MIT study: mRNA permanently alters DNA
A new study my Harvard and MIT show evidence of permanent changes to DNA from mRNA vaccine.
Seems like an interesting and questionable find. Thank You for posting
Retroviruses, which include contemporary viruses such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV), have been infecting vertebrates for over 450 million years . A key step in the retrovirus lifecycle is retrotransposition, in which the RNA-based virus genome is reverse transcribed and integrated into the DNA of the host cell. Occasional integrations into the germline genomes of egg or sperm cells have the potential to become endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) that become fixtures in the host genome. Genome-sequencing projects of many species have revealed that ERVs have a ubiquitous presence in vertebrate genomes, constituting over 8% of the human genome . Most ERVs are considered fossilized relics that can no longer replicate or encode functional viruses, but the occasional insertion may prove beneficial for the host and become co-opted for a cellular role.
Since the discovery of ERVs decades ago, a number of retroviral proteins have been identified that have been co-opted to perform a wide range of biological functions . Notably, there is an apparent propensity for ERVs to acquire new roles in the placenta . One of the most iconic examples of retrovirus “domestication” is the gene Syncytin-1, which originates from a retroviral envelope gene. In primates, Syncytin-1 was repurposed for the development of a multinucleate tissue layer known as the syncytiotrophoblast, which separates maternal and fetal bloodstreams in the placenta . Remarkably, Syncytin-like retroviral proteins have been reported to be expressed in the placentas of nearly all mammals, yet Syncytins in different lineages derive from at least 10 independent infections by unrelated retroviruses . These findings have led to speculation that the co-option of unrelated ERVs in different species was a driving force underlying the evolutionary diversification of the placenta .
And that syncyntin-1 was talked about a lot about six months ago.
Good find Kathy. Viruses are snippets of info and they are everywhere all the time. For the most part our bodies simply deal with them, deciding whether or not we need that info. Super oversimplification but our bodies are amazing and we are constantly communicating with the environment around us. We would not be what we are today if not for this process.
Pharma corps know all of this, have known for 25 years or more, and they believe they can interceed in that process and give humans some kind of concocted info, dress it up like a virus, shoot it into people and expect a positive outcome. Like it is as easy as learning how to code. Most of humanity is so enamored with “TECH” that hear about this, I tell them about this, and they say “wow! isn’t technology amazing?”.
But it gets worse. Not only are we attempting to “reprogram” our DNA but we are actively shutting down our ability to take in the billions of natural viruses, the viruses that allow us to be resilient, to evolve and adapt. WHat could go wrong?
To think for one minute that humans can jump in and take over this process is the epitome of hubris. Not that I am much of a religious guy but this is what is meant by “playing God” and it never works out well.
This is link to Greg Hunter’s interview with Karen Kingston. It is very chilling. Please make Dr. Chris Martenson aware of this interview and I hope Chris will do an interview with her.
Mirroredname…. So so beautiful!!!! Did you write this? Thank you!!
Dr Zach Bush discusses this often – that viruses are the real driving force behind evolution, particularly in terms of causing the diversity of life we see around us. Very intriguing concept.
Here is an interesting and relevent extract from the original atrical:
Increasing the stability of the RNA increases the probability that it will become integrated into your DNA; and, increasing the translation efficiency increases the amount of protein translated from the RNA if it does happen to become incorporated into your DNA in a transcriptionally active region of your genome. Theoretically, this means that whatever negative effects are associated with the natural process of viral RNA/DNA integration, these negative effects could be more frequent and more pronounced with the vaccine when compared to the natural virus.
This seems out there …suggesting that mRNA could be in a genetically altered tomato or your salad…..
I can’t see this, as hard as it is to wrap the mRNA in a nanolipid particle, and keep it at the right temperature…but I’m no Fauci. (Thank God)
Yes, this is all in the realm of what they want to do. And perhaps are able to do very soon. We see gates working on genetically modified mosquitos to distribute ” whatever’ this seems to be a real ecological disaster in the making mind all the criminality and ethics.
But dont worry, its all coming!