Thanks for posting Ubermeister.
I agree with Canuck 21…..this is a MUST WATCH.
Chris – have you considered asking Peter Mc for an interview?
Adding to this thread: Another must-watch interview — a Canada-based colleague of Dr McCullough:
Dr. Roger Hodgkinson, retired Cambridge-trained pathologist living in Canada, formerly at U of Alberta, chair of the Examination Committee for General Pathology at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons in Ottawa, involved in DNA sequencing for early diagnosis of cancer. He says:
Myocarditis is “never mild” – can take 20+ years to manifest – once a heart muscle cell dies it is never replaced – inflammation means the heart muscle cells are dying.
There is “grotesque” “medical idiocy” going on
“There are very serious scientific possibilities here for long-term infertility” in both women and men
Vaccinating young people is “state-sanctioned child abuse on the most monstrous scale”
This is “extreme medical malpractice”
There is no informed consent
MSM is being “brutally censored”
This is “medical negligence of the highest order”
“the truth will out…books will be written… heads will roll, there will be blood in the gutter…something so gigantically mad cannot be suppressed…the Emperor has no clothes… so many people are culpable …everyone involved is guilty of the most terrible crime ever committed against humanity”
“Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it.
Whoever commits a fraud is guilty not only of the particular injury to him who he deceives, but of the diminution of that confidence which constitutes not only the ease but the existence of society.”
Found at Jesse’s Cafe Americain
When this hits the light of day – not if, when – society will be shaken to the very core of its being, and beyond. This is an existential threat, the start of an existential change. What that ultimately looks like is up to us.
…Above is the header portion of Page 105 of the Confidentiality Agreement. It deals with the actual physical transfer of “mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates” being sent to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
It is signed on December 12 by Ralph Baric, PhD, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who is listed as the “Recipient” of the mRNA Coronavirus Vaccine candidates, Image below: …
More evidence! This is a fascinating read with all kinds of info that validates the dangers of the vaccines.
This is Hearing No. 37 of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee with Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Krueger, beginning at minute 3.56.38 of the hearing to the end. The transcript was first produced in German and then translated (by Gilian Crowther, member of the BDÜ, the Federal Association of Interpreters and Translators)
…*VSK: I’m a cell biologist and my specialist field is the functional characterisation and elucidation of proteins, i.e., I understand how proteins are produced, how they are transported in the cell, how they are taken up by cells, how they are metabolised, how intra- and intercellular communication takes place, including within tissue, and how organs interact. This is all very important if one wishes to conduct a risk assessment: how the vaccine functions for example, and the dangers/risks of the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). This technology is not really new: it’s novel as a vaccine, but we have been using these LNPs in research for over 20 years, and we have always been struggling with the problem of toxicity of the lipids and balancing this against their efficacy.
…And finally if we have time I would like to talk about the long-term consequences relating to immune disease, that is an aspect that has not yet been discussed in public at all.
RF: I don’t know if you are aware of this, but right next to you [on screen] is the colleague Dr. Holzeisen, who is key in constructing the plea for annulment of the vaccine authorisation: what you say today is likely to have a substantial impact on the lawsuit that we formulate and submit to the European Medicines Agency/the EU Commission.
…RF: This description is not the normal way a vaccine works, from what we have known up to now, the possibilities that you describe seem reminiscent to more of a genetic intervention or perhaps one should say a genetic experiment -?
VSK: Yes, that is true. The vaccine itself, even if the DNA – that contamination – were not in it – is still a genetic intervention. I’ll be talking more about that, then you will be able to understand it really clearly. But I don’t know how high the contamination is, they have only stated the fact that it is contaminated.
VF: But against the backdrop of this DNA issue, especially in the case of dividing cells, the question that arises is that it is probably especially dangerous to vaccinate pregnant women or children, because in those cases the cells are dividing much more than in an adult or a very old person.
VSK: That’s absolutely the case.
VSK: But as I have said, we are all at risk because our cells are subject to ongoing dynamism: millions of cells in us are being degraded and renewed every day: one has to consider all the stem cells, all the immune cells, it is a constant flux: if these contaminants interfere, then …
That’s why the AstraZeneca vaccine is an entirely different caliber.
But to stick with BioNTech: there are further contaminants, there is double-stranded RNA for instance. The EMA Committee says it is slight, it is acceptable, but… It is measuring it in the quantities that are in there: part of the 30 micrograms is double-stranded DNA….that is something else that cannot be used.
… RF: But just to go a step back for a moment: You have just said that the EMA has specified several requirements, and when they have fulfilled them they should come back again. So how come vaccinations are already taking place?
VSK: That’s a question I’d ask you! 26.41
Such political pressure.
Dr. H: That’s criminal, unbelievable. Terrifying.
There is much more worth reading, for those who are interested.
This is very convincing. The point the narrator makes at the end is this; If they really let us see how damaging the vaccines really are, nobody would take it.
I’m just going to throw this into the mix. I raised a Freedom of Information request with the UK’s medicines regulator (MHRA). I had asked them to provide evidence of human challenge trials in relation to the covid-19 gene therapies currently in use. I received their response today:
“Regarding your specific questions, MHRA holds no data on any human challenge studies performed on subjects receiving the Pfizer, Oxford/AstraZeneca or Moderna vaccines.”
Not really sure what to say about that…
For reference, the World Health Organisation defines human challenge trials as:
“Human challenge trials are trials in which participants are intentionally challenged (whether or not they have been vaccinated) with an infectious disease organism. This challenge organism may be close to wild-type and pathogenic, adapted and/or attenuated from wild-type with less or no pathogenicity, or genetically modified in some manner.”
The link I posted in #36 no longer works, here is a new link:
Here is Dr. Hodgkinson again, this time with Attorney. Fuellmich, who really seems to draw out the unvarnished thinking of those he’s interviewing for the upcoming class-action lawsuits. I think his guests are used to toned-down media appearances, they really seem to open up in this venue, where the future stakes are high, and clear communication is paramount. Everything is in English.
I think the whole interview is informative. Beginning at 14 minutes Dr. Hodgkinson, who is a Pathologist, discusses the potential spread of virus and spike proteins from sweat glands, I haven’t heard it explained quite this way before. Dr. Hodgkinson is not as familiar to me as Dr. McCullough (earlier post), but interview is just as worthwhile.
Fuellmich, a class-action specialist, is pursuing a path which may lead to success of some kind in stopping the vaccination crime-against humanity, and hopefully a grim reckoning for the monsters responsible at Nuremberg 2.0. Let’s cheer him on.