Comprehensive Summary of mRNA shot effects

Login or register to post comments Last Post 0 reads   6 posts
  • Wed, Nov 24, 2021 - 06:11pm

    Emily Burgoon

    Emily Burgoon

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Nov 24 2021

    Posts: 5

    count placeholder5

    Comprehensive Summary of mRNA shot effects

Hi all,

First thank you Chris for all the valuable information you make available to us. I’m a physician in solo private practice, and I’ve found your detective work invaluable in clarifying what is being mis-represented in the official narrative. A4M did a great CME weekend on all the clinical science around COVID, long COVID and the injections this past summer – which gave me a pretty good summary of the various undesirable physiologic effects of the mRNA shots. By far the best interview I’ve come across since in terms of summarizing that in impressive detail and clarity is an interview Sherry Tenpenny did with Russell Blaylock MD. I’ll link it at the end of the post – scroll down to the 11/2 episode with Dr. Blaylock. Really important to understand how the shots take the breaks off cancer growth, cause blood vessel clots and immune dysregulation to name just a few.

I’m sharing this because 1. I’d love to see some more comprehensive interviews with clinicians like Dr. Blaylock to help members here better understand the medical side of why the vaccine data and VARS shows what it does, and 2. I’d love to see Chris do an interview with Dr. Blaylock – especially to make the valuable medical insight he has available to an broader audience than Sherry Tenpenny’s (no offense to her I appreciate her very much – and also there are probably less religiously inclined people who would benefit from having access to this medical information but wouldn’t necessarily go to her religious website).

Here’s the link:





  • Wed, Nov 24, 2021 - 07:01pm



    Status Gold Member (Offline)

    Joined: Mar 12 2020

    Posts: 347

    count placeholder4

    Slovenia nurse- 3 different formulas shot

Why doesn’t everyone have horrible vaccine reactions? Claims from Slovenia are there are 3 different formulas.

On Saturday 20 November, the Chief Nurse of the University Medical Center, Ljubljana Clinical Center, (pictured above, who deals with the administration of vaccine vials and manages everything, quit her job, went in front of TV cameras and took out vaccine bottles.

She showed the gathered journalists the codes on the bottles, each with the final number 1, 2, or 3 in the code, and then explained the meaning of these numbers:

Number 1 is placebo, saline.

Number 2 is the classic mRNA “vaccine”

Number 3 is an RNA stick containing the ONC gene, related to adenovirus, which contributes, among other things, to the development of cancer.

For these who get jabbed from vial whose code ends in the number 3, she says people who received them will have soft tissue cancer within 2 years.

She said that she had personally witnessed the vaccinations of all politicians and tycoons and that they all received the preparation number 1

  • Wed, Nov 24, 2021 - 08:00pm

    Bill in La Mesa

    Bill in La Mesa

    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 246

    count placeholder5

    A German biologist’s mRNA vax critique

A few months back, I came across this deep dive into the mRNA vaccines with German biologist Vanessa Schmidt Krueger, which was quite impressive:

It’s one tall glass of water, but here are a few edits that may intrigue:

Interview with Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Kruger / Hearing # 37 of German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee 30 January, 2021

*VSK: I’m a cell biologist and my specialist field is the functional characterisation and elucidation of proteins, i.e., I understand how proteins are produced, how they are transported in the cell, how they are taken up by cells, how they are metabolised, how intra- and intercellular communication takes place, including within tissue, and how organs interact. This is all very important if one wishes to conduct a risk assessment: how the vaccine functions for example, and the dangers/risks of the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). This technology is not really new: it’s novel as a vaccine, but we have been using these LNPs in research for over 20 years, and we have always been struggling with the problem of toxicity of the lipids and balancing this against their efficacy.

The first point is that the BioNTech vaccine that is currently already being used is not highly purified, it contains contaminants of certain components.  The problem that BioNTech had is that in the clinical phase the product, i.e. the RNA, was produced with completely different techniques to how it is being produced now. During the clinical phase they only needed small volumes of vaccine, they were able to use very expensive techniques that delivered highly purified end products. Now that they have entered mass production, that is no longer possible, they have had to switch to lower-cost processes.

t the RNA is transcribed from the DNA and then the DNA has to be eliminated, it is digested by enzymes: by DNAses. And if this DNA is not digested well enough, if residues are left, this harbours risks.  BioNTech has admitted that there are DNA contaminants.

It was found that the integrity of the RNA always varies in the batches that had been made.  So – the integrity of the RNA means of course the RNA quality. They have found that this is not very high: it was higher for the processes during the clinical phase.   they have found new batches with only 55% RNA integrity, i.e., half of it is basically unviable.

VSK: To come back to Ms. Fischer’s question about the DNA. The problem is that when it contains DNA contaminants, then the situation is: well, with RNA it is relatively unlikely that it can integrate into the host’s cell nucleus. The situation is different with DNA, and especially in this case because you have contaminants of linearised DNA.

the lipid nanoparticles get into all cells, not just the muscle cells – it is an error to believe the latter

So it is theoretically possible that this linearised DNA that is in there as a contaminant could integrate into the host’s cell nucleus in a dividing cell, linearised DNA is optimal for integration.

The vaccine itself, even if the DNA – that contamination – were not in it – is still a genetic intervention.

there are further contaminants, there is double-stranded RNA for instance. The EMA Committee says it is slight, it is acceptable

There are also contaminants with regard to the lipids (30.32). There are two new lipids, they have focused on them. One is ALC-0315, that is the cationic lipid, and the other is ALC-0159, the PEGylated peptide, the PEG component. And they have found that the end product – that there are contaminants in the end product in some batches.

The technology of the nanoparticles. I don’t want to completely malign it. It’s a superb technology really. But the problem is that it is still much too early for use in human beings. The toxicity is still too high, that first needs to be eliminated, then it would really be a brilliant technology. There are many scientists working on getting rid of this toxicity, research has been conducted on that for years.

the LNPs consist of up to 50% of these cationic lipids: 50% is very high, they are toxic because they have this positive charge. This enables them to enter into interactions with other components of the cell really well, they can also basically interact with negatively charged amino acids. This destroys the proteins which lose their ability to function because they “unfold” as it is called. In principle they can interact with the DNA because the DNA is also negatively charged due to its phosphate groups, creating DNA strand breaks. They can also interact with other lipids because they are also negatively charged, especially the lipids of the cell membrane. E.g. the cell membrane of the mitochondria.  If however these cationic lipids gain entry, it is confirmed in many publications that they destroy this membrane, and this leads to the formation of a large number of oxygen radicals. These oxygen radicals create a lot of damage in the cell. They interact – they alter the amino acids, the cell pours out as many cytokines as it can, the oxygen radicals also attack membranes and create lipid peroxidation.

The questions that arise before something like this comes onto the market are how long it remains in the body, divided up as follows: how long do the lipids remain, How long does the mRNA remain? How are they broken down? What is their distribution in the body?

So what is the distribution of the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in the animal trial?  They injected the whole muscle and watched how the lipids spread out throughout the body, and found that these lipids were in many organs after just 15 minutes.  They found evidence of the cationic lipid in the plasma for 12 days, and evidence of the PEG lipid for 6 days. So they remained for quite some time.  The cationic lipids are exclusively degraded in the cells, only 1% was found in the stool. This means the cells take the full hit of the toxicity.  One can still find 5% of the lipid in the liver after 4 – 6 weeks – that is incredibly long.

cationic lipids have a half life of 20 to 30 days in human beings, and the elimination to 5%, so not really eliminated, takes 4 – 5 months.  That’s a long time.

So why exactly is the liver being damaged? It’s because the liver is the organ that takes up the most lipoproteins. And why does it take up the most? Because one of its functions is to break down cholesterol; I’ve explained that the nanoparticles are bound to ApoE proteins. These make their way directly back to the liver where the cholesterol is broken down, and that’s why the liver comes into contact with a huge amount of this.  With the mice or rats, the damage disappears after 3 weeks: does some small damage remain in the liver, or does it regenerate completely? VSK: Yes, it regenerates completely. The liver is fairly robust.

Long-term studies and studies on possible autoimmune conditions were not conducted.

This mechanism crosses the blood-brain barrier due to the ApoE -mediated transport. So the LNPs can cause damage in the brain.

RF: How long does one need to hold one’s breath when one has been vaccinated. A lifetime, or does there come a time when you can relax again? VSK: It depends on which damage you are observing. The lipids are there for 4 – 5 months. Damage can arise for as long as the lipids are there.

  • Wed, Nov 24, 2021 - 08:45pm   (Reply to #2)

    Guyman Dude

    Guyman Dude

    Status Member (Offline)

    Joined: Dec 16 2020

    Posts: 23

    count placeholder4

    Comprehensive Summary of mRNA shot effects

This should be pretty easy to verify by anyone with access to vials with the three serial number categories.  If this could be proven, it would be a devastating blow to the indemnity of the manufacturers, and it would weigh heavily as criminal evidence against the FDA, the CDC and the King of the Jungle, Fauci himself.

  • Thu, Nov 25, 2021 - 10:28am   (Reply to #3)



    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Apr 23 2020

    Posts: 226

    count placeholder1

    A German biologist’s mRNA vax critique

Amazing analysis.  Great find, Bill.  If we wonder why no one is speaking up about the long term risk, we now have analysis evidently given in testimony.

You can argue against this by calling it disinformation, but that is a belief without data to support it. Until the proper long term studies are conducted rigorously.

  • Thu, Nov 25, 2021 - 11:14am



    Status Silver Member (Offline)

    Joined: Feb 07 2020

    Posts: 380

    count placeholder1

    Comprehensive Summary of mRNA shot effects

This is old news to those informed on the mRNA serums, just check out the date of the testimony.

Nothing Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Kruger states is incorrect, or factually in error.  None of it is “misinformation.”

It is widely known the serums from Moderna and Pfizer are contaminated with impurities, which are not normally tolerated.  And, it is not necessary to confirm what the drug companies have already stated about their products, but pointed out by the good Doctor herein.

Since  this testimony, everything the Doctor has said has been confirmed by other credible sources and published papers.  The longevity of the lipid nanoparticle, its ability to travel to any location of the body, the longevity of spike production by the serums, the ability to RT into the patient’s DNA…the toxic effects of the serum elements…everything.

The mRNA genetic instructions for the production of the S1 spikes they create, are preloaded with “a-tails” which provides each forced production of the S1 to take place between 125-135 times per cell.  They do not just make ONE S1 spike, like a normal RNA instruction, which has only one “a-tail.”  These are synthetic mRNA instructions, goosed to be able to create at least 125 S1 spikes, each.

Inject billions of lipid nanoparticals…and end up with TRILLIONS of synthetic S1 spikes…each one capable of attaching to the ACE2 receptors anywhere they occur in the body…and cause damage wherever they do so.  Damage for several months, in any place they travel, regardless of the BB.

Since the S1 spikes are synthetic, they may also have been engineered to be “stealthy” to the immune system, which may not be able to “see” them…before..and after they attach to an ACE2 receptor.  This is achieve by replacing the third protein in its codons, with the G protein, which does not hinder the function of the mRNA, or the structural integrity of an S1 spike…but, which makes them “invisible” to the immune the mRNA ,and S1, time to perform their desired functions…which are absolutely harmful.

The Truth is already out there…thousands of people are perfectly aware of them…but, most of these people belong to the forces of Evil, which are perpetrating this crime upon us.

Be ready to either submit, or to fight, as this is an “All or Nothing” game.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

Login or Register to post comments