Counteracting mRNA & DNA s-protein vaccines

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   9 posts
  • Mon, Nov 22, 2021 - 06:06am

    #1
    Gjoko PP

    Gjoko PP

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Nov 03 2021

    Posts: 4

    count placeholder0

    Counteracting mRNA & DNA s-protein vaccines

Hi everyone,

It’s a pleasure to be here. I have a question for all of you. Looking at what’s going on in the world one can’t be accused of a too big of imagination if concludes that most of the countries (especially in Europe and N. America) will soon be following the path that Austria and Germany are paving – law mandated vaccinations for everyone.

If that does happen and I tend to believe it will, then is there a way to effectively minimize the damage or prevent the S-protein wreaking havoc in the body?

Thank you,
GP.

  • Mon, Nov 22, 2021 - 06:25am

    #2

    Oliveoilguy

    Status Platinum Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 29 2012

    Posts: 1466

    count placeholder4

    Counteracting mRNA & DNA s-protein vaccines

The best way to counteract the “vaccines” is to take a strong stand against them. I will not be vaccinated …period.

Every day we can all talk to one new person….plant a seed….educate….spread the facts that you learn here on PP. Do not comply!

  • Mon, Nov 22, 2021 - 07:38am

    #3
    Ision

    Ision

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 07 2020

    Posts: 401

    count placeholder7

    Reply To: Counteracting mRNA & DNA s-protein vaccines

The only way to blunt the effects of trillions of S1 spike proteins produced by the genetic mRNA drugs, or the SARS COV 2 chimera virus, is using compounds, which hinder, or prevent, the S1 spikes from attaching to the human ACE2 receptor, so these spike cannot cause damage.   This is the specific function of Ivermectin in fighting either the virus, or the synthetic S1 spikes of the genetic drugs.

Ivermectin clogs up the Prion Domain of the virus and “vaccine” S1 spikes, and prohibits the spike from attaching to your ACE2 receptors, either to penetrate your cells, or to simply attach and cause cellular swelling and chemical imbalance and surface friction.   Ivermectin will also attach to the ACE2 “doorway” and block the S1 spikes, not already clogged by Ivermectin, from effectively attaching, too.

The presence of Ivermectin prior, during, and after the induced S1 spikes, allow the body’s immune system time to effectively attack them, without the production of micro clots.  It will also prevent the virus from replicating by preventing its ability to “cut” long chain nucleotide sequences, which is required for the virus to replicate.

The new Pfizer pill uses a different chemical compound to achieve some of the capabilities of Ivermectin, specifically the virus being able to “cut” its nucleotide stands, during its attempt to replicate.   However, the new Pfizer drug is quite limited in its efficiency against the virus, when compared to the multiple anti-viral functions of Ivermectin.    Still, it seems this new drug would be better than nothing..and definitely better than Pfizer’s mRNA clot-shot.

The deliberate and calculated withholding of Ivermectin from the public, during this entire Plandemic…is a Crime Against Humanity…performed with malice of forethought and criminal intent.

  • Mon, Nov 22, 2021 - 09:44am

    #4
    nordicjack

    nordicjack

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 03 2020

    Posts: 773

    count placeholder1

    Reply To: Counteracting mRNA & DNA s-protein vaccines

This whole thing ends when everyone says no.  They could not mandate or fire a single worker if all say no.  If the vaccine is safe and works.  people will line up for if there is a threat.  this should have only been given to people that were old with co-morbidities.

I dont have to worry about what to do if vaccinated.  I will go down fighting to keep their shit out of my body.   I will not die on my knees weak and sicker than they already have made me with all the shit they have already dumped in me.   I have taken my last stand.

Regarding IVM and HCQ – that is a joke, they will not use it.  Even for people dying who want it.   They will state that it isnt proven effective, or it can be “dangerous”  Dangerous? really  40 years of use , billions of doses, no serious reports.  Fully FDA approved.   And somehow its riskier than a new tech vaccine rushed to market.  right.  These people are criminal and nothing less.

  • Mon, Nov 22, 2021 - 01:00pm

    #5
    Gjoko PP

    Gjoko PP

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Nov 03 2021

    Posts: 4

    count placeholder2

    Counteracting mRNA & DNA s-protein vaccines

Hi,

Thanks to everyone for replying. I would like to make a short clarification to everyone that said – you have to make a stand!

Guys, I really do know that, but what you need to understand is that not everyone in the world has the cultural background, nor the constitution of the United States.

I live in a country with e completely different culture, different fiscal power of it’s citizens and different level of trust in the government then a US citizen. Trust me when I tell you that most of the people here are servile. There are many historical and cultural reasons for that, but I will have to create a 10 page essay to actually explain why things are like that.

So, things are what they are. I am as loud as I can be on social media explaining what I perceive as reality. And I’ve been active and actively posting thoughts on the Covid situation since January 2020, but apart from being called anti-vaxx in the past several months, which I certainly am not, nothing else has really changed. Maybe I don’t know how to approach the people that follow me, but I don’t feel I’ve changed anyone’s mind so far….

Anyways, thank you for all your thoughts on the matter. Especially big thank you to Ision on his comprehensive and on-point answer. I really hope that you are right.

 

Best Regards,
GP.

  • Mon, Nov 22, 2021 - 02:54pm

    #6
    Stph

    Stph

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jul 01 2021

    Posts: 233

    count placeholder1

    Counteracting mRNA & DNA s-protein vaccines

I support Ision’s suggestion to use Ivermectin day before, day of, and day after being injected.  Maybe even longer than that.

THIS IS WW4!   I think nearly all of us are grossly underestimating our adversaries- hoping the lockdowns and mandates go away with a few demonstrations,  a few elections, etc.  Therefore, we are unfocused and holding back – trying not to overreact.  The key people warring on us, on the other hand, are REALLY clear:   they have pledged their souls to the fight and, certainly, their fortunes, and their lives.   They aren’t likely to stop because we don’t comply.  They expect to swing, and if they don’t win this all-out.  And we think “protests” and “non-compliance” will carry the day?    I hear Australia has begun forcibly moving people to concentration camps as of today.  It is a fight to the death, so far without much use of kinetic weapons.

Some possibilities  for prophylaxis against the vaccines:

(1) The mRNA vaccines are delivered via a lipid nanoparticle sheath. Can the lipid be disrupted?

(2) Can the lipid nanoparticle be blocked from fusing to the cell membrane?

(3) Once the mRNA gets inside the cell, can it be prevented from expressing?

 

(1a) possibly disrupt the lipid capsule immediately after injection via a “detergent”, an alcohol (literally, getting drunk as a skunk), or other means?

(1a) Is it possible to introduce competition for fusing to the cell membrane by enticing the nanoparticles to bind, instead, to free floating fat in the body?  I have no idea — but it seems possible to me eating a superhigh fact died (McDonalds an a shake) might “confuse” the lipid nanoparticles so that most of them misdeliver their payload?  Does this make any sense at all?

(2) I have no current “scheme” for how to block the fusion, but it still seems possible.

(3a)  Raise the cytoplasm pH to slightly acidic: via Zinc, quercetin (or other ionophore), HCQ, etc.  That supposedly will stop replication.  How does it do that?   It stops mRNA transcription to proteins.   This is the proposed method of action for zinc + hydroxychlorozine, according to some articles I’ve previously linked articles on how zinc, and other things, work.    They raise the pH so that protein synthesis can’t occur.  This has been reasonably studied in the context of viral infections.  It seems reasonable, to me, it would work similarly against expression of the weaponized mRNA spike.

Why isn’t this widely used to stop people from catching viral diseases in general?  Because stopping the mRNA transcription to spike protein also stops the cell from making the proteins the cell needs to make for normal function. (BTW this suggests that taking zinc+quercetin, or HCQ every day might have some downsides).

NOTE: (1) the ionophore (quercetin or something else) is important to facilitate zinc transport across the cell membrane (increase the intracellular concentration of the zinc).  (2) Again, I have read several articles describing how this works to prevent viral replication.   IT SEEMS TO ME IT WOULD WORK AGAINST *ANY* mRNA TRANSCRIPTION – including spike mRNA delivered by lipid nanoparticles. Can anyone think of a reason it would not work?  I should think it would be super safe to try for, at least, the few days it would take for the body to destroy the mRNA delivered by the vaccine; I think the cells can afford to have protein synthesis halted for a few days in order to stop the mRNA bioweapon.

I would appreciate some feedback/assessment from Chris or anyone else with a stronger/more current biochem background and these, or any other, proposals.  I think blocking the vaccines is not something that is normally regarded as “good”, but it should be possible and could be VERY good in this case!

  • Mon, Nov 22, 2021 - 05:06pm   (Reply to #6)

    #7
    Ision

    Ision

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 07 2020

    Posts: 401

    count placeholder1

    Counteracting mRNA & DNA s-protein vaccines

What is not commonly understood is that the mRNA serums, being touted as “vaccines,” have been synthetically modified, via the substitution of one, naturally occurring protein, for another protein, which the body’s immune system is unfamiliar with…and cannot recognize as being “foreign.”

Basically, the mRNA serum instructions will still produce the desired proteins to create the S1 spikes, once the nanoparticles invade the cell, but this substitution of proteins makes the limpid nanoparticles themselves INVISIBLE to the Immune System…as if it was not there.  This stealth ability designed into the nanparticles allows them the time to invade the cell, without being attacked by the Immune System.

So, if one manages to hinder nanoparticle entry, the blocked nanoparticle will still be unmolested by the immune system…affording it the ability to find an unprotected cell…or to wait out the preventative measure used against it.

Knowing how to evade the Human Immune System is Bio-Warfare 101, and is why one may consider the mRNA serums to be bio-weapons.  They are all deliberately invisible to defending immune systems, which cannot SEE THEM, or attack them.

Consider that this same technology was used to design the S1 spike, which is produced by the nanoparticle mRNA serums.   Imagine if the synthetic S1 spike has also been made to be “invisible” to the immune system, via the strategic replacement of the same protein.  This would afford these spikes the time to secure attachment to ACE2 receptors and do their damage…virtually unmolested.  Consider too..that the synthetic spike of the mRNA serums is NOT a match for the spikes on a SARS COV 2 virus.   They differ in structure, save for their Prion Domains…which is the ONLY place they mirror each other.  A very small target…

It is no wonder the vaxx does not sterilized the virus, as the lymphocytes it may provoke against it…are targeting other aspects of the SPIKE…than the Prion Domain, which both have somewhat in common.

We are dealing with bio-weapons here.   Both the product of deliberate design and production…released on purpose and not by accident…whose purpose is the culling of the human population and the advancement of tyranny.

There is a reason ammo is hard to buy.  People are getting ready.

  • Mon, Nov 22, 2021 - 06:02pm

    #8
    MustStayAnonymous

    MustStayAnonymous

    Status Bronze Member (Offline)

    Joined: Jun 23 2021

    Posts: 52

    count placeholder0

    Counteracting mRNA & DNA s-protein vaccines

 

So, lots of Teas!

  • Mon, Dec 06, 2021 - 11:32am

    #9
    royceman

    royceman

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 4

    count placeholder0

    Counteracting mRNA & DNA s-protein vaccines

From “Canceling the Spike Protein: Striking Visual Evidence” Editorial by Thomas E. Levy, MD, JD

Link: http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v17n24.shtml

I suggest reading the full article but here’s the relevant part (and if the website somehow gets deleted, please reply to this comment and let me know bc I saved the full article just in case and can post that here too):

Suggested Protocol (to be coordinated with the guidance of your chosen health care provider):

For individuals who are post-vaccination or symptomatic with chronic COVID, vitamin C should be optimally dosed, and it should be kept at a high but lesser dose daily indefinitely.

  1. Ideally, an initial intravenous administration of 25 to 75 grams of vitamin C should be given depending on body size. Although one infusion would likely resolve the symptoms and abnormal blood examination, several more infusions can be given if feasible over the next few days.
  2. An option that would likely prove to be sufficient and would be much more readily available to larger numbers of patients would be one or more rounds of vitamin C given as a 7.5 gram IV push over roughly 10 minutes, avoiding the need for a complete intravenous infusion setup, a prolonged time in a clinic, and substantially greater expense (Riordan-Clinic-IVC-Push-Protocol, 10.16.14.pdf).
  3. Additionally, or alternatively if IV is not available, 5 grams of liposome-encapsulated vitamin C (LivOn Labs) can be given daily for at least a week.
  4. When none of the above three options are readily available, a comparable positive clinical impact will be seen with the proper supplementation of regular forms of oral vitamin C as sodium ascorbate or ascorbic acid. Either of these can be taken daily in three divided doses approaching bowel tolerance after the individual determines their own unique needs (additional information, see Levy, vitamin C Guide in References; Cathcart, 1981).
  5. An excellent way to support any or all of the above measures for improving vitamin C levels in the body is now available and very beneficial clinically. A supplemental polyphenol that appears to help many to overcome the epigenetic defect preventing the internal synthesis of vitamin C in the liver can be taken once daily. This supplement also appears to provide the individual with the ability to produce and release even greater amounts of vitamin C directly into the blood in the face of infection and other sources of oxidative stress (www.formula216.com)

Hydrogen peroxide (HP) nebulization (Levy, 2021, free eBook) is an antiviral and synergistic partner with vitamin C, and it is especially important in dealing with acute or chronic COVID, or with post-COVID vaccination issues. As noted above, the COVID virus can persist in the stool. In such cases, a chronic pathogen colonization (CPC) of COVID in the throat continually supplying virus that is swallowed into the gut is likely present as well, even when the patient seems to be clinically normal. This will commonly be the case when specific viral eradication measures were not taken during the clinical course of the COVID infection. HP nebulization will clear out this CPC, which will stop the continued seeding of the COVID virus in the gut and stool as well. Different nebulization approaches are discussed in the eBook.

When available, ozonated saline and/or ozone autohemotherapy infusions are excellent. Conceivably, this approach alone might suffice to knock out the spike protein presence, but the vitamin C and HP nebulization approaches will also improve and maintain health in general. Ultraviolet blood irradiation and hyperbaric oxygen therapy will likely achieve the same therapeutic effect if available.

Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and chloroquine are especially important in preventing new binding of the spike protein to the ACE2 receptors that need to be bound in order for either the spike protein alone or for the entire virus to gain entry into the target cells (Lehrer and Rheinstein, 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Eweas et al., 2021). These agents also appear to have the ability to directly bind up any circulating spike protein before it binds any ACE2 receptors (Fantini et al., 2020; Sehailia and Chemat, 2020; Saha and Raihan, 2021). When the ACE2 receptors are already bound, the COVID virus cannot enter the cell (Pillay, 2020). These three agents also serve as ionophores that promote intracellular accumulation of zinc that is needed to kill/inactivate any intact virus particles that might still be present.

Many other positive nutrients, vitamins, and minerals are supportive of defeating the spike protein, but they should not be used to the exclusion of the above, especially the combination of highly-dosed vitamin C and HP nebulization.

Recap

As the pandemic continues, there is an increasing number of chronic COVID patients and patients post-COVID vaccination with a number of different symptoms. Furthermore, there is increasing number of vaccinated individuals who still end up contracting a COVID infection. This is resulting in a substantial amount of morbidity and mortality around the world. The presence and persistence of the COVID spike protein, along with the chronic colonization of the COVID virus itself in the aerodigestive tract as well as in the lower gut, appear to be major reasons for illness in this group of patients.

Persistent elevation of D-dimer protein in the blood and the presence of rouleaux formation of the RBCs, especially when advanced in degree, appear to be reliable markers of persistent spike protein-related illness. The measures noted above, particular the vitamin C and HP nebulization, should result in the disappearance of the D-dimer in the blood while normalizing the appearance of the RBCs examined with dark field microscopy. Even though new research is taking place daily that may modify therapeutic recommendations, it appears that taking the measures to eliminate D-dimer from the blood and to maintain a consistently normal morphological appearance of the blood is a very practical and efficient way to curtail the ongoing morbidity and mortality secondary to the persistent spike protein presence seen in chronic COVID and in post-COVID vaccination patients.

There are many vaccinated individuals who feel well yet remain cautious about potential future side effects, and who really have no easy access to D-dimer testing or dark field examination of their blood. Such persons can follow a broad-spectrum supplementation regimen featuring vitamin C, magnesium chloride, vitamin D, zinc, and a good multivitamin/multimineral supplement free of iron, copper, and calcium. Periodic but regular HP nebulization should be included as well. This regimen will offer good spike protein protection while optimizing long-term health. Furthermore, such a long-term supplementation regimen is advisable regardless of how much of the protocol discussed above is followed.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

Login or Register to post comments