Covid-19: A Psychological Military Operation

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   8 posts
  • Mon, Oct 18, 2021 - 11:05am

    You've been Nudged...!

    You've been Nudged...!

    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 28 2021

    Posts: 538

    count placeholder4

    Covid-19: A Psychological Military Operation

“We are at war, people—a one-sided war. The freedom-fighters of America have lost their way and cannot discern that enemies are deep within their midst. This is because today’s war is psychological. No adversary of freedom has ever before been able to conquer the entire world through military combat—humanity always saw what was coming and fought back. But this time around it is different. Americans and people in other free nations are clueless that they have been under an enemy attack since the inception of Covid-19, and that a diabolical military psyop has been underway.

What are psyops? Let’s use the US Department of Defense’s own definition on the word, since they have been exercising psychological warfare since World War I:

Psyops are the use of propaganda and psychological tactics to influence emotions and behaviors.

The DOD’s 2004 and 2010 “Counterinsurgency Operations Reports” explain a psyop as the following:

The mission of psychological Operations (psyops) is to influence the behavior of foreign target audiences to support US national objectives. A psyop accomplishes this by conveying selected information and advising on actions that influence the emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of foreign audiences. Behavioral change is at the root of the psyop mission.”

  • Mon, Oct 18, 2021 - 01:00pm



    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Aug 10 2020

    Posts: 1030

    count placeholder7


Well I call it as I see it, and I call psyops against the citizens of one’s own country high treason.

  • Mon, Oct 18, 2021 - 01:07pm

    Mike from Jersey

    Mike from Jersey

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jan 22 2018

    Posts: 1417

    count placeholder5

    Reply To: Covid-19: A Psychological Military Operation


I believe that is true.

Democracy is about citizens determining a country’s policies and actions. For a democracy to exist, citizens must have access to accurate information so that they can make informed decisions about the policies and actions to be implemented.

But if those in power run psyops against the citizens to undermine that freedom of choice and manipulate citizen decision-making, there is only one thing to call it: treason.

  • Mon, Oct 18, 2021 - 02:11pm



    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Apr 13 2008

    Posts: 1453

    count placeholder3

    Covid-19: A Psychological Military Operation

Not to mention causing massive numbers of the country’s citizens to die un-necessarily. ay, it’s treason.

Thanks for getting to the heart of it and calling it what it is, Canuck21.

  • Mon, Oct 18, 2021 - 09:40pm



    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 12 2020

    Posts: 347

    count placeholder6

    This is the AIDS scenario 2.0

The playbook for C-v has been nearly identical to how they managed the discovery and treatment of AIDS. Deadly disease with debilitating effects, using PCR tests to diagnose without viral standard, collapsing the control group in drug trials (twice resulting in treatment with failed cancer drugs), and scare mongering. Who owns the patents? Ahh…there’s the rub. Look to NIH. The new preventative treatments have also resulted in a high death rate, but we’re controlling the data so no one knows.  As always, follow the money.

The Discovery of AIDS-

After the seemingly sudden onset of the deadly AIDS epidemic, the NIH began guiding public policy in a new and broadened capacity. The very foundation of this whole industry of HIV/AIDs has been fraught with fraud from the beginning.

Fauci’s buddy Gallo stole the bulk of the AIDS research from the French when he wanted them to share research. Fauci made sure that Gallo was awarded the PCR patent for AIDS- billions of dollars. After years of legal wrangling, Dr. Luc Montagnier was finally awarded royalties.  Gallo’s fraud was disclosed post a Nobel Prize.

Gallo admits French Discovered the virus

A controversial piece of scientific history will be officially rewritten this week, with the publication of an acknowledgment by Dr. Robert C. Gallo that the AIDS virus he claimed to have discovered in 1984 was in reality a virus sent to him from France the year before.

Gallo`s acknowledgment, in a letter to the British scientific journal Nature, follows by two weeks the publication, in the American journal Science, of a report from the Pasteur Institute in Paris showing that a virus discovered there in 1983 is a virtual genetic twin of the Gallo virus.

The letter, which associates said was written at the urging of Gallo`s senior colleagues, appears to put an end to a six-year effort by Gallo and his employer, the National Institutes of Health, to claim the AIDS virus as an independent discovery…

The federal government adopted the same position in court after the Pasteur Institute alleged in 1985 that the AIDS blood test developed in Gallo`s lab, and subsequently patented by the U.S. government, had been made with the French virus.

The case was settled out of court in 1987, but the controversy has continued until now…

The settlement agreement split annual royalties from the AIDS test equally between NIH and the Pasteur Institute.

Supposedly in 2002 Gallo and Montagnier reconciled to work on a vaccine. This was problematic.

Dr Montagnier, 69, formerly of the Pasteur Institute in Paris, approached Dr Gallo, 64, a few years ago and cynics point out that the timing of their agreement suits Dr Gallo by distracting attention from a damning new book called ‘Science Fictions: A Scientific Mystery, a Massive Cover-Up, and the Dark Legacy of Robert Gallo’, by Chicago Tribune journalist John Crewdson.

This is the same Dr. Luc Montagnier who was scourged by the press in 2020/21 for addressing holes in the C-v narrative including lock-downs and stating the C-v vaccines would create variants and cause ADE.

First the testing methods:

In AIDS, they first introduced diagnosis with PCR to the public. Positive test = death.  (Whether this decline was augmented externally by other means is unclear.) Fear and panic was introduced. “We don’t know how it’s transmitted…you could touch someone and contract it…isolate from the sick or well.” Sound familiar?

This PCR /disease mantra also claimed asymptomatic individuals are positive, even though you have to take a test to know. But what if it’s based on a lie? A scientific paper that had been accepted on multiple reference cites for years claiming the HIV diagnosis by PCR was completely false was removed just before Event 201.

F. William Engdahl, historian and author, revealed that Dr. Fauci, who has worked at the CDC for 36 years, endorsed the discredited HIV/AIDS “virus” theory that used corrupt science and testing. Roberto A. Giraldo, MD and Etienne de Harven, MD wrote that the major tests used to diagnose AIDS, including the ELISA, Western blot, and the PCR genetic test, are invalid. The doctors wrote, “None of these tests detect the HIV virus itself, nor do they detect HIV particles. The fact that after 25 years of intense research HIV has been neither isolated nor purified in terms of classical virology indicates to us that the infectious view of AIDS as a contagious viral disease is based on an apparently non-existent microbe!”

When they closed bath houses and did other public health moves, the AIDS deaths declined. So it worked right? Wrong. At that point, NIH/CDC changed the PCR threshold and made it lower to be identified as infected. Now again asymptomatic people could be HIV positive. Seems familiar…much like how Fauci and CDC have played fast and loose with the cycles for PCR for C-v and the criteria of diagnosis which magically changed the same day JoeOB was installed.

Second- Loss of T cells

The key to symptoms in HIV / AIDS is decimation of T cells- bone marrow t0 thymus lymphocytes.

The activation of T lymphocytes yields a variety of effector functions that are pivotal to combating infections. Cytolytic T cells can kill infected cells through the expression of perforin, which induces holes in cell membranes, or ligands for death receptors such as Fas or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor. Production of T cell cytokines such as interferon-γ (IFN-γ) can inhibit viral replication, whereas other cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-21 are critical for optimal B cell growth and immunoglobulin production.1However, this same armamentarium, if not tightly regulated, can also precipitate damage to host tissues and provoke autoimmune responses.

This phenomenon also occurs in the C-v vaccinated.  Their immune systems rapidly decline overall, but specifically they lose T cells.

Crick Institute: Covid vaccine destroys T-Cells
Pfizer vaccine barely produces antibodies to fight against COVID-19
The Francis Crick Institute, in collaboration with the British National Institute for Health Research, released a study that showed that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine produced fewer neutralizing antibodies against COVID-19’s variants. (Related: Spanish study finds Pfizer vaccine contains high levels of TOXIC graphene oxide.)

The scientists analyzed the antibodies from the blood of 250 healthy adults who have received either one or two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine up to three months after their first dose…

It found that only 50 percent of the people who received a single dose of the Pfizer vaccine had a quantifiable neutralizing antibody response against the alpha variant of COVID-19. This number decreased even further to just 32 percent and 25 percent for the delta and beta variants, respectively.

The situation gets worse for older individuals who have weaker immune systems. The researchers found that older vaccine recipients generated even fewer antibodies. Coupled with the vaccine’s ability to destroy T cells and weaken the immune system even further, getting vaccinated could spell disaster for many people.—Arsenio Toledo, Natural News, Sunday, August 22, 2021

Third- The treatment with toxic drugs:

The treatment for AIDS infection? Failed cancer drug AZT. (Like Remdesivir it is highly toxic and causes horrific side effects/death. Please recall that as “And the Band Played On” revealed, Fauci’s NIH was at the helm of the initial AIDS crisis. They restricted funds and selectively treated. When trials were done with AZT, they intentionally collapsed the control group. (Again?)

The plot of the Dallas Buyers Club was that the gay men learned AZT killed, so instead of using it, they opted for a cocktail of anti-virals. Now if you query this info, the faux-checkers immediately attack the notion while offering no supportive evidence for their stance.

Even today no matter what the complaint, if you’re HIV positive the drug treatment of choice is AZT. They also give to babies and children. According to K. Mullis, they’re dying like flies from it. As one patient pointed out, “Tell me another type of chemotherapy where you take the drug every single day of your life.”

Greed rules-

At the end of 1989, two years after we had started the highly controversial AIDS column in SPIN, we published an article by Celia Farber called “Sins of Omission” about the truly bad and corrupt science surrounding promoting AZT as a treatment for the syndrome of diseases.
Celia was the editor and frequent writer of the column and unearthed hard evidence of the cold-bloodedness of the AIDS establishment pushing a drug that was worse than the disease, and killed faster than the natural progression of AIDS left untreated. AZT had been an abandoned cancer drug, discarded because of it’s fatal toxicity, resurrected in the cynical belief that AIDS patients were going to die anyway, so trying it out was sort of like playing with the house’s money. Because the drug didn’t require the usual massively expensive research and trial processes, having gone through that years earlier, it was insanely profitable for its maker, Burroughs Wellcome. It was a tragically perfect storm of windfall profits, something to pacify AIDS activists and the media, and a convenient boom to the patent holders for HIV testing.

Fauci was instrumental in getting Truvada, another failed cancer drug, approved as the only prophylaxis for HIV/ AIDS. So now you take chemo not to get sick.

Here’s a lengthy interview with Kary Mullis and others discussing what happened with AIDS. He belonged to The Group for the Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis.

All the parallels to the current C-v pandemic are striking.



  • Mon, Oct 18, 2021 - 11:50pm



    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 12 2020

    Posts: 347

    count placeholder2

    Fauci ties to Gilead

Forgot to add, both Remdesivir and Truvada are made by Gilead, a good friend of Fauci.

Fauci promoted Truvada (AZT) as a prophylactic to the AIDS virus
Fauci in 2007 began to finance clinical trials of the AZT drugs in HIV “negatives,” on the theory the chemotherapy would “protect” them from becoming “positive.” That is, testing toxic HIV drugs on otherwise healthy persons to “insure” they never got AIDS. If it sounds mad, it was. Gilead supplied the drug, Truvada, to NIAID between 2007-2012 for Phase III human tests on HIV negative subjects. Four tests of at least 2,000 and up to 5,000 test subjects each, were done. The project was called “pre-exposure prophylaxis” or “PrEP.” Healthy subjects were given doses of chemotherapy drug Truvada on the thesis it could prevent them from one day getting HIV-positive. CDC, in its May 2014 recommendation urged physicians to prescribe Truvada for negatives in the so-called “risk groups,” an official government imprimatur for an extremely profitable drug.

The FDA ignored two of the four Truvada tests that had failed and been halted. Despite that and owing to data manipulation by Fauci’s NIAID and Gilead, the FDA approved the dangerous Truvada for PrEP. Today Gilead lists the side effects of Truvada: Kidney problems, including kidney failure; worsening Hepatitis B; too much lactic acid in your blood (lactic acidosis), which can lead to death; severe liver problems, which can lead to death; bone problems. They state that Truvada “can help reduce the risk of getting HIV-1 through sex, when taken every day and used together with safer sex practices.”



  • Tue, Oct 19, 2021 - 12:25pm



    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Sep 03 2008

    Posts: 2913

    count placeholder0

    aids 2.0?


I’m pretty sure that AZT is no longer the front line treatment for HIV.  See:

2016, WHO published the consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection and recommended tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) + lamivudine (3TC) (or emtricitabine, FTC) + efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg as the preferred first- line antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen for adults and adolescents. Since that time, scientific evidence and programmatic experience have accumulated on the use of dolutegravir (DTG) in both first- and second-line ART, including during pregnancy and tuberculosis co-treatment, and for children. In 2018, these guidelines were reviewed to provide updated guidance on preferred option for these populations which now include DTG and raltegravir (RAL), and updated recommendations on using ARV drugs for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis. Annex 3 above links to the ARV dosing guidance for children, adolescents and adults.

And I’m also pretty sure the rapid test for HIV isn’t PCR.  Here:

Antibody tests look for antibodies to HIV in your blood or oral fluid. Antibody tests can take 23 to 90 days to detect HIV infection after an exposure. Most rapid tests and the only FDA-approved HIV self-test are antibody tests.

Do you have different – current – information to the contrary?

I do agree that Fauci did a bunch of things back in the 80s that he’s repurposing for COVID19.  “Gosh – it worked so well on a small section of the population, why not try it again on everyone?”  But I don’t think it applies across the board.

Just the bit about: Sorry AIDS patients – No Treatments For You.

  • Wed, Oct 20, 2021 - 11:20am

    Josh L

    Josh L

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: May 14 2021

    Posts: 15

    count placeholder0

    Possible NO Exemptions for DOD civilian of US Navy

I have on record from superintendent gs 14 that there will be NO exemption process and big navy is handing out firing slips on Nov 10. Has anyone been aware of similar? That would confirm our suspicions that they completely own the courts.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

Login or Register to post comments