New Lancet article exposes that vaccines don’t stop spread

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   8 posts
  • Wed, Dec 01, 2021 - 01:03am

    #1

    Jim H

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1767

    count placeholder23

    New Lancet article exposes that vaccines don’t stop spread

The naked truth is now getting published.  The emperors of public health, who have called this a pandemic of the unvaccinated, have no clothes.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00258-1/fulltext?s=08#%20

LETTER| VOLUME 11, 100272, DECEMBER 01, 2021

The epidemiological relevance of the COVID-19-vaccinated population is increasing

High COVID-19 vaccination rates were expected to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in populations by reducing the number of possible sources for transmission and thereby to reduce the burden of COVID-19 disease. Recent data, however, indicate that the epidemiological relevance of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals is increasing. In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaccinated index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaccinated index cases (25% for vaccinated vs 23% for unvaccinated). 12 of 31 infections in fully vaccinated household contacts (39%) arose from fully vaccinated epidemiologically linked index cases. Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status or variant type [[1]]. In Germany, the rate of symptomatic COVID-19 cases among the fully vaccinated (“breakthrough infections”) is reported weekly since 21. July 2021 and was 16.9% at that time among patients of 60 years and older [[2]]. This proportion is increasing week by week and was 58.9% on 27. October 2021 (Figure 1) providing clear evidence of the increasing relevance of the fully vaccinated as a possible source of transmission. A similar situation was described for the UK. Between week 39 and 42, a total of 100.160 COVID-19 cases were reported among citizens of 60 years or older. 89.821 occurred among the fully vaccinated (89.7%), 3.395 among the unvaccinated (3.4%) [[3]]. One week before, the COVID-19 case rate per 100.000 was higher among the subgroup of the vaccinated compared to the subgroup of the unvaccinated in all age groups of 30 years or more. In Israel a nosocomial outbreak was reported involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members. The source was a fully vaccinated COVID-19 patient. The vaccination rate was 96.2% among all exposed individuals (151 healthcare workers and 97 patients). Fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died, the two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease [[4]]. The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies four of the top five counties with the highest percentage of fully vaccinated population (99.9–84.3%) as “high” transmission counties [[5]]. Many decisionmakers assume that the vaccinated can be excluded as a source of transmission. It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.

  • Wed, Dec 01, 2021 - 01:07am

    #2

    Jim H

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1767

    count placeholder11

    Commentary on the Lancet article

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/lancet-article-demolishes-vaccination

An amazing Lancet letter “The epidemiological relevance of the COVID-19-vaccinated population is increasing” was just published.

The largest significance is that the article WAS ALLOWED TO BE PUBLISHED BY LANCET. This means that the tide of scientists being scared by government/globalists/Big Pharma funding is turning, and the truth is coming out at the highest levels of science such as the Lancet.

The article is great, but the things it is saying are a regular subject of our discussion……

….This reinforces my opinion that the Covid Cult is coming apart at the seams and the failure of “Covid vaccines” is no longer a secret.

The key to any sort of narrative revolution of information warfare is NOT to convince your crazy Fauci-worshipping neighbor. The point of it is to convince decision makers and opinions makers that they are holding onto untenable positions.

Please spread this article, or the Lancet article with your own comments, as widely as possible. It will make it increasingly impossible to ignore.

People who profess how ”they believe in science” usually least understand science and can only understand Dr Leana Wen from CNN or Dr Fauci, so doubtfully they can even understand the text of the Lancet article. Please explain the meaning of this article to them. Tell them “the biggest medical science magazine just published an article saying vaccines are trash and do not even slow down the pandemic”.

If they show any interest, tell them that hundreds of thousands of terrified people are desperately seeking to get “un-vaccinated”. Ask them why do they want increasingly frequent boosters.

  • Wed, Dec 01, 2021 - 05:33am

    #3
    sand_kitty

    sand_kitty

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Apr 13 2011

    Posts: 2030

    count placeholder8

    New Lancet article exposes that vaccines don’t stop spread

(Trying to consolidate this information a bit.  All of this has already been posted several times by others.)

Swedish epidemiological study of 1.6 million people intended to determine the duration of Vaccine Effectiveness (VE).

Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccination Against Risk of Symptomatic Infection, Hospitalization, and Death Up to 9 Months: A Swedish Total-Population Cohort Study

Figure 2

Initial VE is quite good for 90 days.  Then fades to 50% at 5 months and goes BELOW ZERO about 9 months.  So you are actually more likely to catch SC2 9 months after full vaccination that if you had never been vaccinated.

——

COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 43

In the UK above.  About 40 weeks after 2 doses of vaccine, the risk of catching SC2 is HIGHER than in those who have never been vaccinated.

[sand_kitty note:  however, table 5 shows that the chance of dying within 28 days of a positive COVID PCR test is still higher in the unvaccinated.  So this same paper actually documents real benefit from vaccination.  It is a mixed picture.]

——

Then there is the whole vaccine injury topic, not mentioned here, which might be better captured in the All Cause Mortality figures.

——-

My guess is similar to Jim H’s.  The vaccine-rationale to control the world is faltering.  The oligarchy has made major advances in control of public policy but the limits of this pandemic have topped out.  (Further progress will require another crisis.  Coming soon……)

Now the goal is to try to rescue the MSM and MSMM (mainstream medical media) so that it remains a trusted and unbiased information source.  They must let some anti-vaccination narrative surface.

Then when small pox appears, the same MSMM can tell doctors and nurses what the oligarchy wants them to do and they will still trust those publications……

I’m not cynical.

  • Wed, Dec 01, 2021 - 09:17am

    #4
    Mike from Jersey

    Mike from Jersey

    Status Diamond Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jan 22 2018

    Posts: 1682

    count placeholder6

    Someone should explain the Lancet article to Jim Cramer

His proposal: “The federal government needs to require vaccines, including booster shots, for everyone in America by, say, January 1st”.

He closed by slamming “anti-vaxxers” and the Biden Administration, while comparing COVID to polio and insisting that the military be brought in to “enforce” the new mandate.

Cramer Goes Completely Mad

I would suggest that anyone going near Cramer get the rabies vaccine – just in case he bites them.

  • Wed, Dec 01, 2021 - 09:47am   (Reply to #3)

    #5
    Mark Carlin

    Mark Carlin

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 02 2009

    Posts: 17

    count placeholder3

    New Lancet article exposes that vaccines don’t stop spread

sandkitty, could you help explain the meaning of VE going ‘below’ zero (illustrated in Table 2)? I get the fact of a likely weaker natural immune system in people who’ve been taking these jabs. Is that the implication, and if so, why wasn’t that spelled out? Thanks

  • Wed, Dec 01, 2021 - 10:51am

    #6
    hotsauce

    hotsauce

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Dec 17 2020

    Posts: 251

    count placeholder0

    New Lancet article exposes that vaccines don’t stop spread

Jim H said:

… The emperors of public health, who have called this a pandemic of the unvaccinated, have no clothes.

I believe the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” idea is also about unvaccinated people supposedly suffering more hospitalization and death.

Either way, it draws attention away from the issue that cannot so easily be masked: all cause mortality. Chris Martenson’s latest video shows that we are doing poorly in all cause mortality and morbidity and we need to be asking why.

  • Wed, Dec 01, 2021 - 12:27pm

    #7
    TWalker5

    TWalker5

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 13 2020

    Posts: 242

    count placeholder8

    New Lancet article exposes that vaccines don’t stop spread

This is the sort of thread that needs to be pinned or otherwise saved and highlighted. I really hope the site upgrade is coming soon.

  • Wed, Dec 01, 2021 - 08:47pm   (Reply to #3)

    #8
    Fractious

    Fractious

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 04 2021

    Posts: 28

    count placeholder0

    New Lancet article exposes that vaccines don’t stop spread

I think the risk of catching covid is higher is vaxxed persons simply due to the fact most are careless after vaccination.  I had a friend go to the mall on black friday and he said it was amazingly packed with virtually no one wearing masks.

I call that a covid-fest.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

Login or Register to post comments