Is DOD (AI division) monitoring vaccine deaths?

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   5 posts
  • Sat, Oct 09, 2021 - 08:28am

    #1

    Oliveoilguy

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 29 2012

    Posts: 1470

    count placeholder3

    Is DOD (AI division) monitoring vaccine deaths?

Karen Kingston shows patents that indicate that vaccinated people have traceable elements in their bodies which allow for surveillance.

This seems preposterous until you quantify the amount of evil and deception coming from government.
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/10/receipts-dod-joint-artificial-intelligence-center-monitoring-vaxx-deaths/

  • Sat, Oct 09, 2021 - 10:26am

    #2
    emdashtheory

    emdashtheory

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 25 2020

    Posts: 287

    count placeholder2

    Is DOD (AI division) monitoring vaccine deaths?

Patent.

Not sure what to make of this. Vaccines aside, enough info can already be gathered from our phone data right now to use this sort of system based on anecdotal evidence of who we’ve been around, and “risk related” search history.

  • Sat, Oct 09, 2021 - 12:42pm

    #3

    Jim H

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 08 2009

    Posts: 1751

    count placeholder3

    I read the patent… lot’s of speculation here on the part of Karen Kingston

The patent is indeed chilling in terms of the future of social credit scoring system with a side order of medical tyranny.. or life under the thumb of Technocracy’s AI.  But really, it bears no relation in my mind to anything people are seeing under the microscope when they inspect the injection serums.

From the patent;

According to some embodiments of the invention , said one or more electronic devices are one or more of a smartphone , a tablet , a smartwatch and a dedicated electronic device.

The patent is speaking primarily to what can already be done via smartphone tracking.  Of course, being a patent and trying to cover the largest conceptual space possible, it lists, “a dedicated electronic device”.  That would be normal patent practice to leave all possibilities open.  Again, the patent is worth a read if you want to get some really specific examples of what lies ahead if we let Western nations morph into Technocratic Tyranny.  I have seen no indication of any electronic-capable devices or particles in the vaccines thus far.. but I am keeping my eyes open.

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/68/80/73/6a17a66e9ec8c5/US11107588.pdf

I am very interested in the developing story on the contents of these vaccines as viewed under the microscope.  The big story for me here is the finding of what appears to be phospholipid microbubbles in the J&J vaccine.  These are shown again at the end of the linked Stew Peter’s show.. and they look like blackish spheres with interconnects – the “interconnects” just being points of contact.  Dr. AMM did the research to connect these visually here;

https://t.me/AMM_MD/452

What are these microbubbles being used for?  Most of the previous uses have been in conjunction with ultrasound to “burst” them once they get to the targeted organ, tumor, etc.  These are separate and different technology vs. the lipid nanoparticle delivery systems used by Moderna and Pfizer.. and I don’t think there has been any disclosure on this prior to an earlier guest on the Stew Peter’s show.. so I have to hand it to Stew.  Still..  What I see is this bombshell finding being subsumed with speculation of 5G, Nanobots, and “self-aware” (Thanks to the well intentioned but somewhat ditzy Carey Madej, DO) little tentacle things.  We have seen evidence of these tentacle things in other microscopic analyses coming from Europe.. so I don’t discount that they are some kind of evidence.. but I prefer to be more circumspect at this point.

Back to the phospolipid microbubbles…

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/15546496

The use of microbubbles to target drug delivery.

The clinical use of viral vectors for gene therapy is limited because viral proteins elicit an immune response within the target tissue [23], and have been shown to cause an intense inflammatory activation of endothelial cells [24]. On the other hand, the nonviral delivery of vehicles, such as plasmids and antisense oligonucleotides, has been associated with a lower transfection efficiency and transient expression of the gene product [25]. The first published report of targeted DNA delivery was performed in 1996, using surface ultrasound and intravenously delivered microbubbles carrying antisense oligonucleotides [3]. In 1997, Bao et al [26] described the use of ultrasound and albumin-coated microbubbles to enhance the transfection of luciferase reporter plasmid in cultured hamster cells. Since then, many studies have confirmed the efficacy of ultrasound-mediated microbubble destruction for drug and gene delivery, both in vitro and in vivo [3,7-9]. Shohet et al [9] demonstrated for the first time with an adenovirus vector that the ultrasound-mediated disruption of gas-filled microbubbles could be used to direct transgene expression to the heart in vivo.

Now we are getting somewhere… at least part of the story must be about protecting the adenovirus from your initial immune response.  Connecting dots here, recall that Adam Gaertner had specifically targeted the J&J jab for his vaccine prophylaxis ideas because, as an adenovirus vector, it was more vulnerable.  Part of his procedure was to lift weights using the shoulder muscles to pre-inflict some tissue damage there to get the immune system ramped up locally prior to injection.

So it appears the pharma vax masters already have a way to protect their adenovirus vector at this stage.. the only place left to intercede being the nuclear membrane via Ivermectin.

We have some real, concrete learning here.. and that is the use of these microbubbles in the J&J shot.  Exactly how these are working without the coincident use of ultrasound is not clear.. we need to keep digging as to how these might be releasing their payload at the point of cellular entry.  To Be Continued….

  • Sat, Oct 09, 2021 - 07:04pm

    #4

    Oliveoilguy

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 29 2012

    Posts: 1470

    count placeholder2

    Thanks JimH

Can’t wait for the next installment. The patent angle seems the most likely to yield real info. The greed associated with cashing in on their “clot shots” seems to be opening up the only vector available to identify their science.

  • Wed, Oct 13, 2021 - 12:48pm   (Reply to #3)

    #5
    Prairie Rose

    Prairie Rose

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 11 2021

    Posts: 78

    count placeholder0

    Is DOD (AI division) monitoring vaccine deaths?

Jim H.,

“Exactly how these are working without the coincident use of ultrasound is not clear.”

Thoughts on a sonic weapon?

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

Login or Register to post comments