… Being a Canadian patriot I felt it was necessary to have a Canadian corruption post all on its own.
Well… enough reading within all the embedded links to keep readers who give a damn busy for quite awhile. Love the cozy pics with Soros 🙄
SARS-CoV-2 mass vaccination: Urgent questions on vaccine safety that demand answers from international health agencies, regulatory authorities, governments and vaccine developers
Since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak, the race for testing new platforms designed to confer immunity against SARS-CoV-2, has been rampant and unprecedented, leading to emergency authorization of various vaccines. Despite progress on early multidrug therapy for COVID-19 patients, the current mandate is to immunize the world population as quickly as possible. The lack of thorough testing in animals prior to clinical trials, and authorization based on safety data generated during trials that lasted less than 3.5 months, raise questions regarding the safety of these vaccines. The recently identified role of SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein Spike for inducing endothelial damage characteristic of COVID-19, even in absence of infection, is extremely relevant given that most of the authorized vaccines induce the production of Spike glycoprotein in the recipients. Given the high rate of occurrence of adverse effects, and the wide range of types of adverse effects that have been reported to date, as well as the potential for vaccine-driven disease enhancement, Th2-immunopathology, autoimmunity, and immune evasion, there is a need for a better understanding of the benefits and risks of mass vaccination, particularly in the groups that were excluded in the clinical trials. Despite calls for caution, the risks of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been minimized or ignored by health organizations and government authorities. We appeal to the need for a pluralistic dialogue in the context of health policies, emphasizing critical questions that require urgent answers if we wish to avoid a global erosion of public confidence in science and public health.
Here’s a news report on the conversations and memos among Pfizer execs how they’re going to raise the price since the vaccine was never intended to stop the pandemic.
@Hothot I feel like “vaccines don’t end pandemic” is going to go from conspiracy theory to “Well, duh” pretty soon.
Just to follow up on the Canada stuff posted earlier:
If a pandemic with a tiny kill rate can justify the suspension of civil rights, then a pandemic with a vaccine that reduces that risk can still carry on with the same suspension of rights IMO.
Unless people start raising the middle finger.
10 fold reduction in mortality once Ivermectin started to be used.
Another super star doctor.
I think I’ve discovered a new heroine, Blaggers.
My question is how many of the officials who vote against the use of Ivermectin are using it?
… In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a grave breach of the Convention.
The “experimental” vaccine is in violation of all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes which carry the death penalty for those who seek to violate these International Laws.
The “vaccine” fails to meet the following five requirements to be considered a vaccine and is by definition a medical “experiment” and trial:
Provides immunity to the virus
This is a “leaky” gene therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims to reduce symptoms yet double-vaccinated are now 60% of the patients requiring ER or ICU with covid infections.
Protects recipients from getting the virus
This gene-therapy does not provide immunity and double-vaccinated can still catch and spread the virus.
Reduces deaths from the virus infection
This gene-therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-Vaccinated infected with Covid have also died.
Reduces circulation of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the spread of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.
Reduces transmission of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the transmission of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus. …
I think that you got my analogies crossed. Here it is spelled out:
Willingly taking an unproven gene therapy disguised as a vaccine = Being relocated and going willingly to the chambers. (Not knowing what each entailed)
Being Marked by a Star of David = Vaccine passports
Being allowed to work or not based on that marking.
Being allowed to shop or not based on that marking.
I believe these analogies answer when people question why the Germans allowed the Juden to be rounded up, beyond “Following orders”. Most said “I didn’t know”.
Just like no one giving the shot today knows. Nobody knows how this experiment is going to turn out, only time will tell. After the fact, just like in WWII.
Interesting development: a new entity within the WHO to further the globalist agenda. Here’s to hoping any further potential lock downs are included in the class action legal proceedings.
The chairwoman of the all-female group is Professor Mariana Mazzucato who has stated the world may be forced into “climate lockdowns.”
From the article in that last link:
“… Under a ‘climate lockdown,’ governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling,” writes Mariana Mazzucato, a professor at the Economics of Innovation and Public Value Center at University College London, in a paper titled “Avoiding a Climate Lockdown.”
The title of her paper is very misleading. She believes climate lockdowns will be necessary unless we “overhaul our economic structures and do capitalism differently.” …
Reposting from “Fauci and CDC Sued…” thread. Thanks to Boomer41 for finding this.