FDA Approval

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   45 posts
Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 45 total)
  • Mon, Aug 23, 2021 - 06:53pm

    #31
    Kat43

    Kat43

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 10 2020

    Posts: 763

    count placeholder1

    Reply To: FDA Approval

Thanks Jim, interesting thoughts.  It does appear that for the masses the Pfizer vaccine has been approved but perhaps other things going on in the background.

Just found and read the Meryl Nass post.  Sleight of hand to preserve liability protection.  That’s certainly believable!

  • Mon, Aug 23, 2021 - 08:39pm

    #32
    Sport7777777

    Sport7777777

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: May 15 2020

    Posts: 74

    count placeholder2

    FDA Approval

This is very suspicious if we had full “confidence” in the vaccine then why would the FDA do that? There would be no need for 2 different labels on a vaccine if we had the full confidence in it. I am now curious to see what actually comes out of this in which way Pfizer will go. Also I am assuming that the vaccine will be the same without any altercations to it.

Thanks for that information as it can be used for many of the troops trying to fight this mandate.

 

  • Mon, Aug 23, 2021 - 09:30pm

    #33
    westcoastjan

    westcoastjan

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 04 2012

    Posts: 1298

    count placeholder3

    WTF??????? FDA Approval

https://rumble.com/vlhq9q-cdc-announces-early-vaccinated-at-high-risk-for-disease-and-death.html

her exact statement …

“additionally, reports from our international colleagues including Israel
suggest INCREASED risk of severe disease amongst those
Vaccinated EARLY….given this body of evidence we are CONCERNED
that the current strong protection against severe infection,
hospitalization and DEATH could DECREASE in the months ahead
…especially among those who were at higher risk or who were
Vaccinated EARLIER during the phases of our Vaccination roll-out”

🤔😯

  • Mon, Aug 23, 2021 - 09:56pm

    #34
    Mario Correa

    Mario Correa

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 12 2021

    Posts: 6

    count placeholder2

    FDA Approval

If we get to the point where the vaccine is mandated and we have no other choice, but to take the vaccine, here is a tactic we might consider. Perhaps Dr. Martenson or any chemical engineers in the forum could suggest a means of neutralizing the the vaccine and rendering it harmless For example, in 2008, before going to the dentist to have numerous amalgam fillings removed, a chemical engineer friend of mine suggested a series of supplements that he believed would neutralize the mercury that was going to be released into my body.  Just a thought.

@dreinmund I feel the same way about Mish.

 

His Austrian deflationist arguments deserve a lot more credit than he ever got, but he goes off on nothing but tangents now.

 

Before the trump thing it was all about Merkle being finished in Germany.

 

I stopped reading him during the election.   I’m saddened but not surprised to see his current behavior.

 

You know the sad thing?   He beat colon cancer By thinking for himself and defying his doctors

 

“Martenson or any chemical engineers in the forum could suggest a means of neutralizing…

 

 

Flccc long covid program is apt here.    I think Dr Tess and others have chimed in.    It’s mostly about ivermectin to bind spike proteins plus other over the counter stuff to help with inflammation.

 

 

  • Mon, Aug 23, 2021 - 11:14pm

    #37
    nordicjack

    nordicjack

    Status Diamond Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 03 2020

    Posts: 1668

    count placeholder2

    FDA Approval – Eua- requires efficacy of 50%

I saw a post earlier today that states that EUA is only granted for a vaccine for covid if the efficacy is 50% or greater.  ( section 3a. ) I will try to reference the document.

But wouldn’t that mean that pfizer jab is no longer eligible for EUA, mind regular approval?    I think that is enough to refuse in itself.

  • Mon, Aug 23, 2021 - 11:57pm

    #38
    Primary Care_MD

    Primary Care_MD

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: May 14 2020

    Posts: 218

    count placeholder3

    I vote “no confidence” re FDA, Fauci, rule of law, banking system

Nothing inspires confidence in the FDA like a phoney ‘full licensure’ which only applies to newer vials not the ones already created, because the ones they’ve been giving us all along must have some weird sh%t in them.

  • Tue, Aug 24, 2021 - 12:10am

    #39
    davefairtex

    davefairtex

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 03 2008

    Posts: 2919

    count placeholder5

    boosters

Jim-

I think one unaddressed area is “boosters”.  In a month or two, the “vaxxed” are going to be turned into the “unvaxxed” – and that severe adverse event rate (of about 1%) on the PFE shot #2 will probably rise to some even-higher number, with shot #3.

Pfizer itself, in its document released today, showed the severe adverse event rates for the shot.  I’ve taken a snap of page 24, below.

Check out how the SAE rate jumped from “new or worsened joint pain” from 0.2% incidence (shot #1) to 1.0% incidence (shot #2).   That’s 1:100 rate for severe new/worsened joint pain, and 1:45 in severe new/worsened muscle pain!  And that’s where the pain is so bad, you can’t work.  “Moderate” muscle pain incidence is 19.5%, “moderate” joint pain incidence is 11.2%.

It is also a 5x increase – shot #1 vs shot #2.  For a shot whose efficacy went from 95% six months ago, to 39% today.

https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download

45% of people had to use pain meds for shot #2!!

These numbers are high enough that – in a company of 100 people, there are certainly those who have had “moderate” experiences, and it might even be true for “severe.”

“I get that you all took the shot before these new series of facts came to light.  You did what you thought was right.  Now you get another chance to do what’s right, in light of new evidence.  By not imposing mandates, you are preserving everyone’s option to say “no” to shot #3.  Or shot #4.  Or shot #10.

The vaccine marketing machine won’t be satisfied with just two shots.  They have a recurring revenue model.  Within a month or two, you guys – all of you – will be dropped right into the ‘unvaxxed’ box because of “declining efficacy.”  You guys really want to be forced to take shot #3?  We don’t even know how bad the numbers on that looks.  When will this stop?”

Just a thought.

  • Tue, Aug 24, 2021 - 12:17am

    #40
    Hohhot

    Hohhot

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 12 2020

    Posts: 347

    count placeholder1

    Humor to break the dire news- the immune system explained by late G. Carlin

This is worth a watch. As he often did, George Carlin skewers the germaphobe narrative in times past with truth. Too bad he’s not here to do the same now as nonsense is guiding the C-V “protocols.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X29lF43mUlo

 

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 45 total)

Login or Register to post comments