Feullmich relates that one of the judges that ruled the PCR test invalid in Europe was harrassed and needed a top defense attorney to ward-off punishment by the system in Germany. He spells out how he thinks this the class-action battle will work out going forward from a European viewpoint. He agrees with Dr. Hodgkinson: Trust nothing you are told, think for yourself and be self-reliant! I think that is an easy sell around here.
Ubermeister: Many thanks for your ongoing efforts posting videos and info re the class action lawsuits and what Dr. Fuellmich is up to. It is much appreciated.
The next few months are going to be tense. I am so hoping for the success of the multitude of legal actions that are being brought forth, and ultimately an international tribunal to hold all the evil bastards accountable 🤞
when is that happen? I guess enough people should have downloaded the data so it should be possible to identify the deleted records.
At the end this is all in EXCEL so easy to compare and filter.
Thanks to thc0655 for this post from the 6-15 DD thread:
Aberdeen, SD – A federal judge in South Dakota brought criminal charges of contempt of court and conspiracy to obstruct justice against three U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) officials on Monday in connection with a deputy marshal’s refusal to reveal her vaccination status to his court.
In March, U.S. District Judge Charles Kornmann tried to require all courthouse employees to be vaccinated, the Associated Press reported.
But U.S. Marshal Daniel Mosteller, who heads up the agency in South Dakota, told Kornmann that wouldn’t work because USMS was not requiring its marshals to be vaccinated.…
Sure seems like a US judge is trying to force an individual, in this case a US law enforcement officer, to undergo an experimental medical procedure in violation of the Nuremberg Code. Just two days ago Dr. Simone Gold of America’s Frontline Doctors asked Reiner Fuellmich and his team about whether judges who ignored or wrongfully dismissed lawsuits along these lines could be charged under the Nuremberg Code. The answer was yes:
This is my fifth try to get this posted, I am worn out. Sorry if the links aren’t live, I just can’t get the damned thing to post.
Woe is Canada…. lost in the WEF weeds and dancing to Turdeau’s tunes.
Our lawyers did an excellent job.
Sarah Miller and Robert Hawkes ran circles around the governments lawyers. In cross-examination, they were able to get some incredible admissions from the government’s witnesses, and they really grilled the health bureaucrats the government sent out to defend the law.
But in the end, Crampton sided with the establishment, and against the people. I’ve read the ruling — in my opinion, it’s a political document designed to make this problem go away.
And fair enough — if the entire media and the entire political establishment and the airline industry itself seem fine with all this and the other awful parts of the lock down, so why would a top judge go out on a limb? And what — become a pariah at all the Ottawa wine-tasting parties?
Our lawyers were in court alongside lawyers from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, and there were a handful of other individuals who sued too — all our cases were bundled together. But I note there wasn’t a single lawyer in court from left-wing civil liberties groups; no tourism or travel or business group; no citizens group. No political group, no opposition political party.
Nobody. Nobody who we rely on in society to protect us from authoritarian measures. I think the government got the message loud and clear — no-one “important” cares.
Well, I care. And I hope you care. So we’re going to appeal.
Here’s what Justice Crampton said:
“…like times of war and other crises, pandemics call for sacrifices to save lives and avoid broad based suffering. If some are unwilling to make such sacrifices, and engage in behaviour that poses a demonstrated risk to the health and safety of others, the principles of fundamental justice will not prevent the state from performing its essential function of protecting its citizens from that risk…”
…Well, we’re appealing. Section 7 of our Charter of Rights guarantees life, liberty and security of the person. I think a court of appeal could be persuaded that detaining our reporter for no provable benefit deprives him of his liberty and isn’t in accordance with the principles of justice. It’s arbitrary. It’s over broad.
Section 9 of the Charter guarantees that Canadians can’t be arbitrarily detained. And then there’s the law itself — the Quarantine Act delegates certain powers and Trudeau’s cabinet, in issuing these orders to detain people, has exceeded those powers. It’s just not there in the law to let them do what they’re doing.
A big but in the story though: the same judge has complained of under funding impacting the courts ability to function:
Which begs the question, did they do their due diligence on this critically important case, or did they just muddle through with limited resources that prevented them from fully sussing out how the Constitutional rights of Canadians are being violated?
I know where my bet is…
Trial lawyers, doctors, scientists and vaccine experts teaming up to stop the plandemic!
Lots of info at this site for those who want to keep abreast of developments.
Looks like the COVID cabal is crumbling. First Fauci, now Daszak. The evidence pouring in and the mishandling and censorship is becoming more evident each day to the point mainstream media is willing to report on previously taboo topics. Maybe by Christmas they’ll be able to hint at vaccine side effects too… who knows. Its only June. We were still trying to get people to understand the effects of the virus last year this time. Despite the slow start, the momentum is building… how far will it carry though and to what end.
Re-posting this link from another thread for continuity.
Transcript of testimony by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
This gives us more of a look at the evidence he is using for his class action lawsuits.