Dr. Judy Wood 9/11

Login or register to post comments Last Post 500 reads   4 posts
  • Thu, Sep 20, 2012 - 12:56am

    #1
    J Kovacs

    J Kovacs

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jan 07 2009

    Posts: 288

    count placeholder

    Dr. Judy Wood 9/11

http://www.drjudywood.com/

 

Has anyone listened to Dr. Judy Wood (ph.d.) on her Direct Energy Weapon?  Her argument is that a D.E.W. was used on 9/11 to take down the Towers?  The interview is pretty good and does raise other questions. 

She also wrote a Book:  Where did the Towers Go?

 

  • Fri, Jul 11, 2014 - 02:49pm

    #2
    PeteBKK

    PeteBKK

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jul 03 2014

    Posts: 11

    count placeholder

    jneo wrote:Has anyone

[quote=jneo]

Has anyone listened to Dr. Judy Wood (ph.d.) on her Direct Energy Weapon?  Her argument is that a D.E.W. was used on 9/11 to take down the Towers?  The interview is pretty good and does raise other questions. 

She also wrote a Book:  Where did the Towers Go?

[/quote]

I'm familiar with her work and the observations she has made about 9/11. I am also aware of the animosity that has built up between the various "truther" camps notably those that support controlled demolition theory and those that support the DEW theory.

I am still of an open mind until a real investigation with subpoena power is conducted. Until then however my belief is that whoever was behind the destruction of  WTC towers 1, 2, & 7, to ensure the "New Pearl Harbor" produced the intended  widespread public shock in order to pursue their geopolitical machinations, they would want to make absolutely sure that those towers came down and it didn't "fizzle out", a rather embarrassing scenario! A hole or two in a building made by a plane wouldn't cut it as a pretext to go to war, or pass the Patriot Act. The sad fact is that the death of many innocents is what they needed.

As such, and knowing from a structural engineering standpoint the towers were designed to support 2-3 times the loads they might be subjected to, the energy required to destroy these structures would have to be enormous. And to ensure the job destroying them was done successfully one would want to be extra prudent and add in a lot more energy than the minimum necessary to avoid any possibility of "mission failure".

This brings me to conclude that without some sort of top secret "Manhattan Project", DEWs have not yet reached such an advanced stage to ensure, without doubt, complete 'dustification' of these enormous towers. High tech nanothermites however are a more tried and tested method that would give the confidence required without a doubt. There is always the possibly that both methods could have been used on 9/11 to avoid any possibility of mission failure.

 

  • Sun, Mar 27, 2016 - 08:49am

    #3
    skipr

    skipr

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jan 09 2016

    Posts: 162

    count placeholder

    misinfo

I consider Judy Woods and her buddy Jim Fetzer's death star theories intentional misinformation in order to discredit any real independent investigation.  The only theory I will consider is one that is based on verifiable facts.  What fact do Woods and Fetzer present?  The one I heard Fetzer talk about was about the collapse of a single vertical column that was still standing after one of the twin towers collapsed.  That column was severely compromised structurally and had a lot of that pulverized concrete on it.  Fetzer claims that the dust that appeared after that last column went down was proof that an ultra ultra high power beam brought it down.  Of course none of that dust was vaporized, but that does not worry W&F.  He must assume that this beam also created those pools of molten metal.  The power required to do that would have brought down the entire grid in at least the entire northeast.  They then bring up the exploding cars at the base of the towers as more proof.  I remember watching a same day interview of a guy who witnessed the base of the towers open up and flames bellowing out.  If a death star weapon was used why wasn't this guy vaporized?

This reminds me of a weapon system that the military was trying to develop to knock out incoming ICBMs etc.  It used a chemical laser that was so large that a 747 was required to fly it.  It was barely able to knock out a thin skinned missile under tightly controlled conditions.  Knocking out hundreds of steel I-beams with +4 inches of flange thickness with a Fetzer Folly weapon is laughable.

I personally believe the tooth fairy brought them down.  🙂  I have as much evidence as Woods/Fetzer.

PS:  I am also a structural engineer and have done a lot of finite element analysis for decades.

  • Mon, Feb 13, 2017 - 05:51am

    #4
    SPAM_pghero

    SPAM_pghero

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 07 2017

    Posts: 3

    count placeholder

    Interesting article.I heard

Interesting article.

I heard that the jet fuel was not hot enough to melt the Twin Tower's steel beams – so there must have been an alternative method, as you mentioned.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

Login or Register to post comments