New Dr Mike Yeadon interview on vaccines

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   2 posts
  • Sun, Apr 04, 2021 - 01:16pm



    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 10 2020

    Posts: 139

    count placeholder15

    New Dr Mike Yeadon interview on vaccines

This interview with Dr Yeadon (former Pfizer VP) is a worthwhile listen:

At about the 18’00 mark he says that the spike protein, which several of the currently available vaccines make the recipient’s body produce, is a “biologically active fusegenic protein” and can create clotting. Cites colleagues observing bleeding, skin bleeds, massive headaches in vax’d patients. Says unless you are high risk, having one of these vaccines is “playing Russian roulette with your life”. At 23’oo says he believes the real reason is to introduce vaccine passports to provide “total totalitarian control of every living being on the planet”. At 35’00 says mutant variants are scarcely different from the original — 99.7% or higher identical. “It’s impossible for a variant” so small to evade the human immune system. Immune systems of survivors of SARS-1 can still recognize SARS- cov-2, which is 20% different. So there is no need for top-up vaccinations. Also, medical regulators have said the top-up vaccines will not need safety trials. He gives his theory as to why these top-up vaccines are being pushed (at 44’00): deniable global depopulation. Concludes: this coercion to become vax’d is illegal under the Nuremburg Code.

How much I personally believe in what he says is irrelevant. What I do believe in is the value of public debate.


  • Sun, Apr 11, 2021 - 07:13pm



    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Apr 13 2008

    Posts: 1290

    count placeholder1

    Dr Yeadon interview 4/7/21, disputes Dr. Bossche re virus variants

I found another recent article/interview with Dr. Yeadon, “EXCLUSIVE – Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’”

Dr. Yeadon thinks there’s a real possibility the goal of the vaccines is a mass-depopulation, pretty scary stuff.  He also takes a swipe at Dr. Bossche’s opinions about virus variants in the process.  I’m wondering if he just misunderstands Bossche’s intent, thinking that he is promoting the need for “top-off” vaccines (which I don’t think Bossche is):

Gov’t lies, Big Pharma moves forward, medicine regulators get out of the way, and possible ‘mass-depopulation’

“But I will take you through this, Patrick , because I am qualified to comment. I don’t know what Vanden Bossche is about. There was no possibility at all, based on all of the variants that are in the public domain, 4000 or so of them, none of them are going to escape immunity [i.e. become more dangerous].

“Nevertheless, politicians and health advisers (to loads of governments) are saying that they are. They’re lying. Well, why would you do that?

“Here’s the other thing, in parallel, pharmaceutical companies have said, several of them, it will be quite easy for us to adjust our gene-based vaccines, and we can hasten them through development, and we can help you.

“And here’s the real scary part, global medicines regulators like [the U.S. Food and Drug Administration] FDA, the Japanese medicines agency, the European Medicines Agency, have gotten together and announced … since top-up vaccines will be considered so similar to the ones that we have already approved for emergency use authorization, we are not going to require the drug companies to perform any clinical safety studies.

“So, you’ve got on the one hand, governments and their advisers that are lying to you that variants are different enough from the current virus that, even if you’re immune from natural exposure or vaccination, you’re a risk and you need to come and get this top-up vaccine. So, I think neither of those are true. So why is the drug company making the top-up vaccines? And [with] the regulators having got out of the way — and if Yeadon is right, and I’m sure I am or I wouldn’t be telling you this — you go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.

“And if you wanted to introduce a characteristic which could be harmful and could even be lethal, and you can even tune it to say ‘let’s put it in some gene that will cause liver injury over a nine-month period,’ or, cause your kidneys to fail but not until you encounter this kind of organism [that would be quite possible]. Biotechnology provides you with limitless ways, frankly, to injure or kill billions of people.

“And since I can’t think of a benign explanation for any of the steps: variants, top-up vaccines, no regulatory studies… it’s not only that I cannot think of a benign explanation, the steps described, and the scenario described, and the necessary sort of resolution to this false problem is going to allow what I just described: unknown, and unnecessary gene sequences injected into the arms of potentially billions of people for no reason.

“I’m very worried … that pathway will be used for mass depopulation, because I can’t think of any benign explanation.”

I would be really interested in others’ opinions of Yeadon vs Bossche.  Are their positions necessarily mutually exclusive (although Yeadon seems to think so)?  I’m behind on the vaccine posts on the mRNA thread, “A very dark view of mRNA vaccines; The warning from Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche” and am just starting to try to get caught up.  So my apologies if this has already been addressed there.


Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Login or Register to post comments