Merck undermines use of Ivermectin
Reuters article, Merck says its analysis of available data does not support the safety and efficacy of Ivermectin for treatment of Covid 19. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/merck-warns-against-using-anti-parasite-drug-to-treat-covid-19/ar-BB1doADd?ocid=msedgdhp
What could be the point of issueing such a statement? This will have a devastating effect on the work of FLCCC.
Pharmageddon (Proper Noun): A dystopian scenario wherein medicine and the pharmaceuticals industry have a net detrimental effect on human health and medical progress does more harm than good.
THE GOOD NEWS IS …
The American “medical” industry is showing their True Nature.
More like a Death Cult. I don’t say that just because of Covid19.
I actually registered the domain name “Epidemic of 2020.com” –
about 5 years ago, after seeing how sick American “medical care” had become.
Take a good look.
This is your free press at work.
These are your drug companies at work.
So the U.S. manufacturer of ivermectin (Stromectol), who stands to benefit financially from its widespread use, repudiates its own product?
The fact that Merck doesn’t have a vaccine candidate makes this even odder.
Nothing about the way this pandemic is being handled makes sense…
I’d counter their disinformation with this:
“Dr Andrew Hill of the Department of Pharmacology at the University of Liverpool (UK) is currently performing a WHO-sponsored review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of ivermectin against covid. In the following 12-minute video, Dr Hill is presenting his preliminary results, which indicate a highly significant 83% reduction in covid mortality (95% CI 65%-92%).”
Maybe it’s a liability thing?
Still surprised at the forcefullness though. You think theyd say neither for nor against.
*edit* To follow up on this, I wonder how much money they stand to make if a billion doses of this off-patent drug are required? Maybe its a lot, but maybe its peanuts compared to their potential losses if *anything* goes wrong or is seen to go wrong or is alleged to go wrong for more than a few people.
You can’t sue the Covid vaccine makers for anything that would show up in VAERS because the govt gave special exemptions, but Ivermectin and HCQ don’t have this special treatment. Maybe Merck figures its not only not worth the hassle but that they may as well come down against it just to close off any angle of legal attack?
If Ivermectin turns out to be a miracle cure, they can still make some feel-good superbowl ads about the time they saved the world.
Maybe they paid them off? There is some really big picture that I am not seeing because nothing makes sense. But I think it is not good..So I keep looking..I like to know what’s coming at me..so I can duck.
Here is the actual statement by Merck. One thing that caught my eye is that IVM might be dangerous when taken with Warfarin…..