“IT’S A BIOWEAPON.” — Dr. Richard Fleming
“IT’S A BIOWEAPON.” — Dr. Richard Fleming
“IT’S A BIOWEAPON,” says Dr. Richard Fleming referring to the virus and the genome of the virus. Dr. Fleming also asserts that new research indicates that the genetic sequences that are in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do not match the source code CoV-2 virus genome, but are spot on with the prion-like domain region which produces what the general public refers to as mad cow disease. This interview will chill you to the bone, please share it far and wide.
Dr. Fleming’s site:
Interesting, so the Spike mRNA of the experimental “vaccines” don’t even match (any version of?) the SARS-CoV-2 Spike mRNA, they’re modified versions.
As Grover points out in this excellent post:
Lots of things just don’t add up. We’re asked to take an experimental vaxxine for a disease that isn’t that deadly if treated early with cheap drugs/vitamins/minerals. Then, the dosage on the experimental vaxxine (at least for the Pfizer jab) was at the highest dosage tested – even though antibody levels for all tested dosages were about the same. The amount of mRNA in the Pfizer jab theoretically produces 13 billion spike proteins – many, many times more than enough to stimulate the body’s immune response.
Hmm, yeah, Dr. Fleming says both the Pfizer and Moderna death jabs have “13.1 billion mRNA in them”, and that the AZ/J&J ones have “50 billion DNA in them”.
But I thought the Moderna mRNA doses vary for up to like 50x? And Pfizer’s are also all the same? Highly unlikely, as there have been clusters of extreme damage (like half of all seniors in a residence dying within days) all the way to “mild inflammation at the injection site”.
The varying doses, which is after all what you do in a Phase 3 trial, would help explain why a majority of (extremely lucky) people seem to have experienced no symptoms yet. Unless you count magnetization as a symptom, which you certainly should, in which case it seems to be roughly half.
Obviously the more of the mRNA (whether released from PEG-lipid conjugates or produced from DNA), the more likely that reverse transcriptase will write the mRNA into DNA so that it becomes part of your genome and so that you presumably will be expressing weaponized Spike proteins for the rest of your life.
So we have the mysterious magnetization (likely to do with magnetogenetic experimentation), the blood clotting properties of Spike proteins, its HIV gp120 similarity to syncytin-1 that might also affect CD4-expressing immune cells, the likelihood that some amounts will be incorporated into people’s DNA… and then we have the bastardized glycine “zipper” misfolding proteins that may cause prion disease:
To complicate matters, the spike proteins that our bodies are instructed to make by the mRNA vaxxine are bastardized copies that have differing sequences of amino acids than the coronavirus spike. The vaxxine makers chose to use glycine in the spike wherever possible (because it is the easiest for the body to make.) Their overzealous use of glycine may have been the real reason for having such a large dosage in the jab.
I’ve written earlier in this thread about prions – infectious proteins. Mad Cow Disease is caused by prions. In sheep, it is called “Scrapie” and in humans it is called Creutfeldt- Jakob Disease. All it takes is eating a small portion of meat from an infected beef/sheep and you have a strong possibility of developing an incurable brain-wasting disease. Researchers have identified the protein sub-structure that is to blame and call it a “zipper.”
Zippers are a sequence of 5 amino acids that are bound by glycine on both ends, denoted as “GxxxG”. Because these zippers have such a flexible hinge, they allow the protein to misfold. Apparently, misfolded proteins are able to cause normal adjacent proteins to misfold. The protein that causes Mad Cow Disease has 10 of these zippers embedded within it. The Pfizer vaxxine causes spike proteins to be made that just so happen to include 5 zippers. I don’t know about the other vaxxines.
Since Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease affects the brain, the symptoms it produces are neurological. It may start out subtly with insomnia, depression, confusion, personality and behavioral changes, and problems with memory, coordination, and sight. As it progresses, the person rapidly develops dementia and involuntary, irregular jerking movements called myoclonus.
In the final stage of the disease, the patient loses all mental and physical functions, lapses into a coma, and eventually dies. The course of the disease usually takes one year.
Just because the jab causes our bodies to make bastardized spike proteins that each contain 5 zippers … doesn’t mean that it will necessarily degenerate into a brain-wasting disease. Then again, how would we know? Where are the trial results that show its safe? Why didn’t our regulators insist on a complete level of trials for such a treatable disease? Hmmm.
So, what happens if the zippers do misfold and end up causing a brain-wasting disease? First off, understand that it is progressive and incurable. Reread that last sentence until the gravity sets in. If a brain-wasting disease caused by the vaxxine progresses similarly to CJD, we’ll notice dementia and involuntary jerking as the telltale. As noted above, the course of the disease usually takes one year. (I’m assuming that is after symptoms start appearing.)
At least we’ll get to see it visually, we won’t have to be guessing. And at least they’re primarily killing off the people who weren’t smart enough to figure out they were being attacked (many of them despite multiple warnings).
Fortunately, CJD isn’t contagious in normal disease vectors. You won’t get it from breathing the same air, kissing, sharing bodily fluids, etc. That’s where spike proteins are potentially different. Again, I ask why the vaxxine dosage is so large? Once the vaxxine does its duty and instructs the cells to make ~13 billion copies of the spike protein, the fate of those spike proteins follows a numbers game. Some are trapped in the cells that made them. Some go through the lymph system and end up in the spleen, some are transported through blood and end up throughout the body (including the nervous system and brain.) Some end up in the lungs and get exhaled. Others get sweated out. Shedding has many forms.
So, if you breathe the air that a vaxxed person exhales, you may just get a small dosage of these spike proteins. If you brush up against them or something they recently touched, you may just get a small dosage of spike proteins. How many spike proteins does it take to cause a brain-wasting disease? I really don’t know how many it would take or even if it is a possibility. The zippers are my concern. Surely, the researchers who substituted glycine as much as they did were aware of zippers. Shouldn’t someone who reviewed the work have known about it? I didn’t come up with this idea. It was brought out by researchers. Once it was known, (even if it wasn’t known initially,) why weren’t the jabs taken off the market immediately? Hmmm.
So, the big investors who put their money in Vanguard and Blackstone have control of big Pharma … and the media … and also contribute handsomely to political campaigns. Is it any wonder that big Pharma ignores cheap, safe off-patent medicines and punishes doctors who try to prescribe these? Is it any wonder that media are silent about all the real happenings? Is it any wonder that our regulatory system, controlled by politicians who are beholden to these people, is as flaccid as it is when supposedly tasked with keeping us safe?
Yes, it IS a wonder that they’re so willing to commit genocide against MILLIONS of their fellow human beings!
What if the whole goal of the plandemic was to get as many people vaxxinated as quickly as possible – before deleterious effects from the vaxxines became evident? Why would the big boyz do this?
It used to be that the rich could use their money to build factories, fill it with machines and materials, and start making products to sell and get even richer. Back in the old days, they needed labor to build the factories, mine, process, and transport the materials, operate the machinery, etc. Now, we have robotics and artificial intelligence to do much of the hard work. As computers and robotics get better, they only need us to buy their products so they can get richer. But, who is going to get taxed to provide universal basic income for those who can’t/won’t work? Once you completely scalp the middle class, there are only the rich to fund everything. Do you think that these investors enjoy giving their money to the government (taxes) to be given to the unwashed, useless eaters to spend? Since they do everything in their power to minimize taxes, paying zero taxes would be mighty appealing.
These people also know that the world is a finite system. We’ve already used up lots of its unrenewable resources. The master resource, petroleum gets used up more every day. The processes that made these fossil fuels cannot replenish it as quickly as its consumed. Once it is gone, it is gone. At that point, the systems that we’ve built to grow, process, and transport food along with the systems to provide clean water won’t be able to keep up. What will the masses do then? When a person loses everything, they’ve got nothing left to lose. It likely would result in revolt and massive destruction. If the end result is inevitable, what difference is there to help the situation along a bit?
That sure seems to have been the goal, and remains the goal. Now they’re coming after the children.
And now they’re coming at us with the “cyber-pandemic”, starting with the TV already priming its hypnotized sheeple and the Cyber Polygon exercise happening in July, a few months before the end of the summer when the “seasonal” (vitamin D deficiency-induced) viral infections start happening again… So many people who allowed themselves to get jabbed will die, probably in the millions, perhaps in numbers so high that they’ll need a distraction cover story, some way to prevent free information flow (encrypted channels) even more… because a new “super delta variant” is not gonna be enough to explain millions of vaxxed-only deaths.
And don’t think it ends there. Controlling the food supply is Phase 3 or Phase 4.
Before I get started on this longish post, everything the vaxxine makers have done is trying to get the mRNA into the cells as quickly as possible. The mRNA needs to be coated and they’re using a positively charged nano-lipid coating that will be electrically attracted to the electrically negative cell wall. Although naked mRNA would be kept out of the interior of the cell, the cell readily accepts the lipid (with its Trojan Horse.) Once in the cell, the mRNA expresses itself and produces the spike proteins as intended. Then, those spike proteins have to deal with the various aspects of the body’s defense mechanisms and transport mechanisms. I haven’t found any specific articles referring to the time line; however, I expect that the spike proteins would be created quickly and shedding would start shortly thereafter – peaking within the first few days. Within a few weeks, I’d expect shedding to asymptotically drop toward zero. (That’s what my gut says.) The longer it has been since your family members got jabbed, the less you need to worry.
I’ve been going with “7-10 days”, and I now always ask everybody new if and WHEN they’ve allowed themselves to be jabbed. Luckily almost everyone I know have not and will never. We’re sometimes noticing a mild allergic reaction after walking in stores (regardless of mask on/off), and we start singing “Spike is in the Air”. 😀
That all sounds very plausible and we’ll only find out if it is close to reality 10-24 months from now. I’m not sure I can hold my breath that long.
However, if I was an evil genius determined to reduce the earth’s population to <1 billion, I’d use the “vaccines” to massively suppress human fertility around the world. What if the un-vaccines caused 80%+ of females to be incapable of reproducing. That effect would not be known for sure for several years and difficult to link to the un-vaccines. The death toll would be slow and gradual as natural processes took their toll but population plummeted because very few babies were being born. That would be the major reason for making sure children and young people are un-vaccinated because they would be the most important reproducers. So, I’m keeping an open mind about what the most deleterious effects might turn out to be.
None of this rules out the simplest explanations (remember Occam’s Razor). Maybe it really is just a big rush for massive profits with disastrously inadequate safety research. Or maybe the elites really are out to kill millions of us with the un-vaccines, stupidly not realizing the survivors will trace it back to them and hang ‘em from the nearest lamppost.
”Happy Hunger Games! And may the odds be ever in your favor.”
Let’s also remember plummeting testosterone levels in men. I’m pretty sure someone knows what’s causing it. The question is it being done on purpose or just a reaction to our living environment.
Most of the people behind this are old clowns themselves, so they don’t want to wait decades. They already knew that they didn’t even have to do anything as the world population would’ve peaked around 11 billion and then descended, as Bill Gates’ friend Hans Rosling most eloquently explained:
Although so far it looked like they did plan over decades (and many researchers have speculated that there might be something else behind these humans that plans beyond lifetimes), and Gates and Xi likely will live another 20+ years, several others are on their way out like Klaus at 83 and Fauci at 80.
The plummeting testosterone seems to be caused by endocrine-disrupting chemicals, primarily xenoestrogens. I sometimes use tribulus, longjack, or boron to increase T (must be paired with exercise).
To understand the big picture I think we need to look at several key issues
1. Humans are unable to effectively address key existential issues. Specifically around our degrading natural environment, deforestation, pollution, species extinctions, aquifers pumped dry… Whatever you think of climate change the state of the Arctic sea ice is frightening. As David Attenborough says – any time a species exceeds its ecological support base its population is in overshoot and its numbers will plummet. My personal opinion is that human population is billions above sustainable and, on the current track, we’re only a couple of generations away from functional extinction.
2.There is a staggeringly massive and well coordinated operation underway. The elites, whoever they are , have been preparing for many years – capturing financial regulators, capturing health administrations, capturing elected governments. (And likely members of the judiciary including the supreme court? It seems unlikely they would leave critical gaps if they can help it). This is their one shot and I suspect we are now in a fight to the death. They have declared themselves. The monster has entered the room and the door has locked behind it. There is no going back from here. Either they win or they are exposed and their paid minions convicted. And they have a limited window of opportunity.
So is it about money or population control ? Motivations are likely multifaceted. The elites are composed of different factions and some, certainly, are just about money. Others, I believe, have recognized the global existential crisis and have the goal of depopulation. It certainly looks like the manufactured crisis of the pandemic is all about vaccines. And vaccines are most likely about population control.
Here is the ironic thing, some of those orchestrating this (Gates?) will genuinely believe they have the best interests of humanity at heart. In their view billions will die anyway. By seizing the initiative they’ll feel they’re are providing hope and direction for the planet.
I am going to shift perspectives and offer a different view. This is a follow on from David Allen’s post above.
Most at PP have come to understand that part of what David Allan just wrote above is unfortunately correct:
Humans are unable to effectively address key existential issues. ….. human population is billions above sustainable and, on the current track, we’re only a couple of generations away from [SP edit–a crash].
Does everyone recall the very difficult discussions even here on PP when population control is featured?
My conclusion #1:
Humanity is not be able to agree upon a mutually respectful win-win arrangement for population control.
My conclusion #2:
Humanity will have a massive population reduction, but not voluntarily. We will “be dragged squealing and screaming like pigs to the slaughter.”
My conclusion #3:
A vaccine based fertility reduction would be a pretty effective, and comparatively humane way to accomplish population reduction. Better than nuclear war and famine, for example.
So, I see two sticky points with this involuntary, secret approach:
1. The ideal of body sovereignty. My control over my own body.
2. The issue of fairness. Us versus Them. Are They depopulating Us? What if this were egalitarian and we knew that all of the elite were being vaccinated with us and neither of us were going to be having children or grand children?
Fairness: That the depopulation effort was fair.
No one has the right to play God and no one knows if we were heading for over-population disaster at some point. My college professor in the 1980’s said all of our natural resources are running out by the late 90’s. Didn’t happen. Y2K didn’t happen. The sky is always falling in someone’s perspective and these population control freaks are wrong to use projective models to make their God-like decisions and if they have done this and it’s very possible, it will be the greatest EVIL to ever befall our world, our beautiful people and planet.
Can you please clarify more what you mean by “playing God.”
I mean when these globalist possibly unleashed a virus and and then a questionable vaccine on us with the goal to reduce our world population. God did it with the floods and Noah. They are doing it with current science. Sand Puppy, I don’t think you are playing God. But are you saying it might be ok to reduce the population in this way because it’s the most humane way? Seeing our loved ones all die and our children barren would be an unimaginable agony. I also wonder if the ones who can have children will be taken by the gov’t like that tv show. So scary.
I am going to shift perspectives and offer a different view. This is a follow on from David Allen’s post above.
Most have come to understand what David Allen just wrote above is unfortunately correct:
Humans are unable to effectively address key existential issues. ….. human population is billions above sustainable and, on the current track, we’re only a couple of generations away from functional extinction.
Interesting ideas! But I think much of that is about artificial scarcity created primarily by the suppression of technologies and the mechanization/profit-maximization of farming. Who says we are “billions above sustainable”? Bill Gates alone could feed all of Africa if he invested in agricultural projects instead of depopulation vaccines. It’s a matter of distribution of resources, not quantity. When a non-renewable resource starts running out, we would move onto alternatives but those are suppressed (the obvious example being oil vs all the secret technologies hoarded for the SSP). And as Hans Rosling pointed out in the video above, we were already peaking at 11 billion at most before descending again, prior to their bioterrorist depopulation scheme.