, I thought about Benjamin Strong too.  “Strong, who was Vice President of Banker’s Trust of New York, was JP Morgan’s emissary to the secret Jekyll Island (Georgia) expedition in 1910 – one of the selected members who stayed at the luxurious Jekyll Island Hunt Club retreat in November for a private ten-day conference.”  – Wiki link

More accurately, both Strong and J.P. Morgan worked for the Rothschild’s.  Upon his death, it was discovered that the majority owner of J.P. Morgan was the Rothschild banking syndicate, Morgan only owned 19%.  It is uncanny how well the Rothschild name has been kept from the American public, hopefully that will change. 

In his role as the Governor of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Strong worked under Sir Montagu Norman, the Governor of the Bank of England (both central banks are primarily controlled by the House of Rothschild).  The two are alleged to have conspired to create the great crash of 1929.

Sorry if I got side tracked, my long winded point is that the Rothschild’s are heavily involved with the international cap and trade scheme being discussed at Copenhagen.  Some things never change.

Greg wrote:

On AGW, I’ve slowly shifted from skeptic/ undecided to reluctantly assuming an almost certain anthropogenic role (I’ve never questioned the pollution/destruction end of it  – even if climate change turns out to be much less catastrophic than our worst fears, does anyone doubt we are completely ravaging the planet?

Hi Greg, I absolutely agree…we should have been working in earnest starting 30 years ago to find clean, sustainable energy alternatives.  We knew back then that our national security and prosperity were in jeopardy as most of our energy was imported and the sources were finite.

Saffron wrote:

When I read the whole article, in a creepy way, it helped me understand how these powers can move forward with these games … they really do believe they are saving the whole earth! Like generals moving counters on a world map, some counters are sacrificed to gain x, y, or z; but now the counters (acceptable losses) are entire nations and millions of people.

That’s a great point; I have wondered how so many people could go along with dangerous scams and schemes.  I think you’re right, many believe that they are doing the right thing.

Larry

  • Sat, Dec 19, 2009 - 10:39pm

    #10
    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Peak Prosperity Admin

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Oct 31 2017

    Posts: 1612

    count placeholder

    Re: Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in …

I perused the Forbes list of richest people in the world.

Got to 200 and  not a Rothschild in sight

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 20 total)

Login or Register to post comments