Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19: meta analysis
The Vax CAN NOT be approved even for EMERGENCY use if there exist effective treatments.
Can anyone confirm? Is this Murder?
Yes. That is true.
Some people are alleging/concluding from this that the suppression of Ivermectin was deliberate for that very reason.
Yes, this is correct. Emergency Use Authorization isn’t possible if there are other treatments available, so anything that could work, but is cheap or generic, has had to be suppressed so that Big Pharma can have its way. Even, maybe especially, something as simple as increased Vitamin D.
Yes, in my view this is mass murder. There have been estimates that as many as 60-70% of C19 deaths worldwide could have been prevented if the I-MASK+ and MATH+ protocols as described on the site flccc.net were in place. It is an absolutely disgusting and reprehensible tragedy. I can no longer watch the lunacy on the evening news.
The phrase in the FDA’s regulations regarding emergency use authorization is that there is no “adequate, approved or available alternative”.
This is certainly one reason. Another may well be that we’re on the threshold of recognizing very simple solutions to a variety of viral diseases that previously were assumed to be unaddressable except by vaccine. Ever since the 1986 act conferred liability protection on manufacturers of approved vaccines, they have been the number one cash cow for Big Pharma. Nothing must impede that. IVM for C19 is just a small piece of how that cash cow could be disintegrated.
1986 act. 1989 major uptick in required childhood vaccines. A few years later, the surge of autism begins (most likely not diagnosed until the child is about 3 years old).
Asking for a friend who has.
I also think the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the US is the main driver for all this. Amount of pharma profits is the second. If you step back and look at it, it is mainly North America and Europe and then the unlucky Brazil that is being devastated by this pandemic. The western world was supposed to have the best health care – go figure.
In Europe the EUA is called Conditional Marketing Authorization (CMA). The European Union’s European Medical Authority (EMA) webpages state the following:
EMA’s CHMP may grant a conditional marketing authorisation for a medicine if it finds that all of the following criteria are met:
the benefit-risk balance of the medicine is positive;
it is likely that the applicant will be able to provide comprehensive data post-authorisation;
the medicine fulfils an unmet medical need;
the benefit of the medicine’s immediate availability to patients is greater than the risk inherent in the fact that additional data are still required.
Conditional marketing authorisations are valid for one year and can be renewed annually.
In my mind this is society’s own goal. Regulations are text. Just change them. I do not think there is anybody, who would want to hinder EUAs/CMAs of new treatments. We need all possible tools to be available to whoever wants them.
Right now it would be important that EUA/CMA trap would not be in the way of using repurpose drugs.
Sure is an upside down world when Ivermectin is controversial & the US gov. pressures social media e.g. Facebook & Youtube, to trash-talk one of the most effective treatments for the Pandemic Du Jour.
Well, you know, what “they” say…follow the quatloos.
“If you want us to help you out, here’s some advice—money talks, bullshit walks!”
attributed to some politician (look him up).
It’s comforting to know we r toast 🙂 !! How about some fear porn to counter the fear porn !! https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/1739-dead-as-cdc-adds-another-200-recorded-deaths-this-week-following-covid-experimental-vaccines/
Global trends in clinical studies of ivermectin in COVID-19
Morimasa Yagisawa, Ph.D., Patrick J. Foster, M.D., Hideaki Hanaki, Ph.D. and Satoshi Omura, Ph.D.
Satoshi Omura – Nobel Lecture
A splendid gift from the Earth: The origins & impact of Avermectin
These are long, but take your time. They are so worth it.